TALMUDIC JEWS HAVE A BLASPHEMOUS OPERA IN ITALY

Oppression of Catholics continue

Popes and saints have opposed attacks of the Talmudic Jews on the Catholic Church. Today the evil seems unopposed. The Talmud which blasphemes Jesus and Our Lady is being translated into Italian by the Italian Ministry of education. Rabbi Ricardo Segni, the chief leftist Rabbi in Rome, is on the committee overseeing the translation.From January 24 to 28 at the theatre Parenti in Milan a blasphemous opera was held.It  had the support of the Jewish Left media. The opera Sul concetto di volto nel figlio di Dio, Romeo Castellucci does not come under hate laws created by the Jewish Left, the ADL etc. The staging of this  opera in Milan known for its blasphemous scenes when staged abroad, is part of the religion of the Talmudic Jews. The director of the Parenti theatre it is reported, is a Jew, Ruth Shammah.

Blasphemy is part of the beliefs of members of the Bnai Brit, Italy who have threatened Catholic academics and universities with criminal charges, for only affirming Catholic teaching. They object to the Catholic teaching  which says Judaism and other religions are not paths to go to Heaven and that Jews need to convert into the Catholic Church to avoid Hell; for salvation. (Dominus Iesus 20, CDF, Notification on Fr. Jacques Dupuis S.j etc). The Rabbis visited the Urbaniana Pontifical University in Rome.

The Jewish Left values and the opera in Milan represent Satan and were not criticized by the Jewish Left.

The opera in Milan against the belief in God with its accompanying blasphemy, in the arts and media, is a part of Talmudic Judaism, the religion of the Freemasons and the Jewish Left. It is the religion of those who choose to serve Satan instead of God.

Those who oppose the Talmudic Jews, the Satanists, Freemasons and the Kabbalists are threatened with anti Semite laws.It is anti Semitic to be a Catholic.

Jesus called a type of Jews, children of the devil and  ‘snakes and vipers’.He spoke about  the ‘synagogue of Satan’.

The owner of the adult film industry in the USA is a Jew and also blasphemes against Jesus it is reported on the internet.Recently there was a Catholic Jewish Left Day of Reflection in Rome. Maintaining dialogue and ‘having good relations with the Jews’ means not being victimized by the political and military threat of Israel and the Jewish Left.  In exchange, the Catholic Church has to change its teaching in ecumenism (no ecumenism of return) and Judaism and other religions (they do not have to convert and all religions are equal).Restrictions are placed on the Catholic Traditional Latin Mass which is vehemently opposed in the leftist mainstream media in Italy.

The price of ‘good relations’ is the creating of a culture with blasphemy,atheism and hate enforced with legal blackmail and extortion, against the followers of Jesus Christ, whom Satan hates.

The anti Semitism threat is being used against Catholic bishops to make them announce that those who are faithful to Jesus and His Church are not Catholics. Catholics are being asked by the Jewish Left not to use the word ‘Catholic’. Satan is a liar and his actions are covert.

Those Catholics who rebel could be ruined financially. So Catholics do not want to talk about this issue in public. They just mention the ‘liberals’ and not the Jewish Left threat to ‘liberal Catholics’ to remain liberal.

I was studying at a Pontifical University and seminary in Rome but could not  continue my studies since they have to protect themself from Jewish Left laws. The faculty was being opposed by ‘outsiders’ because of my official Catholic views. My Spiritual Director was being telephoned and finally he asked me to search for a new Spiritual Director. This priest himself would have to leave the seminary.

Pontifical universities in Rome welcome students with liberal views, freethinkers and New Agers, those opposed to Church teachings. Those who hold the Catholic teachings are threatened and expelled. This is done often with the approval of the Vatican including the former Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. The cardinals and bishops want to maintain 'goof relations'  with the Jewish Left and their Catholic supporters like Andrea Riccardi and the St. Egidio organization.

Prayers of Reparation were held on January 23 by the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate Benevento and Il Camino dei Tre Sentieri. Protests were held outside the theatre by Catholic political organizations Nuova Forza, Militia Christi and others.-Lionel Andrades

Forza Nuova, Militi Christi and others  protesting againt the opera in Milan.

