Tuesday, March 19, 2024

Missionaries of Charity of Mother Teresa in Rome : Feast of St. Joseph today

 

The Missionaries of Charity’s vows for brothers and sisters and ordination of priests must only be held with the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms, and especially Vatican Council II, interpreted rationally i.e. LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, refer to physically invisible cases only in 2024. So they are not exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).Vatican Council II is not a break with Tradition but has a continuity with the Athanasius Creed which says all need to be members of the Church for salvation.

On the feast of St. Joseph today, they have been renewing their vows but have not been interpreting Vatican Council II rationally in harmony with Tradition. So their understanding of the Nicene and Apostles Creed is different from mine. 



They also reject the Athanasius Creed which I accept. They can get back to orthodoxy by re-interpreting LG 8, 14, 15, 16 etc as being hypothetical only. They are not explicit examples of salvation outside the Church for us human beings. At the level of physics, they are not visible matter.

Mother Teresa did not know that Vatican Council II could be interpreted rationally and neither did Fr. John Hardon sj.

The Missionaries of Charity communities, men and women, are politically correct with the Left, and so there is a denial of the Catholic Faith.

They accept the error in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston (LOHO).It confused invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance as being physically visible exceptions for the dogma EENS, defined by three Church Councils, which did not mention any exceptions.

With the invisible-visible confusion the understanding of the Creeds, Catechisms and Councils are changed. For them there are exceptions and for me there are none.

Unknown to many of them, this is first class heresy and it is schism with the past Magisterium, which is common in the mainline Catholic Church.

They need to reject the error in the 1949 LOHO and re-interpret Vatican Council II rationally, like me i.e. LG 8,14,15,16 etc refer to non explicit cases in 1965-2024.

Presently the Missionaries of Charity (MC) in Rome are aligned with the Vicariate which interprets all Church Documents by confusing what is invisible as being visible and then accepting the expected nontraditional conclusion. They want the hermeneutic of rupture and not continuity with Tradition.

So the MC’s , to be recognized by the Rome Vicariate and the Vatican, have to publically espouse heresy ( new versions of the Creeds), schism ( break with the 16th century on EENS, Creeds etc) and sectarianism( Protestant-Catholic Church) .This is not the Catholic Faith.

However the MC system of prayers is sound and admirable and so their work for the poor.

But the MC priest is not eligible to offer Holy Mass when he interprets Magisterial Documents (Creeds etc) irrationally. This is an impediment according to Canon Law.

The MC priests here have had their formation at the pontifical universities in Rome where Vatican Council II is still interpreted irrationally.

The Missionaries of Charity of Mother Teresa are good people, carding persons but before God they cannot make a religious vow or be ordained, when they interpret Vatican Council II etc irrationally and so heretically and schismatically. They have a rational choice.

The vow is made before God and to Churchmen who are faithful to Tradition. The Vicar General of Rome, Cardinal Angelo Donatis and Pope Francis reject Tradition and de fide teachings which obligatory for all Catholics to believe in .They also for political reasons interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and so deceptively.

The Vicariate gives them wealth in exchange for the Faith. -Lionel Andrades


OCTOBER 20, 2022

Creeds are no more a sign of unity in the Catholic Church. There are two interpretations of the Nicene, Apostles and Athanasius Creed

  

I AFFIRM THE ATHANASIUS CREED THEY DO NOT

affirm the Athanasius Creed.

I interpret the Nicene and Apostles Creed rationally. 

I interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

do not use the false premise to interpret the Catechisms of Trent, Baltimore, Pius X, John Paul II etc.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church is not a break with Tradition for me.Since I choose the Rational Premise.I do not employ the false premise, inference and conclusion of cardinals Ratzinger and Schonborn.

I interpret Vatican Council II rationally so there is a hermeneutic of continuity with Feeneyite extra eclesiam nulla salus (EENS), the Deposit of Faith and the theology popes and saints of the past.

