Sunday, July 2, 2017

Cardinal Luiz Ladaria S.j made factual errors in two ITC theological papers which were politically correct

Image result for Photo Cardinal Luis Ladaria S.j with Pope Benedict

Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j, as President and Secretary of the International Theological Commission (ITC), Vatican, made an objective mistake in two theological papers of the ITC. I e-mailed him quite a few times.He never responded.No one at the Vatican would talk about the error.
It seemed as if for political reasons he was maintaining the factual error in the ITC papers, which had the approval of Cardinal Ratzinger.So his earlier appointment as the Secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) seemed political.He was going to hand over to ecclesiastical Masonry, Church documents and doctrine which would be interpreted as a rupture with Tradition even though a rational option was available.
We now have a Prefect of the CDF who is in manifest public heresy but is supported by the influential Left within and outside the Church, as are the other Jesuit professors of theology, who still teach all weird stuff at the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome.

Here is proof of Cardinal Ladaria and Pope Benedict XVI's  testing everyone's intelligence.

The Hope of Salvation for Infants who die without  being baptized', International Theological Commission, 2007
59. The Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston (1949) offers further specifications. “To gain eternal salvation, it is not always required that a person be incorporated in reality (reapse) as a member of the Church, but it is necessary that one belong to it at least in desire and longing (voto et desiderio). It is not always necessary that this desire be explicit as it is with catechumens.

When one is invincibly ignorant, God also accepts an implicit desire, so called because it is contained in the good disposition of soul by which a person wants his or her will to be conformed to God’s will”. - The Hope of Salvation for Infants who die without  being baptized', International Theological Commission, 2007
'it is not always required that a person be incorporated in reality(reapse) as a member of the Church.'
Why is it not necessary?
Since there were exceptions for Pope Pius XII, Pope Benedict XVI and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria s.j.Why were there exceptions? Since for  the new Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith, invisible for us baptism of desire was a visible exception to all needing to enter the Church for salvation( Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441 extra ecclesiam nulla salus). People in Heaven were visible on earth! Or he knew of people who would go to Heaven even without being a member of the Church, he could judge.
He is contradicted by John Martignoni the Director of Evangelisation in the Diocese of Alabama, USA whose bishop is Robert Baker.
'Zero cases of something cannot be exceptions to the dogma EENS' said Martignoni who has a program on EWTN.
The new CDF Prefect obviously made a factual error and upon this error ( invisible people without the baptism of water are physically visible) supported  a new theology in the Church.The New Theology was created before Vatican Council II but he supported it and so found favour with Cardinal Ratzinger.
_____________________________

Here is another example of Cardinal Ladaria's mistake.

'10. Exclusivist ecclesiocentrism—the fruit of a specific theological system or of a mistaken understanding of the phrase extra ecclesiam nulla salus—is no longer defended by Catholic theologians after the clear statements of Pius XII and Vatican Council II on the possibility of salvation for those who do not belong visibly to the Church (cf, e.g., LG 16; GS 22)...'-International Theological Commission, Christianity and the World Religions
'on the possibility of salvation for those who do not belong visibly to the Church'
A possibility is not a visible case.Here is a mistake in the inference.
Father Stefano Visintin osb, the present Vice Rector and former Dean of Theology at the Pontifical University of St.Anselm, Rome has said that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are not exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. This is something elementary.How can people who do not exist in our reality be living exceptions of salvation outside the Church.A possibility of a person  being saved with the baptism of desire, for example, with or without the baptism of water, si a theoretical case only.We cannot meet someone saved as such.To infer that the baptism of desire is an exception to the dogma EENS is not real.
This is basic philosophy gone mad. Ladaria overlooked it with the blessings of Pope Benedict and other members of the ITC ( Cardinal Muller, Archbishop D Noia, Mons. Guido Pozzo etc) and was made the secretary of the CDF.The 'gang' approved him at the CDF. Pope Francis is  now happy with his work .

