Tuesday, January 25, 2022

Santa Francesca Romana

 

How Various Demons Attack

From Forums of the Virgin Mary [translated]:

The different types of demons attack people and the different temptations they put on them.

The demons are organized very efficiently to tempt human beings.

And they do it like in a relay race. 

A demon does the work for which he is expert.

And then when the person is mature, he hands over the post to another so that he is in charge of following and so on, in a chain.

St. Francesca Romana

This was revealed to Santa Francesca Romana, who was even shown what the temptation is at each stage, when a person is moving away from God and is on the way to perdition, and the demons that direct these attacks.

Here we will talk about the visions that Francesca Romana had about purgatory, demons, and hell, and the process of tempting people, so that you have knowledge, with the aim of defending yourself.

Between the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries lived Santa Francesca (or Francisca) Romana, who is listed as the most Roman of the saints.

From a very pious noble family, she wanted to be a religious but was forced to marry; she became an exemplary wife and had three children. Saint Francesca founded the Oblates of Mary, became a widow three years before her death, and became a nun in the Tor de Specchi monastery that she had founded.

She had a lot of supernatural gifts.

She naturally gave off a perfume that smelled like a mixture of lilies and roses.

And when she died, during the three days of her wake, the scent of flowers on her body became more intense.

It also sometimes gave off an unearthly glow.

Saint Francesca had the gift of recognizing the objects that were blessed and those that were not.

She also received supernatural knowledge about things and people. 

Too, she had the gift of prophecy, the gift of discerning spirits, and the gift of counsel, which she used to convert sinners and lead the deviant to the right path.

When she meditated on the Passion of Christ, she felt the pains that the Lord had experienced.

And on Christmas Eve 1433, she had the joy of receiving the Child Jesus in her arms.

When her son died in 1413, she appeared to him with a young man of the same size, but much more beautiful.

And he told her that he was the archangel that the Lord had sent to assist her in her earthly pilgrimage.

He would help her with everything.

File:Guercino - St.Francesca Romana, 1756.jpg - Wikimedia Commons

And that spirit radiated such light that Francesca could read or work at night, without any difficulty, as if it were daytime.

It lit the way for her when she needed to go out at night.

And with that light she could see the intimate thoughts of hearts.

She had many visions about the afterlife.

She was taken to purgatory and said that neither horror, nor disorder, nor despair, nor eternal darkness reigns there, as in hell.

She was told that this place of purification was also called the “inn of hope.”

But she saw there suffering souls and also the guardian angels who visited them and assisted them in their sufferings.

She was also taken to Heaven, where she understood something of the essence of God.

But what is most striking about Francesca Romana’s visions are those she experienced of hell and the activity of demons.

First of all, Francesca was informed that the angels who fell into sin were one-third; the other two-thirds persevered. (This is an important word to keep in mind: perseverance.)

But these fallen angels were differentiated into three groups.

One-third were the ones who really rebelled against God and are in hell to torment the damned. They are the ones who followed Lucifer. They do not come out of the abyss except with the permission of God and when it comes to producing a great calamity to punish the sins of men.

And they are the worst among demons.

The other two-thirds of the fallen angels are the ones who did not take sides between God and Lucifer, but kept silent. 

One-third live in the air and the others on the ground.

Those that are in the air frequently cause phenomena in nature: frosts, storms, noises, and wind, floods, earthquakes, etcetera — with which they weaken the souls attached to matter, leading them to inconstancy and fear, inducing them to faint in faith and to doubt Divine providence.

Because when providence is mistrusted, that is when all the temptations come.

And when there were very strong storms in the air, Saint Francesca resorted to lighting blessed candles and sprinkling Holy Water, claiming that they were the best remedy against this type of storm.

And the other third are the demons that circulate among us, who have the mission of tempting us, having previously been weakened by the demons of the air.

The demons that are among us belong to the last choir of angels, to the same choir as the guardian angels, that is, they have the same power.

