Saturday, June 8, 2019

Catholics wrongly interpret Vatican Council II with the small 't' and assume it is the big 'T'

From the pro-SSPX forum Suscipe Domine

Offline Prayerful

  • St. Joseph's Workbench
  • Hauptmann
  • ****
  • Posts: 6318
  • Thanked: 2688 times
    • Religion: Catholic
    Re: Church Militant promoting Fr. Feeney
    « Reply #91 on: April 28, 2019, 05:20:51 PM »
    Now they walk back much of their defence.

    Fr. Feeney’s Strange Doctrine

    Sad!

    Just because Church Militant allowed one of their contributors to write an article critical of Fr. Feeney does not necessarily mean that the entire apostolate is "walking back much of their defense." I know some people who work for CM who definitely would not be favorably impressed by Jim Russell's atrocious article. 

    Russell repeats the untenable position that every teaching in Vatican II is of itself infallible because, according to him, an Ecumenical Council cannot teach error. To posit this even after Pope Paul VI explicitly said that Vatican II differed from other Councils in that it was merely pastoral and refrained from making any dogmatic definitions that are of themselves infallible, is completely dishonest. It is very important to consider that Paul VI, in saying what he said, was acknowledging that dogmatic definitions have been made at other Councils that are of themselves infallible. It logically follows that the first thing any Catholic who is confused as to what he must believe about a particular doctrine should do is look to the dogmatic definitions that have been made at the Church's first twenty Ecumenical Councils. Russell omitted in his article entirely any reference to the of themselves infallible definitions of Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus made at the Fourth Lateran Council and the Council of Florence. The defintions of the dogma made at these Councils completely vindicate Fr. Feeney and the St. Benedict Center:

    Quote
    “There is but one universal Church of the faithful, outside of which no one at all is saved.” (Lateran VI, Pope Innocent III)

    “The most Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that none of those existing outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews and heretics and schismatics, can have a share in life eternal; but that they will go into the eternal fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless before death they are joined with Her; and that so important is the unity of this ecclesiastical body that only those remaining within this unity can profit by the sacraments of the Church unto salvation, and they alone can receive an eternal recompense for their fasts, their almsgivings, their other works of Christian piety and the duties of a Christian soldier. No one, let his almsgiving be as great as it may, no one, even if he pour out his blood for the Name of Christ, can be saved, unless he remain within the bosom and the unity of the Catholic Church.” (Council of Florence, Pope Eugene IV)


    In the comments section of the article Russell defends his proposition that every teaching in Vatican II is of itself infallible because he says that every teaching taught in an Ecumenical Council is a "universal teaching of the Church." This proposition is false because universality includes the attribute of time, and a novel teaching, by definition, lacks this attribute of universality. For a teaching to be considered part of the Church's infallible ordinary and universal magisterium it is not sufficient that it be taught by all bishops throughout the world at a particular time; it must also be something that has been taught throughout all times. Br. Andre Marie, M.I.C.M. wrote an excellent article on this very subject. https://catholicism.org/the-three-levels-of-magisterial-teaching.html

    The definition of a heretic is not a baptized person who refuses to believe a teaching of a particular Catechism or a teaching of a particular pastoral Ecumenical Council. The definition of a heretic is a baptized person who refuses to believe a dogma of the faith. The definitions of EENS made at Lateran IV and Florence are dogmas of the faith. Fr. Feeney and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart have fully assented to these dogmas; Jim Russell has not.

