Sunday, June 10, 2018

Like Church Militant TV, LifeSites News would want to protect its financial interests as does the Lepanto Foundation : so it hides the truth about the Catholic Faith

Image result for LifeSiteNews logo
Diane Montagna did an interview with Prof.Roberto dei Mattei sometime back for LifeSitesNews on the conference(June 23,2018).
Today she could ask Prof. Mattei or  Dr.Robert Shaw if it  is true that they use a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition.They do this in principle, in general, as usual.
There will probably be no denial.
Image result for LifeSiteNews  Diane Montagna photo
There could be two responses from the speakers and organizers. One response to LifeSitesNews  could  be, "Yes  Diane, we do use a false premise(baptism of desire(LG 14) refers to known people saved outside the Church) to interpret Vatican Council II.So in this way there is a rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite). With the false premise we have extra ecclesiam nulla salus( Cushingite).It would be saying that there is known salvation outside the Church.So since there is 'an unknown possibility',which we assume is an actual person in real life, a known non Catholic, saved outside the Church, we reason ( badly) that every body does not need to enter the Church as a member in 2018."

Or the other response of the organizers to LifeSitesNews could be,"No, Diane, we do not use the false premise to interpret Vatican Council.Lionel is wrong.The baptism of desire(LG 14) refers to an unknown and invisible non Catholic saved outside the Church in 2018. So there is no rupture with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( Feeneyite). Without  the false premise we have extra ecclesiam nulla salus( Feeneyite).It  means, there is no known salvation outside the Church.So since the theoretical possibility of a non Catholic being saved outside the Church is not a reality, every body does need to enter the Church as a member in 2018.This  is the dogmatic teaching.It is extra ecclesiam nulla salus, supported by Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14).The ordinary way of salvation is faith and baptism.It is the norm. The norm is not the baptism of desire etc .So are Feeneyites on extra ecclesiam nulla salus, Vatican Council II, the Catechisms and other magisterial documents".

She could then ask them if they would be ready to  interpret LG 8, LG14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2 etc without the false premise,i.e with hypothetical cases just being hypothetical,with Feeneyism.They are not objectively known people saved outside the Church in 2018.There cannot be any known Catholics saved outside the Church.
Prof. Mattei and every one in all his medias would refuse to answer.

She would then ask politely, "But are you'll not being irrational ?".
Roberto dei Mattei,Joseph Shaw and John Lamont would refuse to answer. In fact all those who signed the Correction of Pope Francis, with Dr.Joseph Shaw as their spokesman, refused to answer. They were not interested in this doctrine of the Catholic Church which was changed a long time back.
Joseph Shaw would respond to Dr. Robert Fastiggi but not to the posts on Lionel's Blog.They would be 'too sensitive' for him.
"So it is upon this philosophical and theological deception that another conference is being organized by the traditionalists?", Diane Montagna  could dare to ask. The organizers would have to say "YES" or keep quiet and change the subject.
"So you all are allowing Catholics in general and traditionalists in particular, to interpret Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism,with a false premise instead of without it, since otherwise, the Council would be in harmony with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church, which you'll do not want to affirm in public for personal reasons ?
There will be no answer from the organizers of the conference.
Image result for LifeSiteNews logo
But how can LifeSitesNews discuss this issue ? How can Diane Montagna be allowed to ask these questions?
It has been years now - that John Henry Western and Steve Jalsevec to protect their own interests, do not  interpret Vatican Council II and EENS with Feeneyism i.e with hypothetical cases just being hypothetical.
They prefer the irrationality and the heresy.They prefer doctrines being changed. Since this is not an issue like Amoris Laetitia. They will be opposing the Jewish Left on this issue.
So like Church Militant TV, LifeSites News wants to protect its financial interests as does the Lepanto Foundation.
-Lionel Andrades



JUNE 10, 2018

John Lamont and Joseph Shaw prepare to talk at the June 23 Lepanto Foundation conference in Rome with their politically correct Cushingite theology, which will preserve their careers and lifestyle and they will get away with it to come back next year
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/john-lamont-and-joseph-shaw-prepare-to.html

John Lamont and Joseph Shaw prepare to talk at the June 23 Lepanto Foundation conference in Rome with their politically correct Cushingite theology, which will preserve their careers and lifestyle and they will get away with it to come back next year

John Lamont and Joseph Shaw prepare to talk at the June 23 Lepanto Foundation conference in Rome with their politically correct Cushingite theology, which will preserve their careers and lifestyle  and they will get away with it. Then they will come back the next year (2019) to repeat the same deception in their interpretation of magisterial documents, especially Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).




