EWTN is not
considered a radical traditionalist Roman Catholic organisation since all their
apologists do not affirm the dogma extra
ecclesiam nulla salus by interpreting Vatican Council II rationally.- Lionel Andrades
Tuesday, February 14, 2023
EWTN is not considered a radical traditionalist Roman Catholic organisation since all their apologists do not affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus by interpreting Vatican Council II rationally
It's Vatican Council II which now is in a crisis. When the Council is rational the crisis ends.The Church returns to the past
FEBRUARY 14, 2023
Cardinal Burke avoids being suspended by Pope Francis and the Left. He does not not announce that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical cases only
FEBRUARY 14, 2023
SSPX is misleading the faithful
FEBRUARY 13, 2023
When the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith punishes Catholics for affirming the traditional strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, it is not Magisterial but political.
-Lionel Andrades
Catholic lay man in Rome. Writer on the discovery of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II, one rational and the other irrational.
Cardinal Burke avoids being suspended by Pope Francis and the Left. He does not not announce that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical cases only
Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke
is not announcing that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican
Council II refer to hypothetical cases only. They are not objective examples of
salvation outside the Church. So Vatican Council II does not contradict the
strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the
Athanasius Creed. The Council is not a break with the Syllabus of Errors and
the rest of Tradition.
Cardinal Burke avoids
being suspended by Pope Francis and the Left. It is the same with Bishop
Athanasius Schneider who told Dr. Taylor Marshall in an interview that there
are no literal cases of the baptism of desire and so mission was important.
Catholics are being misled when cardinals and bishops do not say that the
Council supports the 16th century EENS of the missionaries.-Lionel Andrades
FEBRUARY 11, 2023
At the ongoing Holy Communion and Confirmation preparation classes in the parish San Giuseppe all’ Aurelio, Rome, near the Cornelia Metro Station, the children are not being taught to interpret Vatican Council II rationally, and so affirm that outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation (CCC 845,846).
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/at-ongoing-holy-communion-and.html
FEBRUARY 10, 2023
Rorate Caeili (web blog) is still misleading Catholics
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/rorate-caeili-web-blog-is-still.html
FEBRUARY 10, 2023
This distinction between radical-traditionalist Catholic and the rank and file Catholic in the main line Church, with Mass in the vernacular, has ended.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/this-distinction-between-radical.html
FEBRUARY 10, 2023
The sedevacantists are correct about Vatican Council II. The Council was interpreted irrationally and not rationally. A false premise and inference was chosen instead of the rational option : Vatican Council II interpreted with a Fake Premise is unethical and political and Michael Voris has to choose it
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/the-sedevacantists-are-correct-about.html
FEBRUARY 10, 2023
Minim priests and religious sisters at the basilica of San Andrea delle Fratte Rome agree with me
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/minim-priests-and-religious-sisters-at.html
FEBRUARY 9, 2023
The Ecclesia Dei communities which met at Courtlain, France are still not telling Pope Francis that if he interprets LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II rationally, then he would be a traditionalist like them. He would have returned to Catholic Tradition overnight.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/the-ecclesia-dei-communities-which-met.html
FEBRUARY 9, 2023
There is no denial from Michael Voris. His interpretation of Vatican Council II (irrational) is political
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/there-is-no-denial-from-michael-voris.html
FEBRUARY 9, 2023
No Statement from SSPX Albano
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/no-statement-from-sspx-albano.html
FEBRUARY 9, 2023
FSSP church in Rome
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/fssp-church-in-rome.html
FEBRUARY 9, 2023
So the SSPX priest to protect himself and the SSPX he will tell the congregation a lie about Vatican Council II. He will call this being prudent
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/so-spx-priest-to-protect-himself-and.html
FEBRUARY 9, 2023
SSPX is misleading the faithful
The SSPX Superior General, bishops and priests want to
please the Jewish Left and the Vatican. They are looking after their careers,
reputation, status, property etc. So they are not rationally interpreting
Vatican Council II and are misleading the faithful. They are not announcing
that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are only hypothetical and
invisible cases in 2023.So these are not references to objective examples of
salvation outside the Catholic Church. They do not contradict the dogma extra
ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed and the past ecclesiocentrism of
the Church. Vatican Council II has the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition.
The interpretation of Pope Paul VI and Archbishop
Marcel Lefebvre was irrational and wrong. We now have a rational and
traditional choice.
Also Pope Pius XII and Archbishop Lefebvre overlooked
the mistake in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office (LOHO). Invisible cases of
the baptism of desire (BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I) could
not be visible exceptions for the dogma EENS.
The LOHO was irrational and heretical when it
suggested that not everyone needs to enter the Church for salvation. It was
schism with the pre-1949 Magisterium.
