Thursday, August 30, 2012

CANON LAW 915


CANON LAW 915 ALSO APPLIES TO CARDINAL KURT KOCH


CANON 915 ALSO APPLIES TO CARDINAL RAYMOND BURKE

CANON LAW 915 ALSO APPLIES TO CARDINAL KURT KOCH

Will the SSPX accept Bishop Di Noia and the Curia's condition that non Catholics do not have to convert in the present time?
According to reports the SSPX has expelled Father Florian Abrahamowicz, for denying the Holocaust and being considered anti Semitic by the Jewish community. There are unconfirmed reports on the Cath.info forum that the Society has also expelled Fathers.Chazal, Pfieffer, Fox and others. They had videos on the internet which criticized Zionism and the Assisi Meeting supported by the Jewish Left.
To avoid litgation and political problems will the SSPX give up its  traditional teaching on other religions as the Vatican has done?
Cardinal Kurt Koch and Archbishop Augustine Di Noia have, probably also to avoid anti Semitism charges and other leftist laws, said that Jews do not have to convert in the present times.
It is known that the ADL on its website opposed the beatification of Pope John Paul II until the Vatican agreed to project him as a liberal pope; the pope who gave us Dominus Iesus and approved the Notification on Fr.Jacques Dupuis S.J.
Canon 915 should also apply to Cardinal Kurt Koch and Archbishop Di Noia for being in public manifest mortal sin.They have denied Vatican Council II (AG 7), the defined dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and other Magisterial texts.They have interpreted Vatican Council II as a break from Tradition and an exception to the dogma on salvation and to the Syllabus of Errors. Canon 915 will not be applied since they are following the pope's position on this issue.
For the SSPX to accept this condition for canonical status would be putting itself in public heresy.
The expulsion of the priests indicates that the SSPX could be under pressure  to change its position on traditional mission and adopt the Vatican line to avoid being targeted with litigation and demands for compensation.
Inspite of such pressure Bishop Richard Williamson has not flinched.It is to be seen how the SSPX responds on this issue.
Will the SSPX accept Bishop Di Noia and the Curia's condition that non Catholics do not have to convert in the present time?
-Lionel Andrades
 
 

CANON 915 ALSO APPLIES TO CARDINAL RAYMOND BURKE

Cardinal Raymond Burke, Prefect of the Supreme Tribunal, Vatican , the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate and the Fraternity Society of St.Peter (FSSP) are not affirming the dogma extra eclesiam nulla salus nor Vatican Council II (AG 7/) yet they offer the Traditional Latin Mass in the Extraordinary Form.Is there an impediment in the cardinal offering the Traditional Solemn Mass on September 22 ?

According to Rorate Caeli at 11:00 AM on Sept 22 the Traditional Solemn Mass will be celebrated by His Eminence the Most Reverend Raymond Leo Card. Burke, Prefect of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura, attending will be His Excellency the Most Reverend Mons. Simone Giusti, bishop of Leghorn. The liturgical service is assured by the Institute Christ the King Sovereign Priest  traditionalist community.


The Solemn Mass will be offered by a cardinal who is not proclaiming a defined dogma nor endorsing Vatican Council II (AG 7) in agreement with the dogma.He has also been silent while the media claims Lumen Gentium 16 is an exception to the literal interpretation of the dogma on salvation.


If he endorsed the dogma in public he would be saying that non Catholic religions are not paths to salvation (CDF,Dupuis 2001) and all their members need to convert into the Catholic Church to avoid Hell (Dominus Iesus 20, AG 7, CCC 845,846 etc).


Does he deny the defined dogma knowingly and then he offers the Pontifical Traditional Latin Mass?

According to Canon Law a religious in public mortal sin is not to offer Holy Mass unless he has received absolution in the Confessional and made public amends to rectify the scandal.Would the cardinal be in mortal sin if he is offering Mass knowing this error ?


Canon 915 also applies to Cardinal Raymond Burke, the FSSP and the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate.


In the Year of the Faith Vatican Council II must be discussed in harmony with the dogma on salvation and without the Cushing Error of being able to see the dead, saved in invincible ignorance etc, who are supposed to be exceptions to the literal interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

In the Year of the Faith the Prefect of the Supreme Tribunal could ask Cardinal Sean O Malley two questions(1) , (which he refuses to answer) and also answer them himself.Cardinal  Sean O Malley, the Archbishop of Boston gives the Eucharist  to pro abortion politicians and the pope will not apply Canon 915 to him. The Boston Archbishop will also not affirm the dogma or Vatican Council II (AG 7).Neither will he do justice to the Fr.Leonard Feeney case of Boston. The priest is still condemned for rejecting the baptism of desire, among people who are ghosts,allegedly alive, and who are 'known' exceptions to the interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney.


A few years back I went to Cardinal Burke's office in Rome  and left some reports for him to read. I also faxed his office later.There was no response.Neither has there been any response to posts on this blog which refer to him.

The cardinal has welcomed the SSPX reconciliation. Why has the Society of St.Pius X ( SSPX ) to believe that  Vatican Council II contradicts the dogma on salvation,  when it does not ? We do not know any exception to the dogma in 2012 or the last 100 or more years.

The cardinal has reportedly said that the LCWR sisters should reform or be suppressed. If Bishop Blair is not willing to answer the two questions and affirm the dogma how can he expect  the LCWR Sisters  not to go into reincarnation and  New Age.Do I have to appeal to the LCWR  to ask the cardinals the two questions?


The issue still is: is their an impediment in the Traditional Latin Mass ?
There is no response from Ecclesia Dei or the Una Voce Federation.
-Lionel Andrades
 
1.
1) Do we personally know the dead saved in invincible ignorance, a good conscience (LG 16) etc ?

2) Since we do not know any of these cases, there are no known exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ?


IMPEDIMENT IN THE TRADITIONAL LATIN MASS?

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/08/impediment-in-traditional-latin-mass.html#links

When they interpret Vatican Council II according to Cushingism and not Fr. Leonard Feeney it has its influence on the liturgy
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/08/when-they-interpret-vatican-council-ii.html
 
NUMBER OF PRIESTS NOT ANSWERING THE TWO QUESTIONS INCREASES
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/07/number-of-priests-not-answering-two.html#links
 
NO PRESS STATEMENT AND ANNOUNCEMENT YET FROM BOSTON ARCHDIOCESE ON AGREEMENT WITH FR.LEONARD FEENEY http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/07/no-press-statement-and-announcement-yet.html#links 

  SSPX TO WORK UNDER ‘SPOTTER’ BISHOPS IN BOSTON ETC IT IS NECESSARY TO CLARFIY THAT WE CANNOT SEE THE DEAD http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/07/sspx-to-work-under-spotter-bishops-in.html

SSPX CAN ACCEPT VATICAN COUNCIL II WITH EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS ACCORDING TO FR.LEONARD FEENEY AND NOT RICHARD CUSHING

Vatican Council II says outside the Church there is no salvation and is in agreement with the Syllabus of Errors, Mystici Corporis,Quanto Conficiamus etc.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/08/sspx-can-accept-vatican-council-ii-in.html