LAMONT INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II WITH THE NEW THEOLOGY AND NOT WITHOUT IT
John Lamont will speak on the New Theology this June 23.He will not mention that Vatican Council II can be interpreted without the New Theology.Then there will be no break with the dogma EENS, the past ecclesiology and the Syllabus of Errors.But the Left will object.
The have been invited by Prof.Roberto dei Mattei of the Lepanto Foundation who has written books on Vatican Council II interpreted with irrational Cushingite theology. He did not know that Vatican Council II could be interpreted with Feeneyism. Now that he knows, he still will not affirm EENS ( Feeneyite) and Vatican Council II (Cushingite). He too is politically correct with the Left and the Vatican.
This will be another deceptive conference held by the traditionalists.



THEY REJECT TRADITION TO BE POLITICALLY CORRECT WITH THE LEFT
The speakers will interpret Vatican Council II, as do the liberals, then they will go away, knowing that there is no controversy .No one is on to them, nobody is objecting.
If they interpreted Vatican Council II with hypothetical cases just being hypothetical and not objectively seen in 2018, there would be no examples of known salvation outside the Church for them. But then there would be objections from the Left and the Vatican.Since they would be affirming Feeneyite EENS and the past exclusivist ecclesiology. Since they would be saying that Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism for salvation and so all non Catholic die without Catholic Faith and so are oriented to Hell. 





They would also be saying that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to hypothetical cases, invisible people in 2018.So they are not exceptions to Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 which tells us that all need 'faith and baptism' for salvation.This would be an interpretation of Vatican Council II with the hermeneutic of continuity with EENS and the Syllabus of Errors. So theologically there would be no place any more for the New Ecumenism, New Evangelisation, New Ecclesiology and New Canon Law based on visible for us baptism of desire etc.

THEY DENY THE PAST EXCLUSIVIST ECCLESIOLOGY OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH 
The speakers would be saying that all Jews,Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus etc and Orthodox  Christians, Protestants,Evangelicals etc  are Hell- bound in 2018.Since they do not enter the Catholic Church with faith and baptism. Jesus is necessary for salvation and so is membership in the Catholic Church. It is no more Jesus without the Church.
This is hard for them.
So they have another one of their superficial conferences with speakers approved by the Left.
The traditionalist Catholics like the liberals are denying the Catholic Faith even after being informed.They are part of the apostasy. They are prudent in a worldly sense.

LAMONT PRESERVES HIS MANDATUM TO TEACH THEOLOGY
John Lamont is not expected to say anything new on June 23,2018. He needs the mandatam to teach theology in Australia from the Cushingite bishops there.It is the same with Joseph Shaw who teaches Philosophy at leftist Oxford University,U.K.
Shaw attends the Latin Mass with the New Ecclesiology, which is a rupture with that of the missionaries in the 16th century, when they offered the Tridentine Rite Mass.He is going to continue with the deception, another year.

THOMAS PINK WAS POLITICALLY CORRECT AT A PREVIOUS CONFERENCE
Prof. Thomas Pink, professor of theology Kings College London has not been invited to this conference. He was interviewed by Michael Matt at another conference some time back, when he maintained his prudent approach.He did not say anything specific. They all act as if they do not know about Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite).Michael Matt at the Remant also does not want to go into the catacombs, just yet.

UNA VOCE NEEDS THE APPROVAL OF ECCLESIA DEI AND THE VATICAN
Prof. Thomas Pink wants to continue with his teaching job and not be called a bigot etc.He does not want it to be konwn that he supports the teachings of the Catholic Church and interprets Vatican Council II in line with the Magisterium of the 16th century.Shaw wants the approval of Ecclesia Dei for his Latin Mass Society in England  and Una Voce.

