Sunday, February 19, 2017

Melania Trump prays at the President's Florida rally

Viaggio nell'inferno di Santa SUOR FAUSTINA KOWALSKA.

Santa Faustina: sono 11 i peccati mortali. Io che ho visto l’inferno vi dico state lontani da loro

Viaggio nell'inferno di Santa SUOR FAUSTINA KOWALSKA.

Oggi, sotto la guida di un angelo, sono stata negli abissi dell'inferno. E un luogo di grandi tormenti per tutta la sua estensione spaventosamente grande. Queste le varie pene che ho viste: la prima pena, quella che costituisce l'inferno, è la perdita di Dio; la seconda, i continui rimorsi di coscienza; la terza, la consapevolezza che quella sorte non cambierà mai; la quarta pena è il fuoco che penetra l'anima, ma non l'annienta; è una pena terribile: è un fuoco puramente spirituale acceso dall'ira di Dio; la quinta pena è l'oscurità continua, un orribile soffocante fetore, e benché sia buio i demoni e le anime dannate si vedono fra di loro e vedono tutto il male degli altri ed il proprio; la sesta pena è la compagnia continua di satana; la settima pena è la tremenda disperazione, l'odio di Dio, le imprecazioni, le maledizioni, le bestemmie. Queste sono pene che tutti i dannati soffrono insieme, ma questa non è la fine dei tormenti. Ci sono tormenti particolari per le varie anime che sono i tormenti dei sensi. Ogni anima con quello che ha peccato viene tormentata in maniera tremenda e indescrivibile. Ci sono delle orribili caverne, voragini di tormenti, dove ogni supplizio si differenzia dall'altro. Sarei morta alla vista di quelle orribile torture, se non mi avesse sostenuta l'onnipotenza di Dio. Il peccatore sappia che col senso col quale pecca verrà torturato per tutta l'eternità. Scrivo questo per ordine di Dio, affinché nessun'anima si giustifichi dicendo che l'inferno non c'è, oppure che nessuno c’è mai stato e nessuno sa come sia. Io, Suor Faustina, per ordine di Dio sono stata negli abissi dell'inferno, allo scopo di raccontarlo alle anime e testimoniare che l'inferno c'è. Ora non posso parlare di questo. Ho l'ordine da Dio di lasciarlo per iscritto. I demoni hanno dimostrato un grande odio contro di me, ma per ordine di Dio hanno dovuto ubbidirmi. Quello che ho scritto è una debole ombra delle cose che ho visto. Una cosa ho notato e cioè che la maggior parte delle anime che ci sono, sono anime che non credevano che ci fosse l'inferno. Quando ritornai in me, non riuscivo a riprendermi per lo spavento, al pensiero che delle anime là soffrono così tremendamente, per questo prego con maggior fervore per la conversione dei peccatori, ed invoco incessantemente la Misericordia di Dio per loro. O mio Gesù, preferisco agonizzare fino alla fine del mondo nelle più grandi torture, piuttosto che offenderTi col più piccolo peccato-Suor Faustina Kowalska

Viaggio di Santa Faustina Kowalska
nell'Inferno
(dal diario di Santa Maria Faustina Kowalska)
20.x.1936. (II° Quaderno)

All religious communities are being forced to re-interpret Vatican Council II, EENS, the baptism of desire/ invincible ignorance with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism






