German bishops go ahead with their liberalism based upon a false interpretation of the Council which is now obvious in the books published on Vatican Council II : Next stage of Synodal Path tomorrow

There are so many communication officers and public relations people in the Archdiocese of Munich and Freising and I have been sending them these blog posts.

Tomorrow is the next stage in the German Synodal Way and there are many people in Germany who are reading these blog posts. The number in the USA has also increased.

What is important to note is that the German Synodal Way is based upon an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II which I avoid.

So with all the books in Germany and the numerous theological magazines, interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise and inference, it is important for the German bishops to review what I have been writing.

It is only on this blog that the precise cause of the hermeneutic of rupture is being discussed.

Other media recognise that what the German bishops are proposing, in their liberalism, has its origin in Vatican Council II. The German bishops themselves claim this. However other media, and the German Catholic Church, do not propose interpreting Vatican Council II without the false premise. No one is discussing it.

This is the only blog which is holding out against all of them. The only person standing against all of them.The only person who has stumbled on to their secret and is standing in their way.

At present the Lefebvrists and the liberals interpret Vatican Council II in the same way.The Syllabus of Errors and the past ecclesiology, has exceptions for them. There have to be exceptions for them otherwise there could not be a rupture with the past ecclesiology. If there is no rupture with the past ecclesiology they could not be politically correct with the Left.They need a rupture with Tradition.They need to say outside the Church there is salvation. It is then that they can propose their new ecumenism, new ecclesiology etc.
They will swoop down on any one who proposes EENS with no physical exceptions in the present times. This would be a rejection of the teachings of Pope Benedict and Archbishop Lefebvre.The moment the Lefebvrists or liberals say there are no physical exceptions to EENS in 2020 they enter the Feeneyite camp.

So can you imagine Cardinal Reinhardt Marx and the German bishops saying there are no physical exceptions to the Syllabus of Errors in 2020?
There are no literal exceptions to the Athanasius Creed ( outside the Church there is no salvation) in 2020.Can you picture German seminarians and students saying this?

There are no literal exceptions to the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q, 27Q) with the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance for German religious communities?.
This is something obvious but if the German bishops and priests affirm it they would all be in the Feeneyite camp.

Remember how Michal Voris went to New Hampshire and interviewed Brother Andre Marie and then Church Militiant TV posted the report 'The Strange Doctrines of Fr. Feeney' by Jim Russel which interpreted EENS with exceptions. It interpreted the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and Vatican Council II as being exceptions to EENS.

Now the issue is Vatican Council II. It is not EENS.

Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the past ecclesiology and the traditionalists and the German bishops do not want to mention it. 

Cardinal Marx is not affirming Vatican Council II without their being exceptions but neither are the Lefebvrists who were present at the Acies Ordinata assembly in Munich.

So when the communications officers at the Catholic University of Euchstadt-Ingolstadt in the diocese of Cardinal Marx, learn that Vatican Council II can be interpreted without the false premise and so all the books on the Council in their theology section has a mistake, what are they to do?

But still the question is how can the German bishops go ahead with their liberalism based upon a false interpretation of the Council which is now obvious in the books published on Vatican Council II ?

How can the universities continue to tell teachers to teach the irrational version of the Council to students ?

The Synodal Path means telling religious communities that they must interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise and inference to be accepted as religious with a vocation in  Germany? -Lionel Andrades

 JULY 22, 2019

Repost : Church Militant TV slanders Brother Andre Marie MICM and Fr. Leonard Feeney by projecting a false theological position upon them : Jim Russell does not know of any BOD, BOB and I.I case during his life time.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/07/repost-church-militant-tv-slanders.html

APRIL 24, 2019

Jim Russell on Church Militant TV does not refer to hundreds of reports on line saying there are no practical cases of BOD, BOB and I.I. : St. Benedict Center's theological position   https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/04/jim-russell-does-refer-to-hundreds-of.html

Italy could be next to leave the European Union -Nigel Farage

Dopo essere stata a Medjugorje ho sentito in me dei cambiamenti

Avere una sorella che vede la Madonna è una grazia di Dio

It is unethical for Pope Benedict to keep this article in German on line and mislead people. Similarly it is unethical for Ferrara and Mattei to keep promoting their books with the error.This is dishonesty.

