Saturday, June 25, 2016

Omelia sulle Unioni Civili 28 Maggio 2016 Don Massimiliano Pusceddu Apostoli di Maria

Friday, June 24, 2016

Archbishop Sacrifices Priest Who Cites Saint Paul to the Homo-Zeitgeist

Brother John Paul Mary(Paddy Kelly)

The Kelly Family - Amazing Grace (paddy crying)

Catholic theology has not changed for me

Theology is our understanding of God, our faith,based on the teachings of the Church and rationality.There are different aspects of theology.There is theology related to morals, salvation(soteriology) , Our Lady (Mariology) and our  understanding of the Church ( ecclesiology) etc.

For centuries our understanding of the Church( ecclesiology) and salvation (soteriology) has been the same.The teaching was there is no salvation outside the Church.Every one needs to be  formal member of the Church for salvation.All need faith and baptism to avoid Hell.This was the exclusivist understanding of what is Church,it was the exclusivist ecclesiology.Every one needed the baptism of water in the Catholic Church was the doctrine.It was a dogma defined by three Church Councils.This was the traditional teaching of the Church until ecclesiology was gradually changed.There was a new doctrine.

Over the centuries various societies campaigned to have the baptism of desire be considered an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).Popes and saints responded with goodwill.They mentioned the baptism of desire with reference to EENS.

The campaign had its first real succhess in the USA.The writers of the Baltimore Catechism(1891) assumed that the desire for the baptism of water in a theoretical case of a catechumen who dies before receiving it was a baptism like the baptism of water.The Baltimore called this 'desire' a baptism.It was placed in the Baptism Section of the Baltimore Catechism and Cardinal Gibbons approved it.The Catechism of Pope Pius X accepted the error.Over the years liberal theologians wrongly assumed that the new baptism of desire was visible and known it was repeatable physically like the baptism of water.This was false since there are no known cases of the baptism of desire.The baptism of desire is always hypothetical for us. It is something theoretical expressed with goodwill.

In 1949 however the Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr.Leonard Feeney used the Baltimore Catechism as a precedent.It inferred that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance,existed without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church and it was an explicit exception to the Feeneyite interpretation of EENS, it was an exception to exclusivist ecclesiology.

So in 1949 there was an exception to the old ecclesiology, there was an exception to the defined dogma EENS.Fr.Leonard Feeney was criticized and excommunicated since the new understanding of ecclesiology, said not every one needed to enter the Church for salvation.So theology had changed. There was a new salvation theology.There was a new ecclesiology.

The new ecclesiology was based on a non traditional premise physically known cases of the baptism of desire) and conclusion( these are explicit exceptions, known cases of people saved without the baptism of water).It  was made part of Vatican Council II.Cardinal Ratinger allowed Redemptoris Missio, Dominus Iesus and the Catechism of the Catholic Church to reflectit.Church documents were no more Feeneyite like the Council of Trent.

The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance of the Gospels, referred to objective and not subjective cases.They were visible and not invisible, explicit and not implicit.Before the Baltimore innovation the baptism of desire etc referred to invisible and not visible cases,hypothetical and physically known persons in the present times.This was a big change in perspective in the Catholic Church. It had become magisterial.It was officially accepted by popes and cardinals. Even the traditionalits accepted it. They did not notice the error.

The Jesuit Fr.Leonard Feeney said there was no known salvation outside the Church, this was Catholic theology but the Rector of Boston College, the Jesuit Provincial,the Archbishop of Boston and liberal theologians of that time did not want to listen to him.He was dismissed from the Jesuit community, his faculties as a priest removed by Archbishop Cushing and later excommunicated with the support of Rome.

The new theology which I call Cushingism was born.It says there are are known exceptions to the dogma EENS as opposed to the what I call Feeneyism, which says there are no known exceptions to EENS, there cannot be known exceptions and the baptism of desire is not an exception to EENS.
Today we can interpret EENS, Vatican Council II and the Cetechism of the Catholic Church (1995) with Cushingism or Feeneyism.Since the first part of the Letter(1949) is Feeneyite and the second part Cushingite.

So with Feeneyism, for me, Vatican Council II(Feeneyite) does not contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS( Feeneyite).
While for just about everyone, Vatican Council II ( Cushingite-LG 16, LG 8 etc refer to explicit cases) contradicts the dogma EENS (Feeneyite).It does not contradict the dogma EENS ( Cushingite).

So for me a Feeneyite there is no change in the ecclesiology of the Catholic Church before and after the Baltimore Catechism.No Church  document for me, could refer to explicit exceptions to the dogma EENs.If it did it was a mistake.Personally I could not know of an exception. I cannot meet someone on the streets saved or about to be saved with the baptism of desire and without the baptism of water.There is no new  theology for me since there are no exceptions.
In Vatican Council II, Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 ( all need faith and baptism for salvation) affirm EENS(Feeneyite) and LG 16, LG 8, UR 3,NA 2 etc are not explicit.They cannot be objectively known in personal cases.So they are not exceptions to AG 7, LG 14 or the dogma EENS(Feeneyite).