Why must the Franciscans of the Immaculate and all religious communities interpret Vatican Council II, EENS, the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance and other magisterial documents with Cushingism as a theology instead of Feeneyism?
Cushingism is irrational.It is contrary to common sense and is not Catholic. It is an innovation in the Church.Ecclesiastical Masonry has approved it.With Cushingism there is a change in Church teachings on other religions, ecumenism, Social Reign of Christ the King, Non separation of Church and State.
This is a change in doctrine.
Image may contain: one or more peopleImage result for Photo of Pope Francis with Cardinal Braz de Avez
So why is this irrational and new theology being forced upon Catholic religious communities?
Catholic media, cardinals and bishops are allowing a change in salvation theology to change the traditional ecclesiology of the Church.There is no more an exclusivist ecclesiology due to the new theology of Cushingism. There is a change in salvation doctrine in the Church.Since the baptism of desire for example, which common sense tells us has to be invisible and known only to God, is considered an explicit exception to the teaching on all needing to be incorporated into the Catholic Church as members for salvation in the present times(2017).How can an invisible case be a visible exception to all needing to convert into the Church for salvation? It is not an exception,yet the present magisteriuim assumes it is explicit and an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Image result for Photo of cardinal Braz de Aviz
In this way Pope Francis and Cardinal Braz de Avez eliminate the dogma EENS which is a foundation dogma for other doctrine e.g ecumenism, inter-religious dialogue, mission etc.
So why the Franciscans of the Immaculate and all religious communities have to interpret Vatican Council II and other Church documents with Cushingism instead of rational Feeneyism and no one is objecting to this ? -Lionel Andrades


FEBRUARY 13, 2017


Why must the Franciscans Sisters of the Immaculate and all Catholic religious communities have to accept BOD and I.I as being visible,objective,explicit and seen in the flesh in personal cases, for them to be accepted by Pope Francis and Cardinal Braz de Avez?.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/02/why-must-franciscans-sisters-of.html



FEBRUARY 9, 2017


There is a wrong inference as a theme in Vatican Council II , and the Franciscan Sisters of the Immaculate have to accept it : Catholic media silenthttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/02/there-is-wrong-inference-as-theme-in.html


_____________________________________________



Image result for Photo Hey this is big news

FEBRUARY 18, 2017


Major news overlooked by Catholic media :Feeneyite-Cushingite model to interpret Vatican Council II, Catechism,EENS etc

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/02/major-news-overlooked-by-catholic-media.html






Two years in prison for running pro-life website signals French crackdown against pro-lifers

