Bishop Athanasius Schneider did not say the Catholic Faith is the only religion of God and instead referred to the Christian religions : no correction or denial from him or LifeSitesNews

Bishop Athanasius Schneider has issued a statement on the uniqueness of faith in Christ, to remedy confusion arising from the controversial document Pope Francis signed with a Grand Imam earlier this week in Abu Dhabi. 

On Monday, the Pope came under fire for signing the “Document on Human Fraternity for World Peace and Living Together” with Sheik Ahmad el-Tayeb, Grand Imam of Cairo’s al-Azhar Mosque, during an interreligious meeting in Abu Dhabi. 

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bishop-athanasius-schneider-issues-statement-on-controversial-document

This is false.

The Catholic Faith is the sole God-willed religion.

The report on the New Oxford Review website is titled Bp. Schneider: Christianity is sole God-willed religion

The Methodist, Baptist, Pentecostal and Orthodox Christian religions are not the sole  God-willed religion. They are not paths to salvation according to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) which is not contradicted by Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents read rationally.

Neither does the Catechism of the Catholic Church 846-848 contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS, when the passages in red refer to only hypothetical cases and not personally known people in 2019.1 So they do not contradict the blue passages and Feeneyite EENS.

Similarly CCC 847 and 848 do not contradict CCC 846 which says outside the Church there is no salvation in support of EENS as it was known to the Magisterium and missionaries in the 16th century.

So Bishop Athansius Schneider should have said that the Catholic Faith is the only religion of God and all non Catholics need to enter, with ' faith and baptism' for salvation ( to avoid Hell).

Instead he interprets Vatican Council II like Bishop Barron and assumes there are known non Catholics saved outside the Church. So the red passages are exceptions to the blue orthodox ones which support exclusive salvation in the Church.

Every year he makes the same mistake and remains politically correct with the Left.

There is no clarification or correction from him or LifeSitesNews on this issue.The Catholic Faith is not the only religion of God. Since there is known salvation outside the Catholic Church for them.

“Christianity is the only God-willed religion,” he writes. “Therefore, it can never be placed complementarily side by side with other religions. Those would violate the truth of Divine Revelation, as it is unmistakably affirmed in the First Commandment of the Decalogue, who would assert that the diversity of religions is the will of God."-Bishop Athanasius Schneider

He has placed the Catholic Faith complementarily with other Christian religions. He has also not stated that all Muslims in general are oriented to Hell unless they enter the Church as members, with faith and baptism.