In the Catechism of the Catholic Church, EENS(Feeneyite) is affirmed with CCC 1257( necessity of baptism) and CCC 846( all need faith and baptism-AG 7).There are no known cases of when 'God is not limited to Sacraments'(CCC 1257).
Like CCC 1257, CCC 846 does not contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.
Since Cardinal Ratzinger was a Cushingite CCC 846 accomodates explicit for us baptism of desire and so states that all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church. This is the new theology.
We can still interpret CCC 846 with Feeneyism.Even though all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church all need to formally enter the Church. There is nothing in CCC 846 to contradict EENS (Feeneyite).
When CCC 848 states all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church it accomodates the new theology of Cardinal Ratzinger and Fr.Karl Rahner.

I know that there is an error in two theological papers of the Vatican's International Theological Commission(ITC).In 
'Christianity and the World Religions '(1997) and  The Hope of Salvation for Infants Who Die Without Being Baptized (2007),ITC's theology on Vatican Council II and EENS was Cushingite.I reject it since it is irrational.It cannot be Catholic theology.

Similarly I reject the second part of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and accept the first part.The second part (Cushingite) contradicts the first part( Feeneyite).
For me salvation theology and ecclesiology which reflect the Gospel teachings has not been changed.It cannot change.EENS and the old ecclesiology is still based on Mark 16:16(those who do not believe will be condemned), John 3:5( all need the baptism of water in the Catholic Church) and Matthew 7:13-14( for wide is the road to Hell and most people take it).

The Eucharist (John 6) and the Sacraments of the Catholic Church are necessary for salvation.The Catholic Church is the new people of God.Catholics are the Chosen People, the Elect(Nostra Aetate 4).They have the new and everlasting Covnenant which Jesus made with his Supreme Sacrifice on the Cross.Catholics have the Promised Messiah of the Jews.They have the old sacrifice in the temple, with the Sacrifice in the Mass.They have the Jewish tabernacle, the Holy Of Holies in the Eucharist.They accept the Jewish prophets and the last of them was St.John the Baptist..The Catholic Church is the continuation of the Jewish religion, the religion of Yahweh.
-Lionel Andrades

Friday, June 24, 2016

The Syllabus of Errors is out of the reality of both popes.So when dogmas and doctrines are thrown out officially,in public by both popes how can the teachings of the Church be a measure to judge Medugorje.Whose faith are they protecting?

(0.51) Fr.Salvatore Parrella, five years back on this Rome Reports video  says that the Church must verify the apparitions not because they don't believe in the possibility that they exist but only to safeguard the faith.Above to protect the essence of the faith.A Christian who basis his faith in apparitions is not a Christian adult, is not mature.
(1:06) The Vatican has several criteria for declaring that an apparition is authentic for example the messages can't contradict the Gospel and the magisterium of the Church and the conversions that arise should be profound..

' to safeguard the faith.Above to protect the essence of the faith.'-Fr.Salvatore Parrella, a member of the Commission investigating Medugorje.