So each person has a guardian angel and an anti-guardian angel by his side, who is a demon of perdition: that is, a demon of the Earth.

All fallen demons see each other, whether they are in hell, in the air, or on earth.

They experience the fire of hell and punish each other.

But the demons of the older choirs are the ones who suffer the most.

And when the Final Judgment comes, all of them will be thrown into hell for all eternity.

Francesca related that the process of temptation carried out by demons is as follows: it begins with distrust in God, then passes to pride, continues with impurity, reaches greed, and ends in idolatry. 

She said that as soon as trust in God is weakened, the devil inspires a person with pride.

And when pride has increased our weakness, the demons of the flesh come and fill our spirits.

Then, when the demons of the flesh have further weakened a person, the demons in charge of the “crimes of money” arrive.

And when this demon of money has further reduced the person’s resources of resistance, the demons of idolatry come to complete what the others have started.

And so the complete collapse of the soul occurs through successive waves of demons that attack it.

Francesca knew according to the temptation that the person was undergoing, what type of fallen angel was attacking and which choir it belonged to.

And when a demon succeeds in causing a soul to be lost, he becomes another man’s tempter, but he is more skillful than the first time, drawing on the experience that gave him victory.

But when a soul is saved, the tempting demon is outwitted by the other demons. And brought before Lucifer, who inflicts a special punishment on him, distinct from his other tortures.

But that is not the greatest suffering they have.

They suffer most terribly by seeing a public act of virtue. 

They suffer more from seeing the good than from all the torments of hell.

All of this is commanded by Lucifer, who is the prince of all demons.

An angel of the highest choir of seraphim, which somehow God uses to punish demons and the damned.

His characteristic vice is pride.

Below him are three other princes.

The first is Asmodeus, whose characteristic is the vices of the flesh and was the chief of the cherubim.

The second is called Mammon, and is characterized by the vice of avarice and was from the choir of thrones.

And the third, called Beelzebub, was from the choirs of the dominations, and handles the vice of idolatry, the diviners and sorcerers.

And that demon has the mission of spreading darkness over rational creatures.

In short, during the time of Christianity there lived Santa Francesca Romana, a woman with many supernatural gifts.

She was told that although souls suffer in purgatory, it is a place of hope, where guardian angels comfort each soul.

And it was revealed to her that the third of the angels that fell are divided into three parts.

A third of them are those who actually rebelled against God led by Lucifer and are already in hell.

But they come out occasionally, with God’s permission, to produce the great disasters on earth.

The other two-thirds remained neutral.

Half of these are in the air and are the ones that produce the usual disorders in nature , and thus weaken the confidence of men in Divine Providence.

And the other half are on earth acting as the flip side of the guardian angels. Their function is to tempt people by increasing mistrust in God, then generating pride, then impurity, reaching greed, and ending in idolatry.

This information is essential to keep in mind to identify how we are being tempted and how to defend ourselves.

Well up to here what we wanted to talk about the organization that the demons have to tempt people and who are the demons responsible for doing it…

https://spiritdailyblog.com/spiritual-warfare/how-various-demons-attack

Matt Gaspers has written another politically -correct -with -the- Left report on Vatican Council II

 

The Synod on Synodality: Implementing the ‘ecclesiology of Vatican II’

The Synod on Synodality is clearly intended to be an extension of the Second Vatican Council — a major push to more fully implement the problematic “ecclesiology of Vatican II” throughout the universal Church.
Matt Gaspers
January 20, 2022

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/758115/?utm_source=home_opinion&utm_campaign=usa
https://catholicfamilynews.com/blog/2022/01/20/the-synod-on-synodality-implementing-the-ecclesiology-of-vatican-ii/


_______________________________


Matt Gaspers  interprets Vatican Council II with the False Premise like Pope Francis  and the Synod on Synodality. It is politically correct with the Left and so Arechbishop Vigano also interprets Vatican Councill II with the False Premise and the old ecclesiology is rejected. -Lionel Andrades


Santo Rosario dalla Collina delle Apparizioni - Medjugorje 22 gennaio 2022

Matterella and Draghi are leftists and so do not interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise but even Vigano and Schneider are not doing so.

