Tuesday, July 23, 2013

Jesuits in first class heresy

Jesuits are in first class in heresy. In the Nicene Creed for them the heresy is 'I believe in three known baptisms for the forgiveness of sins and not one known baptism that of water'.
 
While in the Athanasius Creed for them it is 'outside the Church there is known salvation'.
 

Cardinal Luiz Ladarian S.J, the present Secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith( CDF),Vatican expresses this heretical view.He was the Secretary General of the ITC and at that time a Professor of Theology at the Pontifical Gregorian University, Rome.This same heresy has been expressed by many Jesuits in different forums.

 
Here is a passage from Christianity and the World Religions 1997 posted on the website of the International Theological Commission, Vatican.
 
66. In his encyclical Mystici Corporis, Pius XII addresses the question, How are those who attain salvation outside visible communion with the Church related to her? He says that they are oriented to the mystical body of Christ by a yearning and desire of which they are not aware (DS 3821). The opposition of the American Jesuit Leonard Feeney, who insisted on the exclusivist interpretation of the expression extra ecclesiam nulla solus,(sic) afforded the occasion for the letter of the Holy Office, dated 8 August ,1949, to the archbishop of Boston, which rejected Feeney s interpretation and clarified the teaching of Pius XII. The letter distinguishes between the necessity of belonging to the Church for salvation (necessitas praecepti) and the necessity of the indispensable means of salvation (intrinseca necessitas); in relationship to the latter, the Church is a general help for salvation (DS 3867—69). In the case of invincible ignorance the implicit desire of belonging to the Church suffices; this desire will always be present when a man aspires to conform his will to that of God (DS 3870). But faith, in the sense of Hebrews 11:6, and love are always necessary with intrinsic necessity (DS 3872). (emphasis added)
 
Cardinal Luiz Ladaria is saying that the baptism of water is not the only known way of salvation, as held by Fr.Leonard Feeney but so is being saved with an implicit desire or invincible ignorance. This is also a known way of salvation.He means we can personally know these  cases, they are physically visible to us or we can name these persons in 2013. Since it is a known way of salvation it contradicts the exclusivist interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney .So for him every one does not have to convert into the Church for salvation. There are known exceptions.
 
In the Nicene Creed we pray ' I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sin' we do not know of any other baptism which can be administered or which can be known to us personally. We cannot name any such case.
 
The Jesuit Secretary of the CDF says implicit desire is known to us in the present times so is being saved in invincible ignorance. So for him , the Profession of Faith, was ' I believe in not one(known) baptism for the forgiveness of sin  but three'.
 
The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are known only to God. So traditionally they were considered irrelevant to the literal interpretation of the dogma on exclusive salvation.It was  Cardinal Richard Cushing the Archbishop of Boston and the Jesuits there who made it  made it  an issue in their opposition to Fr.Leonard Feeney, who was expelled from the Jesuit community.
 
They were denying an ex cathedra dogma which is a mortal sin and implying there was a change in the Nicene and Athanasius Creed. This is repeated on the ITC website.
 
 Here it is again on the International Theological Commission's  'The Hope of Salvation for Infants who die without being baptized'  2007
 
58. In the face of new problems and situations and of an exclusive interpretation of the adage: “salus (sic) extra ecclesiam non est”,[88] the magisterium, in recent times, has articulated a more nuanced understanding as to the manner in which a saving relationship with the Church can be realized. The Allocution of Pope Pius IX, Singulari Quadam (1854) clearly states the issues involved: “It must, of course, be held as a matter of faith that outside the apostolic Roman Church no one can be saved, that the Church is the only ark of salvation, and that whoever does not enter it, will perish in the flood. On the other hand, it must likewise be held as certain that those who live in ignorance of the true religion, if such ignorance be invincible, are not subject to any guilt in this matter before the eyes of the Lord”.[89]
 
Again the Jesuit Secretary General of the ITC Fr.Luiz Ladaria S.J assumes those saved in invincible ignorance are exceptions  to 'whoever does not enter it , will perish in the flood'. He is implying that these cases are known to us, he could name them and so ' outside the Church there is known exception'  and  he believes ' in three or more baptisms for the forgiveness of sins'.

To change or deny the Nicene Creed is a first class heresy. It is a mortal sin.
 
Pope Pius IX in the text quoted above has not stated that these cases are known to us or are exceptions to the literal interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus. This is all implied wrongly.
59. The Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston (1949) offers further specifications. “To gain eternal salvation, it is not always required that a person be incorporated in reality (reapse) as a member of the Church,... 
Lionel:
Yes in principle. This is a possibility known only to God. For us these are hypothetical cases. They are not known exceptions to  the Creed or the dogma on salvation.
 
... but it is necessary that one belong to it at least in desire and longing (voto et desiderio). It is not always necessary that this desire be explicit as it is with catechumens. When one is invincibly ignorant, God also accepts an implicit desire, so called because it is contained in the good disposition of soul by which a person wants his or her will to be conformed to God’s will”.[90]-and'The Hope of Salvation for Infants who die without being baptized'  2007 (1)
 
 The Magisterium has made a mistake and the mistake is a first class heresy. It has been approved by Pope Benedict XVI and the Prefects of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
 
This same heresy is part of the Jesuit's rejection of the teachings of  St.Ignatius of Loyola when they conduct the Ignatian Spiritual Exercises. They assume there are known exceptions to exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church and that there are known exceptions to mortal sin.
 -Lionel Andrades
 
1.
 
