Sunday, September 17, 2017

U.S Attorney General must take into account the deception at EWTN and the USCCB


Image result for Photo U.S Attorney General's office logo

The United States Attorney General and the House Ethics Committee must take into account the deception at Eternal Word Television Network(EWTN) which is being sustained by the United States Bishops Conference(USCCB).It is the deceptive policy of the USCCB and EWTN to project a false image of Catholic teachings on salvation.So they tell Catholics and people in general that there are known exceptions to the traditional exclusivist understanding of salvation in the Catholic Church.
Image result for Photo USCCB logoImage result for Photo EWTN logo
This allows them to reject American students who want to to be seminarians at Catholic seminaries who do not follow along with the deception.Also priests who do not support this deception are not allowed to remain priests.
The deception is unethical and it should be stopped. The USCCB infer that invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are visible exceptions to the traditional exclusivist interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), outside the Church there is no salvation.
It is irrational to suggest that there are known people in Heaven who have been saved outside the Church; without faith and baptism, and they are known examples of salvation outside the Church on earth in the present times.How can people in Heaven be known exceptions to all needing to enter the Church on earth? Yet this deception has to be accepted by Catholic students who want to be seminarians.Priests who do not repeat this lie could be suspended.-Lionel Andrades


SEPTEMBER 14, 2017


USCCB RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION AT PNAC :US GOVERNMENT SHOULD ADDRESS IT
eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/usccb-religious…

SEPTEMBER 14, 2017


U.S Attorney General, House Ethics Committee could file a case of deception and cheating against the USCCB : discriminates against Catholics
eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/us-attorney-gen…

SEPTEMBER 14, 2017


Lay Catholics inform your Bishop and Parish Priest that you do not know of any BOD, BOB and I.I case in 2017 : so you affirm the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS
eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/lay-catholics-i…

SEPTEMBER 13, 2017

Lay Catholics must reject the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office conclusion : expedient religious are teaching it in Catechism classes
eucharistandmission.blogspot.ro/…/lay-catholics-m…



https://www.gloria.tv/article/MVdhj3JwvdTi2EMSiNs3j3ryU

Bishops Fellay, Williamson and Sanborn know that references to hypothetical cases in the Catechism and Vatican Council II are not exceptions to EENS : affect marriage, ecumenism and politics in Europe

Bishops Bernard Fellay, Richard Williamson and Donald Sanborn  know that they have been interpreting hypothetical cases in the Catechism of the Catholic Church 1 and Vatican Council IIas being concrete and known exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). So why don't they admit this error in public?
They also know that if they  admit that hypothetical cases mentioned in Vatican Council II, are hypothetical only,  the interpretation of the Council is traditional. So why don't they say that the Council is traditional?
Why don't these bishops who have had their religious formation under Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, admit that they were wrong  all these many years?
Image result for Photo of Bishop Bernard FellayImage result for Photo of Bishop Richard WilliamsonImage result for Photo of Bishop Donald Sanborn

Instead they are still maintaining the deception.
If they cannot admit that invisible for us baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) never were exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS, then at least they could point out this error when they notice it among the liberals.Invisible and unknown people are assumed to be known and visible by Catholic Answers, Catholics United for the Faith,EWTN, Steubenville University etc.So help them out.
Image result for Photo of marriages Catholic in France and Switzerland
MARRIAGE ISSUE 
In France and Switzerland where the Society of St.Pius X(SSPX) with the bishops conferences have to coordinate on the marriage issue, this issue of invisible BOD, BOB and I.I has to be brought up.The bishops in Europe approve inter faith marriages since they reject Feeneyite EENS.For them there is known salvation outside the Church.The Protestant and Jews could be saved in their religions.So dispensations are freely given.They need to be shown that BOD, BOB and I.I are not examples of salvation outside the Church and so are not exceptions to Feeneyite EENS. Catholics living in inter faith marriages are living in heresy and mortal sin.Their spouses are outside the Church and on the way to Hell.
So Bishop Fellay over the marriage issue could ask the bishops conferences in France and Switzerland to clarify that BOD, BOB and I.I do not refer to visible and personally known cases in 2017 and so they are not exceptions to the dogma EENS as it was interpreted over the centuries.
Image result for Photo of Orthodox churches in Europe
ORTHODOX CHURCHES OUTSIDE
Similarly in East Europe  the Maronite Catholic Church have to be informed that there is nothing in Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church to contradict Feeneyite EENS.So the old ecclesiology stands.There can only be an ecumenism of return and members of the Orthodox Churches, like the Protestants, are outside the Church.They are outside the Mystical Body of Jesus.
Image result for Photo of Polish president praying
SOCIAL REIGN OF CHRIST THE KING IN POLAND
Similarly the bishop's conference in Poland can be informed that they can proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation,since there is no known salvation outside the Church.Vatican Council II and the Catechism do not contradict the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS. The Holy Office made a mistake in 1949.
So bishops Fellay, Williamson and Sanborn need to make an announcement on this important issue.-Lionel Andrades