FEB 18TH 2017 BY DEACON NICK DONNELLY  EUROPE
Xl 8izrby7zt
Share
The Socialist-dominated French National Assembly has passed a law banning free speech online about abortion by criminalising any pro-life websites judged to be seeking to dissuade women from killing their unborn children. French pro-life campaigners are comparing the decision with the totalitarian pro-abortion regime of communist China. 
The new law imposes a maximum of two years imprisonment and a fine of £26,517/ $33,600 on any pro-life website judged to in "any manner of “spreading or transmitting allegations or indications liable to intentionally mislead, with the purpose of deterring (from abortion), on the characteristics or medical consequences of a voluntary interruption of abortion.”
Apart from the obvious injustice of this pro-abortion law, it leaves unclear, and therefore open to abuse, the definition of "information" judged to be seeking to dissuade a woman from having an abortion, and it does not define who has the authority to judge if the information falls foul of the law. It is though that even health and government officials will have the power to apply the law.
In the run-up to the vote in the National Assembly François Holland's socialist government has been using the French press to demonise pro-life websites. Laurence Rossignol, minister of families, children, and women’s rights, described popular pro-life websites, such as ivg.net as "fanatic" for seeking to give women all the facts about abortion. She said:
"A woman facing an unwanted pregnancy is sometimes vulnerable. The sites we are talking about take advantage of the complexity of situations and emotions to get them to renounce abortion. These people are a minority. They are fanatics. So you have to limit their impact on society, and I do not know what the future holds.”
Marie Philippe, a spokeswoman for ivg.net, explains the purpose of their website that is now under threat of criminal sanction:
"The site provides help for women who suffer from an abortion who finally find a place here to express their pain, ideologically denied in our country. These women receive support and the opportunity to be recognized and understood in their pain. We offer help and support to every woman who in her heart would keep her child and undergoes outside pressure. We are shocked by the number of testimonies of women who were obliged to abort under the pressure and constraint of their community."
Jean-Marie Le Méné,President of the pro-life Jérôme Lejeune Fondation, protested the oppressive decision of the National Assembly by declaring on their website that "Yes, we are dissuasive!" directly defying the new law:
To paraphrase the famous quote in the movie Casablanca, the Jérôme Lejeune Foundation is put in the box of “usual suspects”, with those who get stigmatized by default. Indeed, as professionals, we do try to beat evil, dissuade our patients from unhappy deeds and maybe unhappiness. We try to give hopeless parents a reason to hope, give specialized consultations to people other doctors don’t care about, encourage researchers to fight diseases that science no longer wishes to fight against because it is easier to give into eugenics, welcome the lives of those whose lives don’t deserve to be lived in the eyes of the world. Indeed, we do. Actually, it is the only thing we do. But what can you do? Offering life is dissuasive from death. By nature.
Forgive us for listening to those who cry, who suffer or are afraid. Forgive us for reassuring them, accompanying them, helping them. Forgive us also for sometimes managing to dissuade people of carrying out an unrepairable deed. To us, it is just a question of good manners ! »
The French bishops appealed to French President François Holland before Christmas to stop the legalisation of the new crime of "digital obstruction of abortion", but sadly to no effect. 
Comment
229,000 babies were killed through abortion in France in 2013. One French woman in three of childbearing age has had an abortion. As the President of the Jérôme Lejeune Foundation puts it, "abortion has become one of the first markers of modern politics." All of France's political parties promote or collude in the provision of abortion as a  "human right", running rough shod over the fundamental right to life of pre-born babies. 
Having said this, Front National populist politician Marion Maréchal-Le Pen has been outspoken in her opposition to this legalised persecution of the pro-life movement in France. In December 2016 shetold the lower house of French parliament:
“In reality, the government seeks to kill any alternative to its official propaganda that aims at trivializing abortion,” she said.
The politician also stated that it is patronizing and insulting toward women to suggest they cannot handle contact with alternative opinions on abortion. “Women are responsible beings who should be treated as such,” she said.
This is “an aberration and total censorship of freedom of expression,” Maréchal-Le Pen declared, adding that the attack on pro-life websites is a last-ditch attempt of the dying Left to reassert itself.
She also said that women currently “receive full government reimbursement for all abortion expenses repayment of all acts related to abortion,” while noting the irony that “an ultrasound of a woman who aborts is better reimbursed than an ultrasound of a woman who wants to keep her child.”
https://www.ewtn.co.uk/news/latest/two-years-in-prison-for-running-pro-life-website-signals-french-crackdown-against-pro-lifers

Saturday, February 18, 2017

Major news overlooked by Catholic media :Feeneyite-Cushingite model to interpret Vatican Council II, Catechism,EENS etc

