Salvini-Meloni-Berlusconi political meeting : the faith does not have a unity for them.When the political parties return to EENS with no exceptions , they have the support of the Catholic faith, in unity.Then the faith has a unity.

According to the headlines in the daily Avvenire , available in the churches, there were 200,000 people at the St. John Lateran pizza in Rome last Saturday, for the Salvini-Meloni-Berlusconi  political meeting.

Of course, no one called for a return to the Catholic faith with Feeneyite theology, without the past Cushingite theology of the liberals and traditionalists.No one called on Catholics to accept Vatican Council II and interpret it in harmony with the past exclusivist ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.So the faith does not have a unity for them. There is division. There is the irrational faith of the ecclesiastics at the Vatican.Then there is the faith of magisterial documents interpreted rationally to produce a traditional conclusion.







So they could not speak about the importance of the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation.

Salvini attends the Traditional Latin Mass on Sundays a few times a year, where the theology is Cushingite and a break with Mass of St. Robert Bellarmine, St. Ignatius of Loyola and St.Francis Xavier.I do not know about the other two Italian politicians.

We know that when Silvio Berlusconi was young he was taught that there was no salvation outside the Church.The Redemptoris Fathers at that time only knew the Feeneyite theology.Cushingism would come into the Church later.

The sedevacantists and SSPX in Italy are Cushingite.So there are exceptions, for them,to EENS and an ecumenism of return.

There are exceptions for them to John 3:5, Mark 16:16 etc.Even though the Bible does not mention any exceptions.

There are exceptions for them to the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed.It is the same for the liberals. If there is one exception there are many.So there can be ' a reasonable hope that most men are saved'  says the American bishop in charge of evangelisation for the USCCB.

How can Berlusconi go back to EENS as he was taught  by the Redemptoris Fathers in school?

How? By simply knowing that there are no exceptions to EENS in real life. None - for us human beings.

Then when the political parties return to EENS with no exceptions , they have the support of the Catholic faith, in unity.The faith has a unity.

-Lionel Andrades




AUGUST 17, 2017
Bishops Fellay, Schneider are not proclaiming the Social Reign of Christ the King supported by Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite)
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/bishops-fellay-schneider-are-not.html
AUGUST 16, 2017
Bishop Athanasius Schneider does not proclaim the Catholic Faith honestly in Kazhkistan http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/08/bishop-athanasius-schneider-does-not.html

JULY 17, 2017
Catholic political parties must teach Catholics the faith which is not being taught by religious due to political pressure
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/catholic-political-parties-must-teach.html
 MAY 3, 2017
Andrzej Duda President of Poland does not note the split between Church doctrine and State in Poland because of Cushingism   http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/05/andrzej-dudathe-president-of-poland.html

 OCTOBER 30, 2016

With Feeneyite Vatican Council II the Catholic Church affirms the Social Reign of Christ the King.  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/10/with-feeneyite-vatican-council-ii.html
NOVEMBER 25, 2014
The Council’s words are strong and forthright here, implicitly asserting the sovereignty of Christ over all nations, but we now seldom hear them quoted http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/11/the-councils-words-are-strong-and.html 

VATICAN COUNCIL II AFFIRMS THE SOCIAL KINGSHIP OF CHRIST THE KING AND THE NON SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/09/vatican-council-ii-affirms-social.html

Entrando in comunità non si scappa dalla vita ma la si affronta in modo ...

The Cushingite theology of Rahner and Ratzinger taught at pontifical universities and at SSPX and sedevacantist institutions support the Left. It creates a break with Catholic Tradition and becomes part of the agenda for a one world fake religion, approved by Satan.

The Cushingite theology of Rahner and Ratzinger taught at pontifical universities and at SSPX and sedevacantist institutions support the Left. It creates a break with Catholic Tradition and becomes part of the agenda for a one world fake religion, approved by Satan.

The philosophy and theology of Rahner-Ratzinger-Lefebvre  is Cushingite and anti-Catholic. They use a false premise to change traditional theology.

So the average Catholic today has to heretically interpret the Creeds and Catechisms and Vatican Council II.The ADL and SPLC  will oppose Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) and the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation.But they will allow the pontifical universities and seminaries and  those of the SSPX and the sedevacantists to flourish.

This could be a reason why, when I ask Bishop Pivaranus and Bishop Donald Sanborn, sedevacantists in the USA, if they know of any one saved in particular with BOD, BOB and I.I or LG etc, they do not answer. Since possibly they do not want to be targeted by the Left for traditional Catholic theology.

Now they do not have a problem.Since they announce that for them BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8 etc are exceptions to EENS and the old ecclesiology and they reject Vatican Council II ( Cushingite). They do not state that they support Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite.-Lionel Andrades

I hope Steve Bannon has not read Joseph Clifford Fenton, Archbishop Lefebvre, Michael Davies, Robert dei Mattei, Chris Ferrara and John Vennari and also Joseph Ratzinger and Cardinal Kasper.This is asking too much. But there is a mistake in the writings of these traditionalists and liberals.They support the Leftist ideology and prevent the Church from going back to Tradition. It is still possible to go back to Tradition and have a unity in our faith with one small move. Bannon and Harnwell have to interpret Vatican Council II as not being an exception to Tradition.