    I say 'walk back' as it seems notably contrary to a piece which was a fair and moderate defence of Fr Feeney that doesn't make bold with Teaching. If someone so eminent and moderate as Cardinal Avery Dulles (a late JP2 addition to the College) can see no error with Fr's theology, primarily EENS, critics of which are headed by the contraception supporting and V2 Ecumenist before V2 Cdl Richard Cushing of Boston (personally I prefer Popes, Councils and Saints to that Americanist). I cannot personally know the views of CMTV staff, and really that's less relevant to articles prominently on their website, in fact it is nearly irrelevant. I wish all bloggers could have a correct and Catholic understanding of the matter.
    Lionel: 
    I have mentioned in a previous blog post 1 that there is a small tradition with a small 't' and a big tradition with a big capital 'T'.We can apply it to a particular case. The small t is from the time of Pope Pius XII until today. The big T is from the time before Pope Pius XII.
    Since the time of Pope Pius XII  the Church has been teaching that there are personally known cases of non Catholics saved with the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I). So there are objective exceptions to EENS for most Catholics today.
    Before the time of Pope Pius XII,for centuries,  however they knew that BOD, BOB and I.I could only be hypothetical.So they referred to BOD, BOB and I.I speculatively and knew they could not be exceptions to EENS.They were only theoretical. They did not exist in our reality. They could only be known to God.
    Catholics today follow the small 't' and believe that it has been the big 'T' in the Church for centuries.They assume that the the saints who refer to BOD, BOB and I.I refer to exceptions to EENS.In other words, personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church. Visible and not invisible people. But this was the thinking in the Church only since Pius XII. It is the small 't'.
     Otherwise how could they be exceptions to EENS, the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.This was how the liberals Ratzinger, Rahner and the others interpreted BOD, BOB and I.I with reference to EENS.
    For the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) too the small 't' is the same as the big T.They mix up the two.
    Then they believe that they are following Tradition with the big T.But it is only tradition with a small t.

    Jim Russel interprets Vatican Council II also with the small 't' and assumes that this was the reasoning of the Church over the centuries.

    Cardinal Richard Cushing,the Jesuits of Boston, Fr. Joseph Ratzinger and many others at Vatican Council II, confused the small t as being the big T.It is the same with Russell on Church Militant TV.
    So when Russell reads Vatican Council II, LG 8, LG14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc,they  refer to personally known people saved outside the Church,for him.He reads the Council  with the same small t. So LG 14, LG 16 etc are exceptions to the traditional, centuries old interpretation of EENS. They are also exceptions to Fr. Leonard Feeney's understanding of EENS, according to the big T
    But Russel's understanding of Tradition, on EENS, is as it was known after Pope Pius XII.He mixes up the small t for the big T.
    So for Fr. Leonard Feeney the baptism of water is necessary for every one without exception(Augustine, Aquinas etc), but for Jim Russel there are known exceptions of the baptism of desire etc.So every one does not need water baptism for salvation, for him.
    So according to the big T (Church Councls, popes) everyone who is in Heaven is there with water-baptism.This is the dogmatic teaching on EENS and we humans cannot know of any exceptions.The big T affirmed the strict interpretation of EENS and the baptism of water was never an exception to EENS.St.Ignatius of Loyola,St. Francis Xavier and St.Robert Bellarmine were all Feeneyites.Since the baptism of desire, blood and invincible ignorance were never exceptions to EENS.
    It is only when we read Bellarmine and the Jesuits of his time, with the small 't', then do they appear to contradict Fr. Leonard Feeney of Boston.
    So for the big T, God has chosen to bind salvation to the Sacraments and we do not know any one who is saved outside the Church, since God is not bound to the Sacraments(CCC 1257).God not being bound to the Sacraments is only theory for us.
    But with the small 't' Russell will interpret 'God is not bound to the Sacraments' as being known people saved outside the Church.So they become exceptions to Feeneyite EENS for him.
    So Russell interprets and accepts the Letter of the Holy Office 1949. Since the Letter see the big 'T' with the lens of the  small 't'.
    Jim Russell like the CDF and the liberal theologians state on CMTV, 'a Catholic in full communion with the Church can indeed hold as a "private theological opinion" a doctrine that effectively negates the truths behind other doctrines long held by the Church.' He interprets the big T with the small t.This  is irrational and heretical.He accepts is as being Magisterial, when it really is a private liberal theological opinion.It is an innovation in the Church since the time of Pope Pius XII.
    This is how Russell, the liberals and traditionalists, interpret Vatican Council II.They do not choose to interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as referring to only hypothetical cases. Then the Council will not be a rupture with the big T.
    But then this would be politically incorrect with the Left for Jim Russell.
    Catholics wrongly interpret Vatican Council II with the small 't' and assume it is the big 'T'

    -Lionel Andrades

    1


    Australian rugby star fights back after being ousted from his sport for offending gays

