It is unethical for Cardinal Luiz Ladari sj to allow Massimo Faggioli, Alberto Melloni and Cardinal Matteo Zuppi to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and pretend this is the norm for the Council.

 

Pope Benedict went without putting things straight and Cardinal Ladaria seems to want to do the same. Like Pope Benedict he chooses the False Premise (Lumen Gentium 16 refers to a visible person in the present times, saved outside the Catholic Church) and False Inference (LG 16 is a visible example of salvation outside the Church and so an objective exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus). So his False Conclusion is that Vatican Council II (LG 16 etc.) is a rupture with Tradition (EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc.).

This is Cardinal Ladaria’s False Reasoning; a False Philosophy which he does not deny. Neither do the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) deny this common error. They officially approve it.

This issue is not being reported by the media. Neither do any of the cardinals’ comment on this.

This error has spread throughout the Church. It has spread like the Arian heresy of past times.

I have e-mailed these blog posts to Cardinal Ladaria and there is no comment.

There is no response also from Fr. Georges de Laire, Judicial Vicar, Diocese of Manchester, New Hampshire, USA.

They are not telling the Jewish Left that they will avoid the False Premise and Inference in the interpretation of Vatican Council II.

Cardinal Ladaria is dishonest on this issue and is allowing the error to be taught throughout the world.

He was dishonest on Amoris Laetitia. There cannot be changes in faith and morals based upon a Vatican Council II which is a break with Tradition when interpreted irrationally.

The Council can also be interpreted rationally. Then there is no break with Tradition. So Cardinal Ladaria cannot justify Amoris Laetitia based upon Vatican Council II (irrational).

It is the same for the Catholic –Lutheran Declaration on Justification. The Lutherans are outside the Church according to Vatican Council II (rational) but he does not mention it. The Council says all need faith and the baptism, of water for salvation. The reference is to Catholic faith and the baptism of water, in general, in the Catholic Church. LG 8, 14, 16 etc. are not objective exceptions for Ad Gentes 7 and the dogma EENS. Lutherans do not have Catholic faith.

The Abu Dhabi Declaration also cannot be based upon Vatican Council II (irrational), Cardinal Ladaria would know this. Also the ecclesiology of the Synods cannot have its foundation upon Vatican Council II irrational. He does not talk about this dishonesty.

It is unethical for Cardinal Luiz Ladari sj to 

allow Massimo Faggioli, Alberto Melloni and Cardinal Matteo Zuppi to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and pretend this is the norm for the Council. -Lionel Andrades

JANUARY 5, 2023

I get no response when I e-mail Fr. George de Laire, the Judicial Vicar of the Diocese of Manchester, New Hampshire, USA.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/01/i-get-no-response-when-i-e-mail-fr.html

 

JANUARY 2, 2023

Vatican Council II cannot be used any more to justify a break with traditional teachings on homosexuality,abortion, adultery, fornication, no salvation outside the Church,polygamy etc. So the cardinals must oppose the appointment of Bishop Heiner Wilmer scj, as the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/01/vatican-council-ii-cannot-be-used-any.html

DECEMBER 31, 2022

Cardinals must ask Bertone to affirm the Catholic Faith in public

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/12/cardinals-must-ask-bertone-to-affirm.html

What happens at the Evening Program in Saint James Church Medjugorje | The Rosary Prayer

4 People Survive After Tesla Drives Over Cliff

https://vaticancatholic.com/4-people-survive-after-car-over-cliff/

‘I was arrested for silent prayer’

Isabel Vaughan-Spruce Arrested for Silently Praying

 

England: Woman praying outside abortion clinic now charged on four counts for her "thoughts" - video

https://vaticancatholic.com/england-woman-praying-outside-abortion-clinic-now-charged-on-four-counts-for-her-thoughts-video/

What is at stake in the buffer zone debate?

Are we prepared to sacrifice free expression?

https://thecritic.co.uk/what-is-at-stake-in-the-buffer-zone-debate/

Where is he today?

 

Where is he today?

Pope Benedict did not tell Archbishop Lefebvre to interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise and then he would be able to affirm Tradition and also the Council, instead he excommunicated him. He did not correct Wikipedia and the media, when they interpreted the Council with the Irrational Premise.Neither did the tell the SSPX that they were correct to reject Vatican Council II interpreted with the Irrational Premise. He kept the SSPX out of the Church for political reasons. He kept Bishop Williamson outside the Church even though he did not commit any moral sin according to the Catholic Church.

Pope Benedict approved the Teilhard de Chardin conference at the Gregorian University, Rome. He said Jews do not need to convert. He did not oppose the use of condoms. He told seminarians and priests not to mention Hell in their homilies. He approved Summorom Pontificum as bait for the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II (irrational).

He did not defend Fr.Leonard Feeney who said there are no visible cases of the baptism of desire and he did not tell the Chief Rabbinate of Israel that there is exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church. He interpreted Vatican Council II irrationally and so rejected Traditional Mission based upon exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. He created ‘practical exceptions’ for Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus, when there were none. He rejected the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors with his irrational interpretation of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance.

A Catholic in his condition is automatically excommunicated and at death is expected to be in the fires of Hell. He would be supporting mortal sins of faith and would be a scandal.

Where is Pope Benedict today?

Did God pardon him?

Pope Benedict was a generous and compassionate person. He cared for the poor.

We have to note that many of these ‘sins’ were also those of Pope John Paul II. JPII we love you. Pray or us. So we cannot judge and condemn Pope Benedict.

DIVES AND LAZARUS

Where he is today asks the brothers of Dives, the rich man, who was in Hell. Jesus tells us that there is a Heaven and Hell and that the beggar Lazarus was in Heaven with Abraham and the rich man Dives lost it.

The brothers of the man in Hell, think that God gave Dives so much in this life, so in the next life he would give him even more.

Pope Benedict rejected the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. A mortal sin.

He changed the interpretation of the Nicene Creed with the irrational interpretation of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance. This is a mortal sin.

He was interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally,creating liberalism, which was official and he kept the traditionalists who did not do the same, out of the Church.-Lionel Andrades

rich man and lazarus - gospel - full movie