Monday, October 30, 2017

Double- speak continues with Ecclesia Dei and the CDF : Vatican Council II is not the real issue for the SSPX reconciliation

Ecclesia Dei and I interpret Vatican Council II and all magisterial documents differently. What if I was an SSPX bishop for example, or what if an SSPX bishop interpreted the Council as I do, would it be acceptable for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
No.It would not be acceptable. Otherwise they would have informed me about it a long time back.
The issue was never Vatican Council II. The issue was always ideology.The SSPX had to accept the leftist ideology in the interpretation of magisterial documents and only then they could be given canonical status.
For me Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. For Pope Benedict and Cardinal Ladaria it was always a rupture.
But they just couldn't create a rupture, there had to be a theological means.
So they accepted the false premise used in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston.This changed the traditional interpretation on EENS.
They then interpreted the hypothetical cases in Vatican Council II as referring to known and objective people saved outside the Church.So LG 16 because a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was interpreted over the centuries. It was no more like it was   for the missionaries in the 16th century Pope Benedict confirmed it last year for any one who still had doubts.
I however have found out their mistake. I am not going into sedevacantism and nor am I going to be a traditionalist who rejects the Council since he does not want to accept a breach with Tradition( Syllabus of Errors etc).
So now if there was an SSPX bishop or priest at the St. Benedict Center or an FSSP priest who announced that they accept Vatican Council II just as I do.....it will not be acceptable.
The SSPX could state that Pope Benedict said that the issue was doctrinal and so they are now affirming Vatican Council II and they have been given permission to offer  the Latin Mass with Summorum Pontificum.
No way.
It has to be Vatican Council II in which LG 16 refers to visible people saved outside the Church even if practically there are no such cases.
So the Nicene Creed to has to be changed.
EENS has already been changed in the 1949 Letter with invisible for us baptism of desire etc being a visible exception to the dogma EENS.
This is how Cardinal Raymond Burke ,Joseph Shaw and the signatories of the Filial Correction interpret Vatican Council II.
In the 2012 General Chapter Statement the SSPX affirmed EENS without the irrational premise, it was a Feeneyite version of EENS and Ecclesia Dei did not announce that they had accepted it.
So now we know that Vatican Council II is not the real issue for the SSPX to receive  canonical status.The SSPX has to interpret invincible ignorance (LG 16) etc  as referring to known cases,visible people saved without 'faith and baptism'. So then LG 16 is a break with the Feeneyite interpretation of EENS, it is a rupture with the magisterium of the 16th century.This is how they do it at the Bishops Conferences world wide.It is only then that Vatican Council II will be acceptable to Cardinal Ladaria and Archbishops Pozzo and Di Noia.There has to be a hermeneutic of rupture while they in public speak of a hermeneutic of continuity.
In March 2016 Pope Benedict announced that there was a hermeneutic of rupture with EENS (Avvenire) and it was caused by 'the development' in Vatican Council II and all along he has been speaking about a possible hermeneutic of continuity with Vatican Council II.
-Lionel Andrades 


Poland: The Pope’s Troubling Silence on the “Rosary on the Borders”

news-header-image
On October 9, 2017, on the Italian website Occidentale, Assuntina Morresi hailed the Polish Catholics’ immense participation in Rosary on the Borders on October 7, and denounced the deafening silence with which the major media outlets shrouded this event.
“The popular participation in the rosary that was recited on Saturday along the Polish border was enormous; in 320 churches spread over more than 4,000 prayer zones, over a million Catholics were actually present, while many others throughout the entire world, whose numbers it would be impossible to count, united themselves to the recitation of the rosary. Rosary on the Borders was the name given to this act accomplished on the day the Church celebrates Our Lady of the Rosary, formerly known as Our Lady of Victory, in commemoration of the Christian victory at the battle of Lepanto on October 7, 1571, when the Ottoman enemy was conquered and minarets were kept from dominating Europe.
The pope at the time, St. Pius V, was the heart of this Christian coalition that won in Lepanto, and it was he who proclaimed this feast.