MATTEI DENIES EENS (FEENEYITE) AND THE PAST ECCLESIOLOGY
Roberto dei Mattei's Lepanto Foundation has received the funds to organize this conference and he is not going to affirm EENS or Vatican Council II with Feeneyism in spite of so many reports online on this subject, some mentioning him specifically.
Catholics have to proclaim heresy as orthodoxy, as the two popes want it, and the speakers are going to go along with it since it is in their personal interest.


Canon lawyers must appeal against Joseph Shaw, John Lamoent and Thomad Pink teaching theolgy with deception. They use a false premise to create a rupture with EENS (Feeneyite) and the past ecclesiology which they do not affirm as Catholics.
-Lionel Andrades


JULY 16, 2016

Even Catholic traditionalists like John Lamont. Joseph Shaw and Thomas Pink will not interpret Vatican Council II rationally, that is hypothetical cases not being explicit in 2016. Since there will be political and social repercussion which will affect their careers as professors
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2016/07/even-catholic-traditionalists-like-john.html


JULY 12, 2016

Joseph Shaw, John Lament and Thomas Pink teach the new theology which violates the Principle of Non Contradiction.They remain politically correct with the bishops to keep their mandatum to teach theology
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2016/07/joseph-shaw-john-lament-and-thomas-pink.html


The Latin Mass Society is part of the Establishment which does not affirm traditional doctrine,ecclesiology and interprets Vatican Council II with an irrationality which is politically correct http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/09/the-latin-mass-society-is-part-of.html


JULY 10, 2015
Pope Francis permits the Traditional Latin Mass only with the new ecclesiology and compromise : Joseph Shaw looks the other way
 http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/07/pope-francis-permits-traditional-latin.html


May 24, 2014 

Traditionalists do not want to affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Another wasted conference in England today  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/05/traditionalists-do-not-want-to-affirm.html#links
______________________________________________


JULY 11, 2016
Fr.Serafino Lanzetta and Joseph Shaw need to correct themself and then they will have a new perspective on the Council : new theology violates the Principle of Non Contradiction

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/07/frlanzetta-and-joseph-shaw-need-to.html



MARCH 16, 2016

Joseph Shaw removes comments: John Lamont prudently avoids the issue

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2016/03/joseph-shaw-removes-comments-john.html



MARCH 11, 2016

Is not the theology taught by Dr.John Lamont in Australia approved by the Masons ?  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2016/03/is-not-theology-taught-by-drjohn-lamont.html

Even Tom Mohniyan's Ave Maria University adhere's fully to Ex Corde Ecclesiae and interprets Vatican Counncil II with a false premise http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/03/even-tom-mohniyans-ave-maria-university.html

John Lamont, Thomas Pink, Joseph Shaw remain politically correct and keep their mandatum to teach theology http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/04/john-lamont-thomas-pink-joseph-shaw.html

Joseph Shaw is not going to tell Muslims at Oxford that the Chuch says all need to formally enter the Church to avoid Hell. Neither is Gavin D'Costa going to say this in Bristol.http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/04/joseph-shaw-is-not-going-to-tell.html

Joseph Shaw would not say that all need to formally enter the Church for salvation in Britain. This would be the old ecclesiology.Instead he would say that there are exceptions. This is the new ecclesiology.http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/04/joseph-shaw-would-not-say-that-all-need.html

Ecclesiology is not changed with I.I and BOD.It never was.Vatican Council II was always orthodox on salvation.The ecclesiology was exclusivist
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/04/ecclesiology-is-not-changed-with-ii-and.html

No text in Quanto Conficiamur Moerore or the Council of Trent says there are exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/04/no-text-in-quanto-conficiamur-moerore.html

Department of Theology and Religious Studies at the University of Bristol is still teaching an irrationality : even after being informed
May 31, 2014
Joseph Shaw, Gavin D'Costa obedient to Cardinal Vince Nicols are misleading lay Catholics  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/05/joseph-shaw-gavin-dcosta-obedient-to.html

May 13, 2014
Orthodox Catholics have no comments on the University of Bristol video
______________________________________________

Exclusivist ecclesiology?
The new theology is based on being able to see the dead. Remove the premise, which is, "I can see the dead on earth".We then have the old ecclesiology, the exclusivist ecclesiology. The ecclesiology of Vatican Council II is exclusivist. Since it affirms the rigorist interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in Ad Gentes 7, which says all need faith and baptism for salvation.LG 16,LG 8,UR 3,NA 2 etc are not known exceptions to Ad Gentes 7 or the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. We are left with the old ecclesiology.

