Archbishops Giacomo Morandi and Archbishop Augustine Di Noia , Secretaries of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and Mons Marco Gnarvi, Diocesan Secretary for the Office of Inter religious Dialogue and Ecumenism, Rome Vicariate are in schism with the popes over the centuries .
They use an irrational premise, inference and conclusion to create this schism.With this irrationality they have also changed the understanding of the Creeds and Catechism and this is heresy.
They do not interpret Vatican Council II rationally and so avoid heresy on extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q, 27 Q), the Syllabus of Errors and the Catechism of the Catholic Church ( outside the Church there is no salvation).An artificial rupture is created with Tradition which is supported by Pope Benedict and Pope Francis.-
SO THIS IS HERESY
1
https://www.ncregister.com/blog/jimmy-akin/on-charging-a-pope-with-heresy
HERESY LIST
1. So EENS is contradicted and so is John 3:5, Mark 16 :16 etc.
2. The Nicene Creed is contradicted.( I believe in more than one known baptism for the forgiveness of sins and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church).
3.The Apostles Creed is re-interpreted ( I believe in the Holy Spirit which teaches the Catholic Church today according to the two popes that there is known salvation outside the Church).
4.The Athanasius Creed is rejected( Outside the Church there is no salvation).
This is all first class heresy in the hierarchy of truths of Pope John Paul II.
What the past Magisterium has infallibly defined to be “divinely revealed” is rejected or changed by the present two popes and the Vatican Curia and the Rome Vicariate.
THE EVIDENCE
1.The evidence is there for Pope Benedict's heresies in the theological papers of the International Theological Commission.It is there in black and white.It is followed by the Archbishops at the CDF and the Rome Vicariate.
2 They are approved by Pope Francis.The same irrational reasoning was used at the Plaquet Deo Press Conference by Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
2. Pope Francis on the plane when asked about his Abu Dhabi statement did not affirm the dogma EENS. Instead he projected Vatican Council II( interpreted with the irrationality) as a rupture with EENS.This was a rejection of EENS.
3. He has officially presented a kerygma in Evangelii Gaudium without the necessity of being a member of the Catholic Church.
4.Today if he is asked he will not affirm EENS like the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.This is further proof.
He can recite the Nicene or Apostles Creed but he will interpret them with the irrational premise and inference which is creates a rupture with their understanding over the centuries.So his reciting the Creeds is meaningless.
5. During the pontificate of Pope Francis, Pope Benedict confirmed that EENS was no more, for Pope Francis, like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century. There was 'a development' with Vatican Council II.He meant Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise and inference.Otherwise there could not be a development.So EENS and the Creeds were changed in their meanings. The original strict interpretation was denied.
6. Pope Francis does not ask Pope Benedict to issue a correction saying EENS today is like it was for the Magisterium in the 16th century.There is no development with Vatican Council II interpreted without the irrationality.
They are both guilty. So we cannot expect a Catholic proclamation of the faith.
7. So with EENS and Nicene, Apostles andAthanasius Creeds changed theologically there are new heretical doctrines. They are there in the new ecumenism, new ecclesiology, newevangelisation and joint mission with other Christian communities who are not outside the Church for the two popes.There is a new understanding of mission in which everyone does not need to enter the Catholic Church for salvation( since there are known exceptions for the two popes).
8.The new doctrines are heretical and practical conclusions of a new theology based upon a false premise and inference. So now heresy is the norm in the Church supported by the present two popes.
9.They interpret the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 with the irrational reasoning. So BOD, BOB and I.I contradict EENS.BOD, BOB and I.I would also contradict the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27 Q ) and other magisterial documents.This is schism with the past popes.
SO THIS IS HERESY
1.So there is a denial of traditional EENS by Pope Francis which is confirmed in public by Pope Benedict.Pope Pius XII called EENS an 'infallible teaching'(Letter of the Holy Office 1949). So this is heresy.
2.Since both popes interpret BOD, BOB and I.I as referring to known people saved outside the Church, they have rejected the Athanasius Creed which says outside the Church there is no salvation. This is heresy.