IV.  On the orientation of all human beings to the Church 6. It must be firmly believed that the Church is sign and instrument of salvation for all people. It is contrary to the Catholic faith to consider the different religions of the world as ways of salvation complementary to the Church. 7. According to Catholic doctrine, the followers of other religions are oriented to the Church and are all called to become part of her- Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Notification on the book, Toward a Christian Theology of Religious Pluralism by Father Jacques Dupuis s.j. Bishop Schnieder is supporting the Theology of Christian Religious Pluralism and Salvation  which Pope John Paul II made Cardinal Ratzinger condemn, in the Notification on the Jesuit  dissident in Asia. “There is only one way to God, and this is Jesus Christ, for He Himself said: ‘I am the Way’ (John 14: 6). There is only one truth, and this is Jesus Christ, for He Himself said: ‘I am the Truth’ (John 14: 6). There is only one true supernatural life of the soul, and this is Jesus Christ, for He Himself said: ‘I am the Life’ (John 14: 6),” Bishop Schneider writes. This is  Christology without Catholic exclusivist ecclesiology, Jesus without the necessity of membership in the Catholic Church for salvation. “True universal brotherhood can be only in Christ, and namely between baptized persons,” he insists. And “outside the Christian Faith no other religion is able to transmit true supernatural life: ‘This is eternal life, that they know you the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent’(John 17: 3).”  “outside the Christian Faith no other religion is able to transmit true supernatural life" ?  Martin Luther said that all that is needed for salvation is faith in Jesus. The moral teachings of the Catholic Church and charity was not necessary.For him it was not necessary to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation and to follow Catholic theology and doctrines.It seems the same with Bishop Schneider and Pope Francis. The Incarnated Son of God taught that outside faith in Him there cannot be a true and God-pleasing religion: “I am the door. By me, if any man enters in, he shall be saved” (John 10: 9).(Jesus does not separate himself from the Church here) God commanded to all men, without exception, to hear His Son: “This is my most beloved Son; hear Him!” (Mk. 9: 7).(Again why is Jesus separated from the Church here ?) God did not say: “You can hear My Son or you can hear other founders of a religion, for it is My will that there are different religions.” God has forbidden us to recognize the legitimacy of the religion of other gods: “Thou shalt not have strange gods before me” (Ex. 20: 3) and “What fellowship has light with darkness? And what concord has Christ with Belial? Or what part has the faithful with the unbeliever? And what agreement has the temple of God with idols?” (2 Cor. 6: 14-16). (What connection do we have with Christian religions which support homosexuality, contraception, divorce etc ) The Apostles preached outside the Church there is no  salvation. God gave the Apostles and through them the Church for all times the solemn order to instruct all nations and the followers of all religions in the only one true Faith, teaching them to observe all His Divine commandments and baptize them (cf. Mt. 28: 19-20). Since the preaching of the Apostles and of the first Pope, the Apostle Saint Peter, the Church proclaimed always that there is salvation in no other name, i.e., in no other faith under heaven by which men must be saved, but in the Name and in the Faith in Jesus Christ (cf. Acts 4: 12). The Church at the times of the Apostles and the Early Christians ( Early Catholics) also proclaimed that outside the Church there was no salvation.The Church did not proclaim that there were personally known people saved outside the Church with the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and in invincible ignorance(I.I).The Church never proclaimed in the past that there were personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church with 'elements of sanctification and truth'(LG 8) or that there were known non Catholics saved outside the Church where the true Church subsists and this is known to us in particular cases(LG 8). With the words of Saint Augustine the Church taught in all times: “The Christian religion is the only religion which possesses the universal way for the salvation of the soul; for except by this way, none can be saved. This is a kind of royal way, which alone leads to a kingdom which does not totter like all temporal dignities, but stands firm on eternal foundations.” (De civitate Dei, 10, 32, 1). St.Augustine  refers here to the Catholic religion. Theological faith (the acceptance of the truth revealed by the One and Triune God) is often identified with belief in other religions, which is religious experience still in search of the absolute truth and still lacking assent to God who reveals himself. For Bishop Athanasius Schneider there is salvation outside the Church and so other religions with only "belief" have their members saved.It is the same for non Christian and non Catholic religions for Bishop Schneider. So speculative and theoretical cases of salvation with BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3 etc are examples of personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church in other religions.Otherwise how could there be salvation outside the Church for Bp.Schneider? Since there is salvation outside the Church for him he does not affirm the strict interpretation of EENS and separates Jesus from the necessity of membership in the Catholic Church. The Apostles and the countless Christian martyrs of all times, especially those of the first three centuries, would have been spared martyrdom, if they had said: “The pagan religion and its worship is a way, which as well corresponds to the will of God.” There would have been for instance no Christian France, no “Eldest Daughter of the Church,”... They were martyred because they believed outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation! They proclaimed it, unlike the Kazakhistan bishop. True universal brotherhood can be only in Christ, and namely between baptized persons. Even if they belong to the Episcopalian Christian community and many other sects which support homosexual marriages and contraception?  