Saturday, September 26, 2020

Why does Archbishop Carlo Vigano not call for the interpretation of Vatican Council II without the false premise, which would be a return to the traditional teaching on exclusive salvation in the Church ( Athanasius Creed etc) which was the basis for the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all political legislation ?

 Why does not Archbishop Carlo Vigano call for the interpretation of Vatican Council II without the false premise, which would be a return to the traditional teaching on exclusive salvation in the Church ( Athanasius Creed etc) which was the basis for the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all political legislation ? -Lionel Andrades

The Lega Nord/Lega (Salvini) Catholic political leaders need to call for the interpretation of Vatican Council II without the false premise and the promulgation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all Italian political legislation.

 The Lega Nord/Lega (Salvini) Catholic political leaders need to call for the interpretation of Vatican Council II without the false premise  and the promulgation of the Social Reign of Christ the King in all Italian political legislation. -Lionel Andrades

Prof. Robert Fastiggi who debated Bishop Sanborn saying 'schism is a bad thing' , uses the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and so create a schism with the past popes on EENS, Athanasius Creed etc. This is the official position of the Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit which employs him. Using the false premise with Vatican Council II is obligatory for faculty and students

   

 Prof. Robert Fastiggi who debated Bishop Sanborn saying 'schism is a bad thing' , uses the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and so create a schism with the past popes on EENS, Athanasius Creed etc. This is the official position of the Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit which employs him. Using the false premise with Vatican Council II is obligatory for faculty and students. -Lionel Andrades


Bishop Robert Barron, Ralph Martin, Scott Hahn and their Staff are using the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition and so avoid the radical traditionalist label

 Bishop Robert Barron, Ralph Martin, Scott Hahn and their Staff are using the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition and so avoid the radical traditionalist label. -Lionel Andrades

Michael Sean Winters at the National Catholic Reporter is a supported of Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston, if he did not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II

 Michael Sean Winters at the National Catholic Reporter is a supported of Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston, if he did not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II. -Lionel Andrades

The Roman Rota in Italy officialy supports the false interpretation of Vatican Council II. They use the irrational premise to interpret the Council when this can be avoided

 The Roman Rota in Italy officialy supports the false interpretation of Vatican Council II. They use the irrational premise to interpret the Council when this can be avoided. -Lionel Andrades

Summorum Pontificum and Ecclesia Dei, Vatican had to uphold the false interpretation of Vatican Council II by Pope Benedict. If the Council was interpreted without the official irrationality, the Church would return to the ecclesiology of the Traditional Latin Mass

 Summorum Pontificum and Ecclesia Dei, Vatican had to uphold the false interpretation of Vatican Council II by Pope Benedict. If the Council was interpreted  without the official irrationality, the Church would return to the ecclesiology of the Traditional Latin Mass. -Lionel Andrades

The Balamand Declaration and the Joint Declaration with Lutherans on Justification were initiated with Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise. So it was assumed that there were known exceptions to the traditional teaching on exclusive salvation . Extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Athanasius Creed were considered obsolete by Cardinal Ratzinger /Pope Benedict

 The Balamand Declaration and the Joint Declaration with Lutherans on Justification  were initiated with Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise. So it was assumed that there were known exceptions  to the traditional teaching on exclusive salvation . Extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Athanasius Creed were considered obsolete by Cardinal Ratzinger /Pope Benedict. -Lionel Andrades

Cardinal Ratzinger used the word 'Magisterium' in Redemptoris Missio when he was rejecting exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church with the use of a false premise, and was projecting a vague Christology, compatible with other Christian communities.He was implying that this was the teaching of the Holy Spirit.

 Cardinal Ratzinger used the word 'Magisterium' in Redemptoris Missio when he was rejecting exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church with the use of a false premise, and was projecting a vague Christology, compatible with other Christian communities.He was implying that this was the teaching of the Holy Spirit. -Lionel Andrades

Messaggio del 25 settembre 2020 a Marija - Medjugorje