Friday, June 5, 2020

Ringraziamo la Madonna per il dono dell'OASI DELLA PACE - 33° anniversario

When Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre said that Rome must come back to the Faith he did not know that he was interpreting Vatican Council II with the New Theology and that without the New Theology Rome would have to come back to the Faith.

A Bishop Speaks: Writings and Addresses (1963-1976)
When Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre said that Rome must come back to the Faith he did not know that he was interpreting Vatican Council II with the New Theology and that without the New Theology Rome would have to come back to the Faith.All he had to do was to avoid the false premise, which was the basis of the New Theology.
It was simple.
So why do the Lefbvrists not make this simple announcement ?
Why ? Since if they affirm Vatican Council II without the New Theology they are back to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus. They will be opposed by the Left.
So they keep quiet on this issue and continue to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and then criticize the Council, without mentioning that the Council II can be interpreted without the false premise and the conclusion would be traditional.-Lionel Andrades

Da Vescovo a Medjugorje ho capito la mia vocazione e cos'รจ la Misericord...

Medjugorje - I primi anni

The College of Cardinals and the popes are interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise and no one is doing anything about it.

The College of Cardinals and the popes are interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise and no one is doing anything about it.
Vatican II, a repository yet to be explored - La Stampa - Ultime ...
There is the Vatican Council II of Pope Paul VI and the Vatican Council II of Lionel Andrades. The interpretation is different . I write this in humility.
There is an objective and factual difference between the two interpretations. and one is rational and the other irrational. The liberals, traditionalists and sedevacantists  follow the irrational interpretation of Pope Paul VI. I follow my own.
For me Vatican Council II (Lionel Andrades) is a not a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27 Q). But for Pope Benedict and Pope Francis there is a rupture with Tradition.
For me unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance  do not contradict Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) in 1949. 1965 or 2020.But for Pope Paul VI there were exceptions  to EENS. In other words  there are known cases of people saved outside the Church. They would have to be known, human beings, 
for them to be exceptions. 
This is irrational. But this is the official and common interpretation of the Council.
All the books on Vatican Council II use this false premise and inference and so their conclusion is different from mine.
So Pope Pius XII and Pope John XXIII were wrong on EENS. They assumed there were exceptions of BOD, BOB and I.I for EENS.Instead Fr. Leonard Feeney was correct. There are no literal cases of BOD, BOB and I.I for them to be exceptions.
The interpretation of Lionel Andrades is magisterial since it is the teaching of the past popes, the saints and Vatican Council II interpretated rationally.The interpretation of Pope Paul VI, Pope Benedict and Pope Francis on this subject is not magisterial, since the Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake. These popes have confused  what is implicit as being explicit, subjective as objective and invisible as visible.They had a rational choice but did not use it.
-Lionel Andrades

Preghiera di Guarigione - Medjugorje 3 giugno 2020

The Judiciary in Italy, the Roman Rota, the Signatura, the Vatican Tribunal - are all interpreting Vatican Council II with the false premies and inference and they are not aware of it.

Pope's Address to the Tribunal of the Roman Rota - ZENIT - English Inauguration of the Judicial Year of the Tribunal of the Roman ...
The Judiciary in Italy, the Roman Rota, the Signatura, the Vatican Tribunal - are all interpreting Vatican Council II with the false premies and inference and they are not aware of it.
Cardinal Raymond Burke is also part of the common problem.
All the judges in general in the secular courts of Italy are interpreting Vatican Council II with the irrational premise.
Lionel Andrades

Theological virus


Image result for Photo of Matteo Salvini with rosary

The whole Church is affected by it.
With a false premise they interpret Vatican Council II.
Even the SSPX, CMRI and MHFM use a false premise to interpret the Council.
Their New Theology is the same as that of the liberals.Without this New Theology, Rome returns to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).
Matteo Salvini does not know all this.And there is no one to expain it to him.It is the Catholic political parties in Italy which can explain the antidote to the people.-Lionel Andrades

Medjugorje mi ha guarita nello Spirito, grazie alla mia malattia.

Era ateo ma Maria lo ha portato tra le braccia di Gesรน