Even the Jehovah's Witnesses believe in Jesus and have a baptism of water. “Whoever believes in the Son of God is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God” (John 3: 18). This truth was valid up to now in all Christian generations and will remain valid until the end of time, irrespective of the fact that some people in the Church of our so fickle, cowardly, sensationalist, and conformist time reinterpret this truth in a sense contrary to its evident wording, selling thereby this reinterpretation as continuity in the development of doctrine. They had to believe in Jesus in a community and get baptized with water. They then had to learn the Faith and avoid mortal sins which could take them to Hell, even though they believed in Jesus. Outside the Christian Faith no other religion can be a true and God-willed way, since it is the explicit will of God, that all people believe in His Son: “This is the will of my Father, that everyone who looks on the Son and believes in him should have eternal life” (John 6: 40). Outside the Christian Faith no other religion is able to transmit true supernatural life: “This is eternal life, that they know you the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent” (John 17: 3). So outside the Catholic religion, among the Christian religions there is salvation.He knows of people saved outside the Catholic Church. This is public heresy. He has changed the Nicene Creed to "I believe in three or more baptisms- desire, blood and ignorance, which exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church. They also exclude membership in the Church and they are known people to me. Otherwise how could they be exceptions to the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins, even if it is in the Methodist, Baptist,Mormon or other  Christian community or church.It could also be among the Jehovah Witnesses, even though they believe Jesus and St. Michael the Archangel are one. I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins, even if it is that of a Muslim who believes in Jesus and still in public supports the tenets of Islamism." He has rejected the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors like the present two popes. He has changed the Apostles Creed to mean " I believe in the Holy Spirit the Holy Catholic Church which now teaches that outside the Church there is known salvation and so all people do not need to be members with faith and baptism, as it was held, de fide, in the past." So Bishop Schneider and I would make a different Profession of Faith. Since there is known salvation outside the Church for him and BOD, BOB and I.I refer to known people saved outside the Church, Vatican Council II (LG 14,LG 16) would become a rupture for him with Tradition. It would be a rupture with the past exclusive ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return. There is no ecumenism of return for him, since there are exceptions for him but which would only be hypothetical cases for me. It means the Catechism of Pope Pius X when it mentions invincible ignorance would contradict the Syllabus of Errors on an ecumenism of return. It would also mean the Catechism of Pope Pius X would contradict itself for Bishop Schneider, when it mentions invincible ignorance and also says that all need to be members of the Church for salvation.So the old catechisms contradict each other for him with his irrational premise and non traditional conclusion. It is not surprise that Bishop Schneider approved the Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma by Ludwig Ott which projects BOD, BOB and I.I as exceptions to Feeneyite EENS. They would have to be objective and explicit cases, Ott and Bishop Schneider, for them to be practical exceptions to EENS. Bishop Schneiders theology is the same as the liberals on salvation. -Lionel Andrades 1  Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II  Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door. Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it." Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him...- Ad Gentes 7. Vatican Council II   Lumen Gentium 14, Vatican Council II 14. This Sacred Council wishes to turn its attention firstly to the Catholic faithful. Basing itself upon Sacred Scripture and Tradition, it teaches that the Church, now sojourning on earth as an exile, is necessary for salvation. Christ, present to us in His Body, which is the Church, is the one Mediator and the unique way of salvation. In explicit terms He Himself affirmed the necessity of faith and baptism(124) and thereby affirmed also the necessity of the Church, for through baptism as through a door men enter the Church. Whosoever, therefore, knowing that the Catholic Church was made necessary by Christ, would refuse to enter or to remain in it, could not be saved. They are fully incorporated in the society of the Church who, possessing the Spirit of Christ accept her entire system and all the means of salvation given to her, and are united with her as part of her visible bodily structure and through her with Christ, who rules her through the Supreme Pontiff and the bishops. The bonds which bind men to the Church in a visible way are profession of faith, the sacraments, and ecclesiastical government and communion. He is not saved, however, who, though part of the body of the Church, does not persevere in charity. He remains indeed in the bosom of the Church, but, as it were, only in a "bodily" manner and not "in his heart."(12*) All the Church's children should remember that their exalted status is to be attributed not to their own merits but to the special grace of Christ. If they fail moreover to respond to that grace in thought, word and deed, not only shall they not be saved but they will be the more severely judged.(13*) Catechumens who, moved by the Holy Spirit, seek with explicit intention to be incorporated into the Church are by that very intention joined with her. With love and solicitude Mother Church already embraces them as her own.- Lumen Gentium 14, Vatican Council II  Unitatis Redintigratio (Decree on Ecumenism), Vatican Council II  It follows that the separated Churches(23) and Communities as such, though we believe them to be deficient in some respects, have been by no means deprived of significance and importance in the mystery of salvation. For the Spirit of Christ has not refrained from using them as means of salvation which derive their efficacy from the very fullness of grace and truth entrusted to the Church. Nevertheless, our separated brethren, whether considered as individuals or as Communities and Churches, are not blessed with that unity which Jesus Christ wished to bestow on all those who through Him were born again into one body, and with Him quickened to newness of life - that unity which the Holy Scriptures and the ancient Tradition of the Church proclaim. For it is only through Christ's Catholic Church, which is "the all-embracing means of salvation," that they can benefit fully from the means of salvation. We believe that Our Lord entrusted all the blessings of the New Covenant to the apostolic college alone, of which Peter is the head, in order to establish the one Body of Christ on earth to which all should be fully incorporated who belong in any way to the people of God. This people of God, though still in its members liable to sin, is ever growing in Christ during its pilgrimage on earth, and is guided by God's gentle wisdom, according to His hidden designs, until it shall happily arrive at the fullness of eternal glory in the heavenly Jerusalem.