Monday, March 13, 2023
MODEL FOR A BADGE/CALLING CARD
MODEL FOR A BADGE/CALLING CARD
FUORI
DELLA CHIESA CATTOLICA NON C’E SALVEZZA
(OUTSIDE
THE CHURCH THERE IS NO SALVATION)
GIOV.3:5, MC.16:16
(JOHN 3:5, MARK 16:16)
CONCILIO
VATICANO II (AG7/LG14)
(VATICAN COUNCIL II (AG7/LG14)
CATECHISMO
DELLA CHIESA CATTOLICA (846)
(CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH 846)
CONCILIO LATERANO (1215), CONCILIO DI
FIRENZE (1442)
FOURTH
LATERAN COUNCIL (1215), COUNCIL OF FLORENCE (1442).
https://twitter.com/AndradesLionel
E-mail:
lionelandrades10@gmail.com
Blog:
eucharistandmission ( Lionel’s blog)
Tel:-
The SSPX must reject Vatican Council II but they must clarify which Vatican Council II they refer to, the rational or irrational one ?
MARCH 13, 2023
To reject the Creeds, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II interpreted rationally is a mortal sin of faith. This is being done by the priests of the SSPX.
MARCH 12, 2023
All the parish priests and religious sisters can teach the children at First Communion classes that there is exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church : Pope Francis has only to make one announcement. Vocations to the religious life will be accepted only from those Catholics who affirm exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. Cardinals at the Conclave will be restricted
MARCH 13, 2023
The interpretation of Vatican Council II today by Cardinal Robert Sarah and Cardinal Francis Arinze is irrational. They are correct politically. We are not obliged to interpret Vatican Council II politically like them and Pope Francis. The people have a choice.
MARCH 12, 2023
Political Mass and political Way of the Cross with a political interpretation of Vatican Council II
MARCH 12, 2023
A New Discovery : Pope Francis, the CDF has only to announce that LG 8, LG 14. LG 16. UR 3. NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical and invisible cases in 2023. Things then fall into place. The Church returns to Tradition.
MARCH 10, 2023
Mass is not one, holy, Catholic and Apostolic at the Benedictine University of St. Anselm, Rome. This is a canonical issue. The Liturgy Department must not be allowed to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.
MARCH 9, 2023
The Novus Ordo Mass can be offered with the same Missal used by the SSPX today : the New Missal is inadequate since it is based upon Vatican Council II interpeted irrationally
To reject the Creeds, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II interpreted rationally is a mortal sin of faith. This is being done by the priests of the SSPX.
The Society of St. Pius X
(SSPX) must announce that they accept Vatican Council II, rational, since the
Council is no more an issue, after the discovery of the two interpretations of
the Council. So when LG 8 etc are interpreted rationally then the Council
supports the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors and the Catechism of Pope
Pius X.The Council supports Tradition.
Vatican Council II
interpreted rationally is a problem for the liberals. The Council interpreted irrationally
is unethical, they must be told by the SSPX.
MORTAL SINS OF FAITH
Father Federico Montani mentioned mortal sins of faith in his sermon yesterday morning.
But the SSPX
priests are authors of books on Vatican Council II and Tradition and they
interpret the Council irrationally. So there are new versions of the Creeds.
There are new versions of the Catechisms and they reject these non-traditional
conclusions. They are not aware of the false premise and inference they have
chosen to interpret the Catechisms.
SSPX BOOKS ON VATICAN COUNCIL II ARE HERETICAL
These books are heretical.
Since I can interpret the Council rationally and there is no new version of the
Creeds. The Catechisms are in harmony with the strict interpretation of the
dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).
The SSPX does not accept
the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS since the baptism of desire and
beings saved in invincible ignorance refer to visible cases for them. They are
invisible for me.
SSPX CONCEPT OF VATICAN COUNCIL II IS HERETICAL
So the general concept of
Vatican Council II, the whole concept of the Council is heretical when it is
expressed by the SSPX bishops and priests. They can simply avoid it by choosing
the rational premise and inference and traditional conclusion.