1
EXAMPLES OF HYPOTHETICAL REFERENCES IN THE CATECHISM
1. 'God is not limited to the Sacraments'(CCC 1257)
'2.all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body'(CCC 846).
3. Those 'justified by faith in Baptism are incorporated into Christ; they therefore have a right to be called Christians'(CCC 818).
4. They are 'joined in many ways to the baptized who are honored by the name of Christian, but do not profess the Catholic faith in its entirety or have not preserved unity or communion under the successor of Peter."(CCC 838).
5. 'the plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims'(CCC 841).

2.

EXAMPLES OF HYPOTHETICAL REFERENCES IN VATICAN COUNCIL II
1. 'elements of sanctification and truth'in other religions(LG 8),
2..'good and holy' things in other religions(NA 2),
3..'a ray of that Truth which enlightens' all men(NA 2),
4.'imperfect communion with the Church(UR 3),
5.' people of good will in other religions'(GS 22),
6.' seeds of the Word'(AG 11), 
7.'invincible ignorance'(LG 16),
8.'a good conscience'(LG 16) etc.


Cardinal Sarah has not affirmed the Social Reign of Christ the King based on the old ecclesiology : since he will not proclaim Feeneyite EENS at Mass

Image result for Photo of Cardinal Sarah at the Angelicum last week
Image result for Photo of Cardinal Sarah at the Angelicum last week
No one has asked Cardinal Robert Sarah to affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King based on the old liturgy.If he would affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), the Feeneyite version, then he could proclaim the Social Reign of Christ the King and the non separation of Church and state, as did the missionaries during Mass in the 16th century.
He does not affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS since he makes the same mistake as the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr.Leonard Feeney. The Letter assumed physically invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD),baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are visible exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS.So for him too BOD, BOB and I.I are visible and known cases of people saved outside the Church even though he would not know of any such person in 2017.This is contrary to common sense. He could be corrected by a school boy or even a non Catholic. We cannot see invisible people in Heaven saved with BOD, BOB and I.I.Neither can we say that any particular person in 2017 will be saved without the baptism of water in the Church and instead with BOD, BOB and I.I.If this was possible it would only be known to God. So it is not relevant or an exception to EENS.
Image result for Photo of Cardinal Sarah at the Angelicum last week
Since there is known salvation outside the Church at Mass for Cardinal Sarah he cannot affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King over all legislation.Since people can be saved outside the Church for him.The Church is not necessary for salvation for him. So at the Angelicum this week he proclaimed the necessity of mission without the neeed for every one to be a formal member of the Church for salvation.This is his non exclusivist ecclesiology at Mass.
Since there is known salvation outside the Church for him and the Feeneyite interpretation of EENS is rejected, he accepts a new ecumenism.Protestants are saved in their religion as if he would know of someone in Heaven who did not have to be a member of the Catholic Church and who got there. This is his new ecclesiology which is a rupture with the past ecclesiology of the Church which considered BOD, BOB and I.I as simply being hypothetical cases and not relevant to EENS.Hypothetical cases were not objective exceptions to EENS for Cardinal Robert Bellarmine.
Image result for Photo of Cardinal Sarah at the Angelicum last weekImage result for Photo of Cardinal Sarah at the Angelicum last week
Cardinal Sarah, like the liberal theologians, including Ratzinger, Kasper and Rahner, assume BOD, BOB and I.I refer to known cases in the present times, saved outside the Church.Then they create a new theology, at Holy Mass in every Rite.

If the priests would reject the new theology based on visible for us BOD, BOB and I.I then they would automatically and effortlessly get back to the old ecclesiology of the Catholic Church, before this irrationality was made official and magisterial.
Image result for Photo of Cardinal Sarah at the Angelicum last week
So when is Cardinal Sarah going to affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the separation of Satanic Secularism and State ?
To do this he has to announce that outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation and that BOD, BOB and I.I are not exceptions to the dogma EENS. Neither is there anything written in the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council II to contradict the dogma EENS as it was known to the missionaries in the 16th century.
So to have an authentic ecclesiology of the Church during the Mass he would have to contradict the statement of Pope Benedict last year in Avvenire when he said that EENS was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century and there was ' a development' with Vatican Council II.This is  a false ecclesiology for Holy Mass in every Rite.
Not only does it have a hermeneutic of rupture with the dogma EENS and the Syllabus of Errors it removes the basis for proclaiming and working, for the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the non separation of Church and State.Someone with an agenda may have forced Pope Benedict to say that in public.-Lionel Andrades