Who agrees with you?
Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson says Vatican Council II does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors.
DEAN OF THEOLOGY AT ST. ANSELM SAYS THERE ARE NO KNOWN EXCEPTIONS TO THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS

 Implicit intention, invincible ignorance and a good conscience (LG 16) in Vatican Council II do not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus –John Martigioni 
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/04/contemporary-magisterium-is-in.html
____________________________

JUNE 9, 2018
Lepanto Foundation conference this month in Rome is expected to be another non committal, prudent meeting among friends : the real problem and its solution is too sensitive for them to discuss and proclaim
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/lepanto-foundation-conference-his-month.html








JUNE 9, 2018

Speakers at the Lepanto Foundation conference in Rome on June 23 do not know that there is a mistake in Lumen Gentium 14,Vatican Council II.They should be discussing it 
 http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/the-speakers-at-lepanto-foundation.html
JUNE 10, 2018
So is the Lepanto Foundation using irrational Cushingism or traditional Feeneyism at the June 23 conference to interpret magisterial documents? We know the answer. Traditionalists are Cushingites on Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/so-is-lepanto-foundation-using.html











MAY 27, 2018

Liberals cannot criticize Cardinal Raymond Burke since he accepts Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite),in harmony with EENS ( Feeneyite),the Syllabus of Errors,an ecumenism and the Social Reign of Christ the King : traditionalists at conf. next month support the New Theology
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/05/liberals-cannot-accuse-cardinal-raymond.html
OCTOBER 15, 2017
We are in the same Church but the Polish bishops interpret the Nicene Creed, EENS, Vatican Council II and the Catechism differently  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/10/we-are-in-same-church-but-polish.html

JUNE 3, 2018  This is the ecclesiology Bishop Athanasius Schneider will not proclaim in public to the Kazakh people.It is physically safe out there to be a Cushingite http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/this-is-ecclesiology-bishiop-athanasius.html

JUNE 2, 2018
Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma - Hardcover (Dark Navy Leather)
Ludwig Ott is in a rupture with the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century and Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441 
 http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/06/message-incomplete-come-back-after-30.html
 MAY 27, 2018
Cardinal Burke has set a new theological and doctrinal model for sedevacantists and traditionalists.They can affirm tradition and Vatican Council II(Feeneyite). He indicates liberals can no more cite Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition, by using a false premise 
 http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/05/cardinal-burke-has-set-new-theological.html
MAY 27, 2018
Things couldn't be better for Cardinal Raymond Burke
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/things-couldnt-be-better-for-cardinal.html
MAY 27, 2018
Liberals cannot criticize Cardinal Raymond Burke since he accepts Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite),in harmony with EENS ( Feeneyite),the Syllabus of Errors, an ecumenism and the Social Reign of Christ the King : traditionalists at conf. next month support the New Theologyhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/liberals-cannot-accuse-cardinal-raymond.html
______________________________________________________



  FEENEYISM
Feeneyism (108)
Feeneyism is the missing link (9)
Feeneyism on Wikipedia (12)
Feeneyism.Cushingism (7)
Feeneyismo (9)
Feeneyite Catechism of the Catholic 
Church 1995 (2)
Feeneyite Catholic College (1)
Feeneyite EENS (1)
Feeneyite EENS Vatican Council II
(Feeneyite) (4)
Feeneyite Theology (1)
Feeneyite Vatican Council II (1)
Feeneyite-Cushingite Model (1)
Feeneyites (4)
Feeneyites were always correct (1)
     CUSHINGISM
Cushing Additions (2)
Cushing heresy (5)
Cushing-Jesuit Factual Error (22)
Cushing-Jesuit Factual Error Examples 
in Vatican Council II (25)
Cushingism (114)
Cushingism and the Catholic popes(7)
Cushingism in Vatican Council II (17)
Cushingismo (6)
Cushingite (3)
Cushingite Bishops (1)
Cushingite Theology (6)
Cushingites (1)
Cushingites must make the correction(1)