ECONE IS POLITICAL
This is a political
interpretation of Vatican Council II by the SSPX and the popes. It is approved
by Econe.
I have e-mailed these blog
posts many times to the SSPX centers in the USA, Canada, France, Germany and
Italy.
ONE SIMPLE QUESTION FOR THE SSPX
I have one simple
question: Do LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical
cases only in 2023?
The answer would be yes,
for Father Aldo Rossi, the former Prior at the SSPX District Albano. He said
that this is something obvious.
When LG 8, 14 and 16, UR
3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are hypothetical and invisible cases only in 1965-2023 then
they are not explicit examples of salvation. They are not objective cases. They
are not known non Catholics saved outside the Church.
VATICAN COUNCIL II IS IN HARMONY WITH THE SYLLABUS OF ERRORS
So they do not contradict
the dogma EENS. They are not practical exceptions for the Athanasius Creed.
Vatican Council II is in harmony with the Syllabus of Errors.
The Catechism of the
Catholic Church is in harmony with the Syllabus of Errors and the Fourth
Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442).
Why must the SSPX reject
Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church when they are
interpreted rationally in harmony with Tradition?
They can continue to
reject the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of
the Catholic Church.
To reject the Creeds,
Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II interpreted rationally
is a mortal sin of faith. This is a mortal sin of faith for the priests of the SSPX bishops and priests,They are unethical on the Council.I am not. - Lionel Andrades
FEBRUARY 28, 2023
Father Federico Montani must only be allowed to interpret Vatican Council II honestly and so rationally at the Latin Mass in Rome. This is a legal point. He is correct when he rejects Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted irrationally and so dishonestly
Father Federico Montani will not be given permission by Cardinal Arthur Roche to offer the Latin Mass at the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) chapel in Rome because of his rejection of Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church. But if he demands that the pope and cardinals interpret Vatican Council II rationally and ethically and accept the traditional and honest conclusion, things could be different. Since Vatican Council II can only be interpreted ethically and rationally and the conclusion has to be traditional only- and the popes and cardinals are not doing this.
The responsibility lies with the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican and not the Superior of the SSPX, Albano,Italy or the other religious communities, like the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate of Fr. Stefano Manelli f.i or the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Still River, MA, USA.
The Vatican is illegal when it chooses a Fake Premise to interpret Vatican Council II. The cardinals cannot pretend that this is normal and legal.
Fr. Mantoni has a legal right to be able to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and honestly. He must not be forced to be dishonest by the Vatican and the Left.
If he announces that he chooses to accept Vatican Council II rationally and honestly and so come in harmony with Tradition, without rejecting Vatican Council II, will the Vatican accept it? Will this be enough to officially allow him to continue to offer the Latin Mass? Will it be the same for other religious communities in Italy and throughout the world?
The SSPX must ask this of the Vatican- only clarify a legal point.
The Vatican and the Left must interpret the Council honestly at every Mass, Latin or Novus Ordo. The members of the Vatican Tribunal are obliged to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and honestly. Even Cardinal Angelo Becciu must be granted this right.
The Judges of the Vatican Supreme Tribunal must only interpret the Council rationally. This is obligatory. Catechesis for the children of the secular judges of the secular courts in Rome must only be based upon Vatican Council II interpreted honestly.
Father Federico Montani must only be allowed to interpret Vatican Council II honestly and so rationally at the Latin Mass in Rome. This is a legal point. He is correct when he rejects Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted irrationally and so dishonestly. - Lionel Andrades
FEBRUARY 27, 2023
Se la FSSPX interpreta razionalmente il Concilio Vaticano II la loro immagine cambia
FEBRUARY 27, 2023
If the SSPX interprets Vatican Council II rationally their image changes
FEBRUARY 27, 2023
Il sacerdote della FSSPX non è etico riguardo al Concilio Vaticano II
FEBRUARY 27, 2023
SSPX priest is unethical on Vatican Council II
The interpretation of Vatican Council II today by Cardinal Robert Sarah and Cardinal Francis Arinze is irrational. They are correct politically. We are not obliged to interpret Vatican Council II politically like them and Pope Francis. The people have a choice.
