Saturday, December 4, 2021
Brother Thomas Augustine MICM in the Diocese of Worcester and the community are interpreting Vatican Council II with the New Theology.So they would be interpreting other Magisterial Documents with the same False Premise, when the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are mentioned
Bishop Thomas Augustine MICM and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Still River, MA,USA, have received canonical recognition in the Diocese of Worcester, USA since they accept Vatican Council II interpreted with the False Premise by Bishop Robert McManus.The bishop of Worcester does not affirm Vatican Council II ( rational).Vatican Council II ( rational ) is in harmony with extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) with no exceptions as held by Brother Thomas Augustine MICM and the community at Still River, Mass.So with Vatican Council II ( irrational ) they are following the same theology as the liberals and Lefebvrists.That they go for the Latin Mass does not make a difference.
They are interpreting Vatican Council II with the New Theology.So they would be interpreting other Magisterial Documents with the same False Premise, when the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance are mentioned. -Lionel Andrades
https://immaculateheartschool.org/about/
https://www.saintbenedict.com/sisters-micm/
The Lefebvrists need to avoid the False Premise of the liberals : they interpret BOD, BOB and I.I with the false interpretation.
The Lefebvrists need to avoid the False Premise of the liberals. They need to interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise. They also need to affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus with no exceptions.This is possible when they interpret the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I), with a Rational Premise. Presently they interpret BOD, BOB and I.I with the false interpretation.
Bishop Donald Sanborn will not comment : Fr.Anthony Cekada interpreted Magisterial Documents with the False Premise
Fr.Anthony Cekada did not affirm Vatican Council II ( Rational) and correctly rejected Vatican Council II ( Irrational) which cannot be Magisterial.However he interpreted the baptism of desire(BOD) and invincible ignorance(I.I) with the False Premise and so created a false rupture with Tradition including Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).So with the False Premise in the interpretation of BOD and I.I he projected them as exceptions to the traditional strict interpretation of EENS.
The deceased priest rejected EENS with no exceptions and he did not know about a Vatican Council II( rational) which did not have exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. He made the same mistake with other Magisterial documents and would probably not be aware of it.
Bishop Donald Sanborn will not comment upon Vatican Council II with LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3 referring to only hypothetical cases always.Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre wrongly interpreted them as being exceptions to Tradition ( Syllabus of Errors, Athanasius Creed etc).-Lionel Andrades
SSPX priests in Italy say there are no objective cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 but Superior Generals will not comment
Don Aldo Rossi the Prior of the Society
of St. Pius X (SSPX), Albano, Italy has said that there are no objective cases
of non Catholics saved in practical like and LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 do not refer to
objective cases in the present times. LG 16 etc are references to only
hypothetical cases. Other SSPX priests have said the same. This is something
obvious said Don Aldo Rossi.
However the SSPX Superior Generals, past
and present, will not comment. They seem to go along with the leftist
ideological interpretation of the Council.-Lionel Andrades
The FSSP in France still interpret Vatican Council II like Bishop Roland Minnerath in Dijon
The FSSP in Dijon,
France did not announce that Lumen Gentium 8, Lumen Gentium 16 etc did not
refer to only hypothetical cases in 2021. They remain politically correct with
Bishop Roland Minnerath. In France they still interpret Vatican Council II like Bishop Minnerath and ther French Bishops Conference.
That the FSSP priests
offer the Latin Mass does not make a difference. They offer the Latin Mass in
France with the New Theology. The Nuncio in France also offers Holy Mass with
the New Theology.-Lionel
Andrades
Posts