 


Sergio Mattarella and Mario Draghi were two leftist candidates who were vying for the presidential seat in Italy. Both have had their religious formation in the Catholic Church in the 1940’s when it was suggested that invisible cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance were visible exceptions for the traditional strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as held by the past Magisterium and the saints and popes. Like the rest of the Church they accepted the false premise i.e. invisible people are visible in the present times.LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc refer to visible non Catholics saved outside the Church in the present times.

Since the popes, from Pius XII did not correct the error in the Letter of the Holy Office , Pope Paul VI approved Vatican Council II also using the False Premise (invisible cases of LG 16 etc are visible examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church) instead of the Rational Premise ( invisible cases of LG 14,LG 16 etc are invisible in the present times).So the New Theology accepted by Mattarella and Draghi was outside the Church there is salvation and LG 8,LG 14, LG 16 etc are practical exceptions for the past extra ecclesiam nulla salus which was made obsolete, in the 1940’s and then again in 1965.

It is the same with Archbishop Carlo Vigano and Bishop Athanasius Schneider, they too accepted the New Theology of the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and then Vatican Council II (1965).

None of them will affirm Vatican Council II (LG 8, LG 14, and LG 16, UR 3 etc) with the Rational Premise i.e. LG 8, LG 16 etc being hypothetical always, they are not objective exceptions for the Athanasius Creed.

They could affirm the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX today since there are no exceptions for Feeneyite EENS in Vatican Council II and the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 made a mistake when it interpreted the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance as being objective cases in the present times (1949).

No one is telling them that as Feeneyites they still can be Catholics who affirm the Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors and Feeneyite EENS.They would meet the Four Marks of the Church, one, holy, Catholic and Apostolic.

Matterella and Draghi are leftists and so do not interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise but even Vigano and Schneider are not doing so.

In the past when Michael Voris produced a good film which showed how the Catholic religion is a continuation of the Jewish religion and outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation. Abraham Foxman of the ADL objected and the Archbishop of Detroit told Michael Voris not to use the name Catholic for his media, at that time, Real Catholic TV. The Jewish Left was content.

Now if Archbishop Vigano and Bishop Schneider will affirm Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise, Abraham Foxman and the Jewish Left will protest and Pope Francis will approve clerical sanctions on Vigano and Schneider.There was a political precedent when Pope Pius XII and Archbishop Richard Cushing, imposed clerical sanctions on Fr. Leonard Feeney after the creation of the state of Israel.Fr.Leonard Feeney was not saying any thing new. He could not meet or see someone saved with the baptism of desire etc outside the Church.

So Archbishop Vigano and Bishop Schneider are not telling Catholics to accept Vatican Council II and to interpret it with the Rational Premise. They are leftist as Matterella and Draghi and have ‘good relations’ with the Jewish Left.if they advised Catholics to interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise it would be assumed that they affirm Feeneyite EENS and the liberal rabbis would protest against their return to the old theology, without rejecting Vatican Council II.-Lionel Andrades





ANUARY 24, 2022

The Political Premise is an issue in the Catholic Church.Archbishop Vigano and Bishop Schneider are avoiding clerical sanctions, like those imposed upon Fr. Leonard Feeney. They unethically use the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II etc.

 The Political Premise is an issue in the Catholic Church. If the Rational Premise is used to interpret Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents  then there will be clerical sanctions imposed by the Vatican with the approval of the Left, on the priest or bishop. 

   With the Rational Premise there  is  harmony with Tradition ( EENS, Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors ertc) and this is not welcome for the Left.