Everyone is interpreting
LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, one way or the
other, whether they know it or not. They are either irrational or rational.
Most of them are irrational.
If Vatican Council II is a
break with Tradition then they are interpreting Vatican Council II
irrationally.
If Vatican Council II has
a continuity with the dogma EENS and the rest of Tradition then they are
interpreting LG 8 etc rationally.
The Church is traditional
since Vatican Council II is traditional for me. There is no rupture with the
past Catechisms. There is no new version of the Creeds.
BOOKS ON VATICAN COUNCIL II ARE IRRATIONAL
In general, books on
Vatican Council II etc are interpreted irrationally. The liberal Jesuits and
the conservatives interpret Vatican Council II as a break with the past. So
their interpretation of UR 3 etc is not the same as mine.They are irrational.
But all the same they are interpreting LG 8 etc.Even though some may not think about it.
Some blame the Council for the break with Tradition and
reject it. The popes accept the Council as a break with Tradition. But neither
of the two mention the false premise (invisible people are visible) and false inference (visible cases of salvation outside the Church make the dogma EENS
obsolete).
Now we have a discovery
and we know that we have a choice. We can only interpret the Council with the
rational premise (invisible cases of LG 8, 14 and 16 etc are invisible) and
rational inference (invisible cases of LG 8 etc are not visible examples of
salvation outside the Church and so are not exceptions for EENS). So our
conclusion is traditional. Vatican Council II has a continuity with Tradition,
with the dogma EENS, all the Catechisms and the Syllabus of Errors.
VOCATIONS
So only those cardinals
should be allowed to participate in a Conclave who interpret LG 8, 14, LG 16
etc rationally. Presently this is not being done. Most or all of them interpret
the Council irrationally and so politically.
Only those vocations to
the religious life must be accepted who interpret Vatican Council II
rationally. Now it is the opposite.
FIRST COMMUNION AND CONFIRMATION CLASS
At First Communion and
Confirmation classes it must be taught that there is exclusive salvation in
only the Catholic Church. Since Vatican Council II is in harmony with the Athanasius
Creed, the Syllabus of Errors and the Catechisms of Pius X and Trent.
AMORIS LAETITIA
The pope can no more justify the Abu Dhabi Declaration or Amortis Laetitis in the name of Vatican Council II interpreted liberally and irrationally. There can only be one honest option.
CARDINALS AT THE CONCLAVE MUST BE HONEST
Only those cardinals can be admitted to the Conclave who interpret the Council rationally. The Profiession of Faith must only be made by those who interpret the Council honestly.
The interpretation of
Vatican Council II today by Cardinal Robert Sarah and Cardinal Francis Arinze
is irrational. They are correct politically. We are not obliged to interpret
Vatican Council II politically like them and Pope Francis. The people have a
choice.- Lionel Andrades
FUORI DELLA CHIESA CATTOLICA NON C’E SALVEZZA
(OUTSIDE THE CHURCH THERE IS
NO SALVATION)
GIOV.3:5, MC.16:16
(JOHN 3:5, MARK 16:16)
CONCILIO VATICANO II (AG7/LG14)
(VATICAN COUNCIL II (AG7/LG14)
CATECHISMO DELLA CHIESA CATTOLICA (846)
(CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH 846)
CATECHISMO DEL TRENTO, CATECHISMO DEL PAPA PIO X,
(CATECHISM OF TRENT, CATECHISM
OF POPE PIUS X)
CONCILIO LATERANO (1215), CONCILIO DI FIRENZE (1442)
FOURTH LATERAN COUNCIL (1215),
COUNCIL OF FLORENCE (1442).
Name. Lionel Andrades
https://twitter.com/AndradesLionel
E-mail: lionelandrades10@gmail.com
Blog: eucharistandmission (
Lionel’s blog)
Tel:-
Posts
