Wednesday, May 25, 2016

Deliverance from Demons by Marino Restrepo

l'immagine del profilo di Pilgrims of Love / Marino Restrepo

Deliverance from Demons by Marino Restrepo

Conversion of the Jews - Testimony N.D.E. Marino Restrepo - Wonderful

SSPX contradicts the General Chapter Statement to reach an agreement with the Vatican

Image result for Photo of SSPX General Chapter Statement
When Bishop Richard Williamson was still with the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) Bishop Bernard Fellay, the Superior General ,  called a General Chapter meeting (2012), to decide if he should sign an agreement ( doctrinal preamble) with the Vatican for full canonical status.
The General Chapter issued a final  statement 1 clarifying the SSPX doctrinal position.It specifically affirmed  the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS)  with no exceptions.This was rejected by the Masons.It was unthinkable for the CDF cardinals and bishops.
Now the SSPX is willing to sign an agreement not affirming EENS  with no exceptions.Since this would be objected to by the CDF.
Bishop Fellay is not only ignoring the doctrinal position of the General Chapter Meeting since it is 'sensitive' he also did not comment on the recent Vatican Document 2 which said Jews do not need to convert.The Document theologically  rejected Vatican Council II (Nostra Aetate 4)  which says Catholics are the new people of God, the Church is the new people of God.
Bishop Fellay not only did not proclaim the Faith to please the CDF, he actually denied the Faith with his silence. He is now willing to sign an agreement  with the Vatican rejecting the General Chapter Statement to get full canonical status and not be threathened  by the Left as being in schism, being a cult etc.
For the Left, if Bishop Fellay affirms the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus it would be Anti semitic , criminal and illegal.It is not the theology approved by the pro-Satan lobby.
Image result for Photo Our Lady of FatimaImage result for Photo Our Lady of FatimaImage result for Photo Our Lady of Fatima
This is the dogma of the faith (extra ecclesiam nulla salus) which Our Lady of Fatima said would be lost.It  cannot be affirmed in public  by Catholics including the SSPX.
No Catholic organisation is allowed to hold a conference on extra ecclesiam nulla salus .The Vatican would come down upon them for the Jewish Left.
Similarly no priest in Rome can be incardinated who affirms extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the 16th century missionaries. He will not be allowed  to be incardinated. The Vatican has an understanding with the chief Jewish (Left) rabbi in Rome.Auxiliary bishops in Rome to whom I have spoken to do not want to comment on this issue.
Image result for Photo Our Lady of FatimaImage result for Photo Our Lady of Fatima
May be at some future time in Portugal the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, will be accepted as Our Lady of Fatima said. Presently even in Portugal the Catholic ecclesiastical hierarchy , controlled by the two popes,  rejects the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
For the sake of security the Vatican and the SSPX, are not affirming extra ecclesiam nulla salus in public. Even Cardinal Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider want to keep their 'full communion' status.So they  keep prudently  quiet on this doctrinal issue.
 It seems just as Pope Francis now insists that the SSPX  enter the  the Church, since the SSPX does not affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus, in future Pope Francis will welcome the evangelicals and Protestants into the Church, since they already do not affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus which the pope and the liberals call 'triumphalsim'.
Image result for Photo of LifeSites Editor John Henry Westen
 There are even organisations like LifeSites and Church Militant TV who do not affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus, like the 16th century  missionaries. Since they possibly have received 'a notice'. Even the communities of Fr. Leonard Feeney in the USA do not have annual conferences or write any more on this subject.
Now the SSPX is officially and in public ready to deny their General Chapter Statement  of 2012.They are also irrationally gong to accept Vatican Council II as a break with extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is the  condition set for them by Archbishop Guido Pozzo and Archbishop Augustine di Noia, at Ecclesia Dei, who in public have also rejected extra ecclesiam nulla salus,to stay in office at the Vatican.-Lionel Andrades
Society of St. Pius X General Chapter Statement

(Rom 11:29)



Tuesday, May 24, 2016

Pope Benedict confirms the message of Fatima

At Fatima Our Lady said the dogma of the faith will be lost ( except in Portugal at some future time) and recently Pope Benedict  announced that the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus was lost.It was no more like it was for the 16th century missionaries.

I mentioned in a previous post 1 that if instead  Pope Benedict announced that the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus has not developed since there are no known exceptions in Vatican Council II to the dogma there would be a world wide uproar.

He did not say that apostasy and heresy has entered the Church and so the dogma of the faith, extra ecclesiam nulla salus, has been officially rejected by the magisterium.

He did not say that the Fatima message made public was incomplete since it does not mention what specific dogma would be lost and in what way was the faith lost or will be lost.This has to be deduced from what is already approved by the Vatican.

