Fr.Francesco Giordano and Prof. Sandra Mazzolini's theology is political and they suggest it is from the Holy Spirit

The Bible says that if any one sins against the Holy Spirit he or she will not be forgiven.I have read different explanations of this frightening text.

I do know that this semester at the Angelicum and Urbaniana Universities in Rome, there are courses on the Holy Spirit in their theology section.The courses are offered by Fr. Francesco Giordano(Angelicm) and Sandra Mazzoloni(Urbanina).

They both will teach that the Holy Spirit guides the Church to say today, after Vatican Council II (Cushingite), that there is known salvation outside the Church.So the old ecclesiology is rejected and there is a new understanding of ecclesiology.Mazzolini has written a book in Italian critical of extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) in the patristic period.She interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism. Then she wrote a book on Vatican Council II interpreted with Cushingism with no clue of the Council being traditional, when interpreted with Feeneyism. 

Just like the traditionalists Roberto dei Mattei and Chris Ferrara wrote books on Vatican Council II, which they interpreted with Cushingism and then rejected the result, Sandra Mazzolini a liberal, also interpreted Vatican Council II with Cushingism, but expects more from her  Cushingite spirit of Vatican Council II.

Mazzolini and Giordano will teach students that outside the Church there is salvation since invisible cases of the baptism of desire etc are visible exceptions  to Feeneyite EENS.This is the new teaching in the Church granted by the Holy Spirit according to them.It is approved by the Father General of the Dominicans.

They will say that Vatican Council II is a rupture  with EENS according to the missionaries of the 16th century and the Patristic period.Since unknown cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc in 2020, are personally seen and known exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.

So the Holy Spirit  for them, contradicts the Principle of Non Contradiction(people saved outside the Church are visible in Heaven and on earth at the same time), makes an objective error.It is a rupture with the teachings of the Holy Spirit over the centuries, on salvation, mission, theology etc.

Of course this has been approved by Pope Francis.He indicated, before the Amazon Synod, that the Holy Spirit guides the Church.This was before the expected innovations were announced.

Then before Christmas, Pope Francis referred to the 'magisterium of Vatican Council II'. He was referring to Vatican Council II Cushingite and not Vatican Council II Feeneyite.Vatican Council II Cushingite is a superficial and heretical way to read the Council-text.It cannot be supported by the Holy Spirit and so cannot be magisterial.

This is all manifest deception and it is being attributed to the Holy Spirit. In a sense this is blasphemy.

Giordano and Mazzolini have changed the understanding of the Creeds and Catechisms with their Cushingite interpretation of LG 8,LG 14, LG 16 etc and they do not correct the heresy.

I have been writing about this for the last few years and Mazzolini and those who support her, ignore me. 

With this public scandal they offer/attend Holy Mass.No corrections are made or apologies offered since their post is a political one.

Now they suggest that all this deception is the teaching of the Holy Spirit. 

How can the Holy Spirit tell us to pre-suppose that there are literal exceptions to traditional exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church, when we cannot know of any ?

Who has seen a baptism of desire case in 2019-2020? Who can say there were  20 or 25 people saved in invincible ignorance outside the Church in 2018-2019 ? No one.

Giordano and Mazzolini promote all this irrationality and innovation, with the support of others, as being the teachings of the Holy Spirit and then get a salary.

Their theology is political and they suggest it is from the Holy Spirit-Lionel Andrades

From the Handbook of Studies of the Angelicum University, Rome (2019-2020)

TE 2547 Pneumatology. 3 ECTS

This course will study the Spirit’s divinity, his procession from the Father and the Son, his in-
visible and visible missions, his seven gifts and the charisms. Theological issues raised by

the charismatic renewal and the Pentecostal movement will also be considered. ( Lionel: They will have to conform to his liberal Cushingite theology, on the Holy Spirit.Many of them are already doing so).
35
FACOLTÀ DI TEOLOGIA

FIRST CYCLE
ODS 2019 da 1 fino a pag pag 201 2 SETTEMBRE_Layout 1 04/09/19 10:07 Pagina 35

BIBLIOGRAPHY: THOMAS AQUINAS, Summa Theologiae I, questions 27-43; I-II, question
68; II-II, questions 171-178; Y. CONGAR, I Believe in the Holy Spirit, Crossroad Publishing,
New York, 1983; G. EMERY, The Trinity: An Introduction to Catholic Doctrine on the Triune

God, The Catholic University of America Press, Washington, D.C., 2011; M. LEVERING, En-
gaging the Doctrine of the Holy Spirit, Baker Academic, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 2016.