    MELBOURNE, Australia, June 7, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) — Committed Christian and Australian rugby star Israel Folau is claiming before Australia’s Fair Work Commission that he was dismissed by his team because of his religion.
    Lawyers for the former Wallabies standout confirmed Thursday that they filed papers against  Rugby Australia and the New South Wales Waratahs for breach of contract. Folau, a 30-year-old fullback, is seeking “substantial remedies” from his former employers, arguing that his termination was unlawful, according to Section 772 of the Fair Work Act that forbids discrimination on the basis of religion.
    “No Australian of any faith should be fired for practising their religion,” Folau said in a statement.
    "The termination has cost Mr. Folau the best years of his rugby career,” his lawyers stated in the filing, “participation at the Rugby World Cup, the chance to become the greatest Wallaby try-scorer (a decades-old record he was likely to break), and the associated exposure and opportunities."
    The filing goes on to say, "As well as around $5 million in lost salary, Mr. Folau will claim in respect of the loss of these opportunities (renewal of contract, sponsorships, etc). The damages will be particularised in due course, but will be substantial. In addition, Mr. Folau will seek civil penalties.”
    “I will forever be grateful and proud to have played the sport I love for our nation,” Folau said. “Ours is an amazing country built on important principles, including freedom of religion. A nation made up of so many different faiths and cultural backgrounds will never be truly rich unless this freedom applies to all of us. The messages of support we have received over these difficult few weeks have made me realise there are many Australians who feel their fundamental rights are being steadily eroded.”
    Folau was the focus of LGBTQ outrage and a disgruntled rugby establishment in Australia when he posted Scriptural condemnations of homosexuality and other perversions. In an April post on Instagram, Folau used an image that listed "drunks, homosexuals, adulterers, liars, fornicators, thieves, atheists and idolaters. Hell awaits you." He added, “Those that are living in Sin will end up in Hell unless you repent. Jesus Christ loves you and is giving you time to turn away from your sin and come to him.”
    His contract was terminated in May after a ruling from a three-member panel, thus making his ineligible to participate in this year’s Rugby World Cup matches.
    When Rugby Australia ruled that he violated its code of conduct, he lost not only a contract that was expected to run until 2022 but lucrative sponsorship deals with companies such as Land Rover and Asics.
    Continued

    There will be no official group prayers of deliverance organised today by the Italian Bishops Conference or the Rome Vicariate during the Gay Pride Parade in Rome


    The LGBT flag flies at the USA Embassy in Rome today.Special street arrangements have been made in the city.The Gay Pride Parade today is a top priority for the Left and Satan. It is imposing a new culture in the country like naked and semi naked women and men at the beaches. This was not part of the culture in Italy over the last 100 years.
    With this governmental patronage for Satan, many will come from abroad to participate in this  obscene parade, with their finances-paid.
    There will be no official group prayers of deliverance organised by the Italian Bishops Conference,during the parade,  even though the routes and organisers  of the Gay Pride Parade throughout Italy have been announced.
    Just as the Cardinal-secretary of the Italian Bishops Conference objects to the rosary being prayed outside the hospitals here where abortion is available, there are no deliverance prayers organised along the route of today's obscenity, to which children should not be exposed.It begins at 15:00/16:00 from Piazza della Repubblica through the center of Rome.
    weekssuction2.jpgm113.jpg
    Satan objects to photos of aborted babies being made public. The rationale given is that it would upset children. However the obscenities at today's Pride Parade, is not obscene for the Left.-Lionel Andrades

     MAY 23, 2019




    UK’s “conservative” government to sponsor next month's annual 'gay pride' parade - Edward Pentin

    JUNE 5, 2019


    Catholics should not support or attend LGBTQ " Pride Month" events held in June. They promote a culture and encourage activities that are contrary to Catholic faith and morals.They are especially harmful for children. -Bishop Thomas Tobin



    Featured Image

    JUNE 1, 2019


    Italian Family Minister endorses procession of reparation for Gay Pride





    MAY 28, 2019

    200 ex-LGBT people say publicly: We exist!

    MAY 26, 2019


    Mortal sins of faith


    MAY 24, 2019


    Should Christians perform Deliverance and minor excorcisms along Gay Pride routes next month during the marches ?



    Catholics today follow the small 't' and believe that it has been the big 'T' in the Church for centuries.They assume that the the saints who refer to BOD, BOB and I.I refer to exceptions to EENS.In other words, personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church. Visible and not invisible people. But this was the thinking in the Church only since Pius XII. It is the small 't'.