A Prayer for Poland and Europe

“Yesterday’s act was supported by the Polish Bishops’ Conference, and it was meant as a prayer for the Polish nation – hence the prayer on the borders – and for Europe, that she might protect and preserve the Christian Faith, the only possible solution for peace. In this sense, in these our times that are bloodied by Islamic terrorism and characterized by secularism, when calls for peace are often sectarian instruments or vague irenic dreams, this was a true, great, and sincere prayer for peace: with the recitation of the rosary, their Christian roots were publicly manifested.
An enormous act, as can be seen from the many photographs circulating online: organized crowds, praying everywhere, on the seaside, in the countryside, inside and outside of churches. It is particularly striking to see this long human chain praying with such a long rosary, with large (human) beads. These pictures were taken by many Italians, who went to the borders yesterday to recite the rosary with the Polish faithful, and then reported everything on social media. The newspapers and news channels completely ignored the event: only Antonio Socci consecrated an article to the event in the Libero, along with Joanna Berendt and Megan Specia on the other side of the Atlantic, in the New York Times. Today, two days later, La Repubblica has finally mentioned the event in its own way, with inexact facts and a title that is an agenda in itself: ‘Mass Exorcism against Islamic Migrants’. Someone should explain to La Repubblica, a newspaper that is so eager to dialogue with the pope, that prayer is not an exorcism ritual.
Today, some news is mentioned only online. Television and the paper press seem to be hopelessly programmed to describe a world that does not exist, or rather they persist in representing only a part of reality, a part that is becoming less and less significant and less representative of the real world, except when they give in to despair when facts do not prove them right or sales drop inexorably.”

Is the Pope Aware?

On October 12, on his website Rossoporpora, the Vaticanist Giuseppe Rusconi lamented the fact that Pope Francis, “although he had several opportunities to do so, never mentioned the great Catholic manifestation. But how is this possible? … He publicly hails the least group of parishioners, students, seminarians… He salutes associations of all sorts (with particular attention for those committed to the environment, immigration, and peace in the world) … but not a word! Completely ignored.
“Was he unaware of the great Polish Rosary? Theoretically, it is possible… but it is very hard to believe that not one of his collaborators informed him. Does he not care about what happened in Poland? Or rather, does he pretend not to care about what happened in Poland?
….
Is Pope Francis aware that he has deeply wounded millions of Catholics, and not only Polish Catholics, with his ostentatious lack of interest for the great Polish Rosary? Does he know what bitterness, what pain this caused? Is he aware of the consequences this could have?”Sources: loccidentale/rossoporpora/FSSPX.News – 10/27/2017
http://fsspx.news/en/news-events/news/poland-pope%E2%80%99s-troubling-silence-%E2%80%9Crosary-borders%E2%80%9D-33080

Due papi devono chiedere a Francescani, Dominciani, Gesuiti, Benedettini, Carmelitani e altre organizzazioni religiose e movimenti laici di affermare il Concilio Vaticano II (senza premessa) e poi farlo