Image result for Photo Hey this is big news
Coherence has now come into the Church. Order and harmony is there with Church-doctrine.Vatican Council II is in step with extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).No rupture any more.No violation of the Principle of Non Contraduction.There is no jarr between the baptism of desire(BOD) and invincible ignorance(I.I) and the centuries old interpretation of EENS( Feeneyite).They are in step.The Syllabus of Errors, an ecumenism of return, the 16th century missionaries...is on the same band length as Vatican Council II with a new name : Vatican Council II (Feeneyite).This is good news. Headline News.This is Vatican Council II with a new look.There is a new end-result.It is rational ,as it was in the past.But I am the only one who writes or speaks about it, or seems to know about it.
Image result for Photo Hey this is big news
The Feeneyite-Cushingite model is not known on CMTV. Gloria TV, Remnant News...It is a breakthrough and they don't know about it.
Use it when Bishop Robert Barron's speaks on salvation.Tell him he's a Cushingite.Show him the alternative. Vatican Council II a break with Tradition is Cushingite or Feeneyite? The answer is easy.Cushingism leads to rupture.The Catechism of the Catholic Church and other Church documents can be read anew.Catholics already use the Feeneyite-Cushingite model.Their Cushingism is not Catholic. 
Cushingism is leftist ideology. It was a new way in 1949 to look at salvation, mission, ecclesiology, ecumenism, Social Reign of Christ the King etc.It is there with the liberals in New York.
Once Fr.Jonathan Morris a priest in the Archdiocese of New York said not every one needs to enter the Church for salvation. So Michael Voris quickly asked whom did he think did not have to enter. Fr. Morris should have said sorry.
But there was no saying-sorry for him.Instead it was Voris who said sorry.He followed up with his - not every one needs to be a card carrying member of the Church.
May be they told Michael that a  person can be saved with the baptism of desire or in invincible ignorance and without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.As if this happens every day.
This was when Voris should have brought out the Feeneyite-Cushingite model from his pocket.But it wasn't there.
It goes like this. Yes! We can interpret the baptism of desire(BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) in two ways. It is like the binary system of computers.You can decide. BOD and I.I are physically invisible or visible in 2017.In black or white. This is simple. It is Feeneyite(invisible) or Cushingite(visible).
It is the same with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).It is as if you can turn the flap over.There are two ways of looking at it today.Though there is one way only in reality.There was only one way theologically in the past.Now most people take the wrong way.It is with the new theology.The blind magisterium leads them by the collar.
EENS is seen today as Feeneyite or Cushingite. EENS (Feeneyite) has no exceptions.There is invisible- for- us baptism of desire and invisible- for- us being saved in invincible ignorance.Invisible cases cannot be exceptions.
For Fr.Jonathan Morris and the Archdiocese of New York extra ecclesiam nulla salus is Cushingite.EENS( Cushingite) has exceptions.There is visible- for- us baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance( allegedly without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church).This is irrational but it is Catholic  for them.Visible for us baptism of desire!? This is their inference.
EENS Cushingism is an innovation.It came into the Church in a strong way in 1949-Boston.Then it was placed in Vatican Council II by Cardinal Cushing and his Jesuit friends.The text in Vatican Council II is Cushingite but it can also be read with Feeneyism.This gives us hope.Re-interpret Vatican Council II and cause a sensation.Change the premise and change the Church.Let being invisible just remain being invisible and watch how things right themself.
The liberals interpret LG 16( invincible ignorance), LG 14( case of the catechumen) as explicit and known cases.Visible ghosts. So they suppose that Vatican Council II is a rupture with Feeneyite EENS.  Vatican Council II becomes the death of the old ecclesiology.Sounds familiar? Yes, it is the mistake  of the traditionalists too.
Conservative Cardinal Ratzinger interpreted EENS and Vatican Council II with an irrationality and got away with it. He was the Prefect of the CDF. Redemptoris Missio refers to the 'ecclesiocentrism of the past'.He was quite clear on what he wanted to choose for the Church.Brazen in his error.
So there now is a new ecclesiology for Pope Benedict.It is dumped upon all of us. It is not the work of the Holy Spirit.Since the Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake. It is made up of EENS (Cushingite), Vatican Council II (Cushingite) and BOD and I.I (Cushingite).Bad fruit.
Dominus Iesus and Redemptoris Missio was written with Cushingism.This is the theology of Fr.Jonathan Morris.It is being taught at the North American Seminary in Rome.It is official at the Vatican.This is the only theology known to Cardinal Sarah too.
It is also the theology of Dr. Ralph Martin.His much quoted book was liked  by Cushingite Archbishop Augustine di Noia at Ecclesia Dei.
So when Pope  Benedict XVI says the SSPX must accept the doctrinal teachings of the Church he means it a la Cushingite.This point is always overlooked by CMTV when they criticize the SSPX on doctrine.
I can affirm all the doctrinal teachings of the Church - but with the Feeneyite model.Michael Voris could do the same.He can switch from Cushingism to Feeneyism.It is the same doctrine but the theology is Feeneyite.
The SSPX could also learn to switch.No one then can fault them for rejecting Vatican Council II or the dogma EENS.
So Michael Voris' question for Fr.Jonathan Moris was sound.It is based on the theological and doctrinal teachings of the Catholic Church interpreted with Feeneyism.But Michael didn't know it at that time.
Fr.Jonathan Moris, Ralph Martin and the faculty at the Sacred Heart Seminary, Detroit however could also say that they follow all the documents of the Church.True.It is here where Michael Voris should shout out 'Yes but with Cushingism.Cushingism is irrational.It is not logical''.
On a practical level, he could ask them where are the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible cases in Detroit in 2017? Downtown ? What are their names and where do they live? There are none! There are no practical exceptions.
Who knows of someone saved in invincible ignorance or the baptism of desire in the past and without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church? No one. It was physically impossible to know who is in Heaven without the baptism of water in 1949 or 1965.You would have to go to Heaven and come back to earth to tell us about it.How can someone say St Emerentiana or St. Victor or the friend of St. Ambrose is in Heaven without the baptism of water? This would be speculation with good will. Secondly how can someone in the past be an exception to the dogma EENS in the present(2017)?
Yes, Fr.Jonathan Moris should have apologised.But his error would have to be explained to him with the Feeneyite-Cushingite model.Then he could understand.This model has changed our way of looking at Vatican Council II.
This is the stuff of world news.A news scoop.And no one is talking about it.Vatican Council II is no more an issue for the trads and sedes. It is past tense.But who will tell it to them ?
-Lionel Andrades