    There is a small tradition with a small 't' and a big tradition with a big capital 'T'.We can apply it to a particular case. The small t is from the time of Pope Pius XII until today. The big T is from the time before Pope Pius XII.
    Since the time of Pope Pius XII  the Church has been teaching that there are personally known cases of non Catholics saved with the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I). So there are objective exceptions to EENS for most Catholics today.
    Before the time of Pope Pius XII,for centuries,  however they knew that BOD, BOB and I.I could only be hypothetical.So they referred to BOD, BOB and I.I speculatively and knew they could not be exceptions to EENS.They were only theoretical. They did not exist in our reality. They could only be known to God.
    Catholics today follow the small 't' and believe that it has been the big 'T' in the Church for centuries.They assume that the the saints who refer to BOD, BOB and I.I refer to exceptions to EENS.In other words, personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church. Visible and not invisible people. But this was the thinking in the Church only since Pius XII. It is the small 't'.
     Otherwise how could they be exceptions to EENS, the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.This was how the liberals Ratzinger, Rahner and the others interpreted BOD, BOB and I.I with reference to EENS.
    For the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) too the small 't' is the same as the big T.They mix up the two.
    Then they believe that they are following Tradition with the big T.But it is only tradition with a small t.
    On the pro-SSPX  forum Suscipe Domine, most of the participants in the discussion 1, looked mixed up ' t ' as being  'T'.
    They then re-interpreted T wrongly believing that is is Tradition. Similarly , on the blog Unam Sanctam Catholicam, on the post Baptism of Desire, blog owner Boniface in the same way mistakes the big T as referring to personally known people saved outside the Church.But this is the thinking in the Church only since the time of Pope Pius XII.This was not the thinking over the centuries. It was the innovation brought into the Church since the time of Pope Pius XII.It was accepted by Archbishop Lefebvre and the cardinals and bishops of his time. This was after World War II and the creation of Israel. They all remained silent and did not support Fr. Leonard Feeney in public nor asked that his excommunication be lifted.He was saying that there were no literal cases of the baptism of desire etc.This is common sense. -Lionel Andrades



    1


    June 7, 2019



    Cushingism today in the Catholic Church is like the Arian heresy of the past. It is widespread. It is heretical yet it is supported by the present two popes  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/06/cushingism-today-in-catholic-church-is.html

    June 7, 2019




    The dogma and the saints taught that the baptism of water in the Catholic Church was absolutely necessary for salvation : Fr. Leonard Feeney was not the first   https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/06/the-dogma-and-saints-taught-that.html

     

    June 7, 2019

     


    Traditionalists and liberals go back over centuries and re-interpret the baptism of desire as being personally known people saved outside the Church and not hypothetical and speculative cases 

     https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/06/traditionalists-and-liberals-go-back.html

     

    June 7, 2019

    The Holy Innocents (as all OT saints) have no connection to baptism as the sacrament was not in place nor was the New Covenant. St. Dismas is potentially the same case, since Jesus had yet to die on the cross - its also very likely that St. Dismas was a baptized disciple 

     https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/06/the-holy-innocents-as-all-ot-saints.html


    ____________________________________________

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Cured of cancer at Medugorje

    MaryTV

     Fruit of Medjugorje

      

    Irish man with multiple scelerosis is healed at Medugorje. He says that when he first came to Medugorje, he noticed the peace was supernatural there.L.A

    Repost : Sr.Ilia Delio, LCWR concept of evolution of consciousness is without Original Sin, Hell and exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church

    June 28, 2012

    Sr.Ilia Delio, LCWR concept of evolution of consciousness is without Original Sin, Hell and exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church

    On the website of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR) thre is the announcement Ocassional Papers Summer 2012 Leadership and the Evolution of Consciousness.An Interview with Sr.Ilia Delio, OSF, senior research fellow at Woodstock Theological Center, Georgetown University.

    The Franciscan Sister draws on gnostic and Vedic ideas which is now part of New Age. She supports Teilhard di Chardin (according to a Youtube video)  and she herself rejects exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church similar to the LCWR which patronises her, a pharmacologist and not a physicist or cosmologist.

