The Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith (CDF) is not informing Rabbi David Rosen and the ADLthat it can no more confuse what is implicit
as being explicit, invisible as being visible and de jure as being de facto, in
the interpretation of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible
ignorance and Vatican Council II, itself. It cannot use this confusion to
interpret the Catholic Creeds and Catechisms to produce a politically -correct -with -the -Left non-traditional conclusion.
This is first class heresy and public
schism for Catholics, when it is known and intentional.It is officially approved by the CDF. -Lionel Andrades
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith, Vatican (CDF) accompanied all the popes from Paul VI in interpreting
Vatican Council II with an irrational and not rational premise and so the
official conclusion was nontraditional instead of traditional.
Also the CDF Letter of the Holy Office
1949 during the pontificate of Pope Pius XII, wrongly assumed unknown cases of
the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance, are known
exceptions for Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) The Letter of the
Holy Office 1949 is referenced in Vatican Council II and placed in the
Denzinger with this objective mistake. It was approved by Fr. Karl Rainer and
Fr. Joseph Rat zinger.
The CDF made a historical doctrinal and
theological mistake in the LOHO when it confused what is physically invisible
as being visible and then approved the New Theology based upon this objective
error. Even non Christian scholars would agree – the CDF made an empirical error. -Lionel Andrades
The Catholic Bishops Conference in
Argentina, Colombia, Mexico, Brazil. Poland, Hungary, France, Italy, Canada,
USA etc are interpreting Vatican Council II with the False and not Rational
Premise. They are confusing what is implicit as being explicit, subjective as
being objective and producing nontraditional, theological conclusions. The new
doctrines are official and heretical. They reject the Athanasius Creed and
re-interpret the Nicene Creed. This is officially approved by the popes and the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. -Lionel Andrades
Before he retires in July, Cardinal Luiz
Ladaria sj, must clarify that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with a
rational or irrational premise and the conclusion will be
different and that Pope Benedict chose the False Premise to interpret Vatican
Council II in two theological papers of the International Theological
Commission. They are Christianity and the
World Religions (1997) and The Hope of
Salvation for Infants who die without being baptized (2007).Cardinal
Ladaria and Bishop Charles Morerod op were officials of the ITC. The two
theological papers with the objective error- confusing what is invisible as
being visible- was approved by Pope Benedict. -Lionel Andrades
Bishop Charles Morerod op was the Secretary General, of the International Theological Commission(ITC),Vatican when Vatican Council II was interpreted with a false premise, in two theological papers.
Morerod, who has been the Rector of the University of St.Thomas Aquinas, Rome, needs to apologise for the mistake.
When he interprets the Creeds and Catechisms with the same error the result is doctrinal confusion and heresy.
It may be mentioned that when he was the the bishop of Lausanne, Genève et Fribourg in Switzerland he refused to allow the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) to use churches in Switzerland.The reason he cited was -doctrine.He wanted the SSPX to continue to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise but to also accept the non traditional conclusion.
In Switzerland, Don Reto Nay a founder of Gloria TV also interprets Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus like Bishop Morerod. The traditionalists in Switzerland use the false premise to interpret magisterial documents. They are Cushingites and not Feeneyites.
So there is no opposition to Bishop Morerod from Gloria TV and the other Cushingite Lefebvrists in Switzerland.
When Cushingite philosophy and theology is replaced with rational Feeneyism,leftist bishops in Switzerland and Europe are expected to go into schism.However Catholics in general, are not expected to accept a false premise, to change the traditional understanding of mission, exclusive salvation, ecumenism, heresy and sacrilege, mortal sin etc.So there could be opposition.-Lionel Andrades
Former Secretary of the International Theological Commission holds that those saved with the baptism of desire and in invincible ignorance are known to us and so an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
The International Theological Commission's position paper Christianity and the World Religions 1997 has an objective factual error and is approved by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger : invincible ignorance is not an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION ASSUMES ‘SEEDS OF THE WORD’ (VATICAN COUNCIL II ) IN OTHER RELIGIONS ARE KNOWN TO US AND THIS IS AN EXPLICIT EXCEPTION TO THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
Traditionalists not welcome in Catholic churches: they first have to accept the doctrine of the dead-saved are physially visible to us and then adapt this new doctrine to Vatican Council II
58. In the face of new problems and situations and of an exclusive interpretation of the adage: “salus extra ecclesiam non est”,[88] the magisterium, in recent times, has articulated a more nuanced understanding as to the manner in which a saving relationship with the Church can be realized. The Allocution of Pope Pius IX, Singulari Quadam (1854) clearly states the issues involved: “It must, of course, be held as a matter of faith that outside the apostolic Roman Church no one can be saved, that the Church is the only ark of salvation, and that whoever does not enter it, will perish in the flood. On the other hand, it must likewise be held as certain that those who live in ignorance of the true religion, if such ignorance be invincible, are not subject to any guilt in this matter before the eyes of the Lord”-The Hope of Salvation for Infants who die without being baptized(2007. International Theological Commission) Fr.Luiz Ladaria S.j was the Secretary General of the ITC in 2007.He is now the Prefect of the CDF.
59. The Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston (1949) offers further specifications. “To gain eternal salvation, it is not always required that a person be incorporated in reality (reapse) as a member of the Church, but it is necessary that one belong to it at least in desire and longing (voto et desiderio). It is not always necessary that this desire be explicit as it is with catechumens.The Hope of Salvation for Infants Who Die Without Being Baptized
AUGUST 26, 2012
International Theological Commission papers are full of ‘non-sense’ since we don’t know anyone saved with the baptism of desire: Priests who protest against the ITC could be suspended
ITC documents 'Christianity and the World Religions' and 'The Hope of Salvation for Infants who die without being baptized ' need to be retracted or corrected: Richard Cushing flaw runs through
Pope Benedict approved the mistake of the International Theological Commission, a magisterial error on a faith issue which contradicted the ex cathedra teaching of three Church Councils and popes
Former Secretary of the International Theological Commission holds that those saved with the baptism of desire and in invincible ignorance are known to us and so an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
The International Theological Commission's position paper Christianity and the World Religions 1997 has an objective factual error and is approved by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger : invincible ignorance is not an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION ASSUMES ‘SEEDS OF THE WORD’ (VATICAN COUNCIL II ) IN OTHER RELIGIONS ARE KNOWN TO US AND THIS IS AN EXPLICIT EXCEPTION TO THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
For Bishop Robert Barron Lumen Gentium 16( invincible ignorance) refers to objectively seen non Catholics saved outside the Church.So for him and Pope Benedict the dogma EENS is obsolete and they search for substitute reasons to evangelize http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/bishop-robert-barron-lumen-gentium-16.html
The International Theological Commission(ITC), Vatican made an objective error in two of its theological papers and Catholic parents can correct the error when teaching the Faith to their children : Voice of the Family , Rome Life Forum ignores this family issue
Rational and traditional Catholic apologetics based on Feeneyism and not Cushingism http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/07/rational-and-traditional-catholic.html
'He that believeth in him is not judged. But he that doth not believe, is already judged: because he believeth not in the name of the only begotten Son of God.' http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/01/he-that-believeth-in-him-is-not-judged.html
Pentecost Sunday May 20,2018 ONLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH SOLAMENTE LA CHIESA CATTOLICA
MAY 15, 2018
Pentecost May 20 2018 : Invisible cases of the baptism of desire or invincible ignorance are not exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus : Invisibili casi di battesimo di desiderio,invincible ignorance ecc.non sono eccezione per il dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus
Posts