CATHOLIC DIOCESES OF WORCESTER, LOS ANGELES: THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE IS NOT AN EXCEPTION TO THE DOGMA OUTSIDE THE CHURCH NO SALVATION

A member of the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary in Los Angeles, California is reported as saying that they have not asked for canonical status in Los Angeles since they do not want to deny the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. The Sisters of the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary in Worcester it is said have been granted canonical status since they agreed to accept the teaching outside the Catholic Church No Salvation not as a dogma. They also agreed it is alleged to hold their interpretation of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance.

General confusion still exists since bishops assume that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

They are not exceptions since they are known only to God. So in this sense they are irrelevant to the dogma. They could only be exceptions if they were explicitly known.

According to Peter Vere canonist all the communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney in Worcester uphold the understanding of the dogma as did Fr.Leonard Feeney i.e every one needs to enter the Catholic Church with Catholic Faith and the baptism of water for salvation (Ad Gentes 7). http://www.catholicism.org/downloads/Peter_Vere_SBC.pdf

There are no known exceptions of the baptism of desire or invincible ignorance. They do not deny the baptism of desire which they accept is possible under certain conditions and is always known only to God.

Invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire being exceptions to the dogma is not part of the Deposit of the Faith. This theory originated in the 1940’s with the Archbishop of Boston Richard Cushing.

The dioceses of Worcester and Los Angeles could clarify, the obvious, for all Catholics, that there is no case of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance known to us and so they are not  relevant to the issue of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

Also other Catholic religious communities in the dioceses could be free to uphold the centuries old interpretation of the dogma which Pope Pius XII called 'the infallible teaching'  (Letter of the Holy Office 1949) and accept, in principle, that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance etc is  known only to God.-Lionel Andrades

CAN EXISTING RELIGIOUS COMMUNITIES IN CALIFORNIA AFFIRM THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS AND ALSO ACCEPT IN PRINCIPLE THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE AND BEING SAVED IN INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE ?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2012/01/can-existing-religious-communities-in.html

JUSTICE IN CALIFORNIA

ANTI SEMITIC TO BE A CATHOLIC

When someone asks me: The Catholic Church teaches that Judaism is a path to salvation? I answer No. It is not a path to salvation (CDF, Notification on Fr. Jacques Dupuis S.J).

If I am asked: Jews and members of other religions need to enter the Catholic Church for salvation and there are no exceptions? I would answer yes. (Dominus Iesus 20 etc)

This is my Catholic Faith and I am not ashamed to say it.

 

If someone claims that I am anti-Semitic or threatens me with anti-Semitism laws I would respond that this is my Catholic Faith. This has been the teaching of the Catholic Church before and after Vatican Council II.

If they declare me an anti-Semite I would say that I am just following the teachings of the Church if someone creates a law which says this teaching is anti Semitism them so be it. I am just being a good Catholic.

Those who deny this teaching commit a mortal sin and if one dies with a mortal sin without going for Confession the soul is lost. In this case we have Catholics not affirming the Church teaching on other religions. They are denying the faith in public, on the internet.

 

Also to suggest that Lumen Gentium 16 refers to cases of invincible ignorance that we know of and so it is a de facto exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus is a denial of the dogma. . In other words it is also an exception to the Nicene Creed in which we pray: “I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sin”. LG 16 is an exception to the Creed?

I may not be a scholar with degrees in Scripture and theology like Robert Sungenis and Scott Hahn however I do know:

1. There is no particular case of the baptism of desire that we know of in the present time. Neither do we know of any case of a non Catholic saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16).

2. The dogma outside the church there is no salvation says every one needs to convert into the Church to avoid the pains of Hell.

3. There is no Church document which says invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire contradict the dogma. So it does not contradict Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14) which says all need to enter the Church with Catholic Faith and the baptism of water.

I could explain this to a young First Communicant who would understand these three points since he would not be conditioned by an education in a Pontifical University or seminary.

-Lionel Andrades

CAN EXISTING RELIGIOUS COMMUNITIES IN CALIFORNIA AFFIRM THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS AND ALSO ACCEPT IN PRINCIPLE THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE AND BEING SAVED IN INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE ?

Will a religious community which already has canonical status in California be accepted if they say:

1) They affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. http://catholicism.org/category/outside-the-church-there-is-no-salvation

2) They accept in principle that a person can be saved with the baptism of desire and in invincible ignorance and these cases would be known only to God.