    Here is a report on the Internet. Comments are added:
    Savior: Ilia Delio reimagines Christ
    Sunday, March 20, 2011
    By Online Editor
    A U.S. Catholic interview
    While some see modern science as a challenge to faith, Franciscan Sister Ilia Delio sees it as an opportunity to think in new ways about God, creation, and the incarnation.
    The age of the universe alone requires us to talk about creation and Christ in new language. “The whole cosmos, from the big bang on, is that Word of God being spoken in the vast spaces of the universe.”
    That same Word is made flesh in Jesus Christ, says Delio, a former professor of spirituality and now a research fellow at Georgetown’s Woodstock Theological Center. But he’s more than the man who walked from Galilee to Jerusalem 2,000 years ago. “Christ is probably the most inclusive term we could use to talk about God’s presence,” she says. “Christ is the one who draws together, who unifies the new creation,” she says.
    That unity is simply the love of God that binds all things together, she says, and that’s where we come in. “While the fullness of God’s love is revealed in Jesus, what happened to Jesus must happen to us as well.”

    Lionel: Love is important.'what happened to Jesus must happen to us as well'seem like  gnosticism and Teilhard di Chardin.
    Teilhard di Chardin based his 'scientific theory' on the discovery of the 'missing link' in evolution which later was proved a fraud.
    There is no scientific basis for Teilhard di Chardin's writing about all of us evolving into Christs'.
    Delio sees the Christian vocation as one of recognizing relationships, both to creation and to other human beings. For followers of Jesus, that means building bridges, especially across religious traditions. “Heaven takes place on earth when we begin to live in God’s love in a new way,” she says. “It can sound cosmic and abstract and yet, it’s the most concrete thing we can do.”
    You write about the connection between science and theology. What does science have to do with our faith in Jesus?
    Every age must discover Christ anew. When we make Christ an academic study or just a doctrinal formula, he loses his vitality and meaning for our everyday lives.
    This especially matters now because the world has changed radically since Christians first started reflecting on who Christ is. Science has opened up for us the cosmos in a new way. Now we know that the cosmos is much older than we could have ever imagined—13.7 billion years old. We can’t get our minds around what even a billion years is like.
    Lionel: This is an opinion i.e 13.7 billion years old. The opinion can be changed in the future. There are other scientists who state that the universe is much younger, not even a hundred thousand years old.

    Science also reveals that the cosmos is dynamic. So if God is the creator of this cosmos, we’re talking about a very dynamic God, not a static, boring God. This is a God who is engaged and relational, a God of dynamic love.
    Lionel: God is the Creator of the Universe and there is no ‘if’ about it.If the cosmos created by God is dynamic it does not mean God is the same. Dynamic, static and boring are human concepts.
    These discoveries challenge us to rethink the meaning of Jesus Christ. Our traditional christology—the formal study of Jesus Christ—was formulated in the fourth and fifth centuries: Jesus Christ is true God and true man, fully divine and fully human without change, without confusion, without separation, without division, two natures in one person. The language is a mixture of the New Testament, Greek metaphysics, and Plato and Aristotle, which reflects an understanding of the universe as fixed and unchanging, not dynamic and evolving.
    Lionel: The universe is fixed and changing. Teilhard di Chardin was proven wrong scientifically in his concept of an evolutionary universe but the  Sister used his theory and the LCWR likes it too.
    Does that mean we have to start all over?
    We have a tradition to work from. If you look at the first six centuries of Christianity, the belief that the Word is made flesh was really tied with creation. In the New Testament, for example, Colossians and Ephesians point to Christ as the firstborn of creation. And the first thing that Christ is about is God’s love.
    If you go back to the early Christian thinkers, to people such as Origen of Alexandria, Irenaeus of Lyons, or Maximus the Confessor, they write about the “primacy of Christ,” how Christ is first in God’s intention to love.
    Lionel: So that (primacy of Christ) has not changed even now. There is no new scientific discovery in consciousness to suggest anything different.
    Franciscans later focused on Christ as God’s Word incarnate. God expresses God’s self in every aspect of created reality. So every person, every tree, every leaf, everything is a little word of the Word of God.
    In that tradition we can talk of the whole cosmos, from the big bang on, as that Word of God being spoken in the vast spaces of the universe. And that’s not metaphor. Nothing would come to be except as an expression of God’s love.
    Lionel: So how does this negate the concept of Hell, demons, sin, suffering and  exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church ?
    What we’re saying is that from all eternity the whole universe is made for Christ. The whole thing is about love, from 14 billion years ago, to the emergence of the human person, to the incarnation in Jesus Christ. It’s love being stressed all along, divine love all through cosmic history.