      FALSE PREMISE
False premise (19)
False premise in Vatican Council II(80)
False reasoning from the Letter is all over 
Vatican Council II: Abp Lefebvre did not notice it - 1 (5)
False reasoning from the Letter is all over Vatican Council II: Abp Lefebvre did not notice it -2 (2)
False reasoning from the Letter is all over Vatican Council II: Abp Lefebvre did not notice it - 1 (2)
False reasoning from the Letter is all over Vatican Council II: Abp Lefebvre did not notice it -3 (7)
False Theology (3)
VATICAN COUNCIL II (FEENEYITE)
Vatican Council (Feeneyite) (1)
Vatican Council has passages which support EENS and no passages which contradict EENS (1)
Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) (4)
Vatican Council II (Feeenyite) (6)
Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) (1)
Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) in harmony with EENS(Feeneyite) (1)
Vatican Council II Feeneyite (8)
Vatican Council II is Feeneyite (11)
Vatican Council II is Feeneyite for me.(1)
Vatican Council II( premise free) (2)
Vatican Council II ( premise-free) (1)
Vatican Council II(premise free) (2)
Vatican Council II(premise-free) (6)
Vatican Council II (premise-free) (9)
Vatican Council II/Feeneyite) (1)

Exclusive salvation (8)
exclusivist and traditional (1)
Exclusivist ecclesiocentrism (1)

    VATICAN COUNCIL II (CUSHINGITE)
Vatican Council II (Cushingite) (6)
Vatican Council II Cushigite (1)
Vatican Council II Cushingite (4)
Vatican Council II(Cushingite). (7)
Cushing Additions (2)
Cushing heresy (5)
Cushing-Jesuit Factual Error (22)
Cushing-Jesuit Factual Error Examples in Vatican Council II (25)
Cushingism (115)
Cushingism and the Catholic popes(7)
Cushingism in Vatican Council II (17)
Cushingismo (6)
Cushingite (3)
Cushingite Bishops (1)
Cushingite Theology (6)
Cushingite Vatican Council II (1)
Cushingites (1)
Cushingites must make the correction(1)

Catechism of the Catholic 

Church (Feeneyite) (2)
Catchechisms for me are
 Feeneyite (1)
Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Cushingite) (2)

I accept (4)
I agree (4)
I am a Feeneyite who does not reject BOD (1)
I am a Feeneyite who does not reject Vatican Council II (1)
I am saying all who are in Heaven are there with the baptism of water in the Catholic Church this is the teaching of the dogma as it was interpreted over the centuries. (1)
________________________________




Cardinal Burke: False religions that permit abortion should be suppressed
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/cardinal-burke-false-religions-that.html

Repost : Even members of the Lay Movements in the Catholic Church can proclaim the necessity of the Social Reign of Christ the King
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/repost-even-members-of-lay-movements-in.html

TUESDAY, MAY 22, 2018

Repost : The beauty of the Catholic Church is not there in any other religion says a Catholic priest.There cannot be Christ without the Catholic Church
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/20html18/05/repost-beauty-of-catholic-church-is-not
MAY 22, 2018
Repost : Catholic political party needed in England
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/repost-catholic-political-party-needed.html

TUESDAY, MAY 22, 2018

Repost : "There are no physically visible cases of the BOD,BOB and I.I in 2018" nor " LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA 2, UR 3, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to only hypothetical cases " so Vatican Council II does not contradict the Syllabus of Errors (Graphics) .blogspot.it/2018/05/repost-there-are-no-physieucharistandmissioncally-visible.html

Cardinal Raymond Burke could meet the leaders of Forza Nuova and Militia Christi in Italy just as he met Matteo Salvini : Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation could be explained
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/cardinal-raymond-burke-could-meet.html

MAY 23, 2018
Left and right schism  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/left-and-right-schism.html

MAY 23, 2018

In a secular state which allows freedom of religion there could be pro-Catholic political parties, supporting the faith and moral teachings of the Catholic Church, and affirming in their manifesto the Social Reign of Christ the King
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/in-secular-state-which-allows-freedom.html


THURSDAY, MAY 24, 2018
Cardinal Burke's reference to false religions not being paths to salvation is from Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/cardinal-burkes-reference-to-false.html