_____________________________

Here is another of Cardinal Ladaria's poltically correct mistake.
67. Vatican Council II makes its own the expression extra ecclesiam nulla salus. But in using it the council explicitly directs itself to Catholics and limits its validity to those who know the necessity of the Church for salvation. The council holds that the affirmation is based on the necessity of faith and of baptism affirmed by Christ (LG 14). In this way the council aligned itself in continuity with the teaching of Pius XII, but emphasized more clearly the original parenthentical character of this expression.- Christianity and the World Religions 1997,International Theological Commission
'and limits its validity to those who know the necessity of the Church for salvation.'
Image result for photo of cardinal Luis ladaria
Those 'who do not know', who are in invincible ignorance, and are allegedly saved would be known only to God. They are physically invisible  for us on earth. They are unknown to us.So they are not relevant to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.Here the ITC has made a mistake.
Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson like Fr. Stefano Visintin osb and John Martignoni agrees.There are no known cases in the present times of someone saved in invincible ignorance of the Gospel through no fault of his own, and who could be an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
This is a given. Yet Cardinal Ladaria has assumed that there are known exceptions to exclusivist salvation outside the Church through invincible ignorance.He interprets Vatican Council II with irrational Cushingism instead of traditional Feeneyism.
When he is informed he refuses to admit his mistake or talk about this subject.
-Lionel Andrades





September 14, 2016
 Image result for photo of cardinal Luis ladariaThe Holy See
International Theological Commission made a mistake

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/09/international-theological-commission.html


International Theological Commission, Vol I
ITC documents 'Christianity and the World Religions' and 'The Hope of Salvation for Infants who die without being baptized ' need to be retracted or corrected: Richard Cushing flaw runs through

SEPTEMBER 15, 2016


Pope Benedict approved the mistake of the International Theological Commission, a magisterial error on a faith issue which contradicted the ex cathedra teaching of three Church Councils and popes

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/09/pope-benedict-approved-mistake-of.html

MAY 30, 2015


Conchiglia of the Holy Trinity and the International Theological Commissionhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/05/conchiglia-of-holy-trinity-and.html


FEBRUARY 7, 2013


Bishop Charles Morerod in a doctrinal error says the SSPX cannot use Catholic Churches because of a doctrinal issue

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/02/bishop-charles-morrod-in-doctrinal.html







______________________________________________________

Former Secretary of the International Theological Commission holds that those saved with the baptism of desire and in invincible ignorance are known to us and so an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus

NO NEED FOR ‘SECRET TALKS’ ANYMORE: WE KNOW THE HERETICAL POSITION OF THE VATICAN NEGOTIATORS

BISHOP CHARLES MOREROD O.P IN BLATANT HERESY IS TO SPEAK BEFORE THE POPE ON ANGLICAN RELATIONS

VATICAN'S INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION MAKES AN ERROR IN ITS POSITION PAPER CHRISTIANITY AND THE WORLD RELIGIONS

INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION USES PREMISE THAT IS FACTUALLY INCORRECT : LIMBO

The International Theological Commission's position paper Christianity and the World Religions 1997 has an objective factual error and is approved by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger : invincible ignorance is not an exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus

INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION ASSUMES ‘SEEDS OF THE WORD’ (VATICAN COUNCIL II ) IN OTHER RELIGIONS ARE KNOWN TO US AND THIS IS AN EXPLICIT EXCEPTION TO THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS

VATICAN'S INTERNATIONAL THEOLOGICAL COMMISSION MAKES AN ERROR IN ITS POSITION PAPER CHRISTIANITY AND THE WORLD RELIGIONS

VATICAN COUNCIL II REJECTS THE THEOLOGY OF RELIGIONS

Baptism-‘necessity of means or precept’-you wouldn’t know the difference, so why mention it ?

SSPX WEBSITE: ' I believe in three baptisms for the forgiveness of sins’ ?

Bishop Fellay, Fr.Schmidberger,FSSP,Joseph Fenton seem unaware the baptism of desire is not an explicit exception to the dogma

NO NEED FOR ‘SECRET TALKS’ ANYMORE: WE KNOW THE HERETICAL POSITION OF THE VATICAN NEGOTIATORS



Traditionalists not welcome in Catholic churches: they first have to accept the doctrine of the dead-saved are physially visible to us and then adapt this new doctrine to Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2013/02/traditionalists-not-welcome-in-catholic.html#links