(4) Ich habe diese neue Zentrierung der Ekklesiologie begrüßt und ihr auch nach meinen Maßen vorzuarbeiten versucht. Man muß freilich zunächst zugeben, daß das Wort Communio im Konzil keine zentrale Stellung einnimmt. Dennoch kann es, richtig aufgefaßt, als Synthese für die wesentlichen Elemente konziliarer Ekklesiologie dienen. Alle wesentlichen Elemente des christlichen Begriffs von Communio findet man vereint in dem bedeutenden Satz aus 1 Joh 1,3, den man als Richtmaß für jedes rechte christliche Verständnis von Communio ansehen darf: »Was wir gesehen und gehört haben, das verkünden wir auch euch, damit auch ihr Gemeinschaft mit uns habt  1

(4) I have welcomed this new centering of ecclesiology and have also tried to prepare it according to my measurements. One must admit, of course, that the word communion does not have a central position in the Council. Still, properly understood, it can serve as a synthesis of the essential elements of conciliar ecclesiology. All the essential elements of the Christian concept of communion can be found in the significant sentence from 1 John 1: 3, which can be seen as a standard for every right Christian understanding of communion: "What we have seen and heard, we also announce to you, so that you also have fellowship with us...

Pope Benedict is seeing the Church as communion and not the only Ark of Noah that saves in the flood.Since for him LG 16 and GS 22 are exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus. There is no exclusive salvation in the Church any more for him and this is reflected in Redemptoris Missio and Dominus Iesus.

So Vatican Council II is rupture with Tradition for him.So the traditionalist look at Vatican Council II, read it superficially like Cardinal Ratzinger, but instead of approving the Council like him they reject.

So Roberto dei Mattei and Chris Ferrara wrote books on Vatican Council II in which they also interpreted LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc like Cardinal Ratzinger.

They have used the same false premise and inference as Pope Benedict and put the blame on Vatican Council II.

They will not admit their error and neither will they write new books on Vatican Council II in which the false premise and inference are omitted.

It is unethical for Pope Benedict  to keep this article in German on line and mislead people. Similarly it is unethical for Ferrara and Mattei to keep promoting their books with the error.This is dishonesty.-Lionel Andrades

1

Die Ekklesiologie der Konstitution Lumen gentium - Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger - Benedictus XVI 

http://ivv7srv15.uni-muenster.de/mnkg/pfnuer/Ratzinger-Kirche-Lumen-Gentium.html

JANUARY 29, 2020

The Synodal Path of the German Bishops begins on January 3o and it is based upon an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II. Also the Amazon Synod was theologically based upon Vatican Council II, interpreted irrationally. This was confirmed by Cardinal Hummes. He said that the basis of the decisions and changes at the Amazon Synod, was Vatican Council II. He meant the Council , interpreted irrationally.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-synodal-path-of-german-bishops.html

 JANUARY 29, 2020

Pope Benedict needs to apologize for projecting LG 16, GS 22 etc as being practical exceptions to the past ecclesiology of the Church.He has made this error in his articles and books and two theological papers of the International Theological Commission, Vatican, which he approved as the cardinal-prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/pope-benedict-needs-to-apologies-for.html

JANUARY 28, 2020

The publishers of Pope Benedict's books in German must note that he used a false premise and inference to interpret Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition and this is not only bad philosophy and bad theology it is unethical and dishonest. 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-publishers-of-pope-benedicts-books.html

 

JANUARY 27, 2020

 

 

The former Archbishop of Munich's books published by Ignatius Press have an in- principle error.The German Joseph Ratzinger's books were written with an irrational premise to create an artificial rupture with Tradition on Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church, the Nicene Creed and other magisterial documents.There should be an apology from Pope Benedict and Ignatius Press. 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-former-archbishop-of-munichs-books.html

JANUARY 28, 2020

 

Deutsche Presserat needs to inform newspapers and publishers that there is a rational and honest interpretation of Vatican Council II it is ethical.It does not create an artificial and calculated rupture with Catholic Tradition,pleasing to one lobby 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/deutsche-presserat-needs-to-inform.html