My interpretation of Church documents is Magisteria. Since it is rational, traditional and in harmony with the past Magisterium of the Catholic Church.There is no development of doctrine.

The interpretation of Magisterial documents with the false premise by the present two popes, is not Magisterial. It is political.

HOW DO YOU INTERPRET THE APOSTLES CREED?

There are two options.One is rational and the other irrational.One is traditional and the other non traditional.There is the heretical option and non heretical, ortohodox version. One is schismatic.The other is not a rupture with the past Magisterium. Most Catholics choose the irrational version. It is not prohibited by the popes, cardinals and bishops.

" I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints" - Apostles Creed

THIS IS HOW THE PRESENT POPES INTERPRET THE APOSTLES CREED

1. When you say " I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints" what do you mean?

Do you mean that the Holy Spirit guides the Church to teach that outside the Catholic Church there is salvation ?

Are you saying that there is  known salvation outside the Church?

Are you saying that there are visible non Catholics saved without faith and the baptism of water?

 So since there is known salvation ( irrational and a heresy), outside the Church, there is no communion with the saints on extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed etc  ? There is a rupture with the past ecclesiocentrism.

THIS IS HOW I INTERPRET THE APOSTLES CREED

2. For me the line, "I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints" is traditional. I interpret it rationally.

It means that the Holy Spirit guides the Church today to teach that outside the Church there is no known salvation.

It means for me that there are no physically visible non Catholics in 2022-2023 who are  saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water in the Catholic Church. 

So I am in communion with the saints - Francis of Assisi, Ignatius of Loyola, Francis Xavier, Catherine of Siena, Maximillian Kolbe etc - on extra ecclesiam nulla salus( with no exceptions).

There is unity in the Catholic Church with the Apostles Creed, the Nicene Creed and the Athanasius Creed. For me the Creeds say all need to be Catholic for salvation.

 There is a continuity with the Catechism of Pope Pius X (24Q,27Q), the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return)and Quas Primas of Pope Pius XI on the Proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King, in all political legislation etc.The Creeds are not a break with the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church.But for the present two popes and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) there is a rupture with the traditional interpretation.

TODAY THERE ARE TWO INTERPRETATIONS OF THE NICENE CREED

This is now the controversial line.

We acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins - Nicene Creed

This is how I interpret the Nicene Creed.

1. There is one baptism of water for the forgiveness of sins, it is the baptism of water. It is physically visible and repeatable. There are not three or more physically visible baptisms.

2.For the popes and the CDF there is another version, an irrational version.There are visible cases for them of the baptism of desire etc. Otherwise they would be Feeneyite.They deny being Feeneyite.

For the cardinals, bishops and priests  there are more than three baptisms for the forgiveness of sins.These are known baptismspersonally visible. They are the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance.They could include LG 8, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council, for the liberals. They exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.

Since they are 'visible' they are,allegedly, practical exceptions for 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).This is their False Inference. This was the bad reasoning of the Letter of the Holy Office(CDF) 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston. It was referenced by the liberals, in Vatican Council II(Lumen Gentium 16).

MAGISTERIAL INTERPRETATION OF THE CREEDS

When Pope Francis and Pope Benedict avoid the false premise, inference and conclusion, their interpretation of the Creeds will be Magisterial.It will be in harmony with the past Magisterium. There would be no hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.They would become traditionalists. 

THE HOLY SPIRIT FOR ME SAYS OUTSIDE THE CHURCH THERE IS NO SALVATION

Since the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance refer to invisible cases in 1965-2022,  for me,the line, 'I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church',means the Holy Spirit teaches the Catholic Church that outside the Church there is no salvation.

But for Pope Francis, Pope Benedict and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Vatican it is different. For them, the Holy Spirit teaches that outside the Church there is salvation(visible cases of the baptism of desire etc)

For them BOD, BOB and I.I( physically visible) are exceptions to EENS, the Athanasius Creed etc., for them. 

