Cardinal Matteo Zuppi, who interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism and not Feeneyism, rejecting de fide teachings of the Catholic Church was allowed to be present at Vespers for the Latin Mass at Rome's Pantheon.It was part of the annual Summorum Pontificum Pilgrimage with many priests participating, while interpreting Vatican Council II, the Creeds and Catechisms with irrational Cushingism.
It indicated that even the Latin Mass can support the New Theology and New Ecclesiology and that Tradition was not restricted to the rubrics of the Mass.On the other hand it was a reminder that Cardinal Zuppi could offer the Novus Ordo Mass with the ecclesiology of the 1870 Roman Missal by simply interpreting Vatican Council II with Feeneyism, that is, with the use of the Rational Premise and Inference.
The dissenting Cardinal-Archbishop of Bologna can in future interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise. Then he would be affirming the past ecclesiology of the Roman Missal.Then his participation at the Latin Mass would not be an issue.
But like Pope Francis, Cardinal Zuppi rejects traditional faith and morals and rationalises this action with Vatican Council II, Cushingite. The Council is a break with Tradition when Cushingism is employed. So it is said by Pope Francis that there can, in general, be a break with traditional faith and morals. The Synods are now supporting even polygamy.
The cardinal officiated at a ceremony for gay unions, held in the church, and did not tell the two young men that they were living in public mortal sin and are on the way to Hell.Yet,last Friday he was allowed by the Summorum Pontificium organisers to be present at Vespers.This was not a scandal for them, at Mass.
With physically invisible cases of LG 8,14 and 16 just being invisible, the Council will not contain any practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite), the Athanasius Creed( Feeneyite) and the Syllabus of Errors ( Feeneyite)- all of which Cardinal Zuppi rejects at Mass in Latin and Italian.
Zuppi has stopped priests in Rome.He did not want them to interpret the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance as being physically invisible. This is common sense and common knowledge. These cases are always physically invisible.Irrespective of your theology we cannot see a baptism of desire case in Rome. But this would be interpreting Lumen Gentium 14 and 16 with rational Feeneyism.He needs the Irrational Premise to create division. With the Rational Premise there would be no liberalism which divides.
It may be mentioned that Fr. Leonard Feeney refused to accept the baptism of desire with Cushingism as did the Jesuits and the Archbishop of Boston. So he received an excommunication approved by the Left.He was not a liberal.
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre also refused to accept the Cushingite interpretation of the Council.He was excommunicated. It was approved by the Left.He was not supporting the division in the Church which comes with the False Premise of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and which was approved by Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger.
Even Archbishop Carlo Vigano seems afraid of a Leftist excommunication.He did not say that he would interpret the Council with LG 8,14,15 and 16 referring to only hypothetical and invisible cases in 2022.Are they hypothetical and invisible for him?
He did not say that with his rational interpretation of LG 8 etc there would no longer be practical exceptions for Feeneyite EENS in Vatican Council II. He has been careful to avoid saying that the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office made an objective mistake. It ushered in Cushingism, the New Heresy and the New Theology.
It was approved by the popes for political reasons. None of them wanted to affirm Feeneyite EENS in public.None of them supported Fr. Leonard Feeney who was not using the False Premise to interpret the baptism of desire.
Now even Archbishop Carlo Vigano is following the advice of the globalists, for the Latin Mass. -Lionel Andrades
http://blog.messainlatino.it/2022/10/pellegrinaggio-ad-petri-sedem-li-vespri.html
Posts
