Tuesday, January 17, 2017

Can Archbishop Carlo Liberati teach this in his diocese?

Immagine correlata
Can Archbishop Carlo Liberati teach this in his diocese? 1

...there is no liberty of expression and belief when Catholic students in religion classes, in Italy's schools, are not allowed to learn the Catholic Faith.Priests, nuns and lay school teachers are not allowed to teach it.
Catechism books are not allowed to state that Vatican Council II teaches that Catholics are the new people of God, the elect (Nostra Aetate), it is the one faith of God (UR 3) and all people need ' faith and baptism'(AG 7, LG 14) to avoid Hell.
According to Vatican Council II the Catholic understanding of Church, is one of having exclusive salvation, it is like the Ark of Noah, in which all need to enter to be saved from the Deluge.(CCC 845).

Osservatorio sul Gender di Famiglia Domani
The organisation Famiglia Domani, has conferences on gender theory, contraceptives, abortion etc but where is the conference on Catholic ecclesiology according to Vatican Council II ? This is a family catechesis issue.
All this is not being taught to Catholic students in religion classes in schools. This is a pro-Satanic policy. Image result for Photo Forza NuovaPontida 150619113309 Where are the Forza Nuova, Militia Christi and Lega Nord protests against this?
The media is 'free' to attack Catholic beliefs and teachings and the municipal libraries are 'free' to criticize the Church but the media and the libraries are not free to say Vatican Council II teaches that all need to convert into the Catholic Church to avoid Hell and that the Catholic religion is a continuation of the Jewish religion.2
At the Jesuit Gregorian University, Rome they cannot teach the Catholic Faith to Catholics since they are threathened with leftist Anti- Semitism and racist laws.This is part of the pro-Satan policy.-Lionel Andrades


2 http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/10/catholic-schools-in-italy-not-being.html

L'Osservatore Romano supports Maltese bishops' sacrilege : another milestone for one world religion

False Church and false worship of Jesus

Our Lady has cautioned us in her apparitions and locutions given to many Catholics. She has said that Satan will enter the highest levels of the hierarchical Catholic Church. The Eucharist will be compromised.
Maltese bishops: Remarried Catholics ‘at peace’ can receive Communion
The Maltese bishops are following the offical sacrilege of the Eucharist in Germany and here in Rome too where the Eucharist is given to any one who comes forward to receive it, even if they are Muslims who are outside the Church and on the way to Hell or women and men in mortal sin, dressed in short pants and other immodest clothes.
We see the influence of the Masons in the Catholic Church.Satan's influence can be seen in the decisions and choices of the Vatican Curia.-Lionel Andrades

Apostasy: The two bishops of Malta have collectively apostatized from Catholic faith by publishing guidelines allowing adulterers to receive Holy Communion. The Vatican joined this apostasy as the L'Osservatore Romano published the guidelines Friday morning in its print and online versions which is widely considered an approval of the apostasy. https://www.gloria.tv/



December 12, 2014
Lineamenta of the Synod of 2015 confirms Pope Francis is to the target the Eucharist once again

The Synod of the Family was a preparation for the great apostasy. It was another important milestone.


October 30, 2014
War Against the Eucharist - Michael Voris


October 5, 2014
More and more is Maria Divine Mercy proving correct in her statements

May 22, 2014
Words Fail: Kasper calls Francis “radical pope,” says he has papal support on divorcees receiving Eucharist

February 25, 2015
Our Lady warned us.....


Monday, January 16, 2017

Dutch priest Christophe J. Kruijen was a liberal like the others at the CDF

It is the Dutch priest Christophe J. Kruijen, 46, in service at the congregation for the doctrine of the faith since 2009, a theologian of acknowledged expertise, awarded with the prestigious Prix Henri De Lubac in 2010 by the French embassy to the Holy See, unanimously bestowed upon him by a jury made up of the cardinals Georges Cottier, Albert Vanhoye, and Paul Poupard, for his theological thesis entitled: “Universal salvation or dual outcome of the judgment: to hope for all? A contribution to the critical study of a contemporary theological opinion concerning the realization of damnation,” defended at the Pontifical University of Saint Thomas Aquinas under the direction of the [liberal] Dominican theologian Charles Morerod, afterward rector of the same university and now the bishop of Lausanne, Geneva and Fribourg.