For instance a Franciscan or Jesuit community could  affirm Vatican Council II, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire. Could this community also  accept vocations who have similar views?

Religious communities should be free to affirm the Catholic Faith.

-Lionel Andrades

CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF SAN BERNARDINO CALIFORNIA: WHY DOES THE CHURCH EXPECT PRIESTS, NUNS AND DEACONS TO ASSUME THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE IS AN EXCEPTION TO THE DOGMA OUTSIDE THE CHURCH NO SALVATION?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2012/01/catholic-diocese-of-san-bernardino.html

WHY DOES THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IN CALIFORNIA EXPECT FR.LEONARD FEENEY’S COMMUNITY TO ASSUME THAT THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE IS AN EXCEPTION TO THE DOGMA OUTSIDE THE CHURCH NO SALVATION?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2012/01/why-does-catholic-church-in-californnia.html

APPEAL TO THE ARCHBISHOP OF LOS ANGELES THE MOST REVEREND JOSE H.GOMEZ

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2012/01/appeal-to-archbishop-of-los-angeles.html

CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF SAN BERNARDINO CALIFORNIA: WHY DOES THE CHURCH EXPECT PRIESTS, NUNS AND DEACONS TO ASSUME THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE IS AN EXCEPTION TO THE DOGMA OUTSIDE THE CHURCH NO SALVATION?

Does Theresa D. Montminy, Chancellor, Diocese of San Bernardino  as a Catholic affirm the ‘rigorist interpretation’ of the dogma and also the possibility of persons being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire, since these cases are known only to God?

I have received an e-mail reply from the Catholic Diocese of San Bernardino, California. It’s in response to the post (1) which I sent to a quite a few people working in the diocese. Sister Elaine Ubelhor, OBL. OSB (2) has responded suggesting that my e-mail was not applicable to them but to the Archdiocese of Los Angeles.

I had already sent it to the Archdiocese of Los Angeles and have received no reply.

This is a general Catholic issue and applies also to the Diocese of San Bernardino in California.

The Deacons in San Bernardino know that there is no known case of a person saved with the baptism of desire or in invincible ignorance. Since we do not know any explicit case, Deacon Ed Clark, Director, Permanent Diaconate, San Bernardino,(3) could agree, that the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are not exceptions to the dogma.

For it to be an exception to the centuries old interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus it would have to be known to the deacons, priests and Sr. Elaine Ubelhor at San Bernardino.

Deacon F. Michael Jelley, Department Director and Vice Chancellor, Ecclesial Services in the diocese would know that neither does Vatican Council II state that we explicitly know these cases or that they are an exception to the dogma. The Church has not retracted this dogma defined three times.

Maria G. Covarrubias, Director, Catechetical Ministry Office, San Bernardino Catholic Church (5) could clarify if the Catechism of the Catholic Church refers to explicitly known baptism of desire and invincible ignorance.

Would Sr. Sarah Shrewsbury, Director of the Vocations Office in the diocese of San Bernardino (6) expect candidates with a religious vocation to say there are visible cases of baptism of desire and it is possible to know non Catholics in the present time saved in invincible ignorance or with a good conscience?

Does Theresa D. Montminy, Chancellor, Diocese of San Bernardino (7) as a Catholic affirm the ‘rigorist interpretation’ of the dogma and also the possibility of persons being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire, since these cases are known only to God?

Would a community of Fr. Leonard Feeney like the one in Los Angeles, who affirm the centuries old interpretation of the dogma, that of the saints and Church Fathers, and who also accept the baptism of desire in principle, be accepted in San Bernardino by Bishop Gerald R. Barnes?

-Lionel Andrades


1.


TUESDAY, JANUARY 24, 2012
WHY DOES THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IN CALIFORNIA EXPECT FR.LEONARD FEENEY’S COMMUNITY TO ASSUME THAT THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE IS AN EXCEPTION TO THE DOGMA OUTSIDE THE CHURCH NO SALVATION?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2012/01/why-does-catholic-church-in-californnia.html


2.


Dear Mr. Andrades,


Your email has reached the Diocese of San Bernardino which is a separate entity from the Archdiocese of Los Angeles. Please forward your email to the Archdiocese of Los Angeles at info@la-archdiocese.org.


