It has been reported that you must accept Vatican Council II. Beware. They want you to accept Vatican Council II in which invisible for us baptism of desire (LG 14) is a visible for us baptism of desire in 2017. So it contradicts the Nicene Creed( I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins), the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus( all need to be incorporated into the Church as members) and the Syllabus of Errors ( based upon the old ecclesiocentrism of the Church). This is diabolical.This is pure and blatant heresy.
You have to accept this according to the two popes and the Vatican cardinals to remain a religious in the Catholic Church.
I am a lay man. So I am free to interpret the Nicene Creed, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church with invisible for us baptism of desire, invisible for us being saved in invincible ignorance in 2017(LG 16), unknown cases of 'seeds of the Word' (AG 11) in the present times and known only to God cases of 'elements of sanctification and truth'(LG 8) etc. So there are no visible and known exceptions to Tradition mentioned in Vatican Council II for me.I am a Catholic who affirms the old ecclesiocentrism which Cardinal Ratzinger and Fr.Karl Rahner S.j rejected. I accept hypothetical for us baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance. While I reject these cases as being known to us. If they do happen they would only be known to God. People in Heaven cannot be seen on earth,is my reasoning.
For the two popes and Cardinal Avez however it is the opposite. They have made irrationality and heresy magisterial and they are forcing it on you. You have to accept it to be regularised as religious.They think you do not know theology.However this is now a condition for all religious in the Catholic Church, not only for your community.
The Vatican Curia is also not consistent.The SSPX has to accept this irrational interpretation of the Vatican Curia and they will be given a personal prelature. While the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate are not favoured as such.
The Franciscans of the Immaculate are considered crypto-Lefebvrists but the Lefebvrists are now being given a personal prelature and you are being threathened with closure.The SSPX can offer the Traditional Latin Mass but the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate cannot.
HERESY IS A CONDITION FOR ACCEPTANCE
They will allow you to remain within the Church if you accept Vatican Council II with the invisible-visible confusion which I call Vatican Council II (Cushingism).However if you accept Vatican Council II without the irrational premise, the invisible-visible confusion, then you will be accepting what I call Vatican Council II( Feeneyite). This interpretation of Vatican Council II is not being accepted by the magisterium and the political Left.Since with Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) there can be no new ecumenism and inter-religious dialogue ecclesiology.It supports the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the non separation of Church and state, since outside the Church there is no salvation.
So know that the issue is not really Vatican Council II. The issue is Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus. They want to know if you accept it or reject it.If you use the irrational premise you reject it. Then for the present magisterium in heresy, you are a Catholic in good standing in the Church.
When the SSPX and Franciscans of the Immaculate said in the past that they rejected Vatican Council II,it meant for the Left that they accepted EENS ( Feeneyite).It was inferred that they rejected Vatican Council II (Cushingite) which is magisterial and endorsed by Cardinal Kasper and the German liberals.
Now you have to accept the liberal interpretation of Vatican Council II and the dogma EENS while they rejected the Feeneyite interpretation of EENS as proposed in the SSPX General Chapter Statement of 2012.
So this must be very clear to you. Understand the mechanics so you do not have to depend on me and this blog.
1.There can be an invisible for us or visible for us baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance.This is the reasoning today.
2.One of these two interpretations is obviously irrational and nonsense.
3.The magisterium has to choose between these two interpretations.You can judge which one they have chosen.
4.Now Cardinal Braz de Avez wants you to choose the irrational one and reject the rational one.He wants you to choose heresy.Remember this is no problem for them. They give the Eucharist to pro-abortion politicians in the USA, practising homosexuals in England and now divorced and remarried Catholics in Germany etc.While Pope Francis suggests conscience is supreme when committing a mortal sin but of course the Franciscans of the Immaculate are not free to follow their conscience.
5.If you choose heresy, knowingly, then it is a mortal sin.The present magisterium wants to dispense you of your old vows and approve you as religious sister in the Catholic Church,with mortal sin.You know that there are mortal sins not only of morals but also of faith. They have changed the faith, with new doctrines created by irrational philosophy and theology.
6.You could ask Cardinal Braz de Avez to interpret the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II, rationally, that is, without the irrational premise and non traditional conclusion. Tell him you accept Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and ask him to do the same. Then ask him if this is acceptable to the present 'magisterium'. Make your views public so that it will benefit all religious communities and all Catholics in the Catholic Church.
Don't be a bad example for the whole Church.
The Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate should protest and refuse to accept Vatican Council II (Cushingite) and instead they should affirm Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) and ask Pope Francis and Cardinal Braz de Avez to do the same.It is not Catholic for the pope to force the Sisters to proclaim a lie; to use deception and so change the interpretation of Vatican Council II.Similarly it is not Catholic to reject the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (Feeneyite) by claiming that there are physically known cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church, or that there are visible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, all without the baptism of water.
This is the error of Cushingism which Pope Pius XII overlooked in the Fr.Leonard Feeney case.Cardinal Cushing and the Jesuits made this error official in the Archdiocese of Boston and then in Vatican Council II.
Now we have an interpretation of Vatican Council II with visible- for- us- baptism of desire (LG 14) or invisible- for- us baptism of desire (LG 14).With an irrational premise (there are invisible cases which are visible) or without it(invisible cases are always invisible) we can choose our interpretation of Vatican Council II.
Pope Francis and Cardinal Braz de Avez want the Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate to choose the irrational, non traditional and heretical version, which suits the Masons.