He was a liberal like the others at the CDF since he rejects exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.For them hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire are explicit and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church.

Bishop Charles Morerod was critical of 'Feeneyism' for him there were known exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma.This was his position when he approved the studies of the present Director of Human Life International,Rome Fr.Francesco Giordano.


OCTOBER 2, 2015

Catholic schools in Italy not being allowed to teach the Catholic Faith

SEPTEMBER 13, 2015

Former Franciscans of the Immaculate seminary faculty priest in U-turn: teaches at the Angelicum University http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/09/former-franciscans-of-immaculate.html

Opus Dei Chaplain contradicts Dean of Theology
 NOVEMBER 11, 2013

Same error in SSPX books repeated by Opus Dei university


NOVEMBER 1, 2013

Opis Dei appoints Mons.Angel Rodriguez Luno as Dean of Theology : prudent priest will not affirm the Catholic Faith


OCTOBER 24, 2013

Opus Dei university in Rome gives Fr.Francesco Giordano a doctorate degree inspite of the error?


Head of the Department of Dogmatic Theology at the Opus Dei University in Rome is still protecting his interests


 NOVEMBER 7, 2013

Opus Dei what does the Catholic Church teach?http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/11/opus-dei-what-does-catholic-church-teach.html

NOVEMBER 5, 2013

Secret at Opus Dei University



AUGUST 24, 2014

The present Magisterium supports the political Left on doctrine and has also made a factual mistake http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/09/the-present-magisterium-supports.html

OATH AGAINST MODERNISM : MAGISTERIUM IS IN HERESY http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/09/oath-against-modernism-magisterium-is.html

It was a small premise and it caused a major and new interpretation of Vatican Council II and Michael Davies did not know about it.

Immagine correlataIt was a small premise and it caused a major and new interpretation of Vatican Council II  and Michael Davies did not know about it.He wrote his book on the liturgy and the Mass while interpreting Vatican Council II with 'that small premise'.The trads and sedes blame the Novus Ordo Mass when their theology has its foundation on a false premise.Change the premise, or rather get rid of it,and you change the ecclesiology of the Mass.Michael Davis did not know this.
We now know. So we have Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and Vatican Council II (Cushingite). Davies was a Cushingite.On this point he was a liberal like Cardinal Ratzinger.
Davies remained politically correct with the Left since he was interpreting Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition.Like Archbishop Lefebvre and Dietrich von Hildebrand he did not know that it was the premise  which was the cause of the bad 'magisterial' interpretation of the Council.
Michael Davies did not know that the theology and ecclesiology of the Novus Ordo Mass is the same as that of the Tridentine Rite Mass.He thought that the ecclesiology had changed ( and it had with the premise) but did not know the precise source for this change.
He was aware of 'the bad fruits of Vatican Council II' (interpreted with the premise) which were there for all to see.
But like Bishop Bernard Fellay today, he would only criticize Vatican Council II for its conclusions, not knowing the specific cause of the conclusion.
What was the missing link? What did they miss out on?
The error was simply assuming invisible cases were physically visible in the present times.It was an objective error.
Since invisible cases were visible they then inferred that there were known exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
They assumed they had found a rupture with 'the ecclesiocentrism of the past'.
So for example,Nostra Aetate says a Muslim can be saved.Why? Since there were known cases for the cardinals.The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, hypothetical cases, were assumed to be known .They concluded at that time that there was known salvation outside the Church without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church. So since there was known salvation outside the Church, Cardinal Cushing and the Jesuits at Vatican Council II could say that a Muslim and a Jew was saved, there was salvation for them in their religion.The Church was no more Feeneyite.Cushing had this approved in 1949.
While the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Cantate Dominio, Council of Florence 1441) and the Catechism of Pope Pius X says every one needs to be incorporated into the Church as members for salvation the Letter to the Holy Office 1949 denied it.Michael Davies did not complain.
On the SSPX website Fr.Peter Scott, former Superior of the SSPX in the USA was telling SSPX members at their chapels to not associate with the 'Feeneyites'.The message was placed on line.He was a Cushingite.
Fr.Richard Williamson( now bishop) also wrote a piece on the SSPX website condemning Fr. Leonard Feeney.More Cushingism and irrational reasoning.
The 1949 Letter was saying invisible cases are objective exceptions to EENS and Bishop Williamson,Fr.Scott and Michael Davies did not notice it.
 This was also the reasoning at Vatican Council II and Michael Davies was not aware of it.He died without knowing that Vatican Council II could be interpreted without this faulty reasoning, violating the Principle of Non Contradiction.He did not know that without this premise on invisible cases being visible the conclusion would be different.There would be no change in ecclesiology. This  would be a major change.Since with the premise the Church as at that time in uncharted theological waters.
If they were aware of the false premise there would be no need for Archbishop Lefebvre to object to Vatican Council II.However if this was known, the magisterium kept it a secret.Rahner,Kung and Ratzinger used the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and when Lefebvre did not accept the premise and conclusion he was excommunicated.It was similar to Fr.Leonard Feeney who did not accept the baptism of desire etc as being an exception to the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.He was excommmunicated.Then the excommunication was lifted without him having to recant and luckily before he died.Archbishop Lefebvre died excommunicated by those who used an irrational premise to interpret Vatican Council II, which was heresy in itself.
Archbishop Lefebvre and Michael Davies did not know that there would be no change in ecclesiology at Holy Mass.No one told them that all they had to do was to avoid that small premise.
Image result for Liturgical Time Bombs In Vatican II: Destruction of the Faith through Changes in Catholic WorshipPope Paul's New Mass (Michael Davies)Apologia Pro Marcel Lefebvre (Michael Davies)
So many changes have been made in the Church based on Vatican Council II and this has been attributed to the Holy Spirit when the exact cause was an irrational premise which violated the Principle of Non Contradiction creating a non traditional and heretical conclusion.
It can still be avoided today but traditionalists are  following the error of Michael Davies, Dietrich von Hildebrand, Archbishop  Lefebvre and others.-Lionel Andrades 