These terms and definitions should be used.Then liberals like Cardinal Kasper cannot get away with confusion and lies in the name of theology.

The Download
A stellar example is his false claim that "we have a reasonable hope that all men are saved," a notion he repeats from a Swiss theologian, Hans Urs von Balthasar of the 20th century. Von Balthasar had been ordained a Jesuit, but later left the order after beginning work with a Protestant woman claiming to be a mystic. So convoluted is his thought on this that well-known Dr. Ralph Martin, who teaches at Sacred Heart Major Seminary in Detroit, Michigan, had to write an entire book dismantling von Balthasar's spurious opinions.- Michael Voris , Bishop Robert Barron's Spiritual Poison 1

For Hans Urs von Balthasar, Bishop Barron, Dr.Ralph Martin and the faculty at the Sacred Heart Seminary, Michael Voris and CMTV the baptism of desire(BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) is Cushingite and so it contradicts the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite).So they are left with a new version of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), it is EENS (Cushingite).So now they support the BOD and I.I (Cushingite) and EENS (Cushingite).There interpretation of Vatican Council II, with Cushingite LG 16( invincible ignorance) and Cushingite LG 14 ( baptism of desire) is  a rupture with Tradition (EENS, Feeneyite,Syllabus of Errors, Feeneyite etc).
So their philosophical and theological position is an innovation in the Church with BOD and I.I, EENS and Vatican Council II all Cushingite.
Image result for Photos terms and definitions
For me BOD and I.I are not visible.So they are Feeneyite. They do not refer to personally known cases in the present times. They are always hypothetical and theoretical in the past and present. So they cannot physically be exceptions to EENS ( Feeneyite).
BOD and I.I were and are always Feeneyite.
So for me  Vatican Council II is Feeneyite since it it is not a rupture with EENS(Feeneyite).It does not contradict the Syllabus of Errors with the old ecclesiocentrism.
For me BOD and I.I, EENS, Vatican Council II, Syllabus of Errors etc are always Feeneyite.They have a hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition.
I do not mix up what is iinvisible as being visible. So we do not have the hermeneutic of rupture of Pope Benedict XVI.
Similarly I would interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism. CCC 846 and 1257 would not be a break with EENS (Feeneyite).However for the Cushingites CCC 846 and 12576 would be a rupture with Tradition ( EENS, Feeneyite).For me CCC 846 and 1257 would refer to invisible cases of BOD and I.I and 'God not being limited to the Sacraments' in any specific case. Cushingites would claim they know of specific cases of persons saved outside the Church i.e without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.
Since CCC 846 says all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church, Cushingites would say there are known cases of BOD and I.I.
These terms and definitions should be used.Then liberals like Cardinal Kasper cannot get away with confusion and lies in the name of theology.
Similarly Church Militiant TV should also use the terms Cushingism and Feeneyism when they are referring to EENS, Vatican Council II, BOD and I.I etc to specify if they are referring to an invisible or visible case.Presently unknowingly they assume invisible cases are visible.
There is spiritual poison when you don't define your terms.-Lionel Andrades 
 1.
http://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/bp.-robert-barrons-spiritual-poison
February 17, 2017Bp. Robert Barron’s Spiritual Poison