 

JANUARY 25, 2020

What is being taught by the Faculty of Religious Education and the Faculty of Theology at the Catholic University of Eichstatt-Ingolstadt in Bavaria, is really deception and politically Left subterfuge.This is not Catholic- teaching.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/what-is-being-taught-by-faculty-of.html

JANUARY 23, 2020

Seminarians from the Eichstadt seminary study theology at the Catholic University of Eichstadt-Ingolstadt,Bavaria and they are taught to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.Students from the seminary of St. Willibrand have to interpret Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) with a false premise and inference to study to become a priest.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/seminarians-from-eichastatt-seminary.html

 
____________________________________________

AUGUST 5, 2018

Whispers of Restoration and 1Peter5 must have articles/media saying the present two popes and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith are in heresy for accepting the mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) and they need to correct the mistake   https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018_08_05_archive.html

AUGUST 5, 2018

Repost : Cardinal Luiz Ladaria : Official text with Abjuration and Profession of Faith and Oath of Fidelity

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/repost-cardinal-luiz-ladaria-official.html

JULY 28, 2019

Roberto dei Mattei will not announce that he made a mistake on Vatican Council II all these years   http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019_07_28_archive.html

JULY 17, 2019

Mattei and Ferrara read Vatican Council II superficially and wrote books misleading Catholics ( Graphics) 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/07/mattei-and-ferrara-read-vatican-council.html

MAY 5, 2018

The truth has to be proclaimed by Roberto de Mattei for a rebirth of the Church during his lifetimehttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/05/the-truth-has-to-be-proclaimed-by.html

DECEMBER 14, 2017

No contradiction or correction from Roberto dei Mattei  

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/12/no-contradiction-or-correction-from.html
__________________________________________

JUNE 20, 2016

Prof.Phillip Blosser, a Professor of Philosophy at Musings of a Pertinacious Papist and Tancred at The Eponymous Flower agree with me : hypothetical cases (baptism of desire etc) cannot be explicit for us in 2016

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/profphillip-blosser-professor-of.html

MONDAY, OCTOBER 10, 2016

I even interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1995) as being Feeneyite. I use the same reasoning : hypothetical cases are not explicit in the present times.  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/i-even-interpret-catechism-of-catholic.html

Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson says Vatican Council II does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/11/archbishop-thomas-egullickson-says.html#links

DEAN OF THEOLOGY AT ST. ANSELM SAYS THERE ARE NO KNOWN EXCEPTIONS TO THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/10/dean-of-theology-at-st-anselm-says.html#links

CANTATE DOMINO, COUNCIL OF FLORENCE ON EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS IS DE FIDE AND NOT CONTRADICTED BY VATICAN COUNCIL II- Fr. Nevus Marcello O.P

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2011/07/cantate-domino-council-of-florence-on.html

BRAZILIAN PRIEST SAYS VATICAN COUNCIL II DOES NOT CONTRADICT DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2011/07/brazilian-priest-says-vatican-council.html#links

I follow the Catechism of Trent in agreement with Vatican Council II and the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/08/i-follow-catechism-of-trent-in.html

CATHOLIC PRIESTS IN ROME AGREE WITH FR.LEONARD FEENEY: THERE IS NO BAPTISM OF DESIRE THAT WE CAN KNOW OF  

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2011/08/catholic-priests-in-rome-agree-with.html#links

JUNE 20, 2011

THERE IS NO BAPTISM OF DESIRE THAT WE CAN KNOW OF- Fr.George Puthoor

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2011/06/there-is-no-baptism-of-desire-that-we.html

WE DO NOT KNOW ANYONE SAVED WITH THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE OR INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE SO EVERYONE NEEDS TO ENTER THE CHURCH AS DON BOSCO TAUGHT- Salesian Rector and Parish priest in Rome

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2011/07/we-do-not-know-anyone-saved-with.html

 JULY 25, 2018

Repost : When I meet Catholics I say Vatican Council II says outside the Church there is no salvation and all need to convert into the Church to avoid Hell    http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/07/repost-when-i-meet-catholics-i-say.html