THURSDAY, MAY 24, 2018
Cardinal Raymond Burke contradicts Cardinal Luiz Ladaria's heretical statement : interprets Lumen Gentium 8 rationally and traditionally http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/0html5/cardinal-raymond-burke-contradicts

 MAY 24, 2018

Cardinal Burke has affirmed the exclusive understanding of salvation and also Vatican Council II ( Feeneyite) : it supports the teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/cardinal-burke-has-affirmed-exclusive.html
 THURSDAY, MAY 24, 2018
Cardinal Raymond Burke has set an example for Catholics in general and traditionalists in particular since he has affirmed what I call Vatican Council II (Feeneyite) and rejected Vatican Council II (Cushingite)

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/05/cardinal-raymond-burke-has-set-example.html

TERMS EXPLAINED
Feeneyism: It is the old theology and   philosophical reaoning which says  there are no known exceptions past or present, to the dogma EENS.There are no explicit cases to contradict the traditional interpretation of EENS.
Cushingism: It is the new theology and philosophical reasoning, which assumes there are known exceptions, past and present, to the dogma EENS, on the need for all to formally enter the Church.It assumes that the baptism of desire etc are not hypotheticalbut objectively known.In principle hypothetical cases are objective in the present times.
Baptism of Desire (Feeneyite): It refers to the hypothetical case 
of an unknown catechumen who desires the baptism of water but 
dies before he receives it and is saved.
 Since this is an invisible case in our reality it is not relevant to the dogma EENS.
Baptism of Desire (Cushingite): It refers to the known case of a catechumen who desires the baptism of water but dies before he receives it and is saved. Since this is a visible case or the SSPX it is relevant to the dogma EENS.
Invincible Ignorance ( Feeneyite): This refers to the hypothetical case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance.
Invincible Ignorance (Cushingite): This refers to the explicit case of someone allegedly saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church, since he was in ignorance.Since it is an exception to the dogma EENS itis assumed to be objectively known in particular cases.This reasoning is irrational.
Council of Florence: One of the three Councils which defined the
 dogma EENS.It did not mention any exceptions.It did not mention
 the baptism of desire. It was Feeneyite.
Liberal theologians: They reinterpreted the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance, as objective cases, known in
 the present times.They use Cushingism.
Vatican Council II (Cushingite): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Cushingism.
LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer not to hypothetical but known cases in the present times. So Vatican Council II emerges as a break with the dogma EENS.
Vatican Council II (Feeneyite): It refers to the interpretation of Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.
LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to hypothetical cases, which are unknown personally in the present times.So Vatican Council
 II is not a break with EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, ecumenism of return, the Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite-one baptism),the teaching  on the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation and the non separation of Church and State( since all need to convert into the Church to avoid Hell).
Letter of the Holy Office 1949 to the Archbishop of Boston: It assumed hypothetical cases were defacto known in the present times.
 So it presented the baptism of desire etc as an explicit exception, to the traditional interpretation of the dogma EENS.It censured Fr.Leonard Feeney and the St.Benedict Center.Since they did not assume that the baptism of desire referred to a visible instead of invisible case.The Letter made the baptism of desire etc relevant 
to EENs.From the second part of this Letter has emerged the New Theology.It was Cushingite.
Letter of the Holy Office 1949 ( Feeneyite). It means accepting the Letter as Feeneyite based on the first part,only .It supports Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.The traditional interpretatiion of the dogma EENS does not mention any exceptions.
Letter of the Holy Office ( Cushingite). It is based on the second part of the Letter.It rejects the traditional interpretation of EENS. Since it considers the baptism of desire ( Cushingite-explicit) and being saved in invincible ignorance ( Cushingite-explicit cases) as 
being exceptions to EENS ( Feeneyite).It worngly assumes hypothetical cases are objectively visible and so they are exceptions to the first part of the Letter.