So our understanding of the Apostles Creed is different.

For them there are exceptions for EENS and for me there are no exceptions.

Yet all of us recite the same Apostles Creed.


EXCEPTIONS MUST EXIST IN OUR REALITY

It is the exceptions which determine the interpretation of the Creeds.They are Cushingite or Feeneyite.

In a box of oranges an apple would be an exception since it is different but also because it exists in that box. If it was not in that box it would not be an exception.But the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance do not exist in our reality.They are not exceptions.

In a hospital with many sick patients if one of them is healed then he is an exception since he is there in that ward.Where are the BOD, BOB and I.I cases being visible in the present times? Who can see someone on earth saved outside the Church?

For Cushingites invisible cases are visible.For Feeneyites invisible cases are just invisible.

EENS is rejected when  Catholics say that not all need to be Catholic for salvation.This is Cushingism.They reinterpret Vatican Council II, irrationally and then say that not all need to convert into the Church to go  to Heaven.Not all - since there are exceptions.This was the heresy and schism of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston.

With that same Irrational Premise of the 1949 CDF Letter, they have changed the Nicene and Apostles Creed with a fake premise.

They choose to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.So the Council contradicts the past Catechisms, the Syllabus of Errors  and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).

This is a mortal sin of faith.Yet this is the Creed for the bishops.

According to Canon Law a Parish Priest has to be a Catholic and affirm the Creed. My interpretation of the Creed is traditional. The priests instead are not traditional.The Parish Priests teach the common  irrational version of the Creeds at First Communion classes and Adult Catechesis(RCIA.This is now political innovation.

To interpret the Apostles and Nicene Creed with a false premise is a mortal sin - but about everyone is choosing the false version.

To reject the Athanasius Creed is a mortal sin.This is a scandal.I am pointing out what the Church judges as being a mortal sin.

In my parish,Santa Maria di Nazareth, Casalotti, Boccea,Rome the priests are not saying that they affirm the Athanasius Creed.


It is the same with the CDF, They reject the Athanasius Creed with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.Then they say that the Council is a break with the Creeds.The CDF and the popes, and also the traditionaists,(SSPX,CMRI etc) do not admit that they all interpret the Nicene and Apostles Creed irrationally.-Lionel Andrades

JUNE 2, 2018

Monday, March 18, 2024

Today I spoke to a student of the Gregorian Pontifical University, Rome studying Missiology : There was a discovery for him. He learnt that LG 8, 14, 15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc always refer to hypothetical cases only in 2024. This was a new version of Vatican Council II

 

MARCH 18, 2024



Today I spoke to a student of the Gregorian Pontifical University, Rome studying Missiology : There was a discovery for him. He learnt that LG 8, 14, 15,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc always refer to hypothetical cases only in 2024. This was a new version of Vatican Council II

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/03/today-morning-i-was-talking-to-student.html

Repost : 'The dogma of the faith' is not lost: SSPX could trigger a schism and 'bring Rome back to the Faith'

 

AUGUST 11, 2017

Repost : 'The dogma of the faith' is not lost: SSPX could trigger a schism and 'bring Rome back to the Faith'

MAY 13, 2017

'The dogma of the faith' is not lost: SSPX could trigger a schism and 'bring Rome back to the Faith'