He did not say that the magisterium is interpreting Vatican Council II, with an irrationality; with the Ratzinger-Rahner new theology , which makes Vatican Council II a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So the Council becomes non traditional and heretical.

The fault is there not with the Council but with the irrational premise and conclusion used to interpret the Council officially.So in this sense the German priest Fr. Ingo Dollinger is correct when he suggests that Vatican Council II indicates a loss of faith.This is something obvious for those who are aware of the irrational premise (there are known cases of persons saved outside the Church, they are in Heaven without Catholic Faith)  and conclusion ( these known cases are explicit exceptions to all needing to formally enter the Church for salvation)  used by the contemporary magisterium.

With the irrational premise( visible cases of persons saved outside the Church)  and conclusion (these hypothetical cases are visible exceptions to EENS)  the ecclesiology ( understanding the Church as exclusivist or non exclusivist on salvation),  of the Church has been changed.

So there is a new ecclesiology( no exclusivist salvation in the Church) which is non traditional and heretical. This is the new ecclesiology ( there is known salvation outside the Church) of the Novus Ordo and Tradtional Latin Mass.It is approved by the present magisterium. The fault is not there with the Mass but with the ecclesiology(understanding of Church). So in this sense too Fr.Ingo Dollinger was correct.
Pope Benedict refuses to break his silence and say that without the irrational premise( visible-dead theory)  and conclusion( visible salvation outside the Church),
Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus are not a break with Tradition.Without the new ecclesiology( the Anonymous Christian/ all do not need to be card carrying members of the Church) , Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus are not a break with Tradition, I repeat

Pope Benedict wants to maintain the lie.So the dogma is lost.

He refuses to break his silence and say that the old and new Mass can be offered with the old ecclesiology(there is no known salvation outside the Church).He maintains the deception.So the heresy and apostasy indicated at Fatima, is already here.It is being maintained officially by the contemporary magisterium.
If  we do not use the Rahner-Ratzinger new theology, which is based upon an irrational observation( the dead are visible in Heaven saved outside the Church) , then the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is still the same as it was in the 16th century.He is not going to announce this.The dogma has been lost for him.

However for those of us who understand we can still interpret Vatican Council and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus without the irrational premise and conclusion. Then the dogma of the faith will not have not changed.We are not in official heresy and apostasy.-Lionel Andrades


When Pope Benedict 'breaks his silence' it usually is to please the Masons?

"My child, they converse of the secret that I gave at Fatima. It is a simple explanation. It could not be fully revealed because of the drastic nature of My message. How I warned and warned that satan would enter into the highest realms of the hierarchy in Rome. The Third Secret, My child, is that satan would enter into My Son's Church." - Our Lady of the Roses, May 13, 1978
When Father Alonso died at the end of 1981, most of his monumental work on Fatima remained suppressed. However, in one short book approved for publication shortly before his death, Fr. Alonso maintained that the Third Secret refers to a "crisis in the Faith of the Church and to the negligence of the pastors themselves." He based this conclusion on the fact that, as Sr. Lucy indicated in her memoirs, the words spoken by the Blessed Virgin begin: "In Portugal, the dogma of the faith will always be preserved etc."
Fr. Joaquin Alonso writes:
«In Portugal, the dogma of the Faith will always be preserved”: The phrase most clearly implies a critical state of Faith, which other nations will suffer, that is to say, a crisis of Faith; whereas Portugal will preserve its Faith.1
     «In the period preceding the great triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, terrible things are to happen. These form the content of the third part of the Secret. What are they? 

     «If “in Portugal the dogma of the Faith will always be preserved,” . . . it can be clearly deduced from this that in other parts of the Church these dogmas are going to become obscure or even lost altogether.»2 

     «Thus it is quite possible that in this intermediate period which is in question (after 1960 and before the triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary), the text makes concrete references to the crisis of the Faith of the Church and to the negligence of the pastors themselves.»3 

     «One conclusion does indeed seem to be beyond question: the content of the unpublished part of the Secret does not refer to new wars or political upheavals, but to happenings of a religious and intra-Church character, which of their nature are still more grave.»