    Lionel: The whole universe is made for Christ and those who disobey go to Hell. The Bible tells us that the fallen angels are in Hell.They were also in the universe or 'a part of the cosmos'.
    It bursts forth in the person of Jesus like a new big bang. Big Bang One is the cosmos; Big Bang Two is God exploding now in human history and giving an explicit direction to the whole course of evolution in Jesus Christ.
    Lionel: In the beginning was the Word (John), in the beginning was not the cosmos.We cannot separate Jesus from the Word .We cannot separate Jesus from  the Catholic Church which is the presence of the Kingdom of God on earth.
    How is Christian life different in this approach to Christ?
    A “cosmic christology,” a more expansive understanding of Christ, is about relationship: God in relationship to us and us in relationship to God incarnate. To be related to the incarnation is to be related to one another and to all of creation. It means seeing the incarnation as the real presence of God in real time, in concrete material reality.
    Lionel: There is no scientific basis for a cosmic christology. Regarding relationships that existed before and even after the Incarnation.

    We tend to focus on the historical life of Jesus: He was a good man. He lived in Nazareth. He went about preaching the gospel, doing good things, healing the sick and raising the dead. We have this idea that if we dutifully follow the pattern of life Jesus laid down for us, we’re guaranteed salvation.
    Lionel: No - salvation is ecclesiocentric, it is there in only the Catholic Church. To just believe in Jesus for salvation is a Protestant concept being used by this Catholic nun.

    But to say Jesus is the Christ means that he is the long-awaited fullness of God’s presence. What is the point of God taking on our humanity if it doesn’t have meaning for us in our own humanity?
    Lionel: The Incarnation has meaning for us in our own humanity, only for Catholics who respond to the Gospel as taught by the Church. It is meaningful for eternal salvation.
    The point is that just as Jesus is the Christ, we, too, are part of the Christ mystery, the Word-made-flesh, God’s love incarnate, which has evolved through 14 billion years.
    Lionel: Jesus was on earth as a human some 2000 years back. There is not much evolutionary change, nothing spectacular or dramatic during this  time.
    As theologian Raimon Panikkar said, Jesus is the Christ, but Christ is more than Jesus alone. Christ encompasses the whole cosmos.
    Lionel: Panikkar did not accept exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church.
    Isn’t that pantheism?
    Pantheism is the belief that God is all things and all things are God. The approach to Christ I am describing has been called panentheism: God is in all things, and all things are in God, but God is more than all things. God is greater than the sum of everything because God is incomprehensible. You can’t conflate the uncreated and the created.

