In Dijon and the rest of France the Latin laity, at least, must ask every bishop and priest, to interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise only. Then the whole Church in France comes back to Catholic Tradition, now associated with only the Traditional Latin Mass. -Lionel Andrades
APRIL 8, 2022
In Chicago all the priests at Holy Mass must affirm the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX since Vatican Council II can only be interpreted rationally.
In Chicago all the priests at Holy Mass must affirm the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX since Vatican Council II can only be interpreted rationally. This is being honest. The laity must not allow them to use a Fake Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and then suggest that the Syllabus of Errors is contradicted by the Council, interpreted irrationally.
The Council should not be a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus or the Athanasius Creed for any priest.
THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE, BAPTISM OF BLOOD AND BEING SAVED ARE ALWAYS HYPOTHETICAL ONLY IN 2022
The baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance can only be interpreted rationally. So they are not explicit, known people in the present times. They are not objective and practical exceptions for Feeneyite EENS.
UNITATIS REDINTIGRATIO REFERS TO ONLY HYPOTHETICAL AND SPECULATIVE CASES IN 2022
Unitatis Redintigratio can only be interpreted as referring to hypothetical cases in 2022. So UR 3, for example, does not contradict the ecumenism of return or the Syllabus of Errors.
LG 8 refers to hypothetical cases of non Catholics saved with elements of sanctification and truth in other religions. These are speculative and theoretical cases. So LG 8 does not contradict the Syllabus of Errors’ teaching on outside the Church there is no salvation.
So all the priests in Chicago, especially those who offer the Novus Ordo Mass in English must affirm the Syllabus of Errors and Tradition and interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise. -Lionel Andrades
APRIL 6, 2022
The laity in Chicago must take back the Church
In Illinois, Chicago they have a group of laity seen in the video who must call upon the priests to give them a Vatican Council II which is rational. Then at Holy Mass in English and Latin the priests have to preach in support of the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the past ecumenism of return to the Church, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) with no exceptions in 2022, the Catechism of Pope Pius X (24Q, 27Q) and the need to have Jesus at the centre of all politics (Quas Primas). The laity in Chicago now has the ball in their court. They can bring unity in theology and doctrines, back to the Church. The priests can no more carry liberalism and theological division on their backs, by using the Fake Premise. The can no more interpret the baptism of desire(LG 14) and invincible ignorance(LG 16) irrationally and then say that there are known to them non Catholics, saved outside the Church, without the Catholic faith and the baptism of water. This is false since there are no such persons in 1965-2022.So BOD and I.I do not contradict the past strict interpretation of the dogma EENS, affirmed by three Church Councils, in the extra-ordinary Magisterium.
When the priests know this they have to change, since the laity will not more affirm EENS, with BOD and I.I interpreted with the False Premise. They will no more interpret Vatican Council II, with LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, interpreted with the Fake Premise. This ruse creates false exceptions for EENS and the rest of Tradition.
So Vatican Council II (Rational) at any Mass and Rite and language, would be coherent with the ecclesiocentric ecclesiology of the past Magisterium. There would not be a break with the theology of the Roman Missal (1580).
The laity must insist that a Catholic priest in Chicago no more support an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II with the False Premise. This should not be allowed.
In Chicago they have an organized group of laity who want the Latin Mass, which has been banned by Cardinal Cupich for the Easter Triduum.
The cardinal interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and fans the fake theological liberalism in the Church. So there is division. There are liberals created who oppose conservatives who follow Tradition. The Bible is re-interpreted. The result is public heresy and schism which are mortal sins of faith.
The laity should not allow the False Premise to be used by the cardinals, bishops and priests in Chicago.
APRIL 5, 2022
Chicago Catholics did not hold a Press Conference asking Cardinal Cupich to interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with the Roman Missal
WE HAVE TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF
VATICAN COUNCIL II : YOURS AND MINE
Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial. Vatican Council II is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms. There can be two interpretations.Catholics must choose the rational option.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version which is heretical, nontraditional and schismatic, when a rational option is there which is traditional?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission)
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
___________________
Posts