Baltimore Catechism: It assumed that the desire for the baptism of an unknown catechumen, who dies before receiving it and was saved, was a baptism like the baptism of water. So it was placed in the Baptism Section of the catechism. In other words it was wrongly assumed that the baptism of desire is visible and repeatable like the baptism of water or that we can administer it like the baptism of water.The Baltimore Catechism is accepted with the confusion.It can be interpreted with Cushingism or Feeneyism.
Catechism of Pope X: It followed the Baltimore Catechism and placed the baptism of desire in the Baptism Section.It can be
 interpreted withCushingism or Feeneyism.
Nicene Creed ( Cushingite) ; It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins' and means there are more than three known baptisms. They are water, blood, desire, seeds of the Word etc.This is a Cushingite interpretation.
Nicene Creed ( Feeneyite): It says 'I believe in one baptism for the forgiveness of sins and means there is one known baptism the baptism of water.It is Feeneyite.
New Theology: It refers to the new theology in the Catholic Church based on hypothetical cases being objective in the present times.So it eliminates the dogma EENS.
With the dogma EENS made obsolete the ecclesiology of the Church changes. There is a new ecclesiology which is a break with Tradition.It's basis is Cushingism.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Cushingite): .It refers to the dogma but with exceptions.All do not need to defacto convert into the Church in the present times, since there are exceptions.
Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus ( Feeneyite): It refers to the dogma as it was interpreted over the centuries.
There are no known exceptions to all needing to formally enter the Church, with faith and baptism, to avoid Hell.
Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Cushingite): CCC 1257 contradicts the Principle of Non Contraduction. 
Also CCC 848 is based on the new theology and so is a rupture with the dogma EENS( Feeneyite).
Catechism of the Catholic Church ( Feeneyite): CCC 1257 does not contradict the Principle of Non Contradiction since there are no known exceptions to all needing the baptism of water for salvation. There are no known exceptions, since God is not limited to the Sacraments.When CCC 846 states all who are saved are saved through
 Jesus and the Church,CCC 846 does not contradict the dogmatic teaching on all needin to formally enter the Church.
CCC 846 does not contradict Ad Gentes 7 which states all need faith and baptism for salvatioon.
________________________


________________________________


Six of Pasqualucci's 'distinct points of rupture with the Tradition of the Church in the texts of the Vatican II documents' are not a rupture.The other points are open to interpretation and traditionalists do not agree among themselves.


But the six points are clear objective errors of Pasqualucci, Amerio and Gheradini. It is the same error in the interpretation of Vatican Council II made by Archbishop Lefebvre, Bishop Bernard Fellay and the other SSPX bishops, Christopher Ferrara, Roberto dei Mattei and the late Fr. Nicholas Gruner and John Vennari.-Lionel Andrades

APRIL 15, 2018
Image result for Paolo Pasqualucci PhotosImage result for Romano Amerio PhotosImage result for Msgr. Brunero Gherardini  Photos
The interpretation of Paolo Pasqualucci, Romano Amerio and Msgr. Brunero Gherardini is irrational it can be seen in the text of the blog 1Peter5 : They misinterpreted hypothetical cases in Lumen Gentium, Unitatitis Redintegratio and Nostra Aetate as being objective people saved outside the Church.This was a mistake
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/the-interpretation-of-paolo-pasqualucci.html


http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/this-imporant-point-was-overlooked.html

FEBRUARY 5, 2018

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/02/so-fault-does-not-lie-with-vatican.html

JUNE 18, 2014
Cristina Siccardi ,Paolo Pasqualucci use the irrational inference in the interpretation of Vatican Council II
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2014/06/cristina-siccardi-paolo-pasqualucci-use.html


APRIL 6, 2018
Image result for Photo of Cardinal Caffarra

APRIL 4, 2018
There will be a false Profession of Faith at the Conference this Saturday in Rome http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/there-will-be-false-profession-of-faith.html

APRIL 5, 2018
Conferences must criticize the March 1 and 30th statements of Cardinals Ladaria and Nicols : affirm exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church, there are billions of non Catholics in Hell today.It is important to be a Catholic and to follow the teachings of the Catholic Church to avoid Hell
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/conferences-must-criticize-march-1-and.html

APRIL 5, 2018
St.Benedict Centers need to correct their position on Vatican Council II with reference to EENS
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2018/04/stbenedict-centers-need-to-correct.html
____________________________________

APRIL 25, 2018
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/04/christopher-ferrara-and-roberto-dei.html

MARCH 8, 2018
Image result for Press Conference on Thursday Placuit Deo Photo

MAY 31, 2018

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/05/canon-law-does-not-permit-rejectioin-of.html




____________________________________________





-Lionel Andrades