    Lionel: I had a personal copy of Pannikars book in which he coins the word panentheism for a Vedic concept.
    Christ is the way we are called to live in this mystery of God’s love. As we live in it, Christ is born.
    So we are all supposed to be Christ?
    You are baptized, right? All who are baptized into Christ have put on Christ, Paul says in Galatians. By our baptism we are changed. We have put on Christ. We are now Christ. In other words Christ is now our life. We are to go out and make Christ alive in the universe.
    Lionel: True in a sense that all who are baptized into Christ have put on Christ. Paul was referring to baptism into the community at that time. It was the Early Church, the Early Catholic Church.So baptism is needed in the Catholic Church for salvation.
    St. Augustine said something along these lines in one of his sermons: “If you are the body of Christ and its members, it is your own mystery that has been placed on the Lord’s table; what you are receiving is your own mystery.”
    How do we live the life of Christ?
    That’s where I bring in the mystics. We’ve become too analytical. Our approach is about law: Do good, avoid evil. But the mystic is one who, through prayer, enters into the mystery of God as love. Christian life is first of all a mystery, the mystery that the incredible, incomprehensible love of God is the source of all that we are.
    Lionel: St.Francis of Assisi was a mystic but he also knew suffering and mortification. It was within the Catholic Church that he had his mystical experiences.He also believed there was a Hell and there were many people there. He believed that all  Muslims need to convert into the Church to avoid Hell.
    The mystical way is one of vision. The mystic moves from the head to the heart to see the world in its true reality. The mystic doesn’t do what is right out of duty, but because she or he sees the presence of God in the poor, in the sick, in those who are anxious, in the marginalized.
    Lionel: St.Teresa of Avila was a mystic and wrote about the Seven Mansions, with visions of the Blessed Trinity. She also taught that the Lutherans were oriented to Hell.She saw demons, she was allowed to visit Hell.So having mystical experiences is not enough.
    Incarnation is also about seeing the hiddenness of God. Francis of Assisi was very focused on the humility of God, who is hidden in everyday, ordinary reality. What do you see when you see another person? When you see a rabbit? A tree? A sand dune? Do you see only sand? Or do you see something more?
    What does that mean for how we treat the rest of creation?
    We tend to treat the earth sort of like a backdrop for our lives. A “cosmic christology” reminds us that every aspect of the cosmos is in Christ, everything is Word incarnate. Everything bears the infinite love of God, each in its own way, which means that there’s nothing earthly that doesn’t have some divine dignity to it.
    The medieval Franciscan theologian St. Bonaventure said the whole world is exemplary of God because everything bears a relationship to God. God created the quark and the star, the bacteria, the snake. Everything reflects God in some way.
    Because every created thing has a relationship to God, I can’t misuse, abuse, or control it. Cosmic christology calls us to be in relationship to created things as a sister or brother. We are all part of the one cosmic family.
    Lionel: We have always been inter related at the level of nature. The universe is one, blood is always read, we breathe the same air and there are common laws of nature for all of us. This is not new.
    The rain falls on the good and the bad.
    Would you really abuse and misuse and manipulate a person or thing you claim to love? I hope not.
    In that respect we have misused the things of the earth. We’ve been very selfish and self-centered, and we have not treated the rest of creation with a sense of dignity, respect, or reverence.
    Understanding God in our midst in the natural world might give us a new consciousness that we use things as gifts. All of life—our life and every life—is a gift. That’s what love is about.
    Does that mean God loves everything equally?
    Another way to approach this is that each person, every single thing that’s created is created uniquely out of the infinite love of God, which means everything bears in its own unique, distinct way the reflection of God’s love.
    When we talk about God’s love, the model is the Trinity. The first person of the Trinity, the Father or the fountain source of love, loves one other than the Father—the Son. That relationship between the Father and the Son is bound in a union of all things, the Holy Spirit.
    In other words God’s love is uniquely and distinctly personal. God doesn’t love in some general diffuse way. Your life and my life and every single life is loved in a unique, personal, and distinct way. Everything bears a unique expression of God in a way that cannot be reproduced or clumped together, which makes everything uniquely lovable.
    How do we start seeing with this broader vision?
    The first thing is prayer. I don’t mean just saying prayers, such as the Our Father or Hail Mary. I mean really praying to know yourself first of all. In our very busy world we need to take time to be with God.
    Lionel: Know yourself in a Vedic, Buddhist way?
    People say that they’re not sure how to pray, but prayer is really just talking that leads to deep dialogue. Do you talk to yourself? That’s part of prayer. Who are we talking to when we talk to ourselves? It’s God, the source of life within us.
    Prayer is being at home with God in our everyday lives. Scripture can help us because it gives us some language and insight as to who God is. This is the ancient form of lectio divina. You read the scriptures and then you meditate. You let them sink in. We’re so busy today that we don’t even have time to let anything sink in, but there is no christology without that, quite honestly.
    The next step is looking at the life of Jesus, at his healing, mercy, and forgiveness. The humanity of Jesus is our humanity. What he did in his life is what we’re capable of doing as well. We’re capable of being compassionate, of being merciful, of forgiving others.
    Jesus sets the pattern for what makes salvation possible. And salvation is really being made whole. The common image of Jesus in the New Testament and the earliest Christian centuries was Jesus the physician. Salvation is better seen in terms of health.
    Lionel: Salvation is going to Heaven and avoiding the pains of Hell.This is different from the Eastern 'wholistic' concepts of ‘salvation’.
    To be saved is to respond to and accept the love of God in our lives, that grace of God that makes us whole. If we are whole, then what? We help make others whole as well.
    Lionel: If you are whole phsyically, mentally and spiritually and you are not in the Catholic Church you can be saved?
    Can you give some specific examples of what needs healing?
    We still have divisions within our local communities and in the churches. We still have a lot of violence in the world. We have wars that continue to proliferate. We still have poverty abounding, probably more today than ever before. Why hasn’t Christianity made a difference in the world? How is it we can still have the same problems that Jesus had in his own time?
    A lot of that has to do with the fact that we have not yet caught on to the heart of Christianity, which is very simply stated in Jesus’ own language: love of God, love of neighbor. Love is the essence of God’s incarnation.
    G. K. Chesterton said, “The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting. It has been found difficult, and left untried.” That’s a pretty hard saying, but there’s truth to it. What if however many millions of Catholics there are really took up living as Christians by living the Christ mystery, by living in the fullness of love?
    Whenever there is conflict or there’s division, can we forgive? Can we be merciful? Can we be compassionate? Can we love? Can we help bridge those divisions, that brokenness?

