The monasteries of St. Benedict at Subiaco are the property of the State and the monks are only allowed to live the Rule of St.Benedict but not his theology.Theology is controlled by the Italian State.When the Catholic Church is not free to teach the theology of St. Benedict it reminds me of Communist China.
According to the theology of St. Benedict every one needs to be incorporated into the Catholic Church as a member for salvation. This was his theology during his missionary drive in Europe.
Since every one needs to enter the Church as a member to avoid Hell,the Social Reign of Christ the King over all social and political legislation was a priority. There was no separation of Church and State.
But extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) is not the theology today permitted by the State and Satan, represented by the political Left.There is a new theology in the Church today which has been approved by the State and the Vatican.
This theology which replaces the original one based on EENS has an objective error. It has a simple mistake.So it cannot be a genuine theology.This is exposed if you would ask the monks at Subiaco or their Superior General in Rome these two questions.
1.Are there known people in 2017 saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire ? They would say "No".Obviously if these cases existed they would only be known to God.We cannot meet someone in Heaven or on earth saved with the baptism of desire etc.So there are no real people as such on earth.
2.Since there are no known people in 2017 saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire with or without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church we could conclude that there are no known exceptions to the dogma EENS? They would have to answer YES here.
Zero cases of something cannot be exceptions to the dogma EENS says the apologist John Martignoni.
The magisterium however assumes there are known exceptions to the dogma EENS,this is the new non-theology.
With a wrong premise they create a non traditional conclusion.
Upon a false premise the whole Church, including the Benedictines have accepted a new theology.
This is the new theology which has replaced the traditional theology on mission,that of St. Benedictine and St. Francis Xavier, for example.
This replacement theology can be reversed however . It can be avoided. This is the good news.It is 'built into the system'.The switch is simple.
How is it done? Avoid the false premise by not interpreting hypothetical cases as being objectively visible.In Vatican Council II for example, keep the references to hypothetical cases as just being hypothetical.So the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance in Vatican Council II would refer to invisible and not visible cases.LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc all refer to hypothetical cases for me.
With this simple step we are back to the old Benedictine theology!
With this simple step there are no exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II to traditional EENS. Traditional EENS according to St. Benedict is in harmony with Vatican Council II.
However can this old theology, this old ecclesiology of the Church be taught today by the Benedictines ? No.The Italian State and the Vatican will not allow it.
The Benedictine Superior, like the pope, to protect their property and maintain their present lifestyle will say that there are personally known and physically visible cases of non Catholics saved with the baptism of desire and in invincible ignorance.Are there really known cases in 2017 saved without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church?This is irrational and false.
Who are these cases in 2017 ? There are no names, when you ask them. How could any one physically see someone in the past saved as such? There is no comment from them. Even if someone was saved as such how could this person be an exception to the dogma EENS in 2017? There is no answer.
The Church is supporting the false theology of the Communists, leftists and Satanists.
A false reasoning is being used.Their philosophy is a deception. It is a lie and is not Catholic.They are deceiving the laity who do not know theology while conservatives and traditionalists keep silent, since they do not want to offend the secular forces or the Vatican.There is no one to explain this to Catholic political leaders.Even the leaders of political parties which are Catholic in Italy, are using this leftist approved theology in ignorance.-Lionel Andrades