Sunday, February 18, 2018

This is how Fr.Fausto Buzzi,SSPX Italy interprets the Catechism and Vatican Council II : it is different from me

Father Fausto Buzzi. Assistant, District Superior,Italy still does not know the difference between Cushingism and Feeneyism as a theology and blames Vatican Council II I mentioned on February 16,2018. No clarification or denial was expected from him as usual.
Here is how he interprets the Catechism of the Catholic Church  and Vatican Council II .It is the same as  Cardinal Cupich and Michael Voris.

CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH
1257 The Lord himself affirms that Baptism is necessary for salvation. He also commands his disciples to proclaim the Gospel to all nations and to baptize them. Baptism is necessary for salvation for those to whom the Gospel has been proclaimed and who have had the possibility of asking for this sacrament. The Church does not know of any means other than Baptism that assures entry into eternal beatitude; this is why she takes care not to neglect the mission she has received from the Lord to see that all who can be baptized are "reborn of water and the Spirit." God has bound salvation to the sacrament of Baptism, but he himself is not bound by his sacraments.-Catechism of the Catholic Church

Feeneyite line.
The Lord himself affirms that Baptism is necessary for salvation. He also commands his disciples to proclaim the Gospel to all nations and to baptize them.

Feeneyite passage:
The Church does not know of any means other than Baptism that assures entry into eternal beatitude; this is why she takes care not to neglect the mission she has received from the Lord to see that all who can be baptized are "reborn of water and the Spirit."

Feeneyite line.
God has bound salvation to the sacrament of Baptism,

Cushingite line
for those to whom the Gospel has been proclaimed and who have had the possibility of asking for this sacrament.

Cushingite line
 he himself is not bound by his sacraments.

They both assume, being  Cushingites in theology  that what is written in red is an exception to that written in blue.

For both of them the  hypothetical passages in red are not hypothetical. So they become exceptions to the passages in
blue.

So the passages in red are relevant and are exceptions to the passage in blue for the both of them.

So they cannot say like the missionaries in the 16th century that all non Catholics are on the way to Hell, with no known exception, unless they enter the Catholic Church with faith and the baptism of water.
For me the text in red refers to only hypothetical cases which are not examples of known people saved outside the Church in the present times. So they are not practical exceptions to the text in blue.
So I am reading the same passage as Fr.Fausto Buzzi a Cushingites but my theology is Feeneyite.


________________

Here is Vatican Council II with and without the paradigm shift.

Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door. Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it."(17) Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him (Heb. 11:6), yet a necessity lies upon the Church (1 Cor. 9:16), and at the same time a sacred duty, to preach the Gospel. And hence missionary activity today as always retains its power and necessity.
By means of this activity, the Mystical Body of Christ unceasingly gathers and directs its forces toward its own growth (cf. Eph. 4:11-16). The members of the Church are impelled to carry on such missionary activity by reason of the love with which they love God and by which they desire to share with all men the spiritual goods of both its life and the life to come.
Finally, by means of this missionary activity, God is fully glorified, provided that men fully and consciously accept His work of salvation, which He has accomplished in Christ. -Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II.

Feeneyite passage:
Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door. 

 yet a necessity lies upon the Church (1 Cor. 9:16), and at the same time a sacred duty, to preach the Gospel. And hence missionary activity today as always retains its power and necessity.

The members of the Church are impelled to carry on such missionary activity by reason of the love with which they love God and by which they desire to share with all men the spiritual goods of both its life and the life to come.

Finally, by means of this missionary activity, God is fully glorified, provided that men fully and consciously accept His work of salvation, which He has accomplished in Christ. 


Cushingite passages:
Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it."

Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him 

For me the text in red refers to only hypothetical cases which are not examples of known people saved outside the Church. So they are not practical exceptions to the text in blue.
So I am reading the same passage as Fr.Fausto Buzzi, Cardinal Cupich and Michael Voris, Cushingites but my theology is Feeneyite.
So for me Vatican Council II(AG 7) says all need faith and baptismfor salvation and this must be proclaimed in mission.But theCushingites read exceptions in this passage.There are those 'inculpably ignorant of the Gospel' whom God can lead to Himself.This is a non hypothetical and concrete case for the two Cushingites. It is an exception to EENS.
So we are all reading the same passage in Vatican Council II(AG 7) but the SSPX Cushingites depend onthe false premise. 
-Lionel Andrades


FEBRUARY 16, 2018

Father Fausto Buzzi. Assistant, District Superior,Italy still does not know the difference between Cushingism and Feeneyism as a theology and blames Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/father-fausto-buzzi-district.html



Who is going to challenge Cardinal Cupich and say there is no doctrinal change with Vatican Council ? Not Church Militant TV

Image result for Photo of Cardinal CupichImage result for Photo of Michael Voris

There is no  mission for Michael Voris based on the traditional teaching of the Church supported by Vatican Council II and the Catechism(1994) since he chooses Cushingism I mentioned in a previous blog post. So it is no surprise that Cardinal Blaise Cupich calls Vatican Council II a paradigm shift.

With Cushingism there is now salvation outside the Church while the rest of the Church does not know that with Feeneyite theology Vatican Council II really says outside the Church there is no salvation.So there would be no radical change in doctrine, as Cardinal Cupich believes.
Here is are passages from the Catechism of the Catholic Church  and Vatican Council II which Cardinal Cupich and Michael Voris will interpret with Cushingism and so there will be a radical change in doctrine, what Cardinal Cupich calls a paradigm shift.I repeat them again in this blog post since they are important to understand.