So when will CMTV comment on this ? Can they really comment on this when they often mention salvation?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/02/so-when-will-cmtv-comment-on-this-can.html






Email Glossary



TERMS EXPLAINED
Cardinals and bishops do not know the name of anyone saved outside the Catholic Church in 2016. Yet all Catholics, including Catholic religious communities and organisations have to assume that there are such people.. This is another LIE.
The FSSP and the Institute of Christ the King are allowed to offer the Traditional Latin Mass since they have chosen to compromise.They have chosen to lie.
I interpret the following terms with Feeneyism and the two popes and the cardinals do so with Cushingism(so does the SSPX).
I use Feeneyism and Cardinal Joao Braz de Aviz and the Franciscans of the Immaculate  use Cushingism.
For me the Baptism of Desire is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.For me Invincible Ignorance is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.For meVatican Council II is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.
For me Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.
For me the Nicene Creed is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.
For me the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.
I avoid the New Theology, while they uses it.
For me the Catechism of the Catholic Church is Feeneyite and for them it is Cushingite.-Lionel Andrades





TERMS EXPLAINED
Feeneyism: It is the old theology and philosophical reaoning which says there are no known exceptions past or present, to the dogma EENS.There are no explicit cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.
Cushingism: It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning, which assumes there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypothetical but objectively known.In principle hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.
Baptism of Desire (Feeneyite): It refers to the hypothetical case of an unknown catechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is saved. Since this is an invisible case in our reality it is not relevant to the dogma EENS.
Baptism of Desire (Cushingite): It refers to the known case of a catechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is saved. Since this is a visible case or the SSPX it is relevant to the dogma EENS.
Invincible Ignorance ( Feeneyite): This refers to the hypothetical case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance.
Invincible Ignorance (Cushingite): This refers to the explicit case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance.Since it is an exception to the dogma EENS it is assumed to be objectively known in particular cases.This reasoning is irrational.
Council of Florence: One of the three Councils which defined the dogma EENS.It did not mention any exceptions.It did not mention the baptism of desire. It was Feeneyite.
Liberal theologians: They reinterpreted the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, as objective cases, known in the present times.
Vatican Council II (Cushingite): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Cushingism.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer not to hypothetical but known cases in the present times. So Vatican Council II emerges as a break with the dogma EENS.
Vatican Council II (Feeneyite): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to hypothetical cases, which are unknown personally in the present times.So Vatican Council II is not a break with EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return, the Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite-one baptism),the teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the non separation of Church and State( since all need to convert into the Church to avoid Hell).
Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston.: It assumed hypothetical cases were defacto known in the present times. So it presented the baptism of desire etc as an explicit exception, to the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS.It censured Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center.Since they did not assume that the baptism of desire referred to a visible instead of invisible case.The Letter made the baptism of desire etc relevant to EENs.From the second part of this Letter has emerged the New Theology.
Letter of the Holy Office 1949 ( Feeneyite). It means accepting the Letter as Feeneyite based on the first part .It supports Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.The traditional interpretatiion of the dogma EENS does not mention any exceptions.
Letter of the Holy Office ( Cushingite). It is based on the second part of the Letter.It rejects the traditional interpretation of EENS. Since it considers the baptism of desire ( Cushingite-explicit) and being saved in invincible ignorance ( Cushingite-explicit cases) as being exceptions to EENS ( Feeneyite).It worngly assumes hypothetical cases are objectively visible and so they are exceptions to the first part of the Letter.
Baltimore Catechism: It assumed that the desire for the baptism of an unknown catechumen, who dies before receiving it and was saved, was a baptism like the baptism of water. So it was placed in the Baptism Section of the catechism. In other words it was wrongly assumed that the baptism of desire is visible and repeatable like the baptism of water or that we can administer it like the baptism of water.(The Baltimore Catechism is accepted with the confusion).
Catechism of Pope X: It followed the Baltimore Catechism and placed the baptism of desire in the Baptism Section.
Nicene Creed ( Cushingite) ; It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' and means there are more than three known baptisms. They are water, blood, desire, seeds of the Word etc.
Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite): It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins and means there is one known baptism the baptism of water.
New Theology: It refers to the new theology in the Catholic Church based on hypothetical cases being objective in the present times.So it eliminates the dogma EENS.With the dogma EENS made obsolete the ecclesiology of the Church changes. There is a new ecclesiology which is a break with Tradition.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Cushingite): .It refers to the dogma but with exceptions.All do not need to defacto convert into the Church in the present times, since there are exceptions.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Feeneyite): It refers to the dogma as it was interpreted over the centuries.There are no known exceptions to all needing to formally enter the Church, with faith and baptism, to avoid Hell.
Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Cushingite): CCC 1257 contradicts the Principle of Non Contraduction. Also CCC 848 is based on the new theology and so is a rupture with the dogma EENS( Feeneyite).
Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Feeneyite): CCC 1257 does not contradict the Principle of Non Contradiction since there are no known exceptions to all needing the baptism of water for salvation. There are no known exceptions, since God is not limited to the Sacraments.
When CCC 846 states all who are saved are saved through Jesus and the Church,CCC 846 does not contradict the dogmatic teaching on all needin to formally enter the Church. CCC 846 does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 which states all need faith and baptism for salvatioon.
________________________