I hope Steve Bannon has not read Joseph Clifford Fenton, Archbishop Lefebvre, Michael Davies, Robert dei Mattei, Chris Ferrara and John Vennari and also Joseph Ratzinger and Cardinal Kasper.This is asking too much. But there is a mistake in the writings of these traditionalists and liberals.They support the Leftist ideology and prevent the Church from going back to Tradition. It is still possible to go back to Tradition and have a unity in our faith with one small move.Bannon and Harnwell  have to interpret Vatican Council II as not being an exception to Tradition.

I have read their writings, encrustations on the faith, and if Bannon too has done the same, I would suggest he put it out of his mind and look at the issue anew.Otherwise he will not be able to understand what I say.

The primary mistake all of them have made is to see 'what is not there' as 'being there', to picture the 'invisible' as being' visible'. Once this error is corrected we are back to the 16th century Magisterium and missionaries.We have taken the ecclesiology back in one simple move.

 

 There is no need of organizing educational projects as was planned by Bannon and  Benjamin Harnwell and were blocked by the Left.

Only one simple theoretical action is needed and things will right itself. It's like watering the roots of a tree.One simple action and all areas of the tree(leaves, branches) are nourished.

That one simple action is recognizing that BOD, BOB and I.I 1 in the Fr. Leonard Feeney case and LG 8,LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc  2  in Vatican Council II always refer to hypothetical cases, invisible people, non existing exceptions to the past exclusive ecclesiology  with an exclusive salvation theology.There is no known salvation outside the Church. We cannot physically meet or see someone saved outside the Catholic Church. We cannot see exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) or EENS according to St.Robert Bellarmine, St. Ignatius of Loyola and St.Francis Xavier.

So with one simple move-correcting the way we look at  things- Bannon's Dignitatis Institute can take the Church back to its old theology and salvation-doctrines.-Lionel Andrades


1
 BOD( unknown cases of a non Catholic saved outside the Church without the baptism of water but with an alleged baptism of desire) , BOB( the unknown case of a person saved as a Catholic martry but without the baptism of water),  I.I ( the personally unknown case of a non Catholic saved outside the Catholic Church without faith and baptism).

 2
 LG 8( the personally unknown case of a non Catholic saved without faith and baptism and instead of elements of sanctification and truth in other religions) , LG 14( the personally unknown case of a non Catholic saved with the desire for the baptism of water, before death, which he or she did not receive and still was saved), LG 16 ( the personally unknown case of a non Catholic saved in invincible ignorance), UR 3 ( the physically invisible case of a Christian saved outside the Catholic Church), NA 2 ( the specifically unknown case of a non Christian or Catholic saved outside the Church with good and holy things in other religions) , GS 22 ( the case of a person whose name and surname is not known who has hypothetically been saved outside the Catholic Church with good will ).

Medjugorje ci ha cambiati, ci ha fatto sentire accolti da Dio

Agnostic psychologist converted at Medugorje

The Sixth Day

October 21, 2019 by sd

---

It’s an astonishing story. It involves an agnostic psychologist who went to a remote village in what was then Communist Yugoslavia — the Hercegovinan sector — to evaluate what on earth was transpiring with six children there who claimed that five days before, on June 24, 1981, they had begun seeing the Virgin Mary. 

She was certain, was Dr. Darinka Glamuzina, a pediatrician with psychiatric training, that it was a psychological circumstance — if not a simple game orchestrated by the youngsters who each day were falling to their knees on a stony hillside in perfect synchronization, their eyes fixed on an invisible something (or as they insisted, someone).

And so it was, that Monday, June 30, in Bijakovići — a village in the parish of Medjugorje — that Dr. Glamuzina, working in nearby Citluk, arrived, at the behest of Communist authorities, to evaluate what was transpiring — alerted initially to the circumstance by an ambulance driver who worked at her clinic and had driven the children there.

“I had a Catholic education when I was very young, but then I went to school and was on the faculty of a college in Zagreb and thought I knew everything because I read so many books,” she told Spirit Daily. “I was twenty-five at the time. I had education in psychology at that time and I was agnostic. Very skeptical.

“When I heard about it, it was very funny to me and I did not believe. I knew it was a primitive territory, Medjugorje, and I thought it was some sort of mass hysteria because they were primitive.”

The children had been brought to the clinic for evaluation by another medical professional, Dr. Ante Vujevic, who would later announce that he could no longer call himself a nonbeliever.

But at this point, skepticism — if not outright rejection of such a claim — still ruled the thoughts of Dr. Glamuzina, however.

“I got very excited,” she says. “The manager of the clinic said to me to go with them the next day to Medjugorje as a medical worker, that as medical workers they should be in Medjugorje to observe what was going on. I agreed and went to Medjugorje.

“My desire was to question them. I remember everything clearly because of the emotions I had at that time. I questioned them on how old they were, what grade of education they were in, what sort of students they were. 

