A Decree of Prohibitions
has been issued against Brother Andre Marie micm and the Slaves of the
Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, USA for not
interpreting Lumen Gentium 16 (saved in invincible ignorance) and Lumen Gentium
14 (the baptism of desire) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church 847-848 (invincible
ignorance etc), irrationally to create a rupture with Feeneyite extra
ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).
The Dicastery for the
Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican and the Diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire, however
interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, and CCC 847-848 as referring
to physically visible examples of salvation outside the Church in 1949-2024. So
exceptions are created for Feeneyite EENS. The Athanasius Creed and the
Syllabus of Errors (ecumenism of return etc) are also made obsolete.
For Brother Andre Marie
micm,Prior of this religious community, LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, refer to physically invisible
cases, unknown cases in 2024. This is common sense. He is honest. He is not
unethical like the diocese in New Hampshire and Cardinal Fernandez at the
Vatican.
Meredith Cook Esq.,
chancellor of the Diocese of New Hampshire, only approves priests in the
diocese who interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, dishonestly. She
and the priests have to confuse what is invisible as being visible. It is only
then that they are allowed to offer Holy Mass in the diocese.
Is this legal? Is this
ethical by secular standards in New Hampshire? Is this acceptable for a Chancellor?
Father Matthew Mason is
the director of vocations in this diocese. He only accepts candidates for the
religious life, who cheat on Vatican Council II. This is official. There never
was a denial from the diocese over the last few years. They have to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally to produce the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.
The Rev. George de Laire, is the Judicial Vicar at the Tribunal of the diocese, and is also unethical on Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. For him invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are visible exceptions for EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215). He has sued Church Militant TV in New Hampshire for suggesting that he has been unethical. If he interpreted Vatican Council II rationally then he would be holding the same theological position on EENS, as Brother Andre Marie and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary in NH. He is still not asking all the religious communities in NH to interpret Vatican Council II, ethically.
Would a secular judge consider the diocese ethical?
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