We cannot a create a new moral or salvation theology based on an irrationality.Pope Benedict has done this

Pope Benedict's Avvenire interview contradicts the SSPX General Chapter Statement on extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II

There is an objective mistake in Vatican Council II. Based on this error Pope Benedict said the dogma EENS has 'developed': avoid the error and we are back to the old ecclesiology with Vatican Council II

Pope Benedict's recent interview with Avvenire on extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Vatican Council II was a preparation for the Exhortation on the Synod to be announced this month

Related image
Pope Benedict must be asked to come back to the faith

Card. Ratzinger interpreted Vatican Council II with an irrationality when a rational option was available .He then excommunicated Abp. Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops for not accepting this heretical version of the faith

The excommunication of Archbishop Lefebvre by the CDF Prefect, like that of Fr.Leonard Feeney by the Holy Office (CDF) in 1949, was an injustice.There was no known salvation outside the Church

You can interpret Vatican Council II without the new theology. Try it and see

Pope Benedict should not promote the irrational and non traditional Rahner-Ratzinger new theology based on known exceptions to the dogma EENS

Rahner's Anonymous Christian is main line Catholic theology : coming back full circle

The central point of what I want to say


There was an official change in doctrine and dogma in 1949 and it has been expressed officially in Vatican Council II (LG 16, LG 8, NA 2, UR 3,etc)

Chris Ferrara still misses the point : reasons irrationally like Pope Benedict

Mistakes in Vatican Council II : All Catholics can interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the 16th century missionaries

Related image

The mistakes in Vatican Council II

Related image

Can the SSPX and the Franciscans of the Immaculate interpret Lumen Gentium 16 as invisible and hypothetical and not objective, seen in the flesh I keep asking ? :Pope Benedict's theology a rip off

Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI: The Catholic Church Is Absolutely Necessary for Salvation

CDF can see 'the writing on the wall',thousands of Internet posts say the dogma EENS and Vatican Council II can be interpreted according to the old missionaries: Pope Benedict theologically contradicts them


Pope Benedict uses irrational Cushingism as a theology to interpret Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus : he was unaware of the choice

Pope Francis, Pope Benedict and Cardinal Muller use an irrational theology to interpret Vatican Council II and so reject the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus


I interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus like Fr.Michael Muller and Fr. Leonard Feeney since physically I cannot see, know or meet any exception to the dogma


Vatican Council II can be interpreted with the old ecclesiology and the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus

The FIUV has been of no help to the Fischer More College and the Franciscans Friars of the Immaculate


FIUV representing the ancient liturgy could interpret Vatican Council with Feeneyism instead of Cushingism

Traditionalist theology being controlled

Related image

No denial from Archbishop Pozzo : CDF/Ecclesia Dei will not interpret Vatican Council II with the Feeneyite theology

Abp.Guido Pozzo does not deny it : Ecclesia Dei/CDF use an irrationality and heresy to interpret Vatican Council II

Bishop Williamson is correct. Rome must come back to the Faith before there can be an agreement

Related image

SSPX ask the Vatican to apologise for the excommunication of Abp.Lefebvre and for interpreting Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism

Archbishop Pozzo must not change the teachings of the Church to please his superiors

Abp. Guido Pozzo wants the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II with heresy

The Level 4 error is there in Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 of Vatican Council II

General Congregation meeting at the Second Vatican Council. File photo courtesy Catholic News Service.

LG 14 was a Level 4 error in Vatican Council II

Related image

CDF Notification on Fr.Jacques Dupuis S.j repeats the error of the 1949 Holy Office Letter : the mistake was placed in Vatican Council in so many passages

All Catholics can do the same : interpret magisterial documents with Feeneyism

There being known salvation is central to the Rahner-Ratzinger new theology

Pope Benedict, Cardinal Kasper's false arguments for Synod Report : Vatican Council II agrees with the dogma extra ecclesiam nullas salus as it was interpreted by the 16th century missionaries


Life after death experience, Dr. Gloria Polo speaks about the Holy mass and the Holy Eucharist

