Wednesday, February 7, 2024

Every Catholic in the parish of San Agapito, Largo Preneste near Termini, Rome can affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), in harmony with Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted rationally. The lay Catholics could also go out on street-mission in groups or alone.


Every Catholic in the parish of San Agapito, Largo Preneste near Termini, Rome can affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), in harmony with Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted rationally. The lay Catholics could also go out on street-mission in groups or alone.

There have been no theological objections from the Parish Priest Fr. Paolo Boumis.

Members of the Scouts, choirs, altar servers and sacristans would be affirming the traditional teaching on outside the Church there is no salvation. It would be based upon Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14 etc). This is the Conciliar teaching, the Conciliar Church, the post 1965  teaching of the Catholic Church which is not contradicted by hypothetical cases of LG 8,14,1,5,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc.

The laity  would draw on centuries-old mission manuals and the writings of the saints, which are not contradicted by Vatican Council II, when it is interpreted rationally.

They would be saying like the saints, that membership in the Catholic Church is necessary, the Church is necessary for salvation ( LG 14 etc). It is not enough to have a vague belief in Jesus, without the Sacraments and the faith, moral and traditional mission teachings of the Catholic Church. -Lionel Andrades




FEBRUARY 5, 2024

Every Catholic can affirm ‘the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus based upon the rational interpretation of Vatican Council II

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/02/every-catholic-can-affirm-strict.html


FEBRUARY 4, 2024

So when I say that I affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Athanasius Creed, it is based upon the only permissable option available for the auxiliary bishops and the Vicar General in Rome i,e when they interpret Vatican Council II rationally

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/02/so-when-i-say-that-i-affirm-dogma-extra.html


FEBRUARY 3, 2024

We have a discovery in the Catholic Church, a tremendous discovery. It has turned things around

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/02/incomplete-we-have-discovery-in.html


FEBRUARY 2, 2024

I met the bishop in whose diocese Sant Agapito is situated. He’s a Feeneyite. Not because he said so but because Vatican Council II interpreted rationally makes him one. If the bishop would say invisible cases are invisible only, he would be a Feeneyite

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/02/i-met-bishop-in-whose-diocese-sant.html


 FEBRUARY 1, 2024

So really they are all affirming the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church, since morally, they must choose only the rational interpretation of the Council and not the Alberto Melloni (Bologna School), irrational version, which is political and not Catholic

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/02/the-entire-parish-of-sant-agapito-largo.html


FEBRUARY 1, 2024

So when the pope and the parish priest interpret Vatican Council II rationally they are Feeneyite whether they know it or not, whether they like it or not. When anyone interprets Vatican Council II rationally the Council emerges exclusivist it says outside the Church there is no salvation

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/02/pope-francis-like-fr.html



JANUARY 30, 2024

Morally we only have the rational option. So this would be the only interpretation of the Auxiliary Bishops of Rome and the religious communities. Annual, renewal of vows will have its foundation only on Vatican Council II interpreted ethically

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/01/morally-we-only-have-rational-option-so.html


 JANUARY 31, 2024

Pope Francis is forced to interpret Vatican Council II rationally, for it to be Magisterial

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/01/pope-francis-is-forced-to-interpret.html


 JANUARY 30, 2024

The Parish Priest has to tell his assistant priests, altar servers, sacristans, choirs, scouts and general congregation to rationally, interpret LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II and then his parish will return to Tradition.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/01/the-parish-priest-has-to-tell-his.html



 JANUARY 29, 2024

For about 50 or more Scouts in the parish LG 8, 14, 15,16 etc refer to hypothetical cases only.So the Scouts, Catholic and non Catholic, would have to interpret Vatican Council II, as being orthodox and traditional. They have a moral obligation to be rational and not irrational.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/01/for-about-50-or-more-scouts-in-parish.html



JANUARY 28, 2024

No denial from the Parish Priest : he agrees with me and everyone else.LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to physically invisible cases .So VC II is not a break with EENS for him

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/01/when-i-say-that-my-parish-priest-says.html


JANUARY 27, 2024

No clarification from Parish Priest

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/01/my-parish-priest-fr.html


 JANUARY 26, 2024

Repost : There is no denial from Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez, the journalists in Rome and now the Faculty of Theology at the University of St. Thomas Aquinas, Rome. They agree with me. For them too LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3,NA 2,GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases , physically invisible people in 2024.This is a given. It is common sense

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/01/repost-there-is-no-denial-from-cardinal.html

 JANUARY 25, 2024

Why should the priests in Covington interpret Vatican Council II dishonestly? Why is it obligatory? They have a choice whose conclusion is traditional

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/01/covington-ky.html

JANUARY 29, 2024

The Synod Synthesis is based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. We now know that the Council can be interpreted rationally and the conclusion is ecclesiocentric and orthodox.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/01/the-synod-synthesis-is-based-upon.html

JANUARY 25, 2024

The Second Vatican Council II when interpreted rationally only supports an ecumenism of return to the Catholic Church

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/01/rome-celebrates-christian-unity-week.html
JANUARY 31, 2024
The Parish Priest at San Agapito, Rome can no more say that he does not affirm ‘the strict interpretation ‘ of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). He cannot say that he does not accept Unam Sanctum of Pope Boniface VIII (founder of La Sapienza University, Rome). Since he is obliged to interpret Vatican Council II rationally and then the Council is Feeneyite. The orthodox passages in Vatican Council II support the past ecclesiocentrism. While the hypothetical passages are not exceptions. It is the same for Feeneyite Pope Francis.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/01/the-parish-priest-at-san-agapito-rome.html


feBRUARY 6, 2024

We have to go back and nullify Pope Paul VI’s innovation on marriage, annulments, divorce etc when he interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally and no one corrected him. Pope Francis’ ‘quick divorce’ also comes with a fake interpretation. There was a change of governance too in 1965. The Papal States were allowed to secede with a bogus interpretation of Vatican Council II.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2024/02/we-have-to-go-back-and-nullify-pope.html

___