'The dogma of the faith' has not been lost and the Society of St. Pius X  are at the point where they can trigger a schism among the liberal bishops conferences and religious communities but also bring Rome, the Vatican, back to the Catholic Faith with one stroke, one simple action, one small theological and philosophical correction.
(AP Photo/Alessandra Tarantino). Pope Francis walks past a statue of the Virgin Mary prior to the start of a mass at the Sanctuary of Our Lady of Fatima Saturday, May 13, 2017, in Fatima, Portugal. The pontiff will canonize on Saturday two poor, illite...
Our Lady at Fatima said that the dogma of the faith will be lost except in Portugal, if she was referring to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, then it is presently lost among all sections of Catholics.
We have discovered however,thanks to her and Jesus, the specific cause of the loss of this dogma of the faith.We have found the missing link and we can correct the mistake.Whether the present liberal magisterium accepts the error and makes the change, is not known.However Catholics in general can come back to the Faith as it was known over the centuries.Whether they will be persecuted and isolated for this is another issue.However for the average Catholic, theologically and doctrinally we are once again in harmony.
The SSPX could restore 'the dogma of the faith' since they have a personal interest in doing so - their canonical recognition.They simply have to affirm Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) which is in harmony with 'the dogma of the faith'.This will cause a rebellion.The world will be furious. May be there will even be a schism before unity is restored.
However as Archbishop Lefebvre wanted, 'Rome will come back to the faith'. 
Image result for Photos Leonard FeeneyImage result for Photos Leonard FeeneyImage result for Photos Leonard Feeney
We must remember Leonard Feeney of Boston. He took on the entire Boston Establishment.They threw everything at him and he did not recant.

This is the big moment for the SSPX and the sedevacantists. They can affirm all magisterial documents with the theology of Feeneyism and bring Rome and the whole Church back to the Catholic Faith.-Lionel Andrades

 AUGUST 11, 2017



Magisterium made a mistake in excommunicating Fr. Leonard Feeney since BOD,BOB and I.I refer to invisible people : Vatican Council II interpretation changes

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/magisterium-made-mistake-in.html




Video Ave Verum - Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary 



 Perpetual Vows of Brother Joseph Mary, MICM 




Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary 



Vocation Video



Sister's Profession of Vows 2014 

Repost : Rev. Msgr. Todd J. Lajiness, Rector and President of the Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit agrees with professors Ralph Martin, Robert Fastiggi and Phillip Blosser : no physically visible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I

 

AUGUST 12, 2017

Rev. Msgr. Todd J. Lajiness, Rector and President of the Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit agrees with professors Ralph Martin, Robert Fastiggi and Phillip Blosser : no physically visible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I

Image result for Photos Rev. Msgr. Todd J. Lajiness

REV. MSGR. TODD J. LAJINESS, RECTOR AND PRESIDENT OF THE SACRED HEART MAJOR SEMINARY, DETROIT AGREES WITH PROFESSORS RALPH MARTIN, ROBERT FASTIGGI AND PHILLIP BLOSSER - THERE ARE NO PHYSICALLY VISIBLE CASES OF THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE(BOD), BAPTISM OF BLOOD (BOB) AND BEING SAVED IN INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE (I.I) IN 2017.

He is confirming what is common knowledge for us human beings.Invisible people cannot be visible at the same time.People in Heaven are generally not visible on earth to the mass of people in 2017.They would be known only to God.
I have been sending Msgr. Lajiness and the faculty members these blog posts and no one has disagreed with me or correct an error in anything I have written.
No one, as expected, has said that people in Heaven are visible on earth or that we can see the dead, who are now in Heaven, saved with BOD, BOB and I.I.It is obvious that we humans cannot meet on earth someone who is in Heaven allegedly saved with the BOD, BOB and I.I.
Neither can we say that any particular person in 2017 will be going to Heaven without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church and instead will be saved with BOD, BOB and I.I.
So there is no denial, correction or clarification from Msgr.Todd J. Lajiness  who has completed a Licentiate in Philosophy at the Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas(Angelicum), Rome in 2000.He also earned a Doctorate in Philosophy from the Angelicum in 2002.
According to his bio data on the seminary website the young Rector's professional activities include being a member of the Board of Commissioners for the Association of Theological Schools and also working in close collaboration with ATS on accreditation visits to seminaries throughout the USA.Additionally, he serves as the President of the National Association of Catholic Schools.
I don't expect him to say anything extraordinary like - there is a dead man seen walking on the streets of Detroit saved without the baptism of water.
It may be mentioned that the new Rector of the Pontifical University of St.Anselm, Rome, Fr.Stefano Visintini osb, has said that there are no known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I and so they are not objective exceptions to the centuries old interpretation of the dogma EENS. They do not contradict EENS as it was known to St. Benedict.
Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson has the same message and a few years back he called upon the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) to accept Vatican Council II. He would be referring to Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite), the interpretation which does not mix up hypothetical cases as being objectively seen in the present times.So LG 16, LG 14, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22, AG 7, AG 11 etc being theoretical and hypothetical would not contradict the dogma EENS and the old ecclesiology of the Church.There would be no break with the Syllabus of Errors.

