ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH ( SOLAMENTE LA CHIESA CATTOLICA
POPE FRANCIS OBSOLETE
The interpretation of Vatican Council II by Pope Francis is obsolete and Catholics are not obliged to follow it. He needs to interpret the Council rationally for it to be magisterial. Instead he interprets invisible cases of LG 8,14,1,5,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being visible examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church in the present times ( 1965-2024) and so for him they are objective exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors and the Catechism of Pope Pius X. They contradict the past exclusivist ecclesiology which is obsolete for him. Seminarians and priests are being cancelled who do not interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16 etc irrationally like him.
Seminarians and priests should be
allowed to interpret invisible cases of LG 8 etc as being just invisible. So
Vatican Council II, in LG 8 etc, does not contradict Tradition.
Bishops and priests will be ‘cancelled’ even if they accept Vatican Council II and interpret it rationally. So Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider do not interpret Vatican Council II rationally.
None of them are giving an interview to Steve Bannon with Vatican Council II interpreted rationally.No one is telling Steve Bannon and Donald Trump that Vatican Council II is conservative. Instead the North American College, the U.S seminary in Rome, the Paulist Fathers at St. Patrick’s church in Rome, the church for the American community, interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.They are as obsolete as Pope Francis and the Society of St. Pius X.
BEDA PONTIFICAL SEMINARY, ROME
For me LG 8, 14, 1, 5, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, refer to physically invisible cases in 2024. This is not my personal theology or theory but common sense. Even non Christians agree with me. I am simply pointing out an objective error being made in the Catholic Church, a common mistake.
But the result is that I am not being allowed to continue my studies in
philosophy and theology in Rome. Neither am I allowed to enter a seminary for
late vocations like the Beda Pontifical College in Rome, under the bishops of
England and Wales. At this seminary, every seminarian has to interpret Vatican
Council II irrationally. The faculty and students have to interpret invisible
cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, as
being visible exceptions for EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council
(1215) of Pope Honorius III who approved the Dominican Order.
DOMINICAN MASTER GENERAL IRRATIONAL
Today the Dominican Master General interprets not only
Vatican Council II irrationally, but also the Creeds, old Councils and all the
Catechisms. For example, the Catechism of the Catholic Church (847-848 on
invincible ignorance) would contradict CCC 845-846, for them. But not for me.
Since CCC 847-848 refer to invisible and hypothetical cases only for me.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church (1257. The
Necessity of Baptism) which says God is not limited to the Sacraments , would
contradict itself (1257).Since it also states that the Catholic Church knows of
no means to eternal salvation other then the baptism of water. There is no
contradiction for me. Since only God can know who will be saved without the
baptism of water. We do not know any such exception for the dogma EENS.
In the Catechism of Pope Pius X 29 Q (invincible
ignorance) would be an exception for 24Q, 27 Q (outside the Church no
salvation/other religions are not paths to salvation). Since 29 Q refers to
invisible cases, it does not contradict 2Q and 27 Q for me.
CDF ASKS ST.BENEDICT CENTER, NH TO BE IRRATIONAL
But the religious community the Slaves of the
Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire were asked
officially and in public, to interpret CCC 847-848 as a break with CCC 845-846
and the dogma EENS. They refused to do so. They interpret Vatican Council II
and the Catechism of the Catholic Church rationally and honestly. They accept
Pope Francis as the pope. Yet they have been accused of being ‘a sect’ by a
section of the Left.Fr.Georges de Laire, Judicial Vicar of the Diocese of
Manchester in NH interprets Vatican Council II and EENS (baptism of desire and
being saved in invincible ignorance) irrationally and dishonestly. His
interpretation is heretical, non traditional and schismatic and yet he is not
being accused of being in ‘a sect’ with Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of
Manchester, USA.
ST.BENEDICT CENTER ACCEPTS CHURCH DOCUMENTS INTERPRETED RATIONALLY
At the St. Benedict Center, the religious community
the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary accepts all Church Documents which
they interpret only rationally. Bishop Peter Libasci, like Cardinal Sean O ‘Malley,
the Archbishop of Boston, also accept all Magisterial Documents but interpret
them only irrationally.
Catholics in Boston and Manchester have to follow them
legally with this irrational interpretation otherwise a leftist Decree of
Prohibitions will be issued, against each of them, approved by the Vatican and the Left.
Canonists and Catholics at large could in future
demand that Cardinal Sean O’Malley, Bishop Peter Libasci and Bishop Robert
McManus (bishop of Worcester, New England, and USA) be honest and coherent.
Presently Cardinal Sean O ‘Malley, Bishop Robert McManus and Bishop Peter Libasci’s interpretation of Vatican Council II, EENS, the Creeds and Catechisms is as dishonest as Simcha and Damien Fisher in New Hampshire. They are not only denying the dogma EENS and rejecting the Athanasius Creed (all need to be Catholic for salvation) but are re-interpreting the Nicene Creed.
The Creed for them is ‘I believe in three or more known baptisms ; physically
visible baptisms, for the forgiveness of sin and it excludes the baptism of water.
They are visible baptisms, of desire, blood, being saved in invincible
ignorance, being saved in imperfect communion with the Church (UR 3), being
saved outside the visible boundaries of the Catholic Church where the Church subsists and which are known to us (LG 8) etc.
The Nicene Creed, it may be mentioned, is recited at
the Novus Ordo Mass and also Holy Mass in other rites.
Pope Francis is not telling Wikipedia, the Jewish Anti
Defamation League (ADL) and Cardinal Sean O ‘Malley that the 60-plus years
interpretation of Vatican Council II is now obsolete. The interpretation of
Vatican Council II by Alberto Melloni of the Bologna School (FSCIRE) which Pope
Francis supports and that of Ursula Von der Leyer of the European Commission,
is not Catholic. Catholics are now interpreting the Council differently.
Canon Lawyers must start ‘ticking off’ bishops,
who legally, do not interpret Vatican Council II,
honestly.-Lionel Andrades
Posts