    Lionel: Love is important.
    If I put this into practice, what does my life look like?
    Say you meet a Muslim. You could respond, as some do, “You’re a Muslim. You’re probably going to go to hell because you believe in the Qur’an, and the Qur’an isn’t really the Word of God. That’s just a book.” You might also judge the person’s accent as too foreign, so you don’t have the patience to spend time trying to figure out what the person is talking about.
    But if you say that God is love, the first thing you realize is that before you is an icon of Christ. This Muslim is one in whom God lives, which means you must be patient and show respect for and interest in that person. In this Muslim, God is revealing God’s self.
    A mystical Christian encounters a person as an encounter with God. This is incarnation now. We allow that person to be who they are because that’s the person God created. I think it’s a matter of looking at the person as an icon of God—one in whom God is shining through.

    Lionel: The Mystical experience is a gift of God. It is a grace. We cannot give ourself a mystical experience as it is believed in the Oriental religions and New Age.
    Unfortunately, we don’t see people or the created world as icons. Instead we treat them as objects—an object you can manipulate and control.
    You used the example of encountering a Muslim. How do other religions fit into this cosmic vision of Christ?
    One thing we have to say is that other religions are not outside the Christ mystery.
    Lionel: What she means by a mystery is a mystery to me. Other religions are not paths to salvation is still the teaching of the Catholic Church.(CDF, Notification on Fr.Jacques Dupuios S.J 2001)
    They are part and parcel of that mystery. That’s why dialogue with the world’s religions is very important. How will we build the bridges of God’s love unless we know other religions and their people?
    Lionel: One has also to know one’s Catholic Faith before entering into dialogue.
    One has to believe in the teachings of the Catholic Church.

    We Christians are called to be bridge builders, and unless we do that, we are going to continue to suffer violence in the world because a lot of the violence is religious in nature. Christianity has the responsibility to incarnate the love of God by reaching out to other religions to talk about this mystery of God.
    When you sit down face to face with another person and you start talking about the things that really matter, you’re going to find more things in common than things that divide. And I think when you find that bridge of commonality, there is Christ.
    I think there is more good to discover in other religions than to be wary of. I think we would do better building bridges with that attitude.
    And we each have role to play?
    God seeks to be incarnate in an expanding incarnation. The Christ is waiting to be born anew, if I can put it in that language. But Christ cannot be born anew without our saying yes to bringing Christ into the world.
    I also think we need to lighten up a little bit and enjoy the ride. Christian life is an adventure, God’s adventure in love. We need to recapture a sense of this cosmic adventure in love and that we’re part of it.
    Science tells us that evolutionary creation will continue on earth for billions of years. The evolutionary universe may go on for 100 trillion years. A lot has happened before us, and a lot is going to happen after us. So stay tuned. I think in the next billion years, the best is yet to come.
    Lionel: We could even be in the End Times over the next few years and the Day of Judgement will be there.
    There is no scientific basis for assuming that there will be a billion years or that there has been a billion years.
     
     
     http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2012/06/srilia-delioand-lcwr-concept-of.html