THE PROBLEM
But even though all of us agree that there are no known exceptions to the dogma EENS and that  BOD, BOB and I.I are not objective to be exceptions, while Lumen Gentium 16 ( invincible ingnorance) would also not be a rupture with the dogma EENS, since it refers to a hypothetical case, there still is a problem.It's a big problem.

THEY HAVE TO TEACH IRRATIONAL REASONING
The problem is that professors Ralph Martin and Robert Fastiggi would agree with us here too, invisible people cannot be visible exceptions to EENS, however when they  teach theology they affirm Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition.It is a rupture with Feeneyite  EENS and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX. 
Since they infer that Lumen Gentium 16 etc refer to non- hypothetical cases, which are explicit exceptions to the dogma EENS, as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.

THEOLOGY- DEGREES  GIVEN TO THOSE WHO ACCEPT IRRATIONALITY
So they approve of academic degrees in theology being given to those who interpret Vatican Council II  with the irrationality( invisible cases are  visible exceptions to traditional EENS).This is irrational and non traditional and is also approved by Msgr.Todd J. Lajiness

EXAMPLES OF SACRED HEART SEMINARY HERESY
1. The faculty have changed the interpretation of the dogma EENS or rejected it. This is heresy.
2. They are not interpreting and affirming Vatican Council II without the irrationality. Then the Council would be in harmony with traditional EENS. This is again heresy.
3. They interpret the Nicene Creed with the same irrationality and so the understanding of the Nicene Creed changes. This is first class heresy. For me it is 'I believe in one known baptism for the forgiveness of sins, it is the baptism of water'. For the seminary faculty it is 'I believe in three or more known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins, desire, blood,invincible ignorance, seeds of the word etc, and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.'

RUPTURE WITH THE PAST MAGISTERIUM
So with the confusion created by their philosophical reasoning, they profess and teach a new irrational and non traditional theology which results in new doctrines which are accepted by the magisterium but are heretical. They are a rupture with the past magisterium of the Catholic Church.

THEY COULD AFFIRM THE FAITH WITHOUT THE IRRATIONALITY
They could simply state that as Catholics, they believe that the present reasoning in philosophy and theology is not the work of the Holy Spirit. So they affirm all magisterial documents without the irrational premise which created the non traditional conclusion.
1.They could state instead, that they affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the magisterium and missionaries in the 16 th century for example.
2.They affirm Vatican Council II without the irrational premise and so the Council is in harmony with the dogma EENS as it was known over the centuries.They reject Vatican Council II as a rupture with the old ecclesiology of the Church.
3.They affirm the Nicene Creed and understand that it means, we Catholics believe in only one known baptism for the forgiveness of sins and it is only the baptism of water. There are no known cases of the baptism of desire, blood and invincible ignorance, with or without the baptism of water.'
4.They could affirm the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994) and interpret it with BOD, BOB and I.I as referring to only hypothetical cases. They cannot be anything else.So there is nothing in the Catechism of the Catholic Church to contradict the dogma EENS as it was known over the centuries.
5.They could affirm the first past of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which is traditional and they could reject the second part of the Letter, which contradicts the first part by assuming BOD,BOB and I.I refer to visible exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.-Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/08/rev-msgr-todd-j-lajiness-rector-and.html

