Thursday, July 19, 2012

THE SOCIETY OF ST.PIUS X HAS ACCEPTED VATICAN COUNCIL II IN ACCORD WITH TRADITION AND HAS REJECTED THE LIBERAL VERSION

The Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) has accepted Vatican Council II in accord with the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (1) in harmony with Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II. They have endorsed Vatican Council II according to Sacred Tradition. They can also cite reference texts from Vatican Council II to support  their doctrinal position.

They have rejected, as in the past, the liberal version of Vatican Council (2) whose adherents cannot cite any texts to support their interpretation which is a break, a rupture with tradition and magisterial documents.

The SSPX is finally in a position to point out to their adversaries that there can be only one interpretation of the Council which can be supported by tradition.In this one interpretation AG 7 supports the dogma on exclusive salvation and LG 16 and LG 8 etc are not known exceptions to the dogma.

The SSPX has stated clearly that they have ‘ faith in the Roman Catholic Church, the only Church founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ, outside of which there is no salvation and no possibility of finding the means that lead to it’.

There is no salvation outside the Church (Cantate Domino, Council of Florence 1441, Vatican Council II (AG 7) etc) and that outside the Church there is even ‘no possibility of finding the means that lead to it’ i.e those saved in invincible ignorance , a good conscience etc  are accepted as possibilities known only to God and not possibilities which contradict the dogma on salvation,since these possibilities are not explicit for us. They are unknown to us humans.

As for the liberal interpretation of Vatican Council II which is a rupture from the past the SSPX rejects ‘all the novelties of the Second Vatican Council that remain tainted with errors’ e.g theology of religions etc which are opposed by Vatican Council II (AG 7).

They accept the Council and ‘the Society can only continue to abide by the statements and teachings of the constant Magisterium of the Church;’ which is in agreement with the Council and in accord with Tradition. It carries the hermeneutic of continuity. The SSPX ‘ finds its guide in this uninterrupted Magisterium which, by its act of teaching, transmits the revealed deposit in perfect harmony with all that the whole Church has always believed, in every place’ and which is in agreement with Vatican Council II.--Lionel Andrades
__________________________________________


1.
This is why its seems to us opportune to reaffirm our faith in the Roman Catholic Church, the only Church founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ, outside of which there is no salvation and no possibility of finding the means that lead to it; in its monarchical constitution, willed by Our Lord, which means that the supreme power of governance over the whole Church belongs to the pope alone, the Vicar of Christ on earth; in the universal kingship of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the creator of the natural and supernatural order, to whom every human being and all society must submit.

2.
As for all the novelties of the Second Vatican Council that remain tainted with errors, and as for the reforms that have resulted from them, the Society can only continue to abide by the statements and teachings of the constant Magisterium of the Church; it finds its guide in this uninterrupted Magisterium which, by its act of teaching, transmits the revealed deposit in perfect harmony with all that the whole Church has always believed, in every place.
-Rome-SSPX: Declaration of the General Chapter of the Society of Saint Pius X sent to the Holy See
As announced in the press communiqué of the Society of St. Pius X’s General House on July 14, 2012, the members of the General Chapter sent a common statement to Rome. It has been published today.
http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/

CAL PLEASE ASK THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TO STOP THE INTIMIDATION OF CATHOLICS IN BOSTON

CAL PLEASE ASK THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TO STOP THE INTIMIDATION OF CATHOLICS IN BOSTON

CATHOLICS DO NOT HAVE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN BOSTON AND IT’S NOT JUST THE HHS MANDATE

BOSTON DISTRICT ATTORNEY MUST BE ASKED TO DISCLOSE THE TRUTH ABOUT FR.LEONARD FEENEY.

Rabbi David Rosen represents the Chief Rabbinate of Israel according to a report in the Boston PilotNews.com which covered an event hosted by the Archdiocese to honour Rosen, who is supported by Israel’s political and military power.

There is so much of fear in Boston that they cannot identify the problem in public, instead, they honour him.

