Tuesday, September 7, 2021
Vatican Council II supports Fr. John Courtney Murray sj when it is interpreted irrationally and Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton when it is interpreted rationally.Pope Paul VI chose the irrational version of the Council when had a choice
VATICAN COUNCIL II SUPPORTS FR.JOHN COURTNEY MURRAY SJ WHEN IT IS INTERPRETED IRRATIONALLY AND MONS. JOSEPH CLIFFORD FENTON WHEN IT IS INTERPRETED RATIONALLY. POPE PAUL VI CHOSE THE IRRATIONAL VERSION OF THE COUNCIL WHEN HE HAD A CHOICE.
Vatican Council II supports Fr. John Courtney Murray sj when it is interpreted irrationally and Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton when it is interpreted rationally.Pope Paul VI chose the irrational version of the Council when he had a choice.The popes and the SSPX choose the irrational version too today, like the liberals and conservative Catholics.
When the Council is interpreted with the rational premise, the Church will once again be conservative.It will support Le Pen and Salvini and not Macron and Matterella.
With the past exclusivist ecclesiology supported by Ad Gentes 7 ( all need faith and baptism for salvation.All.) and LG 14 etc not being an exception to Ad Gentes 7, there is no block in the Council to oppose the proclaiming of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all political legislation.This is the rational approach i.e hypothetical cases of LG 14 etc, remain hypothetical only.
MATTEI, KWASNIEWSKI
Roberto dei Mattei and Peter Kwasniewski may
affirm the Social Reign of Chrst the King but they negate it with their
irrational interpreation of Vatican Council II. The St.Benedict Centers too
support the past ecclesiocentrism but negate it like the liberals, when they do
not choose to interpret Vatican Council II rationally. LG 14 etc have to refer
to visible cases for them to be exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors. And if
there is salvation outside the Church, if there are exceptions for EENS, then
why proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King ?
This is important to remember during elections.All
Catholics, should only vote for political candidates who affirm the Social
Reign of Christ the King in all politics, and interpret Vatican Council II
rationally, unlike Mattei and the others.
When Vatican Council II is interpreted with the
rational premise there is no separation between the traditional Church and
conservative political parties and politicians.Le Pen and Salvini would not
have the Church agaist them.
With the rational interpretation of Vatican
Council II the Church would be saying that the migrants need faith and baptism
for salvation.They would have to accept Jesus in the Catholic Church, and live
the faith and moral teachings, and avail of the Sacraments, to avoid Hell.
GOD AT THE CENTRE OF POLITICS
God would be at the centre of political activity
and legislation ( pro –life, Ten Commandments, virtues of modesty and chastity
in public etc) and not Satan ( abortion, contraception, pornography, immodesty
in public, homosexual unions etc).
ARCHBISHOP VIGANO IS ON THE WRONG SIDE ON VATICAN COUNCIL II
Arcbishop Carlo Maria Vigano and the Lefebvrist
group support Satan and the Masons when they interpret Vatican Council II with
the irrational and not rational premise.The fruits are bad. It’s the same with
John Henry Weston, Marco Tosatti, Joseph Shaw and others. They could choose the
rational interpretation of Vatican Council II and be politically incorrect with
the Left.
ROME MAYOR ELECTION
The laity, like the FSSP and SSPX, do not interpret the Council rationally.So theologically, they support the Left, knowingly or unknowingly.
Le Pen and Salvini in ignorance allow Pope Francis to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and they keep silent on this politico-religious issue.It’s the same with Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke. There are no protests.
Even in France the bloggers at Riposte Catholique, Salon Beige,Met etc, do not ask the French Bishops Conference and Bishop Roland Mitterand in Dijon, to accept and interpret Vatican Council II rationally.This is a political and religious issue in the Catholic Church.
The traditionelle and militante in France must accept a rational interpretation of Vatican Council II.Since the liberals in France need a theology on which to peg their liberalism.They need the false premise and the traditionelle must not permit them to have it in silence. It was the same for Fr. John Courtney Murray sj and today for Pope Francis.The theology had to be created and the only way it was done was by using a false premise.Without the false premise,which creates the New Theology, there is no liberalism.This was not known to Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton and Fr. John Courtney Murray sj in their sparring over the issue of Religious Liberty.
We have a new discovery after some 50 years. We now know that there are two interpretations of the Council and John Courtney Murray has been made obsolete.-Lionel Andrades
Lionel Andrades
Promoter of the Lionel Andrades interpretation of
Vatican Council II.For him the Council is dogmatic and not only pastoral.
Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations
of Vatican Council II, one is rational and the other is irrational, one is
interpreted with the false premise and the other without it. One is Magisterial
and the other, the common one, is non Magisterial.
It is the same for the Creeds and Catechisms.
There can be two interpretations.
Why should Catholics choose an irrational version
which is heretical, non traditional and schismatic, when a rational option is
there which is traditional ?
Blog: Eucharist and Mission (eucharistandmission )
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com