Repost : Professors of Philosophy at Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit have to teach irrational philosophy and heretical theology since it is magisterial

 

 AUGUST 12, 2017

Professors of Philosophy at Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit have to teach irrational philosophy and heretical theology since it is magisterial

Image result for Photos of Aristotle's Principles of Noncontradiction in Philosophy
Dr.Eduardo J.Echeverria is a professor of Philosophy and Theology at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary and his publications include 'Pope Francis and the Legacy of Vatican Council II'. He means Vatican Council II interpreted with the irrational premise.This is the only Vatican Council II he knows. 
Victor and Elizabeth Sales, Associate Professors of Philosophy at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary Detroit, are in a philosophical soup too, ends don't tie up and they have to project confusion and irrationality as being Catholic philosophy.
Their reasoning is wrong and their philosophy is bad when they teach students that Vatican Council II is a rupture with  Tradition. They infer like the traditionalists that LG 16, LG 8, LG 14, AG 7, UR 3, GS 22, etc refer to concrete, known cases saved outside the Church.This is how the Archdiocese interprets the Council.
The motto of the Detroit seminary is 'forming Hearts and Minds. Proclaiming Jesus Christ'.They mean, with bad philosophy and theology they form hearts and minds and they proclaim Jesus Christ, without the necessity of membership in the Catholic Church for salvation.
Image result for Photos of Aristotle's Principles of Noncontradiction in Philosophy
So there is known salvation outside the Church for  Eduardo J.Echeverria and  Victor and Elizabeth Sales as a result of their  bad reasoning.This is bad philosophy and it is not Catholic. It is objectively wrong and so cannot be the teaching of the Holy Spirit.



Forming Hearts and Minds. 

Proclaiming Jesus Christ.
With a foundation in bad philosophy they prepare Catholic students at the seminary to receive the bad theology they have personally received.
They have to teach irrational philosophy and heretical theology since it is magisterial.
So when I send them these blog posts they do not comment  since even though their  philosophy and theology is deceptive and the teaching dishonest they have to go through with it.
They give students a foundation in irrational reasoning, with the help of a false premise, which 'forms hearts and minds', to accept an innovative and new theology, which makes Vatican Council II a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).
Image result for Photos of Aristotle's Principles of Noncontradiction in PhilosophyImage result for Photos of Aristotle's Principles of Noncontradiction in Philosophy
The two Associate Professors have to violate Aristotle's Principle of Non Contradiction in the interpretation of Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston.
How can people in Heaven, allegedly saved with the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) be objective exceptions on earth to all needing to be formal members of the Catholic Church for salvation?
Image result for Photos of Aristotle's Principles of Noncontradiction in Philosophy
Would these professors of Philosophy be able to state as simple Catholics that they believe that the present reasoning in philosophy and theology at Sacred Heart Seminary  is not the work of the Holy Spirit. So they personally affirm all magisterial documents without the irrational premise which created the non traditional conclusion?

1.They could state instead, that they as professors of Philosophy at Sacred Heart Major Seminary affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the magisterium and missionaries in the 16 th century for example.
2.They affirm Vatican Council II without the irrational premise and so the Council is in harmony with the dogma EENS as it was known over the centuries.They reject Vatican Council II as a rupture with the old ecclesiology of the Church.
3.They affirm the Nicene Creed and understand that it means, we Catholics believe in only one known baptism for the forgiveness of sins and it is only the baptism of water. There are no known cases of the baptism of desire, blood and invincible ignorance, with or without the baptism of water.'
4.They could affirm the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994) and interpret it with BOD, BOB and I.I as referring to only hypothetical cases. They cannot be anything else.So there is nothing in the Catechism of the Catholic Church to contradict the dogma EENS as it was known over the centuries.
5.They could affirm the first past of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which is traditional and they could reject the second part of the Letter, which contradicts the first part by making a philosophical error ;  by assuming BOD,BOB and I.I refer to visible exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.
These five points would help them not violate the Principle of Non Contradiction in their teaching and personal beliefs as Catholics.
I have also asked Dr.Phillip Blosser, a professor of Philosophy at this seminary to affirm these five points as a Catholic, as I do, and I am waiting for his reply.
-Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/08/professors-of-philosophy-at-sacred.html