Rabbi Rosen is on public record mentioning the conditions for the acceptance of the Society of St.Pius X  into the Church. He has demanded that Catholics stop praying the Revised Good Friday Prayer for the Conversion of the Jews. He has demanded that there be no mission to the Jews in Boston and so Catholics do not proclaim their faith

With the support of Israel he can even tell the Vatican whom to appoint and to even  keep the Society of St. Pius X out of the Church.

The Chief Rabbinate does not admit in public that if the Vatican or Boston Archdiocese does not obey them, there will be political or military action. They simply say there will be the end of dialogue. The ‘end of dialogue’ means expect the worse.

I have asked the Archdiocese of Boston two questions about the Catholic Faith and there is no reply. There is no answer from Mr. Terrence Donilon the Secretary for Communications & Public Affairs, Archdiocese of Boston neither, from Fr. Bryan Parrish, Assistant Vicar for Administration and Special Assistant to the Vicar General.

They are all probably afraid of David Rosen and laws which permit the legal extortion of Catholics and non Jews.

The issue here is Catholic religious freedom in Boston, the right for a Catholic to hold his religious beliefs and express them.

Last month there was a Fortnight of Freedom meeting in Boston against the HHS Mandate.Similarly the issue here is the legal right for Catholics to interpret Vatican Council II and Catholic dogmas without being told by David Rosen and others what is acceptable and unacceptable to them.

The Catholic Action League of Massachusetts is asked to take up this issue with the Attorney General and ask him that the two questions be answered which will lead to justice being done to the late Fr. Leonard Feeney.

Also ask the Rabbi David Rosen to refrain from telling Catholics what to believe or what is their faith just as Catholics do not do the same to members of the Jewish Left.

Catholics need to protest outside Israeli embassies and where David Rosen is to address Catholics.
-Lionel Andrades

NO PRESS STATEMENT AND ANNOUNCEMENT YET FROM BOSTON ARCHDIOCESE ON AGREEMENT WITH FR.LEONARD FEENEY

Mr. C.J Doyle of the Catholic Action League of Massachusetts please review the Fr.Leonard Feeney case



SSPX COMMUNIQUE AFFIRMS ' UNIQUE CHURCH FOUNDED BY OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST, OUTSIDE OF WHICH THERE IS NO SALVATION NOR POSSIBILITY TO FIND THE MEANS LEADING TO SALVATION'

For this reason it seems opportune that we reaffirm our faith in the Roman Catholic Church, the unique Church founded by Our Lord Jesus Christ, outside of which there is no salvation nor possibility to find the means leading to salvation...
Rome-SSPX: Declaration of the General Chapter of the Society of Saint Pius X sent to the Holy See
http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/
____________________________________________

ROMAN FORUM MEETS AND THEIR DISSENT IS EXPECTED TO CONTINUE

The Roman Forum has met this summer in Gardone, Italy and the confusion is still expected to continue. Mons.Ignacio Barreiro,  Brian Mcall  and others are still not willing to say in public that invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire are not explicit exceptions to the dogma and Fr.Leonard Feeney.This issue is at the centre of present dissent and so like John Rao, Chairman of the Roman Forum and members of the Society of St.Pius X  and  liberals, they teach dissent on this subject.

Mons. Barrero participating in the Roman Forum offers the Traditional Latin Rite Mass when  in Rome and he is not going to affirm the literal interpretation of the dogma to protect his reputation and interests. Similarly the Australian Fr.Joseph Kramer (FSSP) also denies the traditional interpretation of the dogma. He offers the Traditional Latin Mass in Rome.There is no difference between him and the liberal Novus Ordo priests.

So if Christopher Ferrara and the others at the Roman Forum cannot state that there are no known exceptions to Fr.Leonard Feeney's doctrinal position on salvation dissent will continue in the Catholic Church and they are a part of it.It is easy for Mons. Ignacio Barreiro to speak at conferences in guarded language but to  affirm the faith in public is difficult for him on the issue of the salvation dogma.Even Hilary White and LifeSites.com do not want to discuss this issue.

Their doctrinal position on salvation is irrational and non traditional. Some of them probably know the truth but they are afraid to affirm the faith in public.-Lionel Andrades