Friday, February 17, 2017

So when will CMTV comment on this ? Can they really comment on this when they often mention salvation?

Bp. Robert Barron’s Spiritual Poison
A stellar example is his false claim that "we have a reasonable hope that all men are saved," a notion he repeats from a Swiss theologian, Hans Urs von Balthasar of the 20th century. Von Balthasar had been ordained a Jesuit, but later left the order after beginning work with a Protestant woman claiming to be a mystic. So convoluted is his thought on this that well-known Dr. Ralph Martin, who teaches at Sacred Heart Major Seminary in Detroit, Michigan, had to write an entire book dismantling von Balthasar's spurious opinions.-Michael Voris 
http://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/bp.-robert-barrons-spiritual-poison
When Bishop Barron says  that "we have a reasonable hope that all men are saved," he is referring to Vatican Council II (Cushingite).
Dr.Ralph Martin has a reasonable hope that some are saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire, outside the Church, without 'faith and baptism'. He too is dependent on Vatican Council II (Cushingite).Cushingite theology is based on invisible cases being visible in the present times.
When will Church Militant address this issue?
When Christine Niles cited the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 as an exception to Cantate Dominio, Council of Florence 1441 on the Mic' Up program, she was firmly fixed in Vatican Council II (Cushingite).The 1949 Letter is Cushingite. It assumes that the baptism of desire etc,without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church,  was a known exception to Feeneyite EENS. This became magisterial. This irrational reasoning was included in Vatican Council II (LG 16, AG 7, LG 14 etc).
When Michael Voris on a Vortex program said not every one needs to be a card carrying member of the Church his foundation was the irregular and strange theology of Vatican Council II (Cushingism).The baptism of desire(Cushigite) is an exception to EENS(Feeneyite).So every one does not need to be a card carrying member of the Church.
I interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.
Since there are no known cases of the baptism of desire and since being saved in invincible ignorance is also a personally unknown case, which is invisible in 2017, Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) says 'all' Jews, Muslims etc need 'faith and baptism' for salvation.All.Vatican Council II here supports the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation.So all Jews and Muslims in 2017 are on the way to Hell without 'faith and baptism' according to Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) and EENS(Feeneyite).
This negates the position of Hans Urs von Balthasar, Bishop Barron, Dr.Ralph Martin and the faculty at the Sacred Heart Seminary,  Michael Voris and the staff at Church Militant TV.
It negates the position of the Vatican Curia and the two popes, that of the Archbbishop of Detroit and the Jewish Left(ADL etc).
So when will  CMTV comment on this ? Can they really comment on this when they often mention the issue of salvation?
-Lionel Andrades