Repost : Msgr.Todd J. Lajiness grants accreditation to only those Catholic instituitions which do not admit that the Church made a mistake

 

 AUGUST 13, 2017

Msgr.Todd J. Lajiness grants accreditation to only those Catholic instituitions which do not admit that the Church made a mistake


Image result for Photos Rev. Msgr. Todd J. Lajiness

The Catholic Church made a mistake more people are realizing it. They made a mistake in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case.Since  the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I) refer to invisible people.They could not be objective exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) in the past or present.
So when it is often said that Pope Pius XII excommunicated Fr.Leonard Feeney with the support of Cardinal Richard Cushing, the Archbishop of Boston, it only means that the pope and the cardinal made an objective mistake. They assumed BOD, BOB and I.I referred to physically visibile people, known cases saved outside the Church.
If the pope violates the Principle of Non Contradiction it does not make the pope correct. We cannot see people on earth saved with BOD, BOB and I.I even if the pope suggests otherwise.
If the Magisterium violates the Principle of Non Contradiction the magisterium is still wrong.
The Catholic Church made an objective mistake through its popes, cardinals and bishops. Pius XII confused  what is invisible as being visible, what is unknown as being known.
Then upon this philosophical error a new theology was created and supported by Rahner, Ratzinger, Cushing, the Jesuits and others which indicated that there is salvation outside the Church.
This new reasoning was applied at Vatican Council II.Lumen Gentium 16 was interpreted as being visible and non hypothetical..So with this false premise there was a non traditional conclusion. The Council had to emerge as a rupture with the dogma EENS and the Syllabus of Errors.This was only due to the interpretation.There was another choice.
However interpreting Vatican Council II with LG visible is obligatory at Catholic seminaries and univesities and it is the only one the present magisterium seems to know or want to know.
If LG 16 is considered invisible and unknown in particular cases Vatican Council II would not be a rupture with the dogma EENS and the Syllabus of Errors. LG 8, LG 14, UR 3, NA 2, AG11, GS 22 would all be irrelevant to the the dogma EENS as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.
But this is not being taught at the Catholic universities and seminaries.This is an alternative interpretation which is rational and traditional  and has a continuity with the past.Pre and post Vatican Council II ecclesiolgoy would be the same.
Even those who know, who discern the magisterial error,  do not want to interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS, the Feeneyite traditional version.
So Msgr.Todd J. Lajiness, the Rector of the Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit,  who is  a member of the Board of Commissioners for the Association of Theological Schools(ATS),USA  and also works with ATS on accreditation, visits seminaries throughout the USA.He ensures that this irrationality is taught in salvation theology. The traditional ecclesiology is rejected. It is not said that 'the Church made a mistake'.
The accreditation is only given to those instituitions which do not admit that 'the Church made a mistake' in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case.
Accreditation is only given to those institutions which intepret Vatican Council II with Lumen Gentium 16 as referring to visible and known people saved outside the Church.
This is deception and dishonesty.
-Lionel Andrades


AUGUST 12, 2017


Rev. Msgr. Todd J. Lajiness, Rector and President of the Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit agrees with professors Ralph Martin, Robert Fastiggi and Phillip Blosser : no physically visible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/rev-msgr-todd-j-lajiness-rector-and.html




AUGUST 12, 2017


Professors of Philosophy at Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit have to teach irrational philosophy and heretical theology since it is magisterial

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/professors-of-philosophy-at-sacred.html

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/08/msgrtodd-j-lajiness-grants.html