The irrational interpretation of BOD and I.I and the
baptism of blood (BOB) and Vatican Council II (LG 8, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc) by
the SSPX is political. They are misleading the Catholics. They are not telling
them the truth about Vatican Council II. -Lionel Andrades
FEBRUARY 9, 2023
FEBRUARY 13, 2023
When the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith punishes Catholics for affirming the traditional strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, it is not Magisterial but political.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/when-congregation-for-doctrine-of-faith.html
FEBRUARY 13, 2023
Bishop Athanasius Schneider avoids being cancelled
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/bishop-athanasius-schneider-avoids.html
FEBRUARY 13, 2023
The norm for salvation is Catholic faith and the baptism of water (AG 7, LG 14) and we do not know of any objective cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church. This is the teaching of the Catholic Church today. This was not the teaching of Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton, Fr. John Hardon, Fr. William Most and Ludwig Ott who interpreted Magisterial Documents with the False Premise.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/the-norm-for-salvation-is-catholic.html
FEBRUARY 13, 2023
If Bishop Athanasius Schneider uses the Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II he would be saying there are no exceptions in the Council-text for Feeneyite EENS
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/if-bishop-athanasius-schneider-uses.html
FEBRUARY 12, 2023
The Vatican and the Left will excommunicate/laicize/suspend any priest who affirms the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So they do not allow Vatican Council II to be interpreted rationally. They want the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus to be rejected even though it is Biblical.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/the-vatican-and-left-will.html
I accept Vatican Council II as a legitimate Council for me. The Council supports the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the rest of Tradition. I interpret LG8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc, as being only hypothetical.
I accept Vatican Council II as a legitimate Council. The Council
supports the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and
the rest of Tradition. I interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II, as
being only hypothetical. They cannot be objective examples of salvation for us
humans in 2023.So Vatican Council Ii supports Tradition. It has the hermeneutic
of continuity with the Syllabus of Errors and the Catechisms of Trent and Pius
X. The ecclesiology of the Church, before and after Vatican Council II is the same.
There is no new revelation or development of doctrine and dogma, when LG 8, LG
14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to speculative cases only.Speculative cases cannot be objective exceptions for the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church. They are not
practical exceptions for the Athanasius Creed and the Great Commission.- Lionel Andrades
How can a Council interpreted irrationally be Magisterial for Michael Voris?
In his
latest video on the FBI Michael Voris is saying that he accepts Vatican Council
II interpreted irrationally as a legitimate Council and he wants the SSPX and the sedevacantists to do the same.
Michael is not telling us that the Council is legitimate only when it is
interpreted rationally. How can a Council interpreted irrationally be
Magisterial for Michael Voris? –
Lionel Andrades
We need red trad cardinals.
We need red trad
cardinals. We need rad trad cardinals who interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3,
NA 2, GS 22, rationally and so take the whole Church back to Tradition. One
simple action affects the whole Church. It is like watering the root of the
tree and the whole tree is nourished.- Lionel Andrades
Dom Alcuin Reid in Frejuf Toulon, France, now under investigation by the Vatican could appeal to the French Ministry of Education to please interpret LG 8,LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, rationally, in the schools, colleges and universities in France.
Dom Alcuin
Reid in Frejuf Toulon, France, now under investigation by the Vatican could appeal to the French Ministry of
Education to please interpret LG 8,LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in
Vatican Council II, rationally, in the schools, colleges and universities in
France.
The Nuncio
in Paris interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and so also the visiting
bishops sent by Pope Francis to the diocese of Bishop Dominique Rey. The Ecclesia Dei communities are not doing
anything about this.
Cardinal
Raymond Burke must interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2 rationally. LG 8 etc must be seen as only hypothetical.
All the
cardinals must do the same.
The future
pope must interpret LG 8, 14, 16 etc as not being exceptions for Tradition.
The future
pope has to be conservative and traditional when he interprets LG 8 etc in
harmony with Tradition. The Church returns to its past ecclesiocentric
ecclesiology at every Mass in all Rites.- Lionel Andrades
FEBRUARY 13, 2023
The Ecclesia Dei communities in France must ask Bishop Dominique Rey, Archbishop Antoine Herouard and Bishop Joel Mercier to uphold the teachings of Vatican Council II, interpreted only rationally. : Investigation begins today : Dom Alcuin Reid cannont be considered schismatic because he does not accept the Council irrationally
The Ecclesia Dei communities in France must ask Bishop Dominique Rey, Archbishop Antoine Herouard and Bishop Joel Mercier to uphold the teachings of Vatican Council II, interpreted only rationally. The appeal must be made to all bishops including the liberals like Bishop Minnerath in Dijon.
They should demand that all the French cardinals and bishops must only interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so come back to Tradition.
Bishop Dominque Rey in Frejuf-Touloun France must only interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II as referring to hypothetical cases only. This is the rational and not common rational interpretation. There is no other rational choice.
Now Bishop Rey, the Ecclesia Dei communities, the liberals and the popes are interpreting LG 8 etc as referring to objective cases in 2023. They are physically visible people, it is reasoned wrongly. These are known people saved outside the Church it is reasoned irrationally.
This is the political interpretation of Vatican Council II thrust upon the Church by the Left. The Ecclesia Dei communities must choose the interpretation of the Council which is in harmony with Tradition.
Bishop Rey must admit that for him LG 8, LG 4, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are only theoretical and speculative cases. So he would expect the investigation which begins today by Archbishop Antoine Herouard and Bishop Joel Mercier to uphold the teachings of Vatican Council II, interpreted only rationally.
APOSTOLIC NUNCIO IN PARIS
Also the Apostolic Nunciature in France must also accept Vatican Council II. It would be unethical for the Nuncio to continue to interpret the Council irrationally.
Also the community of Alcuin Reid must only interpret Vatican Council II rationally. They is being honest and traditional. Dom Alcuin Rein is a monk of the Monastere Saint-benoit in the Diocese of Frejuf-Toulon.The community cannot be considered schismatic because they do not accept the Vatican Council II, irrational, as do the investigating bishops.
- Lionel Andrades
https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2023/02/francis-intervenes-in-pro-traditional.html
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/the-ecclesia-dei-communities-in-france.html
FEBRUARY 13, 2023
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