F. GIORDANO

SECOND SEMESTER

SE 2591 The Salvation of Non-Christians in St. Thomas Aquinas’ Corpus. 4 ECTS
In this seminar we wish to approach the issue of salvation of non-Christians using the thought
of St. Thomas Aquinas, covering themes from the nature of Faith and the necessity of Baptism
to that of invincible ignorance. Since St. Thomas did not address this theme frequently in his
texts, we will see a number of other key themes in his theology which will open the way to
help answer these questions.
BIBLIOGRAPHY: ST. THOMAS AQUINAS, Summa Theologiae, Editio Leonina, Romae,
1888-1903; RICCARDO LOMBARDI, S.J. The Salvation of the Unbeliever, Burns & Oates,
London 1956; LOUIS CAPERAN, Le Problème du Salut des Infidèles, Essai historique, Grand

Séminaire, Toulouse 1934; LOUIS CAPERAN, Le Problème du Salut des Infidèles, Essai théo-
logique, Grand Séminaire, Toulouse 1934 ; RALPH MARTIN, Will Many Be Saved ?, Eerd-
mans, Grand Rapids (MI) 2012.

F. GIORDANO Wed. 8.30-10.15


From the Handbook of Studies (Ordo) Urbaniana Pontificial University, Rome

Diretto Canonica

Secondo semestre 

SIGLA   DESCRIZIONE DOCENTE 

TB1018 Teologia della missione S. Mazzolini ECTS 3/I sem. 

Departmento di Missiologia

QUADRO DELLE DISCIPLINE Primo semestre Corsi obbligatori

SIGLA     DESCRIZIONE DOCENTE 

MB1000 Introduzione alla Missiologia J.-A. Barreda ECTS 3/I sem.

 MB1001 Missiografia J.-A. Barreda ECTS 3/I sem. 

MB1002 Storia della Chiesa missionaria A. Trevisiol ECTS 6/ann. 

MB1006 Teologia della spiritualità missionaria C. Dotolo ECTS 3/I sem.

 MB1012 Teologia della pastorale missionaria P.B.W. Steffen ECTS 3/I sem. MB1013 Fenomenologia della religione B. Kanakappally ECTS 3/I sem.

 MB1016 Teologia sistematica della Missione A. Pooda ECTS 3/I sem. MB1025 La missione nell’Antico Testamento D. Scaiola ECTS 3/I sem. 

MB1026 Metodologia del lavoro scientifico A. Pooda ECTS 3/I sem. Corsi introduttivi alle religioni 

SIGLA        DESCRIZIONE DOCENTE 

MLT1027 Animazione e cooperazione missionaria: fondamenti teologici e orientamenti pastorali A. Pooda ECTS 4/II sem. 

MLT1028 Pneumatologia: economia salvifica dello Spirito Santo S. Mazzolini ECTS 4/II sem. 116Missiologia 

MLT1038 Globalizzazione ed etica nell’era della complessità D. Mancini ECTS 4/II sem. 

MLT1046 Percorsi di evangelizzazione per oggi A. Adamo ECTS 3/II sem. Corsi integrativi SIGLA

JANUARY 4, 2020

The Handook of Studies of the Urbaniana Pontifical University, Rome ( Ordo) shows like the Handook of Studies of the Angelicum University Rome ( 2019-2020) that Vatican Council II is interpreted irrationally to create a rupture with traditional mission doctrine, the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Catholic Church, an ecumenism of return and extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was known to the miissionaries in the 16th century

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-handook-of-studies-of-urbaniana.html

The Master General of the Dominicans, Fr. Gerard Francisco Timoner III cannot issue a statement or clarification since he does not have the faith, or he could be removed from office, for expressing it.

The Master of the Order of Preachers is the Superior General of the Order, the Dominicans.He is  ex officio Grand Chancellor of the Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas in Rome  and of the Pontifical and Royal University of Santo Tomas in Manila,Philippines.Fr. Gerard Francisco Timoner III  was elected the  Master of the Order, this year.He was a Professor of liberal Cushingite,theology at the University of Santo Tomas in Manila.Timoner was ordained a priest in 1995. He earned additional degrees in sacred theology and intercultural theology at the Catholic University of Nijmegen in 2004. Pope Francis named him a member of the leftist International Theological Commissio.He accepts the ITC's political interpretation of Vatican Council II and extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), the Catechisms and Creeds. So for him too like the rest of the Dominicans there is an artificial rupture with Tradition and the Dominican saints on the past ecclesiology, ecumenism etc.There interpretation of Magisterial documents is a mortal sin of faith. It is a public scandal. But they are obliged to follow because of their various personal attachments in life.

Presently, this Master General is as dishonest as the previous one since they  pre-suppose,after being informed, that unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance are known exceptions to Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). In other words there was no error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which was referenced in Vatican Council II by the liberals and accepted by Cardinal Ratzinger and Bishop Charles Morerod op, at the ITC.

The Father General extends his faulty reasoning to Vatican Council II.He assumes invisible cases referenced in LG 8, LG 14, lG 16, UR 3, NA2, GS 22 etc are physically visible examples of salvation outside the Church and so are objective exceptions to traditional EENS.If they were not visible they could not be exceptions to EENS. If they did not refer to known people saved outside the Church they would be irrelevant to EENS.So since there are exceptions to EENS for him he implies they are visible. Then he commits heresy on the Creeds and Catechisms and Vatican Council II -but keeps his job.

But the Master General like the present two popes does not say that all need to enter the Church with faith and baptism for salvation(AG 7 ). So there are exceptions for him. He does not say that in Heaven there are only Catholics. So there are known exceptions to EENS on earth for him.

