October 11, 2019
Books to avoid - Fenton and Hardon's theology is off the rails
Un known cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance were assumed to be personally known examples of salvation outside the Church and so exceptions to the 16th century interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus.Upon this error the liberals created the New Theology.
The
conservative writers Fenton and Hardon accepted this New Theology. So
they interpreted Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition(EENS,
past ecclesiology, ecumenism of return, Syllabus of Errors etc).
Now we know that we can read the Council without the false premise.
Fenton
and Hardon are as obsolete as Archbishop Lefebvre and Cardinal
Ratzinger and Ladaria.They are all in the same
heretical Cushingite camp.
-Lionel Andrades
For
the writers of these books LG 8, LG 14 and LG 16 being hypothetical
cases do not contradict the old ecclesiology. There is no known
salvation outside the Church. So there is no theological and
philosophical foundation for the New Theology.
There
is nothing in Lumen Gentium to contradict the past exclusivist
ecclesiology of the Church. So there is no philosophical and theological
foundation in Vatican Council II for the New Ecclesiology.
Unitatis
Redintigratio does not name any particular person saved outside the
Church as a Protestant or other Christian in his religion.It does not
state that we can know of a Christian saved outside the Church without
Catholic faith. So the Decree on Ecumenism(UR) does not anywhere
contradict the past ecumenism of return.
Similarly
Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism for salvation and we know
there can be no practical exceptions known to us humans in 2019. So
Vatican Council II is not a rupture with Mission and Salvation as it was
known to the Magisterium and missionaries in the 16th century.
Ludwig
Ottt assumes unknown cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of
blood (BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) were known
exceptions to the traditional interpetation of the dogma extra ecclesiam
nulla salus.The same mistake was made by Fr. Francois Laisney.Other
writers made this mistake and also interpreted Vatican Council II
irrationally. The same error is being made today by the Cardinals and
bishops at the Amazon Synod.-L.A
OCTOBER 9, 2019
Only on the blog Eucharist and Mission (Graphics)
-Lionel Andrades
OCTOBER 9, 2019
Vatican Council II is no more Christological it is also Ecclesiocentric.It has an eccleiocentric ecclesiology.This is not being reported by the media.The Amazon Synod Working Paper avoids this issue.LG8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, refer to hypothetical cases only.They are not objective exceptions in the present times(1965-2019) to the old exclusivist ecclesiolgy and an ecumenism of return.So the interpretation of Vatican Council II by the Synod is limited and wrong.
AUGUST 25, 2019
Many Catholic books on salvation and Vatican Council II are written with irrational Cushingite philosophy and theology
-Lionel Andrades
Posts
