Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Cardinal William Levada and the LCWR sisters are saying that there is no more exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church


The LCWR moves into New Age and the Prefect of the CDF is silent over the ‘theology of religions’.

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) has rightly faulted the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR), USA for assuming other faiths are means of salvation and encouraging  a spirituality without Jesus.

The LCWR sisters do not believe in exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church. However the Prefect of the CDF also does not believe in exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. He has written a Preface for the book Documenti and has approved the theological papers of the International Theological Commission (ITC) on the Vatican website.

Indifferentism is common to both the LCWR and the CDF. May be they just do not realize it.

A book approved by the CDF it is known is never proscribed like those of dissident theologians.However Documenti contains modernism. It can be confirmed on the ITC website.

An SSPX (Society of St.Pius X) bishop recently suggested that the pope was promoting modernism. We know that the Holy Father Pope Benedict XVI has approved the ITC documents.

Pope Benedict XVI as a theologian has assumed that there are explicit exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. The exceptions to the dogma supposedly known to us, are implicit desire/baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance.

So the Holy Father believes that there are non Catholics in 2012 who are saved and they are known to us.

Then he goes a step further and assumes that non Catholics are saved in general in their religions and so do not have to convert.( Cardinal Bertone referred the front page article on the L’Osservatore Romano written by Cardinal Walter Kaspar in a message to the Chief Rabbinate of Israel written under political and military threats reported in the newspapers).

So if non Catholics are saved in general in their religions naturally we can have a ‘theology of religions’. This is the development of doctrine.So see the  'development':first the ITC assumes there are known exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma. Then it assumes that if a few non Catholics can be saved many can also be saved. It recommends a ‘theology of religions’ which Pope John Paul II prohibited in the CDF Notification to Fr. Jacques Dupuis S.J.(2001). Then the ITC concludes that if adults can be saved in their non Catholic religions without Catholic Faith and the baptism of water so can infants. So it is hoped that all infants will go to Heaven and not Limbo.

The whole series of wrong conclusions originated from the Richard Cushing error i.e. baptism of desire cases are known on earth who are exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the dogma. They now call this 'a development of doctrine' at the Pontifical Universities in Rome, Urbaniana etc.

So when the SSPX bishop says that the pope is a modernist he does not realize that the cause is one philosophical oversight which is influencing theology and that the same error is also being made by the SSPX. The SSPX bishops too are modernists on this issue.

Once this error is identified things will become clear for every one.

The Prefect of the CDF and the SSPX bishops, or other bishops and cardinals need to say the obvious: "We do not know any case of a non Catholic saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire”, then the whole spiral of errors will come crashing down and then we can put the right pieces together again.-Lionel Andrades

Tuesday, June 26, 2012 
ITC documents 'Christianity and the World Religions' and 'The Hope of Salvation for Infants who die without being baptized ' need to be retracted or corrected: Richard Cushing flaw runs through

ITC documents 'Christianity and the World Religions' and 'The Hope of Salvation for Infants who die without being baptized ' need to be retracted or corrected: Richard Cushing flaw runs through

The International Theological Commission (ITC), Vatican documents 'Christianity and the World Religions' and 'The Hope of Salvation for Infants who die without being baptiized' need to be retracted since their theology is based on an objective error. These two documents use the Richard Cuhsing error as a premise for non rational conclusions.

False theological conclusions have been made on a factual error which has seeped into two of the documents of the ITC published in the book Documenti which is available in the libraries of the Pontifical Universities in Rome.

It was Cardinal Richard Cushing , the former Archbishop of Boston who along with the  Jesuits assumed that the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance were explicit exceptions to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, which traditionally  taught that there was exclusive salvation  in only the Catholic Church.

We now know that there are no exceptions and even if Fr.Leonard Feeney rejected the baptism of desire, it makes no difference, to his literal interpretation of the dogma.

Cardinal William Levada who wrote  the preface for Documenti would also not know anyone in 2012 saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire, 'seeds of the Word', imperfect communion with the Church, a good conscience and other implicit forms of salvation.

However based on this error, of explictly known baptism of desire etc, the ITC concluded that there can be a theology of religions and that we can hope that infants who die with Original Sin and without the baptism of water will go to Heaven and not Limbo.-Lionel Andrades

______________________________________________
Cardinal Luiz Ladaria, Bishop Charles Morerod O.P Oath of Fidelity: to dissent
Profession of Faith allows for dissent on ecclesiology and baptism


INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION USES PREMISE THAT IS FACTUALLY INCORRECT : LIMBO

The International Theological Commission's position paper Christianity and the World Religions 1997 has an objective factual error and is approved by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger : invincible ignorance is not an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus

INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION ASSUMES ‘SEEDS OF THE WORD’ (VATICAN COUNCIL II ) IN OTHER RELIGIONS ARE KNOWN TO US AND THIS IS AN EXPLICIT EXCEPTION TO THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS



VATICAN'S INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION MAKES AN ERROR IN ITS POSITION PAPER CHRISTIANITY AND THE WORLD RELIGIONS


VATICAN COUNCIL II REJECTS THE THEOLOGY OF RELIGIONS


Former Secretary of the International Theological Commission holds that those saved with the baptism of desire and in invincible ignorance are known to us and so an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus


SSPX WEBSITE: ' I believe in three baptisms for the forgiveness of sins’ ?


WILL BISHOP BERNARD FELLAY IN THE PROFESSION OF FAITH SAY: 'I BELIEVE IN ONE BAPTISM FOR THE FORGIVENESS OF SINS?


Bishop Fellay, Fr.Schmidberger,FSSP,Joseph Fenton seem unaware the baptism of desire is not an explicit exception to the dogma
Monday, June 25, 2012
CARDINAL LEVADA WRITES PREFACE FOR ITC BOOK : IT SAYS THE HOLY OFFICE CORRECTED FR.LEONARD FEENEY FOR DENYING THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE, WHICH IT IS ASSUMED (WRONGLY) CONTRADICTS THE DOGMA
In what way does the baptism of desire contradict the literal interpretation of the dogma, CDF?