* PRELIMINARY NOTE: The theme “The Hope of Salvation for Infants who Die Without Being Baptized” was placed under the study of the International Theological Commission. In order to prepare for this study, a Committee was formed comprised by Most Rev. Ignazio Sanna, Most Rev. Basil Kyu-Man Cho, Rev. Peter Damien Akpunonu, Rev. Adelbert Denaux, Rev. Gilles Emery, OP, Msgr. Ricardo Ferrara, Msgr. István Ivancsó, Msgr. Paul McPartlan, Rev. Dominic Veliath, SDB (President of the Committee), and Sr. Sarah Butler, MSTB. The Committee also received the collaboration of Rev. Luis Ladaria, SJ, the Secretary General of the International Theological Commission, and Msgr. Guido Pozzo, the Assistant to the ITC, as well as other members of the Commission. The general discussion on the theme took place during the plenary sessions of the ITC, held in Rome. In October 2005 and October 2006. This present text was approved in forma specifica by the members of the Commission, and was subsequently submitted to its President, Cardinal William Levada who, upon receiving the approval of the Holy father in an audience granted on January 19, 2007, approved the text for publication. (emphasis added)
  

July 23, 2013
Jesuits!
 http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/07/jesuits.html

Jesuits!

 

Catholic blogs refer to salvation only with reference to Protestants

So many Catholic blogs when they refer to salvation do so only with reference to Protestants.
Then they are also afraid to say clearly that Muslims and Jews are on the way to Hell according to the teachings of the Catholic Church.
Instead they will repeat error and heresy and claim that the baptism of desire is a known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus .Then they will suggest that the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 made a mistake by suggesting that there were known exceptions to the literal interpretation of Fr. Leonard Feeney.
All  magisterial documents are interpreted  with this error of being able to see known exceptions to the traditional teaching on other religions, even thought they cannot name any such case.
 
Here is an example of such an error by a priest of the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate on the blog Black Cordelias.

Protest-ant Beliefs vs. Catholic Church
http://theblackcordelias.wordpress.com/2011/12/27/protest-ant-beliefs-vs-catholic-church/#comment-12455

-Lionel Andrades

Spiritual Directors at the Gregorian University have a message for Pope Francis : unity among Catholics

Spiritual Directors at the Gregorian University, in their errors and heresy, have a message for Pope Francis.When corrected it can create unity among Catholics
 
Here are the two points taught by the Jesuits. If Pope Francis addresses them he could begin a reconciliation with the sedevacantists, traditionalists SSPX and the community of Fr.Leonard Feeney in the Archdiocese of Los Angeles.
1) When the Jesuits teach that Fr.Leonard Feeney was excommunicated for saying that the baptism of desire is not an exception to the dogma, and that this is the Magisterial teaching, then the Jesuits are saying that the Magisterium made an error. It is an objective, factual error. It is a fact of life that we cannot see the dead. So how can there be known exceptions? The Jesuits teach that the Magisterium also assumes that the dead are alive and are an exception to Fr.Leonard Feeney's interpretation.
When this error is corrected by Pope Francis  he will be affirming the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the same as the sedevacantists CMRI, MHFM etc and the communities of Fr.Leonard Feeney.
2) If the Jesuits continue to teach that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are known exceptions to the Nicene Creed ( I believe in three known baptism for the forgiveness of sins and not one baptism) and the Athanasius Creed (outside the Church there is known salvation) they are also saying that this is the teaching of the Magisterium and the Magisterium is in heresy like them.
 

It is simple misinformation that Pope Francis has to clarify:
 
1. We obviously cannot see the dead on earth.
2.The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 says Fr.Leonard Feeney was excommunicated for disobedience and not for heresy. When the Church lifted the excommunication they did not ask him to recant.
The secular media claims he was excommunicated for heresy so does EWTN ,on line, which is false.( See Tragic Errors of Fr.Leonard Feeney (EWTN) . EWTN assumes it was for heresy.They use an interpretation with the  Richard Cushing premise.http://www.ewtn.com/library/scriptur/feeney.txt )
 
Here are the Jesuit  Spiritual Directors at the Gregorian University who have not commented or denied the last post  on this blog which was e-mailed to all of them :- 
 
Alex Zatyurka S.J (zatyrka@unigre.it),
Mark Inglot S.J (m.inglot@unigre.it )
Josephn Jeevendra Jadhav S.J (jadjav@unigre.it ),
Xavier Hwang S.J ( hwang@unigre.it ),
Peter Lah S.J ( lah@unigre.it ),
Linus Kujur S.J (kujur@unigre.it ),
Miguel Coll S.J (mcoll@unigre.it ),
Adam Wolanin S.J (wolanin@unigre.it ) ,
Bryan Lobo S.J (bryanlobo@jesuits.net ),
Michael Woods .J ( Woods@unigre.it) ,
Jonas Elias Capriani S. ( caprinisj@gmail.com )
Francisco Campos ( franciscofcampos@gmail.com ),
Victor Zhuk S.J ( Victor.zhuk@gmail.com ),
Eric Ramirez S.J ( eramirezsj@gmail.com ),
Jakub Garcar S.J (jakub.garcar@gmail.com )
 
They will conducte the Ignation Spiritual Exercises as a break with St.Ignatius by assuming there are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and to the Catholic Church's traditional teaching on mortal sin. This is heresy and they suggest that this is the teaching of the Magisterium.
-Lionel Andrades