Cardinal Walter Kasper would first interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise . Then he would say that since Vatican Council II says there is known salvation outside the Church, non Catholics are saved without the Sacraments.

 Cardinal Walter Kasper would first interpret Vatican Council II with a false premise . Then he would say that since Vatican Council II says there is known salvation outside the Church, non Catholics are saved without the Sacraments.So the old exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church is obsolete and ' non one believe in it any  more' as he says.So the Church can change its teachings for him, on Communion for the divorced and remarried.

If the Church can make one major change in doctrine and theology, for him, then why not other changes ?

He does not mention the false premise. It is a secret between him and Pope Benedict. -Lionel Andrades

The false premise(FP) is not the invention of Pope Benedict. He made it his own and adapted to it.Pope Pius XII overlooked the false premise in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston with reference to Fr. Leonard Feeney. Pope John XXIII kept silent.Pope Paul VI also kept silent as the Council Fathers (1965) at Vatican Council II went to work using the FP

 The false premise(FP) is not the invention of Pope Benedict. He made it his own and adapted to it.Pope Pius XII overlooked the false premise in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston with reference to Fr. Leonard Feeney.

Pope John XXIII kept silent.Pope Paul VI also kept silent as the Council Fathers (1965) at Vatican Council II went to work using the FP. -Lionel Andrades

Pope Benedict used a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, misled Catholics and created division within the Church. The sedevacantist community Congregatio Mariae Reginae Immaculatae(CMRI) of Bishop Mark Pivarunas, must stop using the false premise and give up their sedevacantism

 Pope Benedict used a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II, misled Catholics and created division within the Church. The sedevacantist community Congregatio Mariae Reginae Immaculatae(CMRI) of Bishop Mark Pivarunas, must stop using the false premise  and give up their sedevacantism.

The Society of St. Pius X (SPPX ) too must stop using the false premise, re-interpret Vatican Council II rationally and ask for canonical recognition.

The Franciscans of the Immaculate too can affirm Vatican Council II without the false premise and ask Cardinal Braz de Avez to do the same.

Michael and Peter Dimond at the sedevantist Most Holy Family Monastery  too can affirm Vatican Council II and the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance, without the false premise and end their sedevacantism based upon the Council. They could admit that Bishop Pierre Thuc like Arhcbishop Lefebvre, Michael Davis, Amerio Romano, Dietrich von Hildebrand and others made a mistake.

Why are traditionalists interpreting Vatican Council II according to the political Left ? Why are they using the false premise to change traditional theology ? SSPX...-Lionel Andrades

Ralph Martin - Flee Now! From the Wrath That is Coming

When Pope Benedict reminds Europe of its Christian roots, he cannot tell Europe they need to come back to the Catholic Church. He does not say that Europe was once Catholic. He cannot, since for 55 years he has been saying that there is known salvation outside the Church ( a false premise ) and so non Catholics and non Christians, for him, do not need to convert into the Church

 When Pope Benedict reminds Europe of its Christian roots, he cannot tell Europe they need to come back to the Catholic Church. He does not say that Europe was once Catholic. He cannot, since for 55 years he has been saying that there is known salvation outside the Church ( a false premise ) and so non Catholics and non Christians,for him, do not need to convert into the Church. Bishop Robert Barron has taken Pope Benedict's liberalism further and said that we have a reasonable hope that most men and women will be saved . -Lionel Andrades

In the political Left interpretation of Vatican Council II the fundamental error is that unknown cases of salvation outside the Catholic Church are assumed to be known

 In the political Left interpretation of Vatican Council II the fundamental error is that unknown cases of salvation outside the Catholic Church are assumed to be known. -Lionel Andrades

Bishop Donald Sanborn interpreted Vatican Council II, extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Catechisms with the false premise. There is no apology or correction. Fr. Anthony Cekada did the same. Probably Bishop Sanborn will expire like Fr. Cekada without correcting the error

 Bishop Donald Sanborn interpreted Vatican Council II, extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Catechisms with the false premise. There is no apology or correction.

 Fr. Anthony Cekada did the same.

Probably Bishop Sanborn will expire like Fr. Cekada without correcting the error. -Lionel Andrades

The Catholic Church was traditional until Fr. Joseph Ratzinger and others at Vatican Council II used a false premise to create false exceptions to traditional exclusive salvation. He was then appointed Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith so that he could preserve this error. He stayed with the job even as Pope Benedict.

