David Murgia in his television program Ai
Confini del Sacro has been spreading
misinformation, largely due to ignorance. There has been ignorance among the
bishops he has interviewed. He and the bishops did not know that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA2,GS 22 etc in
Vatican Council II always refer to an invisible and not visible person. So
they cannot be objective examples of salvation for us human beings. If there
are people saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) etc it would only be known to
God. LG 8, 14 and 16 do not contradict the Athanasius Creed which says all
need to be Catholic for salvation. All with no known exceptions.
Bishops
must affirm the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Catechism of Pope Pius
X and Cantate Dominio, Council of Florence 1441 in harmony with Vatican Council
II, in which LG 8, 14, 16 etc refer to hypothetical cases. They do not
contradict the past ecclesicentrism of Catholic Tradition.This is important for the Gallinero community and also the bishop of Frosinone.
He needs to
correct the common error before his next television program. He has made a
public mistake in his past programs. Also RAI 1 and TV 2000 in their programs
on doctrines of the Catholic Church have made this mistake.They have confused what is
invisible as being visible.They then suggest that there are objective exceptions for
Tradition in Vatican Council II, interpreted irrationally.
In Albano,
Italy, for example, the schools of the region Lazio, the Bishop of Albano Vincenzo Viva and
the SSPX District center interpret Vatican Council II by confusing LG 8, LG
14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being a rupture with Tradition. This is false.
The department of education in Italy and also other Government offices must correct
this error. It is ethical and magisterial only when the Catholic Church interprets Vatican Council
II rationally.- Lionel Andrades
Bishop of Frosinone and La Nuova Gerusalemme, Bambino Gesu al Gallinero, interpret Vatican Council II dishonestly
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/bishop-of-frosinone-and-la-nuova.html
Cardinal Matteo Zuppi must ask the CEI, Italian government, Alberto Melloni, the bishop of Frosinone and the secular Magistrate in Gallinero, Frosinone, to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and honestly.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/cardinal-matteo-zuppi-must-ask-cei.html
The Italian Ministry of Interior and the CEI need to officially correct their position on Vatican Council II.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/the-italian-ministry-of-interior-and.html
At the pontifical Beda College, an English Catholic seminary in Rome, they discriminate against seminarians who interpret Vatican Council II ( LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc),rationally in harmony with Tradition.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/at-pontifical-beda-college-english.html
The Catholic Bishops Conference in Italy (CEI) and Propaganda Fide discriminate against students who do not interpret Vatican Council II (LG 8 etc) irrationally.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/the-catholic-bishops-conference-in.html
The cardinals and bishops of the Italian Bishops Conference (CEI), are unethical. They are dishonest with their political interpretation of Vatican Council II. Since, there can be two interpretations of the Council. One is rational and the other is irrational.They choose the irrational version since it is supported by the Left :The CEI policy on Vatican Council II is dishonest
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/the-cardinals-and-bishops-of-italian.html
I accept Vatican Council II as a legitimate Council for me. The Council supports the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the rest of Tradition. I interpret LG8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc, as being only hypothetical.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/i-accept-vatican-council-ii-as.html
How can a Council interpreted irrationally be Magisterial for Michael Voris?
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/how-can-council-interpreted.html
Dom Alcuin Reid in Frejuf Toulon, France, now under investigation by the Vatican could appeal to the French Ministry of Education to please interpret LG 8,LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, rationally, in the schools, colleges and universities in France.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/dom-alcuin-reid-in-frejuf-toulon-france.html
Bishop Athanasius Schneider avoids being cancelled
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/bishop-athanasius-schneider-avoids.html
French bishops and Religious Superiors Oath of Office and Renewal of Vows and Profession of Faith are presently false.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/french-bishops-and-religious-superiors.html
The Ecclesia Dei communities in France must ask Bishop Dominique Rey, Archbishop Antoine Herouard and Bishop Joel Mercier to uphold the teachings of Vatican Council II, interpreted only rationally. : Investigation begins today : Dom Alcuin Reid cannont be considered schismatic because he does not accept the Council irrationally
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/the-ecclesia-dei-communities-in-france.html
Lionel Andrades
Writer on the two interpretations of Vatican Council
II, one rational and the other irrational. Catholics in general unknowingly
choose the irrational option.The Council
is wrongly interpreted as a break with Tradition. We have discovered that it
really is in harmony with the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope
Pius IX and the Catechism of Pope Pius
X.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church and all
Magisterial Documents can be interpreted rationally and there is a continuity
with Church Tradition over the centuries.
Posts
