The mainstream Catholic Church has gone ‘sectarian’. They
purposefully interpret Vatican Council II irrationally to produce an artificial
rupture with the salvation doctrines and theology of the Church over the centuries.
They now officially teach the error to little children at Communion and
Confirmation classes. It is an ecclesiology of Jesus without the necessity of
the Catholic Church for salvation. The past ecclesiocentrism is no more taught
and Vatican Council II is not interpreted rationally and in harmony with the
Magisterium of the Middle Ages. EWTN, National Catholic Register, National
Catholic Reporter, Crisis Magazine are all interpreting Vatican Council II
dishonestly and do not deny it. It is the same with Life Site News, Church
Militant TV, Cardinals Sarah and Burke, Bishops Strickland and Schneider, the
SSPX and the FSSP.
They are making a virtue out of a political necessity
and are not even trying to deny it.
For me LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in
Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical cases only. They are not visible
examples of salvation outside the Church in 2024.They are not objective
exceptions for the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church. There is no
break with the Magisterium of the 16th century or the Church Fathers
and the Apostles. For me the Church is still one, holy, Catholic and Apostolic.
The main line Church cannot say the same. They are sectarian schismatic,
heretical and nontraditional. It is official and public.
Why should the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary
at the St. Benedict Center, in Richmond, New Hampshire, USA accept a Decree of
Prohibitions, from a sectarian bishop and the Vatican, when the St. Benedict
Center is faithful to the Magisterium over the centuries and accept Vatican
Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted rationally?
Why must seminarians at all the pontifical
universities interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic
Church with a false premise (invisible cases of LG 16 are visible), and false
inference (there are objective, visible exceptions for the dogma extra
ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX, the Athanasius
Creed etc)? This is a Canon Law issue.QA bishop and rector according to Canon Law has to be a Catholic and has to accept all the teachings of the Catholic Church.
RELIGIOIUS VOCATIONS COERCION
Why must all religious vocations in all the Catholic dioceses interpret LG 8, 14, 15,
16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, as being physically visible examples of salvation
outside the Church- to be accepted as a priest or nun? This is an issue for the
canonist.
https://www.simchafisher.com/tag/fr-georges-de-laire/
A
canonist needs to clarify with Fr. Georges de Laire, Judicial Vicar, Diocese of
Manchester in New Hampshire, if LG 8,14,1,5,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, refer to
invisible or physically visible cases in 2024?
Al these
years since he issued his legal Decree against the St. Benedict Center, he has
not been responding to questions.
He did
not grant an interview to Michael Voris when Voris was in New Hampshire to
interview Brother Andre Marie micm, the Prior of the Slaves of the Immaculate
Heart of Mary. Instead he gave an interview to the Catholic Herald, U.K in
which he said he did not want to discuss theology. But theology was the reason
for Decree being issued against the religious community in his diocese.
His
spokespersons Damien and Simcha Fisher in New Hampshire, criticize the St.Benedict
Center without acknowledging that Brother Andre Marie micm accepts Pope Francis
as the pope and accepts Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic
Church, which he interprets rationally and so traditionally. It is Fr. Georges
de Laire, Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester in New Hampshire and
Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez and the Jewish Left, who are interpreting
Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally,
confusing what is invisible as being visible and then producing a sectarian
break with Tradition. This is unethical.
No one in New Hampshire is responding to questions. Why must the St. Benedict Center in New Hampshire, be considered sectarian and not Bishop Libasci, Fr. Georges de Laire and Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez ?
-Lionel Andrades
MARCH 7, 2024
Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire are not a sect. They affirm Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church .They accept Pope Francis as the pope even though he is irrational on Church Documents. They interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so the Council is in harmony with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus defined by three Church Councils and is supported by the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Catechisms of Trent and Pius X
All of the drama started in early January of 2019 when the Slaves were issued a letter of precepts by the Diocese of Manchester. As judicial vicar, de Laire had spent years dealing with problems surrounding the Feeneyite sect, and he is the official who issued the letter of precepts.
After barely hiding their anti-Semitism and refusing to adhere to official Church teaching on the doctrine of “No Salvation Outside The Church,” the Slaves were finally told to stop calling themselves a Catholic organization, and they were barred from having a priest celebrate Mass at their rural Richmond compound, among other measures. - Damien Fisher
https://www.simchafisher.com/2024/03/01/defamed-priest-makes-church-militant-pay-catholic-outrage-outlet-shutters-doors/
Damien and Simcha Fischer still refer to the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire as a sect even though the religious community affirms Vatican Council II, the Catechism of the Catholic Church.They accept Pope Francis as the pope, even though he interprets Magisterial Documents irrationally. Since they interpret Vatican Council II rationally the Council is in harmony with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus defined by three Church Councils and supported by the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Catechisms of Trent and Pius X.
The Simchas do not mention, even after being informed, that Bishop Peter Libasci the bishop of Manchester in New Hampshire and his Judicial Vicar Fr. Georges de Laire and the Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, do not accept Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted rationally. This is the reality the Simchas cannot deny. They simply ignore it.
Fr.Georges de Laire has to interpret Vatican Council II dishonestly to avoid being a Feeneyite on EENS and have a Decree of Prohibitions issued against him, as now he has issued it against the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
The Council interpreted rationally, unfortunately for them, is in harmony with Feeneyite EENS.
Since Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism for salvation, all, and Lumen Gentium 8,14,16, Unitatis Redintigratio 3, Nostra Aetate 2, Gaudium et Specs 22 etc are not practical exceptions for Ad Gentes 7. Further, the Catechism of the Catholic Church 845,846 says outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation and cites Lumen Gentium 14 which says the Catholic Church is necessary for salvation. There are no exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II for AG 7 and LG 14.
So the main-line Catholic Church with their irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II, are the real sect, who have broken away from the centuries old Magisterium of the Catholic Church. They do this by using a false premise (LG 16 refers to invisible cases in 2026) and false inference ( they are visible examples of salvation outside the Church and so practical exceptions for Feeneyite EENS).
It is the popes since Paul VI who have interpreted Vatican Council II dishonestly. They have been irrational. This is not denied by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, Bishop Peter Libasci and Fr. Georges de Laire and neither Simcha and Damien Fisher.
Michael Voris had gone to New Hampshire to defend the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary. Fr. Georges de Laire in New Hamsphire had declined being interviewed by Church Militant TV. Even today there is no media clarification from the Judicial Vicar or Damien and Simcha Fischer on the contents of this blog post.
-Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/03/slaves-of-immaculate-heart-of-mary-at.html