 The Catholic Church was traditional until Fr. Joseph Ratzinger and others at Vatican Council II used a false premise to create false exceptions to traditional exclusive salvation. He was then appointed Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith so that he could preserve this error. He stayed with the job even as Pope Benedict.-Lionel Andrades

We do not know any one who is saved outside the Church because ' God is not limited to the Sacraments ' (CCC 1257) instead God has chosen to limit salvation to the Sacraments ( Ad Gentes 7)

 We do not know any one who is saved outside the Church because ' God is not limited to the Sacraments ' (CCC 1257) instead God has chosen to limit salvation to the Sacraments ( Ad Gentes 7). - Lionel Andrades

There is no political Left interpretation of Vatican Council II without the false premise

 There is no political Left interpretation of Vatican Council II without the false premise.-Lionel Andrades

An Urgent Message from Fatima | Dr. Ralph Martin | Going Deeper

Venerazione Santa Croce - Međugorje

The political Left begins its intepretation of Vatican Council II by assuming there is known salvation outside the Catholic Church. This is a false premise.The Left then projects LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II as examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church and exceptions to Tradition( EENs, Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX etc). So Pope Benedict asked - when there is salvation outside the Church why have Mission ?

 The political Left begins its interpretation of Vatican Council II by assuming there is known salvation outside the Catholic Church. This is a false premise.The Left then projects LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II as examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church and exceptions to Tradition ( EENS, Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors etc).

So when Pope Benedict asked - when there is salvation outside the Church why have Mission ?. -Lionel Andrades

Presently I am the only one who has said it in public and clearly, that Vatican Council II is to be interpreted rationally and in harmony with exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church

 Presently I am the only one who has said it in public and clearly, that Vatican Council II is to be interpreted rationally and in harmony with exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.

This is not the politcal Left interpretation of the Council. It wrongly assumes hypothetical cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 156, UR 3, NA 2, Gs 22 etc in Vatican Council II are objective examples of salvation outside the Church and practical exceptions to the strict interpretation of EENS and Traditional Mission which pre supposes that all non Catholics are oriented to Hell with no exception. -Lionel Andrades

Il miracoloso Gesù Bambino di Praga

When you read Vatican Council II just assume that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical and speculative cases only. They are not personally known non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church.In this way you undo Pope Benedict's bad philosophy and theology

 When you read Vatican Council II just assume that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc  refer to hypothetical and speculative cases only. They are not personally known non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church.In this way you undo Pope Benedict's bad philosophy and theology. - Lionel Andrades

Lefebvrists still at it

Taylor Marshall, Roberto dei Mattei, Michael Matt and Joseph Shaw will not affirm Vatican Council II without the false premise or discuss it. They need the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition. Financially, they are grateful to Pope Benedict. -Lionel Andrades

By assuming there is known salvation outside the Church( when he does not know of any such case ) Pope Benedict creates exceptions to Jesus' teachings in the Bible. There are exceptions for him to the Great Commission. Much of his theological writings are there to uphold this personal propaganda.He had to keep writing and writing so that the truth would not be known and his false narrative would me maintained in the Church, for political-Left reasons

 By assuming there is known salvation outside the Church( when he does not know of any such case ) Pope Benedict creates exceptions to Jesus' teachings in the Bible. There are exceptions for him to the Great Commission. Much of his theological writings are there to uphold this personal propaganda.He had to keep writing and writing so that the truth would not be known and his false narrative would me maintained in the Church, for political-Left reasons.-Lionel Andrades

Pope Benedict assumes there is known salvation outside the Catholic Church ( a false premise)

Pope Benedict assumes there is known salvation outside the Catholic Church( a false premise) and projects LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc  in Vatican Council II, as examples of known non Catholics saved outside the Church and objective exceptions to the traditional ecclesiology he says Jews do not need to convert into the Catholic Church for salvation and he prays along side non Christians. - Lionel Andrades

According to the political Left interpretation of Vatican Council II other religions are paths to salvation but with a rational interpretation of Vatican Council II, without the false premise, all need faith and baptism for salvation (Ad Gentes 7) and there is no known salvation outside the Church, since LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, Gs 22 etc refer to hypothetical and invisible cases only

 According to the political Left interpretation of Vatican Council II other religions are paths to salvation but with a rational interpretation of Vatican Council II, without the false premise, all need faith and baptism for salvation (Ad Gentes 7) and there is no known salvation outside the Church, since LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc  refer to hypothetical and invisible cases only. -Lionel Andrades

Adorazione da Medjugorje del 17 dicembre 2020