Sunday, January 15, 2017

St. Catherine Laboure and the Miraculous Medal - ( video remastered )


St. Catherine Laboure and the Miraculous Medal - ( video remastered ) --- www.youtube.com/watch --- franciscanfriars --- airmaria.com ---

Media chooses Vatican Council II (Cushingite) instead of Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) : approved magisterial heresy

For Philip Pullela(Reuters), Nicole Winfield (AP) and other journalists Vatican Council II is always Cushingite instead of Feeneyite.The Council is interpreted with an irrational premise.So the conclusion is non-traditional Cushingism.There emerges a break with Catholic traditional teaching on there being no salvation outside the Church.If they interpreted Vatican Council II without the irrational premise; without the baptism of desire being visible,then Vatican Council II is Feeneyite.It is in harmony with the ecclesiocentrism of the past.
This means in inter-religious dialogue I would say like Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson and Fr. Stefano Visintin osb that there are no personally known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) as it was known over the centuries.
And if there are no exceptions then we are officially back to the old ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.
Image result for nostra Aetate logos
So all Muslims and Jews need to convert into the Catholic Church as members.Since there is no known salvation outside the Church to contradict EENS.A possibility is not a concrete exception to the Feeneyite interpretation of EENS.It is only speculation.
So in inter religious dialogue I would be saying all Jews, Muslims, Orthodox Christians and Protestants need to be incorporated into the Catholic Church as visible members to avoid the fires of Hell and this would be just a personal view.It would be the official teaching of the Catholic Church according to Vatican Council II( Feeneyite) and traditional magisterial documents in 2017.It would be magisterial according to the Church documents but not necessarly magisterial according to the people in the Vatican.
Image result for Logo La StampaRelated image
Image result for Logo L'osservatore RomanoRelated imageImage result for logo Tablet  newspaper u.kImage result for logo of National catholic register
So if Philip Pullela,Nicole Winfield, Cindy Wooden and Edward Pentin would interpret Vatican Council II like me, they would reach the same conclusion.It would not be my personal opinion but the official teaching of the Church according to the text of Vatican Council II. Ad Gentes 7 supports the dogma EENS and LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to invisible and not visible cases in 2017.So they are not relevant or exceptions to EENS ( Feeneyite).There is no violation of the Principle of Non Contradiction.
However they have to use the irrational premise (invisible cases are visible, people in Heaven are visible on earth) to violate the Principle of Non Contradiction and create a conclusion which is irrational, non traditional and heretical for Catholics.
They also cannot report Vatican Council II as being Feeneyite since it is not magisterial or approved by the Jewish Left.Their employers would object.
So it was no surprise for them I suppose when in March 2016 Pope Benedict said that there was 'a development with Vatican Council II' and so the dogma EENS was no more like it was for the 16th century missionaries.He was referring of course, to Vatican Council II, Cushingite.It's only with an irrational premise,that there is a rupture with EENS.
Pope Benedict would know that if he cited Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) there would be no change in the dogma EENS, it would be the same as it was in the 16th century.
Image result for nostra Aetate logos
Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) would indicate that Mohammad and all Muslims are oriented to Hell, as the Church held over the centuries.This would not be approved by the political Left  or Cardinal Muller and Archbishop Di Noia.They  have to remain ideological and so reject Vatican Council II (F).
This is politically correct for La Stampa and La Repubblica but it is magisterial heresy which is officially being maintained throughout the Church by the two popes.
So With Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) there is no incardinatiion for a priest.He has to affirm the irrational Vatican Council II ( Cushingite).There is no professorship in a pontifical university for a priest or lay Catholic who affirms Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).The Society of St.Pius X cannot be granted a prelature unless they approved Vatican Council II (Cushingite) with its non traditional conclusions.The Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate cannot offer the Latin Mass or the Novus Ordo Mass if they affirm Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).
Vatican Council II (F) would not be approved by the two popes so that they could maintain 'good relations with the Jews'(of the Left).
With Vatican Council II(F) I cannot study Philosophy or Theology at a pontifical university in Rome.This I know.
The rank and file Catholic however is not told that there is an objective error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston and that error is repeated in Vatican Council II.The Letter assumes there is known salvation outside the Church with visible for us baptism of desire etc.
Image result for nostra Aetate logos
So Nostra Aetate states:
 841 The Church's relationship with the Muslims. "The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind's judge on the last day." 1