Image result for Photo Sant Francesco Saverio
I due papi devono chiedere ai Francescani, Domenicani, Gesuiti, e Carmelitani ad altre comunità religiose di affermare il Concilio Vaticano II (senza premessa) anche loro due bisogno farlo.
I due papi devono chiedere tutti i Cattolici a affermare il Concilio Vaticano II e altri documenti magisteriali senza la invisibile- persone- e- visibile- premessa.
Image result for Photo Sant Francesco SaverioImage result for Photo Sant Francesco Saverio
In questo modo sappiamo che i due papi stanno affermando razionalmente i documenti Cattolici e non li interpreta con una filosofia e una teologia irrazionali. Devono chiedere alle comunità religiose, ai movimenti laici e alle organizzazioni Cattoliche di annunciare, che tutti i non cattolici hanno bisogno formalmente convertirsi nella Chiesa Cattolica con 'fede e battesimo' (AG 7, LG 14) e non esistono eccezioni conosciute nei tempi attuali (2017).
 L'invisibile- per- noi LumenGentium 16, Lumen Gentium 8, Unitatitis Redintigratio 3, Nostra Aetate 2 ecc non può essere eccezioni.Questa è un'affermazione razionale del Concilio Vaticano II.È tradizionale e non eretica.
Image result for Photo San Francesco Saverio E rOMAImage result for Photo San Francesco Saverio E rOMA
In tempi presenti le comunità religiose, cardinali e vescovi e i laici in generale, rifiutano il Concilio Vaticano II(senza la premessa).Interpretandolo come una rottura con la Tradizione (extra ecclesiam nulla salus, Syllabo, ecumenismo di ritorno, Credo Atanasio ecc.) quando il Concilio ( senza-premessa) non è una rottura con passato.
Image result for Photo San Francesco Saverio E rOMAImage result for Photo San Francesco Saverio E cHIESA DI gESU
Pertanto i cattolici possono ancora essere invitati da Papa Francesco ad andare alle periferie e proclamare Gesù e la necessità di appartenere alla 'gerarchica Chiesa Cattolica' di Sant'Ignazio di Loyola. Tutti devono essere incorporati nella Chiesa Cattolica in come membri perchè fuori della Chiesa Cattolica non c'e salvezza conosciuta. Ogni uomo deve essere un Cattolico Romano per evitare i fuochi dell'inferno.
Le comunità religiose e laici Cattolici da soli, prendendo l'iniziativa, possono affermare il Concilio Vaticano II (senza premessa) in armonia con la precedente ecclesiologia esclusiva della Chiesa Cattolica. Ha una continuità con il Sillabo e un ecumenismo di ritorno.
Image result for Photo Sant Francesco Saverio
E eretica per Papa Francesco e Papa Benedetto per aspettarsi e di incoraggiare  cattolici interpretino il Concilio Vaticano II con Lumen Gentium 16 ecc,con casi ipotetici scambiati per non essere ipotetici,e poi supporre che questi  " visibili" non -cattolici siano salvati fuori della Chiesa, quando nessuno sa di tali persone.Nessuno sa di alcuna eccezione pratica al dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus nei tempi attuali.
Image result for Photo San Francesco Saverio E cHIESA DI gESUImage result for Photo Sant Francesco Saverio gOA bOM jESUS CATHEDRALImage result for Photo Sant Francesco Saverio gOA bOM jESUS CATHEDRAL
Con ipotetici casi interpretati come persone esplicite e conosciute salvate al di fuori della Chiesa, il Concilio Vaticano II indicherebbe erroneamente l'esistenza di eccezioni pratiche, agli insegnamenti di Gesù in Giov.3:5 (la necessità del battesimo d'acqua per la salvezza dall'inferno) e Mar.16:16 (coloro che non credono in Gesù, nell'unica Chiesa che ha fondato saranno condannati).Il Concilio Vaticano II indicerà.Il Concilio Vaticano II indicerà falso che ci sono eccezioni alla teologia passata della Chiesa.
-Lionel Andrades



OCTOBER 30, 2017

Image result for Photo of St.Francis Xavier


Two popes must ask Franciscans, Domincians, Jesuits, Benedictines, Carmelites and other religious organisations and lay movements to affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) and then do it themselves

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/two-popes-must-ask-franciscans.html

Image result for Photo Sant Francesco Saverio

Commémoration des 500 ans du protestantisme. Des catholiques protestent et perturbent la cérémonie




Scandaloso video dei giovani portati fuori dalla Cattedrale di Bruxelles: recitavano il Rosario durante la commemorazione della riforma protestante


http://blog.messainlatino.it/2017/10/scandaloso-video-dei-giovani-portati.html

Gospel Reading at Mass today : He laid his hands on her,and she at once stood up straight and glorified God.