Fr.Salvatore Parrella, is Vice President of the Pontifical Faculty of Theology,Marianum.He belongs to the  Order of Servants of Mary (The Servites).He completed studies for a doctorate in dogmatic theology at the Pontifical Gregorian University, Rome.He has received the mandatum to teach theology from the Vatican's Congregation for Catholic Education (2011).He has had his religious formation with Vatican Council II interpreted with irrational Cushingism as a theology. 
I know members of the Servites here.They were originally a mendicant community but not any more. They have no concept of interpreting Vatican Council II with traditional Feeneyism. This is the faith for them.
Once during Mass in Italian at one of their churches near Piazza Venezia I said aloud a prayer intention citing Dominus Iesus.The Servite priest was perturbed.He was trying to correct me in public during the Mass.I related a verbatim line from Dominus Iesus calling for the conversion of non Catholics whose religions were not paths to salvation.
The Servite Fr.Parrella is the Coordinator for approving Baccalaureate and Post Graduate Licenciate degrees in theology at the Marianum.He is a professor of dogmatic theology and mariology.
So when the Servites refer to safeguarding the faith they mean a Vatican Council, in which hypothetical cases(LG 16 etc) are assumed to be concrete, seen in the flesh cases.They are then postulated as explicit exceptions to the old 'triumphalistic ecclesiology',in particular the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is fantasy.This is fantasy theology.The stuff of apparitions.
Fr.Parrella  has also been serving in an academic capacity at the Pontifical University Antonianum and the theological faculty at the Pontifical University Augustinianum, Rome.He has also been a professor at the Opus Dei's Sacred Cross(Santa Croce) University, Rome. 
How can a liberal theologian be on the Vatican Commission when he uses an irrational premise and conclusion to create a new theology; Cushingite theology? The Medugorje visionaries at least could object formally.
When the visionaries pray the Nicene Creed, they mean there is only baptism for the forgiveness of sin, there is one known baptism,the baptism of water.For Fr.Parella and the Servites there are three or more known baptisms, all without the baptism of water.They are the 'baptism' of desire, blood, seeds of the Word(AG 11), imperfect communion with the Church(UR 3) , elements of sanctification and truth in other religions(LG 8), a ray of that Truth(NA 2) in other religions etc.These are all explicit cases for him which contradict the Nicene Creed, the Athanasius Creed, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors.No one protests or asks him to defend himself theologically.He could opt for a rational theology as did the founders of his religious community.
He now wants the Marian apparitions to conform to his fantasy theology( visible cases of the baptism of desire) and lack of faith(no traditional Vatican Council II and EENS).The Cushingite theology which he teaches contradicts the Gospel.It contradicts John 3:5 and Mark 16:16 as it was interpreted by the 16th century missionaries.This was the theology of the saints,martyrs and the first popes.His Cushingite theology is not that of the Church Fathers.They  did not state that the baptism of desire or being saved in invincible ignorance were explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.The Medugorje visionaries could  protest at Parrella's Apparition Theology(visible-dead now in Heaven without the baptism of water) which he uses to interpret magisterial documents.
From March 2010 to January 2014 he had been nominated by the Prefect for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith,on the advice of Cushingite Pope Benedict, to be a consultant on the Vatican's International Commission to discern the Medjugorje phenomenon.Medugorje has to adapt to his lack of Catholic faith.With Cushingism the Syllabus of Errors is rejected.There is magisterial heresy.
Pope Benedict supports the Magisterial Heresy, in the second part of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949. So what 'essence of the faith' are they protecting?
Pope Francis has denied the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and calls the old ecclesiology, triumphalism and ideological.He considers conscience supreme with no objective reality.The Syllabus of Errors is out of the reality of both popes.So when dogmas and doctrines are thrown out officially, in public,by both popes how can they use the teachings of the Church as a measure to judge Medugorje.Whose faith are they protecting?
The books written by Fr.Parrella indicate he is a liberal with a heretical Cushingite formation.Among the books he has authored are the following:

Credo nel Dio di Gesù Cristo. La responsabilità del "conoscere" la fede, oggi, Edizioni I.S.U. Università Cattolica, Milano, 2007;
Le Mariofanie. Per una teologia delle apparizioni, Edizioni Messaggero Padova, 2009;
Anglicani e Cattolici «Con Maria la Madre di Gesù» (At 1, 14). Saggio di Mariologia ecumenica, San Paolo, Cinisello Balsamo 2009;
Impronte di Dio nella storiaApparizioni e Mariofanie, Edizioni Messaggero Padova, 2011;
Immacolata e Assunta. Un'esistenza fra due grazie. Le ragioni del cattolicesimo nel dialogo ecumenico, San Paolo, Cinisello Balsamo 2011.
Apparizioni e Mariofanie. Teologia, Storia, Verifica ecclesialeSan Paolo, Cinisello Balsamo 2012 (con Gian Matteo Roggio).
-Lionel Andrades

Video : A Message from Medjugorje



June 2, 2016
“Dear children, as the Mother of the Church, as your mother, I am smiling as I look at you: how you are coming to me, how you are gathering around me, how you are seeking me. My comings among you are proof of how much Heaven loves you. They indicate to you the way to eternal life, to salvation. My apostles, you who strive to have a pure heart and to have my Son in it, you are on the good way. You who are seeking my Son are seeking the good way. He left many signs of His love. He left hope. It is easy to find Him if you are ready for sacrifice and penance—if you have patience, mercy and love for your neighbors. Many of my children do not see and do not hear because they do not want to. They do not accept my words and my works, yet through me, my Son calls everyone. His Spirit illuminates all of my children in the light of the Heavenly Father, in the unity of Heaven and Earth, in mutual love—because love invokes love and makes works more important than words. Therefore, my apostles, pray for your Church, love it and do works of love. No matter how betrayed or wounded, it is here because it comes from the Heavenly Father. Pray for your shepherds so that in them you may see the greatness of the love of my Son. Thank you.”

National Medjugorje Conference 2013 - Christina Georgotas

The Miracle of Medjugorje 1 of 5

The Miracle of Medjugorje 1 of 5

The Miracle of Medjugorje 2 of 5

The Miracle of Medjugorje 3 of 5

The Miracle of Medjugorje 4 of 5