-Unitatis Redintigratio (Decree on Ecumenism), Vatican Council II  Catechism of the Catholic Church 846-848   "Outside the Church there is no salvation"  846 How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church Fathers? Re-formulated positively, it means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body:   Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door. Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it. 847 This affirmation is not aimed at those who, through no fault of their own, do not know Christ and his Church:  Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience - those too may achieve eternal salvation. 848 "Although in ways known to himself God can lead those who, through no fault of their own, are ignorant of the Gospel, to that faith without which it is impossible to please him, the Church still has the obligation and also the sacred right to evangelize all men." -Catechism of the Catholic Church 846-848   DOMINUS IESUS  IV. UNICITY AND UNITY OF THE CHURCH 16.  The Lord Jesus, the only Saviour, did not only establish a simple community of disciples, but constituted the Church as a salvific mystery: he himself is in the Church and the Church is in him (cf. Jn 15:1ff.; Gal 3:28; Eph 4:15-16; Acts 9:5).  Therefore, the fullness of Christ's salvific mystery belongs also to the Church, inseparably united to her Lord. Indeed, Jesus Christ continues his presence and his work of salvation in the Church and by means of the Church (cf. Col 1:24-27),47 which is his body (cf. 1 Cor 12:12-13, 27; Col 1:18).48 And thus, just as the head and members of a living body, though not identical, are inseparable, so too Christ and the Church can neither be confused nor separated, and constitute a single “whole Christ”.49 This same inseparability is also expressed in the New Testament by the analogy of the Church as the Bride of Christ (cf. 2 Cor 11:2; Eph 5:25-29; Rev 21:2,9).50 Therefore, in connection with the unicity and universality of the salvific mediation of Jesus Christ, the unicity of the Church founded by him must be firmly believed as a truth of Catholic faith. Just as there is one Christ, so there exists a single body of Christ, a single Bride of Christ: “a single Catholic and apostolic Church”.51 Furthermore, the promises of the Lord that he would not abandon his Church (cf. Mt 16:18; 28:20) and that he would guide her by his Spirit (cf. Jn16:13) mean, according to Catholic faith, that the unicity and the unity of the Church — like everything that belongs to the Church's integrity — will never be lacking.52 The Catholic faithful are required to profess that there is an historical continuity — rooted in the apostolic succession53— between the Church founded by Christ and the Catholic Church: “This is the single Church of Christ... which our Saviour, after his resurrection, entrusted to Peter's pastoral care (cf. Jn 21:17), commissioning him and the other Apostles to extend and rule her (cf. Mt 28:18ff.), erected for all ages as ‘the pillar and mainstay of the truth' (1 Tim3:15). This Church, constituted and organized as a society in the present world, subsists in [subsistit in] the Catholic Church, governed by the Successor of Peter and by the Bishops in communion with him”.54  With the expressionsubsistit in, the Second Vatican Council sought to harmonize two doctrinal statements: on the one hand, that the Church of Christ, despite the divisions which exist among Christians, continues to exist fully only in the Catholic Church, and on the other hand, that “outside of her structure, many elements can be found of sanctification and truth”,55 that is, in those Churches and ecclesial communities which are not yet in full communion with the Catholic Church.56 But with respect to these, it needs to be stated that “they derive their efficacy from the very fullness of grace and truth entrusted to the Catholic Church” -Dominus Iesus 16.  ________________________________ LETTER OF THE HOLY OFFICE 1949 DURING THE PONTIFICATE OF POPE PIUS XII ( This letter was  an inter office correspondence between cardinals. However the liberals placed it in the Denzinger and it has been referenced in Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church. It contains an objective error when it assumes invisible and unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are visible and known exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.Upon this Letter is based the New Theology.)  We are bound by divine and Catholic faith to believe all those  things which are contained in the word of God, whether it be Scripture or Tradition, and are proposed by the Church to be believed as divinely revealed, not only through solemnjudgment but also through the ordinary and universal teaching office (, n. 1792). Now, among those things which the Church has always preached and will never cease to preach is contained also that infallible statement by which we are taught that there  is no salvation outside the Church. However, this dogma must be understood in that sense in which the Church herself understands it. For, it was not to private judgments that Our Savior gave for explanation those things that are contained in the deposit of faith, but to the teaching authority of the Church... Now, among the commandments of Christ, that one holds not the least place by which we are commanded to be incorporated by baptism into the Mystical Body of Christ,  which is the Church, and to remain united to Christ and to His Vicar, through whom He Himself in a visible manner governs the Church on earth... Therefore, no one will be saved who, knowing the Church to have been divinely established by Christ, nevertheless  refuses to submit to the Church or withholds obedience from the Roman Pontiff, the Vicar of Christ on earth. Not only did the Savior command that all nations should  enter the Church, but He also decreed the Church to be a means of salvation without which no one can enter the kingdom of eternal glory. In His infinite mercy God has willed that the effects,necessary for one to be saved, of those helps to salvation which are directed toward man's final end, not by intrinsic  necessity, but only by divine institution, can also be obtained in certain circumstances when those helps are used only in desire and longing. This we see clearly stated in the Sacred Council of Trent, both in reference to the sacrament of regeneration and in reference to the sacrament of penance (, nn. 797, 807).   Therefore, that one may obtain eternal salvation, it is not always required that he be incorporated into the Church actually as a member, but it is necessary that at least he be united to her by desire and longing. However, this desire need not always be explicit,as it is in catechumens; but when a person is involved in invincible ignorance God accepts also an implicit desire, so called because it is included in that good disposition of soul whereby a person wishes his will to be conformed to the will of God. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/ave-maria-original.html __________________________ http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20010124_dupuis_en.html