1257 The Lord himself affirms that Baptism is necessary for salvation. He also commands his disciples to proclaim the Gospel to all nations and to baptize them. Baptism is necessary for salvation for those to whom the Gospel has been proclaimed and who have had the possibility of asking for this sacrament. The Church does not know of any means other than Baptism that assures entry into eternal beatitude; this is why she takes care not to neglect the mission she has received from the Lord to see that all who can be baptized are "reborn of water and the Spirit." God has bound salvation to the sacrament of Baptism, but he himself is not bound by his sacraments.-Catechism of the Catholic Church

Feeneyite line.
The Lord himself affirms that Baptism is necessary for salvation. He also commands his disciples to proclaim the Gospel to all nations and to baptize them.


Feeneyite passage:
The Church does not know of any means other than Baptism that assures entry into eternal beatitude; this is why she takes care not to neglect the mission she has received from the Lord to see that all who can be baptized are "reborn of water and the Spirit."

Feeneyite line.
God has bound salvation to the sacrament of Baptism,


Cushingite line
for those to whom the Gospel has been proclaimed and who have had the possibility of asking for this sacrament.

Cushingite line
 he himself is not bound by his sacraments.

They both assume, being  Cushingites in theology  that what is written in red is an exception to that written in blue.

For both of them the  hypothetical passages in red are not hypothetical. So they become exceptions to the passages in
blue.

So the passages in red are relevant and are exceptions to the passage in blue for the both of them.

So they cannot say like the missionaries in the 16th century that all non Catholics are on the way to Hell, with no known exception, unless they enter the Catholic Church with faith and the baptism of water.
For me there is no paradigm shift since the text in red refers to only hypothetical cases which are not examples of known people saved outside the Church in the present times. So they are not practical exceptions to the text in blue.
So I am reading the same passage as the Cushingites but my theology is Feeneyite.


________________

Here is Vatican Council II with and without the paradigm shift.

Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door. Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it."(17) Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him (Heb. 11:6), yet a necessity lies upon the Church (1 Cor. 9:16), and at the same time a sacred duty, to preach the Gospel. And hence missionary activity today as always retains its power and necessity.
By means of this activity, the Mystical Body of Christ unceasingly gathers and directs its forces toward its own growth (cf. Eph. 4:11-16). The members of the Church are impelled to carry on such missionary activity by reason of the love with which they love God and by which they desire to share with all men the spiritual goods of both its life and the life to come.
Finally, by means of this missionary activity, God is fully glorified, provided that men fully and consciously accept His work of salvation, which He has accomplished in Christ. -Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II.

Feeneyite passage:
Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door. 

 yet a necessity lies upon the Church (1 Cor. 9:16), and at the same time a sacred duty, to preach the Gospel. And hence missionary activity today as always retains its power and necessity.

The members of the Church are impelled to carry on such missionary activity by reason of the love with which they love God and by which they desire to share with all men the spiritual goods of both its life and the life to come.

Finally, by means of this missionary activity, God is fully glorified, provided that men fully and consciously accept His work of salvation, which He has accomplished in Christ. 


Cushingite passages:
Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it."

Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him 

For me the text in red refers to only hypothetical cases which are not examples of known people saved outside the Church. So they are not practical exceptions to the text in blue.
So I am reading the same passage as Cardinal Cupich and Michael Voris, Cushingites but my theology is Feeneyite.
So for me Vatican Council II(AG 7) says all need faith and baptism for salvation and this must be proclaimed in mission.But the Cushingites read exceptions in this passage.There are those 'inculpably ignorant of the Gospel' whom God can lead to Himself.This is a non hypothetical and concrete case for the two Cushingites. It is an exception to EENS.
So we are all reading the same passage in Vatican Council II(AG 7) but the Cushingites depend on the false premise. This is how they get their paradigm shift.
Image result for Photo of Simon RafeImage result for Photo of Bradley Eli
Who is going to challenge Cardinal Cupich and say there is no doctrinal change with Vatican Council ?
Simon Rafe? He's a Cushingite.
Bradley Eli at CMTV? His religious formation was with Cushingite theology as was that of Rodney Pelletier.
Image result for Photo of Christine NilesImage result for Photo of Rodney Pelletier
Christine Niles? She accepts the Cushingite Letter of the Holy Office 1949.
So since traditional salvation theology and the past ecclesiology can be changed with Cushingism ( and this is a major radical shift in the Church )  now Cardinal Cupich wants to do the same with morals.
Image result for Photo of Amoris Laetitia
Amoris Laetitia suggests that there are known exceptions to manifest mortal sin and they can be known by us in daily life.Sounds familiar? 
There are known exceptions of the baptism of desire etc to the dogma EENS and they are known to the Cushingites.
They must be thinking that they got away with it once with salvation theology so why not this time with moral theology ?-Lionel Andrades

1

FEBRUARY 18, 2018


There will not be mission for Michael Voris based on the traditional teaching of the Church supported by Vatican Council II and the Catechism(1994) since he chooses Cushingism

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/there-will-not-be-mission-for-michael.html


_________________________________________




FEBRUARY 16, 2018


Cardinal Blaise Cupich is correct : with Vatican Council II interpreted with Cushingism a paradigm shift can be created

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/cardinal-blaise-cupich-is-correct-with.html




FEBRUARY 16, 2018




Father Fausto Buzzi. Assistant, District Superior,Italy still does not know the difference between Cushingism and Feeneyism as a theology and blames Vatican Council II

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/02/father-fausto-buzzi-district.html