Father Steven Scheier and Gloria Polo's Judgment Experience

Dr Gloria Polo The Beginning of Life and my spiritual death FULL

Image result for Father Steven Scheier photo

Father Steven Scheier's Judgment Experience

Monday, May 23, 2016


AddThis Sharing Buttons
by Church Militant  •  •  May 23, 2016   

The Catholic president signed the Cirinnà bill into law

ROME ( - On Friday, Sergio Matarella, president of the Italian Republic,signed the gay civil unions bill, giving legal recognition to same-sex couples for the first time in Italy's history. The Cirinnà bill, named after it sponsor Sen. Monica Cirinnà, grants gay couples certain rights similar to married couples, short of allowing them to adopt children.
Even though it seemed quite unlikely, the opposition had counted on the hope that the president would veto the Cirinnà bill owing to its unconstitutional flaws, and that it would return to the Chambers for further deliberation. Mario Adinolfi, distinguishable figure from Catholic committee Difendiamo i nostri figli ("Let's Defend Our Children") and now a candidate in Rome's mayoral elections through his own party, People for the Familyhad made a heartfelt appeal to the Catholic president: 
We pledge with our president to act as wisely as King Baudouin of Belgium, who chose to abdicate his throne in 1990 because of his refusal to sign a law that would contradict his principles, the law approving abortion in his country. Mattarella is an eminent jurist who has also been a member of the Constitutional Court, and, above all, he's a Catholic. He cannot allow himself a superficial reading of this law.
President Sergio Mattarella is just another one among so many progressive Catholics in Italian politics who have supported the gay unions bill even though Catholics themselves made clear where they stood. A close friend to several bishops and cardinals, his house frequently received the visits of Cdl. Giovanni Battista Montini (later Pope Paul VI) when he was a boy.
Church Militant Premium subscribers get unlimited access to hundreds of hours of Catholic video, including educational series, documentaries, exclusive interviews and world news and commentary. Not a subscriber? Start your free trial.
Even though Mattarella is extremely well connected with Church hierarchy, Catholic newspapers were not reluctant to expose their diffidence when he was elected president in February 2015. La Bussola Quotidianaeven before the Parliament announced the name of whom they had elected, published an article asking for a non-Catholic president "because we live in a time where 'Catholic' is not an indicator of anything, especially for Catholics."
In a piece called "Mattarella in Presidency, to Finish off Catholics," the Italian paper Corrispondenza Romana analyzed Mattarella's political history as a typical left-wing "Democratic Catholic": 
The goal of all trends of the Catholic Left was to operate its own extinction and lose any Catholic connotation in order to fully accept the complete secularism of politics, where everything is simple mediation. Mattarella belongs to this history and this culture, and it is quite significant that he emerges to the maximum levels when his history and his culture are considered dead, so diluted they are in today's general secularism.
Already predicting what would come, the article expressed displeasure with the fact that many immoral bills moving through the senate — the Cirinnà bill included — would be approved with the signature of a Catholic president. 
The Chamber of Deputies had approved the Cirinnà bill in early May by an overwhelming margin of 372–51, with 99 abstentions. The vote was harshly criticized for making use of the "vote of trust," an instrument of Italian democracy in which the parliament agrees to vote for a law without discussing its details, accepting the text as originally presented, rubberstamping the measure. It's a motion commonly applied to save time or, more likely in this case, to circumvent obstructions from the opposition.
The "vote of trust" was approved in the afternoon (369–193), and by evening the Chamber had approved the Cirinnà bill. The bill had been discussed when voted by the senate, and a few modifications (like the removal of the clause that granted adoption rights to homosexual couples) were made during negotiations with the opposition, but these amendments were only made to manoeuver center-right politicians, as the real concerns of the Italian people were never addressed.
Massimo Gandolfini, president of Let's Defend Our Childrenstated that Prime Minister Matteo Renzi "needs to be stopped before Italy becomes his monarchy. He's not a Prime Minister for Italians, he represents a small lobby, and his government is the most antidemocratic in the history of the Italian Republic. He writes laws with his allies during the night and have them voted in the morning."
On the Cirinnà bill and the "vote of trust," Gandolfini declared:
This is an anti-constitutional law that has never been submitted to real democratic opposition. ... Today [there was] a vote of trust in the Chamber and no discussions on such a delicate matter, something that alters the ontological status of the family in Italy — a real act of political arrogance and incivility against democracy. ... This law is a simulacrum of matrimony. 
Immediately after the Chamber of Deputies vote, all the members of the Democratic Party went to celebrate in front of the iconic Trevi Fountain, illuminated with rainbow colors in celebration of the gay agenda. The same fountain would be illuminated red in April to pay homage to the blood of Christian martyrs shed around the world.
Prime Minister Renzi, when asked about the reaction from the Catholic world, replied: "The negative response from the Church was largely expected. I am a Catholic, but I have sworn on the Constitution, not on the Gospel. If one should lose votes in the name of a fair battle, so be it."
He also revealed his government has no intention of giving up on a law that allows homosexual couples to adopt. "If I could have crafted a law approving adoption [for homosexuals] in this legislature, I would have done it. We'll try to get this done by 2018." 
The political opposition is reacting to the vote. Matteo Salvini, leader of the Northern League, called all mayors from his party to civil disobedience, and on the following day representatives of the main center-right parties summoned a press meeting to declare they are going to request a popular referendum to stop the law from taking effect — to which Sen. Cirinnà responded, "We'll warmly welcome that. It'll only push us closer to same-sex marriage. Italy will turn its back on conservatism, bigotism, and the Middle Ages."
The senator exulted over the president's decision Friday. "Mattarella's signing of the civil unions law means a historic turning point for civil rights in Italy." She observed that in order to proceed with the celebration of gay unions, state officials need to wait for a decree issued by the Council of Ministers "which I am sure they will provide very quickly," she predicted, "writing one of the most beautiful pages in the history of rights in Italy.