With the Rational Premise there can no more be the 'reforms of Vatican Council II', the 'new revelation and revolution with Vatican Council II' and the' the development of doctrine'.

It is only with the False Premise there can be a false  New Theology which says outside the Church there is known salvation and which rejects the old theology which said outside the Church there is no salvation- since there can be no practical and known exceptions for us human beings.

Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano and Bishop Athanasius Schneider use the Political Premise, the False Premise to be politically correct with the Vatican and the Left.

The popes from Paul VI to Francis have used the Political Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and the popes from Pius XII have employed it to interpret extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance- creating a new version, which is Cushingite and not Feeneyite.

So Archbishop Vigano and Bishop Schneider are avoiding clerical sanctions, like those imposed upon Fr. Leonard Feeney. They unethically use the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II etc.

So there is no more mission as in the past, since the False Premise ( there are visible cases of no Catholics saved outside the Church) creates false exceptions (invisible cases of non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church, without  Catholic Faith and the baptism of water are exceptions for EENS).So the Athanasius Creed, Syllabus of Errors and dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, which was the theological basis for traditional mission is made obsolete.-Lionel Andrades


JANUARY 23, 2022

Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano and Bishop Athanasius Schneider could have their ecclesiastical and priestly faculties respectively removed if they do not interpret Vatican Council II , the Creeds, Catechisms, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus etc with a Fake Premise ( invisible cases are visible in 1965-2022) and so create a rupture with Tradition, especially the Athanasius Creed, the dogma EENS, the Syllabus of Errors and other Church Documents which affirm the traditional ecclesiocentrism.


Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano and Bishop Athanasius Schneider  could have their ecclesiastical and priestly faculties respectively removed,  if they do not interpret Vatican Council II , the Creeds, Catechisms, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) etc with a Fake Premise ( invisible cases are visible in 1965-2022) and so create a rupture with Tradition, especially the Athanasius Creed, the dogma EENS, the Syllabus of Errors and other Church Documents which affirm the traditional ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church.

So they tacitly support the official and common heresy and schism and remain politically correct with the Vatican, the Masons and the rest of the Left.

As Lefebvrists there is no danger of being laicized since they employ the same fake premise as the liberals and Masons. They are not Feeneyites.

Unlike the two prudent bishops, Fr. Leonard Feeney was excommunicated and his priestly faculties taken away by Cardinal Richard Cushing, the Archbishop of Boston. This was approved by Pope Pius XII sometime after the creation of Israel as a state. The Jesuit priest would not use the Fake Premise; he would not say invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance, were physically visible exceptions for traditional EENS, with no known exceptions.

The two bishops are deflecting attention from the real issue-the Fake Premise, to the Latin Mass, which has nothing to do with their abjuration.

When a bishop does not rationally and traditionally affirm the Creeds, Catechisms, Vatican Council II and the other Councils, EENS, Church declarations (Joint Statement on Justification with the Lutherans, the Balamand Declaration with Orthodox Christians etc), dogmas and traditional doctrines, what’s left? It is like an abjuration of the Faith, material or manifest.

The two bishops are denying the Faith to maintain their ecclesiastical and priestly status.

The laity is following them in ignorance.

Today morning at the Sunday Mass at the church San Silvestro

The laity is following them in ignorance.

Today morning at the Sunday Mass at the church San Silvestro in Capite, Piazza San Silvestro, Rome at Holy Mass in Italian the priest said that this Sunday was dedicated by Pope Francis, for the Word of God; the Bible for Christians.

But how do we interpret the Word of God, the Bible- with or without the False Premise? The dogma EENS for example, comes from the interpretation of John 3:5 and Mark 16:16 etc.The Pallotine Fathers at San Silvestro and the laity in general, like Pope Francis, interpret EENS as having exceptions- but for me there are no exceptions.

The Nicene Creed was recited at Holy Mass. It can be interpreted with or without the False Premise. The Filipino community at the church interprets it with the False Premise and I use the Rational Premise. We all affirm the Nicene Creed but our premise and conclusion are different in the same Church.