Gospel Lk 13:10-17

Jesus was teaching in a synagogue on the sabbath.
And a woman was there who for eighteen years
had been crippled by a spirit;
she was bent over, completely incapable of standing erect.
When Jesus saw her, he called to her and said,
"Woman, you are set free of your infirmity."
He laid his hands on her,
and she at once stood up straight and glorified God.

But the leader of the synagogue,
indignant that Jesus had cured on the sabbath,
said to the crowd in reply,
"There are six days when work should be done.
Come on those days to be cured, not on the sabbath day."
The Lord said to him in reply, "Hypocrites!
Does not each one of you on the sabbath
untie his ox or his ass from the manger
and lead it out for watering?
This daughter of Abraham,
whom Satan has bound for eighteen years now,
ought she not to have been set free on the sabbath day
from this bondage?"

When he said this, all his adversaries were humiliated;
and the whole crowd rejoiced at all the splendid deeds done by him.

JESUS (English) Healing on Sabbath of Woman Crippled by Evil Spirit
https://youtu.be/_80Xpyqibr0

The Touch
https://youtu.be/yArWsPS1ZU8



Two popes must ask Franciscans, Domincians, Jesuits, Benedictines, Carmelites and other religious organisations and lay movements to affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) and then do it themselves

Image result for Photo of St.Francis Xavier
The two popes must ask the Franciscans, Dominicans, Jesuits, Carmelities and other religious communities to affirm Vatican Council II ( premise-free) and do it themselves.
The two popes need to ask the Franciscans, Benedictines and other religious communities, along with all lay movements, to interpret and affirm Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents without the invisible- people- are- visible- premise.
Image result for Photo of St.Francis Xavier
In this way we know that the two popes are affirming Catholic documents rationally and are not interpreting  them with an irrational philosophy and theology.They need to ask the religious communities, lay movements and all Catholic organizations,to announce that all non Catholics need to formally convert into the Catholic Church with faith and baptism (AG 7, LG 14)  and there are no known exceptions in the present times(2017).Invisible-for-us LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc cannot be exceptions.This is affirming Vatican Council II rationally. traditionally and non hermetically.Presently the religious communities, cardinals and bishops, and lay people in general are rejecting the Council by interpreting it as a rupture with Tradition(EENS, Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return, Athanasius Creed etc), when it is not really a rupture when Vatican Council II ( premise-free)is used.
Image result for Photo of St.Francis Xavier
So Catholics can still be asked by Pope Francis to go to the peripheries and proclaim Jesus and the necessity of membership in the hierarchical Catholic Church of St.Ignatius of Loyola.All need to be incorporated into the Catholic Church as members since outside the Church there is no known salvation.Every one needs to be a Roman Catholic to avoid the fires of Hell.
Religious communities and lay Catholics on their own can affirm Vatican Council II (premise-free) in harmony with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.It has a continuity with the Syllabus of Errors and an ecumenism of return.
Image result for Photo of St.Francis Xavier
Presently it is heretical for Pope Francis and Pope Benedict to expect Catholics to interpret Vatican Council II with LG 16 etc referring to non hypothetical cases, people allegedly saved outside the Church, when no one knows of any such person.Also with this irrationality, Vatican Council II becomes a rupture with the missionaries and magisterium of the 16th century, for example.
With hypothetical cases being interpreted as explicit and known people saved outside the Church, Vatican Council II
would wronly suggest that there are practical exceptions, to Jesus' teachings in John 3:5 ( the necessity of the baptism of water for salvation from Hell) and Mark 16:16( those who do not believe in Jesus,in the only Church he founded will be condemned).
-Lionel Andrades


 OCTOBER 29, 2017

The New Evangelisation of the two popes is based on the Letter of the Holy Office, lay movements must observe. It is flawed.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/the-new-evangelisation-of-two-popes-is.html
Image result for Photo of St.Francis Xavier





Image result for Photo of St.Francis Xavier