3.With seen- in- the- flesh cases of BOD, BOB and I.I(otherwise they cannot be exceptions to EENS) for the present two popes they have changed the meaning of the Nicene Creed to ,'I believe in three or more known baptisms, desire, blood and invincible ignorance... and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church'. This is first class heresy.
4.Since BOD, BOB and I.I refer to known people saved outside the Church( otherwise they could not be exceptions to EENS according to the 16th century) the Catechism of Pope Pius X is contradicted when it says that all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation.
The Catechisms would also contradict themselves with the use of the pontiff's irrationality.They would be contradicting EENS and the Creeds according to the 16th century. This is heresy.
5.Vatican Council II can be interpreted with hypothetical cases just being hypothetical and not objectively known people saved outside the Church. Then Vatican Council II would not be a rupture with EENS according to the Magisterium of the 16th century.But this is not the interpretation of the two pontiffs. This is heresy. They intentionally interpret Vatican Council II with a hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition( past ecclesiology, ecumenism of return, Syllabus of Errors, Creeds and Catechism).
6.Dominus Iesus and Redemptoris Missio was written assuming that BOD, BOB and I.I referred to known people saved outside the Church.So there was salvation outside the Church. This is irrational but this is the basis of the New Theology.Possibilities and theoretical cases are assumed to be practical exceptions to EENS in the present times(2019). With the New Theology Dominus Iesus and Redemptoris Missio do not affirm exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church and so they are a rupture with Tradition( 16th century EENS, past ecclesiology).A heretical theology creates new doctrines.They are heretical.They are expressed in the new ecumenism( in which Protestants do not need to convert), a new ecclesiology( in which there is salvation outside the church), new mission( in which non Catholics are saved in their religion since there is known salvation outside the Church,possibilities are real people) etc.This is heretical doctrine.
7. With visible- for- the- pontiff cases of BOD, BOB and I.I and so they have re-interpreted St. Thomas Aquinas who was a Feeneyite. Aquinas affirmed the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS and knew that hypothetical cases of being saved in invincible ignorance and the case of the unknown catechumen, were not objective exceptions to EENS.The pontiffs and the CDF also project St. Augustine. St. Francis of Assisi and the other saints who affirmed exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church, as denying it.They deny it with alleged practical exceptions of BOD, BOB and I.I.The saints are interpreted heretically.
So we have heresy in theology and doctrine and it is manifest. It can be corrected. This is why I mention it here.
Jimmy Akins states:
Summing Up( according to Jimmy Akins) 1
The Open Letter has many other flaws, but its chief one is that it fails to make the case that the present pope is guilty of heresy. To do that, it would need to show the following:
- The Magisterium has infallibly defined some specific truth ( The Creeds and EENS.)
- It has infallibly defined that this specific truth is divinely revealed, creating a dogma (EENS and the Creeds)
- The pope has been baptized (that’s easy)
- The pope’s words or actions indicate that he refuses to believe the dogma (EENS was refuted at the Abu Dhabi meeting. It has been refuted many times with a Christian theology of religious pluralism. EENS is never affirmed in public )
- His words or actions cannot be understood in a way consistent with the dogma (This is documented in the The Open Letter with reference to EENS and Vatican Council II(Ad Gentes 7 )
- He does so obstinately (This is documented here in this report. The heresy is repeated.EENS, the Creed and Vatican Council II are re-interpreted as a rupture with Tradition.
The present two popes and the Prefect of the CDF need to recant and announce:-
1.Invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are not physically visible and personally known exceptions to EENS.So EENS today is not a rupture with EENS according to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.
2.Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church do not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS, the past exclusive ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.
3.They can confirm that they personally do not know of non Catholics saved outside the Church in 2019 and neither do people in general know of such cases. If any one was saved as such it would only be known to God.Lionel Andrades
1.Invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are not physically visible and personally known exceptions to EENS.So EENS today is not a rupture with EENS according to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.
2.Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church do not contradict the strict interpretation of EENS, the past exclusive ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.
3.They can confirm that they personally do not know of non Catholics saved outside the Church in 2019 and neither do people in general know of such cases. If any one was saved as such it would only be known to God.Lionel Andrades
1
https://www.ncregister.com/blog/jimmy-akin/on-charging-a-pope-with-heresy
Posts