So this is the same one, holy, Catholic and apostolic Church in which we are all in, but definitely one of our two interpretations is not apostolic or Patristic.

The interpretation of Church Documents, with the political premise, by Archbishop Vigano and Bishop Schneider, is not apostolic and patristic.With the  Fake Premise they reject the old theology and create a new theology which is an innovation, schism and heresy. I affirm the same Church Documents as them but with the Rational Premise there is a hermeneutic of continuity with the Apostles and the Patristic period.

Clerical state

In the Catholic Church, a bishop, priest, or deacon may be dismissed from the clerical state as a penalty for certain grave offences, or by a papal decree granted for grave reasons. This may be because of a serious criminal conviction, heresy, or similar matter.

Affirming Magisterial Documents with the Rational Premise in harmony with the past Magisterium could result in the dismisal of a priest or ecclesiastic from the clerical state. -Lionel Andrades

https://sansilvestroincapite.org/about-us


___________________________________________________


  

JANUARY 22, 2022

Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano and Bishop Athanasius Schneider use the Fake Premise like the liberals. So they offer the Latin Mass in schism and heresy and do not deny it, for political reasons. They do not deny their mortal sins of faith and they hear the Confession of Catholics in sin.

 


Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano and Bishop Athanasius Schneider use the Fake Premise ( invisible cases of LG 16 etc are visible in 2022) instead of the Rational Premise( invisible cases of LG 8,LG 16,LG 14 etc are physically visible in 2022) and Pope Francis, Pope Benedict and Cardinal Walter Kasper do the same.

So invisible and unknown cases of non Catholics saved with the baptism of desire (LG 14) or invisible ignorance (LG 16) or ‘elements of sanctification and truth in other religions’ (LG 8) are visible and known for them in 1965-2022 so they conclude that there are practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors etc.

For me unknown and invisible cases in 1965-2022 of non Catholics saved according to LG 8, LG 14, and LG 16 are invisible and unknown. So they are not practical exceptions for the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church.

The traditionalists and liberals however use the same False Premise (invisible people are visible in the present times) while I use the Rational Premise (invisible people are invisible in the present times).Their conclusion is non-traditional (EENS is obsolete since there are practical exceptions) and mine is traditional (EENS is not obsolete since there are no practical exceptions in the present times).

So I can go for the Latin Mass and be orthodox while they offer the Latin Mass creating false exceptions for the Athanasius Creed, EENS and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism of return to the Church etc).This is irregular. It is unorthodox. It is an innovation.

They choose the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition while I choose one of continuity with Tradition.

They choose a break with the past Magisterium which is schism. I avoid it.

They re-interpret the Creeds and Catechisms with the same False Premise (invisible people are visible) and I avoid it. This is first class heresy which I avoid.

So they offer the Latin Mass in schism and heresy and do not deny it, for political reasons.

They do not deny their mortal sins of faith and they hear the Confession of Catholics in sin.

Bishop Schneider when interviewed by Dr. Taylor Marshall has said that there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire (LG 14).So he used the Rational Premise (the invisible cases of the baptism of desire are invisible in the present times).However he is not saying that LG 8, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II also refer to hypothetical cases. It would mean the Council does not contradict EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors. 

He does not affirm these Church Documents with no exceptions. There are exceptions for him, so the Council is a break with Tradition. This is the traditionalist position on Vatican Council II which is politically correct with the Left and the Vatican. It is acceptable for them. It is also the liberal position.They affirm the Council with exceptions and so there is  a break with Tradition which they accept.

They both use the same False Premise but the traditionalists in a vague way  and the liberals accept it.