 FEBRUARY 12, 2019

LifeSiteNews' report on Archbishop Schneider's statement is confusion

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/lifesitenews-report-on-archbishop.html

FEBRUARY 15, 2019

CDF could ask Cardinal Muller and Bishop Schneider to interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church rationally

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/cdf-could-ask-cardinal-muller-and.html

_______________________________________________________

February 16, 2019

 

Times have changed for Cardinal Kasper 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/times-have-changed-for-cardinal-kasper.html

Padri Minimi nella Basilica di Sant'Andrea delle Fratte, Roma non insegna la rigorosa interpretazione della salvezza (EENS) secondo il Catechismo della Chiesa Cattolica (1994)

Padri Minimi  nella Basilica di Sant'Andrea delle Fratte, Roma non insegna la rigorosa interpretazione della salvezza (EENS) secondo il Catechismo della Chiesa Cattolica (1994)

La Congregazione religiosa di San Francesco di Paula, i Padri Minimi, nella Basilica di Sant Andrea della Fratte Roma non insegma la stretta interpretazione della salvezza ( extra ecclesiam nulla salus) a secondo il Catechismo della Chiesa Cattolica ( 1994) di Papa Giovanni Paulo II.

Il Catechismo della Chiesa Cattolica (CCC 846) dice tutti bisogna fede e battesimo per la salvezza, tutto necessarie essere membri della Chiesa Cattolica per evitare l'inferno. Tuttavia questo non e eseguito nelle Catechismo in parrochia.

«Fuori della Chiesa non c'è salvezza» 846 Come bisogna intendere questa affermazione spesso ripetuta dai Padri della Chiesa? Formulata in modo positivo, significa che ogni salvezza viene da Cristo-Capo per mezzo della Chiesa che è il suo corpo: Il santo Concilio « insegna, appoggiandosi sulla Sacra Scrittura e sulla Tradizione, che questa Chiesa pellegrinante è necessaria alla salvezza. Infatti solo Cristo, presente per noi nel suo corpo, che è la Chiesa, è il Mediatore e la Via della salvezza; ora egli, inculcando espressamente la necessità della fede e del Battesimo, ha insieme confermato la necessità della Chiesa, nella quale gli uomini entrano mediante il Battesimo come per la porta. Perciò non potrebbero salvarsi quegli uomini, i quali, non ignorando che la Chiesa cattolica è stata da Dio per mezzo di Gesù Cristo fondata come necessaria, non avessero tuttavia voluto entrare in essa o in essa perseverare ».  847 Questa affermazione non si riferisce a coloro che, senza loro colpa, ignorano Cristo e la Chiesa: « Infatti, quelli che senza colpa ignorano il Vangelo di Cristo e la sua Chiesa, e tuttavia cercano sinceramente Dio, e sotto l'influsso della grazia si sforzano di compiere con le opere la volontà di Dio, conosciuta attraverso il dettame della coscienza, possono conseguire la salvezza eterna ».  848 « Benché Dio, attraverso vie a lui note, possa portare gli uomini, che senza loro colpa ignorano il Vangelo, alla fede, senza la quale è impossibile piacergli, 341 è tuttavia compito imprescindibile della Chiesa, ed insieme sacro diritto, evangelizzare » tutti gli uomini.

