The President of Ignatius, Mark Brumley also publishes books by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger on Vatican Council II, Ecclesiology etc. The same mistake is there in those books too.

 

Ignatius Press publishes the book Salvation by Michael Patrick Barber.It  hides  Catholic doctrine on salvation.For political reasons the author interprets Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus with the common Irrational Premise. Then there is a rupture with the traditional strict interpretation of EENS.This is important for his employment. He has been on the faculty of the liberal Augustine Institute, Denver where the President is Tim Price.

If Ignatius Press interpreted Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise then Mark Brumley would have to affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus like Peter and Michael Dimond at the Most Holy Family Monastery.

The use of the False Premise by Brumley and the present two popes is political. The popes would need to interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise, for them to be Magisterial on the Council.

The Council is Magisterial and in with harmony with the past Magisterium only when it is interpreted with the Rational Premise and Inference.The Conclusion is traditional. The conclusion of Michael Patrick Barber is heretical.It is a rupture with the popes over the centuries.

The dogma says outside the Church there is no  salvation and he believes outside the Church there is salvation. The dogma does not mention any exceptions but for him there are exceptions.The exceptions are created by assuming there are known people in the present times saved outside the Church. So there would be physically visible non Catholics saved outside the Church. They would be visible in Heave or on earth. This is the irrational reasoning.

The present two popes to preserve the Vatican, and also their life, interpret Vatican Council II with the Irrational Premise. This produces a false break with Tradition. 

This is not apostolic.Over the centuries the popes only chose the Rational Premise to interpret the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance. So there was no confusion with the Creeds, Catechisms and EENS.

Now Barber has chosen the False Premise and produced a break with the apostolic teaching on salvation.He is following the policy of the Augustine Institute.

 The President of Ignatius, Mark Brumley also publishes books by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger on Vatican Council II, Ecclesiology etc. The same mistake is there in those books too.- Lionel Andrades

Ignatius Press still publishes a book titled Salvation by Michael Patrick Barber who interprets Vatican Council II with the Irrational Premise. He also interprets the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance with the irrational premise. So he does not affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus like the dogma EENS defined by three Church Councils.

 

‎

Ignatius Press still publishes a book titled Salvation by Michael Patrick Barber who interprets Vatican Council II with the Irrational Premise. He also interprets the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance with the irrational premise. So he does not affirm extra ecclesiam nulla salus like the dogma EENS defined by three Church Councils. 

Barber has been on the faculty of the Augustine Institute, Denver where they all choose the Irrational Premise to interpret Creeds, Catechisms and Vatican Council II.Douglas Bushman, Tim Price and Fr. Mitch Pacwa also interpreted the Council in the same irrational way.

So Mark Brumley confirmed indirectly on Twitter that he will continue to accept authors who will interpret Vatican Council II irrationally to produce a political break with the Council of Florence. The Irrational Premise and Inference are unethical but this is the only way the Catholic liberals can create a politically correct break with Tradition. It has been approved by the popes since Pius XII.

Fr.Mitch Pacwa and Douglas Bushman have appeared on EWTN praising the work of the Augustine Institute in Denver.The liberal EWTN also follows the same politically correct policy. If EWTN and the National Catholic Register would affirm Vatican Council II rationally, they would be in harmony with EENS according to the sedevacantists at the Most Holy Family Monastery.-Lionel Andrades

https://ignatius.com/salvation-swckp/

Liberals do not want to choose the Rational Premise :If Liberals Christine Niles, Michael Voris, Fr. Mitch Pacwa, Mark Brumley and Jimmy Akins would interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise then they would be in harmony with the extra ecclesiam nulla salus of Peter and Michael Dimond at the Most Holy Family Monastery, USA

Liberals do not want to choose the Rational Premise.If liberals Christine Niles, Michael Voris, Fr. Mitch Pacwa, Mark Brumley and Jimmy Akins  would interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise then they would be in harmony with the extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) of Peter and Michael Dimond at the Most Holy Family Monastery, USA. The Council would be in harmony with Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1442 on  outside the Church there is no salvation.This would be EENS with no known exceptions. But now they do not interpret the Council with a Rational Premise since they do not want to be accused of being Anti Semitic. So CMTV criticizes the bishops who also would be protecting their own interests, like CMTV, with dissent, heresy and schism. How can the popes and CMTV claim that Vatican Council II interpreted with the False Premise is guided by the Holy Spirit ? How could the popes before 1949 be Magisterial with the Rational Premise but after 1949 be Magisterial with the Irrational Premise and Inference. With the Irrational Premise they produce a non traditional conclusion, which is a rupture with the pre-1949 Magisterium ? So CMTV cannot ask Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester, USA to interpret Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise.Then he would support EENS according to the St. Benedict Center, in New Hampshire. The Judicial Vicar in New Hampshire, Fr. Georges de Laire has placed a political Decree of Prohibitions against the St Benedict Center, NH, for interpreting Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise.He and Cardinal Luiz Ladaria sj, Prefect of the CDF did not want the SBC to be in harmony with the traditional strict interpretation of the dogma EENS, of the Jesuits in the Middle Ages.With the False Premise the Church is no more apostolic, it is no more like the Church Fathers. This is not the one, holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church. -Lionel Andrades