But for the two bishops this is not ethical even by secular standards when they use the False Premise to create an artificial break with Catholic Tradition, in particular the old theology which was ecclesiocentric.They are following the Left in their interpretation of Vatican Council II and are liberals and not traditionalists.-Lionel Andrades


JANUARY 19, 2022

Bishop Athanasius Schneider said that the Society of St. Pius X was not in schism. But the SSPX is in schism when they interpret Vatican Council II with the Fake Premise, like the Ecclesia Dei communities at Cortalain, France last September. The False Premise has to create schism.

 


In the last Confraternity of Our Lady of Fatima Question and Answer session Bishop Athanasius Schneider said that the Society of St. Pius X was not in schism. But the SSPX is in schism when they interpret Vatican Council II with the Fake Premise, like the Ecclesia Dei communities at Cortalain, France last September.

The False Premise has to create schism.

Now the SSPX cannot affirm the Athanasius Creed since there are exceptions created with the Fake Premise.There are none for me.

They cannot affirm the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX on an ecumenism of return to the Church since there are exceptions created with the False Premise. So their New Theology is the same as the liberals and the Masons.

Their website rejects Feeneyite EENS since for them the baptism of desire, invincible ignorance and the baptism of blood are objective cases since 1965.

The Catechism of Pope Pius X (29Q-invincible ignorance) contradicts the same Catechism (24Q.27Q-outside the Church there is no salvation).This is all schism with the past Magisterium.

The past Magisterium did not use the False Premise to interpret the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance. St. Thomas Aquinas did not say that the man in the forest saved in invincible ignorance was a known case and so a practical exception for EENS, which he held. Hypothetical cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance were not objective exceptions for the strict interpretation of EENS, for St. Robert Bellarmine. This is common sense.


The SSPX interprets the Council schismatically like the FSSP. So the FSSP did not correct Bishop Roland Minnerath at Dijon, France, who has written books supporting a theology of religious pluralism and the rejection of the Syllabus of Errors.

This is schism. This is first class heresy. Schism and heresy are mortal sins of faith.

Today the SSPX can get out of schism and choose the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition. They have to admit that Pope Pius XII made an objective error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and that unknown cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance cannot be known and visible exceptions for traditional Feeneyite EENS. They must announce that LG 8, LG 14. LG 16, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to invisible cases in 2022.This is something obvious. 

So then there would be nothing in the Council-text to contradict the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors and 16th century EENS.

Vatican Council II would be traditional, exclusivist and in harmony with the popes, saints and martyrs of the past.

This though, is not the Vatican Council II of the popes from Paul VI to Francis I. It is they who are in schism and can choose orthodoxy with the Rational Premise.-Lionel Andrades















 JANUARY 18, 2022

All the Superior Generals of the Ecclesia Dei are supporting mortal sins of faith

 

-Lionel Andrades


JANUARY 17, 2022

A Feeneyite is someone who does not use the False Premise to interpret the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance.He accepts the BOD and I.I as being hypothetical only.This is the Rational Premise.

 

A Feeneyite is someone who does not use the False Premise to interpret the baptism of desire(BOD) and invincible ignorance(I.I). He accepts the BOD and I.I as being hypothetical only.This is the Rational Premise.

 So he does not reject the possibility of God choosing to save someone with BOD or I.I or the possibility of there being only Catholics in Heaven. However he does not project hypothetical cases of BOD and I.I as being practical exceptions for the 16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) of the Jesuits, which had no exceptions. Invisible people cannot be visible exceptions for EENS according to St. Ignatius of Loyola and St. Robert Bellarmine. 

Fr.Leonard Feeney was in harmony with St. Francis Xavier and St. Thomas Aquinas on EENS. 

Vatican Council II says Catholics are the new people of God (Nostra Aetate 4), they are the new elect. In Heaven there are only Catholics who are there with Catholic faith and the baptism of water (Ad Gentes 7, Catechism of the Catholic Church 846 Outside the Church No Salvation).Salvation in potential is open for all but to receive this salvation all need to be Catholic, all need to enter the Catholic Church (Dominus Iesus 20, Pope John Paul II).