'The plan of salvation also includes...'
Vatican Council II (Nostra Aetate) assumes a possbility known only to God (and which would really follow with the baptism of water in the Catholic Church since this is the dogmatic teaching of EENS) is an exception to the traditional interpretation of EENS.There is known salvation outside the visible boundaries of the Church for the Vatican Council II cardinals. Since there was known salvation outside the Church according to the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office which was approved by the magisterium of that time.
The Letter with the objective error has been placed in the Denzinger by Fr.Karl Rahner s.j.The objective error is there all over Vatican Council II. It is like a theme.
Feeneyites avoid it in the interpretation of the Council. They simply assume it is a reference to a hypothetical case.
The Reuters and AP correspondents hold on to the error and assume like the rest of the Church that it is a reference not to a hypothetical cases but someone personally known.Then they report that Vatican Council II is ' a revolution' in the Church .The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is too afraid to issue a correction.-Lionel Andrades

Nostra Aetate: Celebrating Fifty Years of the Catholic Church's

OCTOBER 28, 2015

The Vatican has made a mistake and there is a cover up by liberal journalists http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/10/the-vatican-has-made-mistake-and-there.html

OCTOBER 27, 2015

Associated Press blacks out information on magisterial heresy : AP reports on Vatican Council II were based on a factual error http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/10/associated-press-blacks-out-information.html

Image result for photo of Archbishop Thomas E.gullickson

JANUARY 14, 2017

Two popes irrational and in heresy : Archbishop Gullickson, Fr.Visintin osb correct http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/01/two-popes-irrational-and-in-heresy.html

A template for real Catholic reform in 2017

JANUARY 13, 2017

Thomas D.Williams calls for a reform in the Church with a new theology and new doctrines which are heretical and irrational but politically correct with the Left, of which he now is a part of


St. Peter's seen from the Tiber river

JANUARY 13, 2017

I'm a Catholic on theology and doctrine : the two popes, trads and sedes are irrational, non traditional and heretical


JANUARY 11, 2017

cardinal raymond burke

Cardinal Burke tell Pope Francis that Vatican Council II ( Cushingite) is not magisterial and he cannot accept it while he accepts Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) and would expect the pope to do the same


Xl arch. gerhard muller now cardinal elect with pope benedict xvi

JANUARY 9, 2017

Cardinal Muller for ideological reasons has changed doctrine with an irrational theology to create magisterial heresy