“I asked about the apparitions of Our Lady and the answers they gave me were so clear and intelligible (though some of them were below-average students). I was impressed with the shortness of their answers and the speed at which they were giving the answers. And that they were so convinced. It was unbelievable, how convinced they were. I was very impressed. I found out that what they knew they really knew. The youngest, Jakov Colo [at the time just ten] said, “You may kill me, but I do see her.”

Indeed, soon they would be detained by Communist police and interrogated — never backing down despite the stated threat of jail.

Though raised Catholics, and though in a devout part of Yugoslavia (culturally Croatian), the children, under the informational blackout of Communism, had not even heard of places such as Lourdes and Fatima. They knew only that they were seeing the Blessed Virgin spoken about by their elders when they recited a Rosary. 

“Everything about it was unbelievable,” says the pediatrician.

“Thousands of people were on the streets. The manager knew [seer] Vicka’s family and so we went to her house. There were many people, and all of them were praying the Rosary. That was unbelievable to me, the atmosphere. The place was packed with energy. I did not want to stick out from the crowd so I asked for a rosary even though I did not know how to pray it.

“In one moment, Vicka said, ‘Let’s go,’ and she started going up the hill and I don’t know how we climbed the apparition hill. The crowd was going up and all of a sudden the other visionaries were there — they just showed up — and formed a line, all six of them.

“I was next to Vicka. I wanted to use my position next to her for my medical evaluation. I was convinced that maybe it was some kind of manipulation or hypnosis — somebody using them, and I would be able to see that.

“Another surprise for me was that they were praying for a long time, and at the same moment, all six said — at the very same moment! — ‘There she comes.’ I was watching them and all six said it at the same time and I saw that all six of them were looking at the same spot at the same time. They were talking and sharing with us what the image was telling them.

“And all of a sudden I got the idea to interfere with the happening. I asked Vicka, ‘May I ask that vision a question?’ And this was very interesting to me — how Vicka said, ‘I am going to ask Our Lady.’ So I realized there was a dialogue. I heard Vicka say, ‘Our Lady, can she ask you something.’ And she waited for answer and said, ‘Yes, you can.’

The dialogue as recorded by a priest there: “Dear Madonna! Could this lady [Dr. Glamuzina] touch you?”

The Virgin reportedly replied, “There have always been unfaithful Judases. Let her come.”

Was that reported accurately — or did Mary say that there always had been Thomases.

“I was a little upset, disturbed,” says Dr. Glamuzina, who later testified before a Vatican Commission which authenticated the first week of apparitions — in all, at least seven, meaning one more than the official apparitions at Fatima. (In both cases, more apparitions occurred after the initial ones.) “I was thinking in a medical way. Vicka said to the vision, ‘This lady is asking who you are’ and then Vicka [quoting Mary] replied, ‘She said she is Queen of Peace.’ 

“How can we have peace when we have so many religions, I asked? I saw Vicka’s lips move and she told me, ‘Our Lady said, there is only one Faith, One God, and One Spirit.’ I was shaken by the answer, because I knew this wasn’t a child’s answer and I saw that there was a dialogue going on.

“This was such a rural area. I asked ‘Why here? Why not at Notre Dame in Paris? Why here in the middle of nowhere?’ I saw Vicka asking that question, and the answer [from Our Lady] was, ‘Because the Faith is firm here.’ I knew it was true because I never saw people pray so much. I knew the answer was true, that it was right.

“I got the answer but also thought I should have an experience, so I said to Vicka, ‘May I touch her?’ and Vicka asked Our Lady and the answer came back, ‘Yes, you can.’ So Vicka was indicating to me where to kneel down, and I knelt down and I raised my hand and my personality split. All of a sudden I knew that what I touched was God. I felt the presence with my entire being. I knew. I knew that I was not worthy of what I touched.” Witnesses said Dr. Glamuzina looked, on her descent from the hill, like she was in a state of shock.

Why did the apparition occur, and why has she now been there so long? 

“Because we are completely illiterate spiritually,” says the doctor, whose husband’s specialty is chemistry. “The world is in a spiritual crisis. She comes as a teacher and a healer.”

According to a report by a BBC reporter, the pediatrician, guided by Vicka, touched the Blessed Mother on her left shoulder “and later publicly admitted that she felt a violent tremor along the whole length of her arm. When she eventually stumbled down the hill, she was in a state of shock.”

Dr. Glamuzina mentioned no such feeling to Spirit Daily but rather an overwhelming feeling in the depths of her agnostic soul. “I knew it was something beyond our comprehension,” she says.

When, after the apparition, she spoke with a second seer, Mirjana Soldo, with whom she walked down the hill, this second seer quoted Mary as saying precisely what Vicka had related. “I asked Mirjana the same questions I asked Our Lady and she gave the same answers,” says Dr. Glamuzina. “I questioned them individually and they all heard the same words. I knew that they saw her.”

“I was so shaken that I was crying all night long, holding the rosary, and asking Our Lady to forgive me. I knew God really exists and I realized I knew nothing about Him.”

 https://spiritdailyblog.com/apparitions/the-sixth-day

Adorazione Eucaristica - Medjugorje 19 ottobre 2019