A Feneeyite is someone who does not project unknown cases of the baptism of desire etc as being known exceptions in the present times for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Athnasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX etc. A Cushingite is someone who projects unknown cases of the BOD and I.I etc, as being known exceptions for the traditional strict interpretation of the dogma EENS and the past ecclesiocentrism.

The Superior Generals of the Ecclesia Dei communities are all Cushingites.

Cushingism creates a break with Tradition. It creates heresy and schism and mortal sins.The New Theology is Cushingite it depends upon the False Premise. The Ecclesia Dei communities intepret Vatican Council II with Cushingism, with the False Premise, with the New Theology.Then they blame Vatican Council II in general and in ignorance, and not their false premise.

On the blog 1Peter 5 Timothy Flanders wants to 'unite the clans' with Cushingism, with Vatican Council II interpreted with the False Premise to produce a false rupture with Tradition, which can be avoided.The Ecclesia Dei communities and the blog 1Peter 5 are united with the liberals and the Masons in their interpretation of Vatican Council II with the same False Premise.

If he uses the Rational Premise as a Feeneyite he will be persecuted. So like Peter Kwasniewski and Roberto dei Mattei they interpret Magisterial Documents with a False Premise and avoid being Feeneyites.-Lionel Andrades



JANUARY 16, 2022

Pope Francis and the Ecclesia Dei communities in France, have chosen the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and so there is heresy, schism and mortal sins at the Novus Ordo and Latin Mass. This is an abjuration of the Faith.The Courtalain communique supports the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II in Traditionis Custode.

 

Pope Francis and the Ecclesia Dei communities in France, have chosen the False Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and so there is heresy, schism and mortal sins at the Novus Ordo and Latin Mass. This is an abjuration of the Faith.The Courtalain communique supports the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II in Traditionis Custode.

 I can interpret Magisterial Documents without the common False Premise and can choose the Rational Premise.

Like Pope Francis in Traditionis Custode and the  Ecclesia Dei communities in France in public  supported  the same abjuration of the Catholic Faith. At Courtalain,France they interpreted  Vatican Council II with an Irrational Premise which creates the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition.They did not announce that the choose the Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II.With the False Premise they create  schism and mortal sins of faith. In public they are denying Tradition for political reasons.They agree with Pope Francis’ interpretation of Vatican Council II in Traditionis Custode.He too like the popes from Paul VI interprets Vatican Council II, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Nicene and Athanasius Creed and Catechisms with the common False Premise.

I mentioned in a previous blog post how mortal sins of faith, first class heresy and schism with the past Magisterium is created with the False Premise.

1.Vatican Council II interpreted with the False Premise (invisible people are visible in 1965-2021) creates alleged practical exceptions for the 2.Athanasius Creed ( all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation from Hell), 3.changes the Nicene Creed ( I believe in three or more known and visible baptisms which exclude the baptism of water and so are practical exceptions for Feeneyite EENS).With the exceptions there is 4.a new version of ecumenism and a rejection of the ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church of the Syllabus of Errors. The baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are interpreted with the False Premise as in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and so 5.there is a rupture with Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441 on extra ecclesiam nulla salusThe Church no more teaches outside the Church there is no salvation for the Ecclesia Dei communities and the 6.Catechism of Pope Pius X (24 Q, 27Q) is obsolete. If they used the Rational Premise  ( invisible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 are always invisible), they would have to affirm the strict interpretation of EENS, the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors in public and then Pope Francis and the political Left would go after them. Now with the False Premise they  interpret Vatican Council II like the Masons.

They have abjured and so the Left permits them to be legal, to collect funds and have financial projects.  -Lionel Andrades



JANUARY 15, 2022



The Ecclesia Dei communities in France are officially supporting Vatican Council II interpreted with an Irrational Premise which creates the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/01/the-ecclesia-dei-communities-in-france.html