Thank you!


Elaine Ubelhor, Obl.OSB
Administrative Assistant
Diocese of San Bernardino
Communications Department
Office of Information Services
Ph: 909-475-5415
Fax: 909-475-5357
eubelhor@sbdiocese.org


3.


Deacon Ed Clark, Director
e-mail: eclark@sbdiocese.org
909-475-5162 909-475-5162


4.


Deacon F. Michael Jelley, Department Director
e-mail: mjelley@sbdiocese.org
(909) 475-5119 (909) 475-5119


5.


Maria G. Covarrubias, Director
(909) 475-5452 (909) 475-5452
Cell Phone: (909) 266-6185 (909) 266-6185
e-mail: mcovarrubias@sbdiocese.org


6.
Sr. Sarah Shrewsbury, Director
sshrewsbury@sbdiocese.org
(909) 783-1305 (909) 783-1305


7.


Theresa D. Montminy, Chancellor
email: officeofthechancellor@sbdiocese.org
909-475-5100 909-475-5100

WHY DOES THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IN CALIFORNIA EXPECT FR.LEONARD FEENEY’S COMMUNITY TO ASSUME THAT THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE IS AN EXCEPTION TO THE DOGMA OUTSIDE THE CHURCH NO SALVATION?

Can the Deacons in Los Angeles affirm the dogma like Fr.Leonard Feeney and also maintain that there is no case of the baptism of desire that we know of and, the baptism of desire is not an exception to the dogma ?

There is no known case known to us of a person saved with the baptism of desire or in invincible ignorance. So since we do not know any such explicit case how can they be exceptions to the dogma outside the church no salvation.

For it to be an exception to the centuries-old interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus we would personally have to know these ‘exceptions’ on earth.

Vatican Council II does not state that we know these cases of persons saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) and the baptism of desire. Neither does Vatican Council II or the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 state that these cases are exceptions to the dogma Cantate Domino, Council of Florence etc.

The Catholic Church has not retracted this thrice defined dogma which says all need to convert into the Catholic Church to avoid Hell. It does not mention invincible ignorance or the baptism of desire as exceptions.

It’s the Jewish Left owned media which assumes that those saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire are known-exceptions which contradict the dogma. The media also supported the Archbishop of Boston, Cardinal Richard Cushing’s new theory, of those saved with the baptism of desire and in invincible ignorance being exceptions to the dogma. So he assumed that there was salvation outside the Catholic Church. Catholics just took all this for granted without really thinking on this issue: how could cases we do not know be known exceptions to the dogma? How could the Church suddenly change its teachings? How could the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 contradict itself affirming the dogma and also the possibility of being saved with the baptism of desire ? How could Vatican Council II say all need Catholic Faith and the baptism of water for salvation( AG 7) and also there can be non Catholics saved in invincible ignorance (LG 16) ?

Jewish Left Rabbis, supported by Jewish political and economic power, have been telling Catholic bishops in California to end Church mission to the Jews. The bishops have publicly agreed with them. Their media still causes confusion on this issue and Catholics assume that it is the teaching of the Church. The bishops do not issue a clarification so as not to offend important people. Catholics are left in confusion.

Why cannot one of the religious communities in California, USA who have received canonical status, unlike Fr. Leonard Feeney’s community, affirm the ‘rigorist interpretation’ of the dogma and also accept the possibility of people being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire,since these cases are known only to God ?

Why cannot the religious order priests and nuns also affirm the dogma as it was interpreted for centuries and also affirm the possibility of non Catholics being saved in invincible ignorance, the seeds of the Word (Vatican Council II), a good conscience, in partial communion with the Church etc ?

Can the Deacons in Los Angeles affirm the dogma like Fr.Leonard Feeney and also maintain that there is no case of the baptism of desire that we know of ? Can the Deacons say the baptism of desire is not an exception to the dogma ?

Does a candidate with a religious vocation to the Archdiocese of Los Angeles have to beleive that the baptism of desire is visible to us and so an exception to the dogma ? Is this a vocational requirement ?
-Lionel Andrades

Saturday, January 21, 2012

APPEAL TO THE ARCHBISHOP OF LOS ANGELES THE MOST REVEREND JOSE H.GOMEZ
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2012/01/appeal-to-archbishop-of-los-angeles.html