http://www.vatican.va/archive/catechism_it/p123a9p3_it.htm

I passaggi in rosso si riferiscono a casi ipotetici, possibilità teoriche e non noti non cattolici salvati al di fuori della Chiesa nei tempi presenti (2019).

Il passaggio in blu concorda con il dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) che dice che tutti devono essere membri della Chiesa Cattolica, per la salvezza, tutti hanno bisogno di fede e battesimo per evitare i fuochi dell'inferno.

Il passaggio in blu è la norma per la salvezza nella Chiesa Cattolica, è la regola su come andare in Paradiso, per tutte le persone, come insegnato alla Chiesa nel corso dei secoli, dallo Spirito Santo.

Perché ci sia un'eccezione ci dovrebbe essere una persona salvata al di fuori della Chiesa che è conosciuta e fisicamente visibile. Una persona invisibile che non esiste nella nostra realtà, non può essere un'eccezione oggettiva a tutti coloro che hanno bisogno di essere membri della Chiesa Cattolica per la salvezza.

Quindi i passaggi in rosso sono solo ipotetici, sempre. Possono essere solo ipotetici.

Durante il Catechismo, i Padri Minori interpretano il passaggio in rosso come un'eccezione al passaggio in blu. Questo è irrazionale.

Il Catechismo della Chiesa Cattolica è in armonia con la rigorosa interpretazione del dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), l'ecclesiologia del passato esclusivo, un ecumenismo del ritorno e il Sillabo degli Errori di Papa Pio IX.

È in armonia con il Concilio Vaticano II interpretato con Feeneyismo invece di Cushingismo irrazionale.

I Padri Minimi hanno bisogno  dire ai giovani Cattolici, e anche ai loro seminaristi, che tutti hanno bisogno di essere membri della Chiesa Cattolica per la salvezza e non ci sono eccezioni conosciute.

Devono dire ai giovani Cattolici che al di fuori della Chiesa Cattolica non esiste alcuna salvezza conosciuta. Quelli che muoiono fuori dalla Chiesa sono sulla via dell'inferno.

Questo è stato l'insegnamento della Chiesa per secoli, basato sulla Sacra Scrittura e sulla Tradizione secondo il Concilio Vaticano II (AG 7). Non possiamo separare Gesù dall'appartenenza alla Chiesa Cattolica, per la salvezza (per evitare l'Inferno).

Alla basilica di S. Andrea delle Fratte, all'Altare del Miracolo, Alphonse Ratisbonne vide la Madonna. Lei gli mostrò la bellezza della Chiesa Cattolica e la sua importanza per la salvezza di tutte le persone.

Divenne prete cattolico e fondò due congregazioni missionarie.-Lionel Andrades

FEBRUARY 13, 2019

Minim Fathers, at the Basilica of Sant Andrea delle Fratte, Rome are not teaching the strict interpretation of salvation (EENS) according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church(1994)

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/minim-fathers-at-basilica-of-sant_13.html

___________________________

 FEBRUARY 12, 2019

I Padri Minimi nella Basilica di Sant'Andrea delle Fratte, a Roma, sono irrazionali: "il rosso non è un'eccezione per il blu"

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/padri-minimi-nella-basilica-di.html

____________________________

 FEBRUARY 4, 2019

Nei documenti magistrali il rosso non è un'eccezione al blu, il rosso non contraddice il blu: con il blu c'è un'ermeneutica di continuità con la Tradizione (extra ecclesium nulla salus del 16 ° secolo , Sillabo degli Errori di Pio IX, ecumenismo del ritorno, esclusivista ecclesiologia ecc. )

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/02/nei-documenti-magistrali-il-rosso-non-e.html