If he corrects this error among the Dominicans, for example ay the Angelicum University, Pope Francis , the Masons and the rest of the political Left would want him to resign.They are unable to accept the truth, with charity or without it.

The Dominicans do not correct the error on the Wikipedia Internet posts on Feeneyism, extra ecclesiam nulla salus, Vatican Council II and Feeneyism, Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary etc.Instead they repeat the error in courses this semester at the university.

The Father General cannot even issue a statement or clarification on this issue since he does not have the faith, or if he does have the faith, he could be removed from office, for expressing it.-Lionel Andrades

The Wikipedia entries on the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Feeneyism, extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Fr. Leonard Feeney is leftist propaganda.It pre-supposes that the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance refer to visible and known exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).It also pre-supposes that Lumen Gentium 8 ( elements of sanctification and truth/ known salvation outside the Church where the true Church subsists), Lumen Gentium 16 etc, are known non Cathlics saved outside the Church.Upon this error they have created a rupture with the traditional teaching on exclusive salvation

The Wikipedia entries on the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Feeneyism, extra ecclesiam nulla salus and Fr. Leonard Feeney is leftist propaganda.It pre-supposes that the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance refer to visible and known exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).It also pre-supposes that Lumen Gentium 8 ( elements of sanctification and truth/ known salvation outside the Church where the true Church subsists), Lumen Gentium 16 etc, refer to personally known non Cathlics saved outside the Church.Upon this error they have created a rupture with the traditional teaching on exclusive salvation.

None of the professors at the Angelicum University contradicted the error on the Internet.Instead they support it to create a new theology, new ecumenism, new ecclesiology and new evangelisation.

Pope Benedict and cardinals Kasper, Ruini and Schonborn had to confirm for the Left, that what is invisible must be projected as visible to change Catholic doctrine, to outside the Church there is salvation.

 

 The John XXIII Foundation for Religious Sciences (FSCIRE), the headquarters of the so-called "Bologna School," has received another million euros from the Italian government for  2020–2022,it is reported.This is because the FSCIRE  assumes 1) there are personally known people:people visible, who are  saved outside the Catholic Church 2) and they assume that  Vatican Council II in LG 8 etc, with so called 'visible cases', contradicts the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.
 

Similarly George Weigel and the scholars at the Ethics and Public Policy Center receive their public funding , since they interpret illusory cases of being saved  in LG 8 etc as being real exceptions to 16th century EENS.They have been informed but do not want to make the change.

Similarly John Allen jr, Massimo Faggioli, Michael Sean Winters and Edward Pentin at the National Catholic Reporter, Commonweal, Crux and the National Catholic Register, earn their living upon this error.It is a few months since I have sente them e-mails copies of these blog posts.They cannot say that I am wrong and they do not want to say that I am correct.😊

-Lionel Andrades 

January 6, 2020

The Wikipedia reports on Fr. Leonard Feeney and extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the EWTN report 'Tragic Errors of Fr. Leonard Feeney' are false. They pre-suppose that Lumen Gentium 16 etc are exceptions to the 16th century, strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). 

 https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/01/the-wikipedia-reports-on-fr-leonard.html

In Paradiso hanno una gioia che non esiste qui sulla Terra

Too bad these is so much confusion on the necessity of the Church for salvation, these days, and the Abbot does not have it in him to speak the truth.

Dom Jean Pateau,Abbot of Our Lady of Fontgombault is a typical Cushingite, probably a Lefebvrist too, since his little report has been posted on Rorate Caeili.

He does not say that the Church is necessary for all for salvation and all need to convert to avoid Hell. He could be looking after his status or whatever.He does not say that all need to convert into the Catholic Church to avoid Hell and that in Heaven there are only Catholics.

The Abbot assumes the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and invincible ignorance refer to physically known, visible in the flesh objective non Catholics, may be in France, who are saved outside the Church. So they are not just theoretical cases but physically visible people saved outside the Church. 

He cannot state that the Church is necessary for salvation and all need to be members with faith and the baptism of water.( Ad Gentes7 ).

Centuries back in the monasteries of France the abbot held the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).

This was changed with the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which assumed unknown cases of the BOD and I.I were known exceptions to Feeneyite EENs. This was approved by the Masons. This is also the reasoning of Dom Jean Pateau.

This mistake was repeated at Vatican Council II. They assumed that there were known non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church in invincible ignorance. So Lumen Gentium 14 refers  to those who know and do not enter the Church being  oriented to Hell.

Yes to those who know but also to all people in general, including those to whom the Gospel has not been preached through no fault of their own.

All need faith and baptism for salvation says Ad Gentes 7 and not just only those who know, as the Abbot would have it.

He is repeating the Lefebvrist error which is common in France. This is not Catholic traditionalism instead it is heresy and scandal.

Since with visiblle- for- the- abbot BOD, BOB and I.I the Catechisms and Creeds are changed. BOD, BOB and I.I have to be visible for the Abbot, otherwise how could they be exceptions to Feeneyite EENS ? And he is definitely not affirming Feeneyite EENS.

For me BOD, BOB and I.I are not exceptions to EENS so I imply that they are not physically visible.

Similarly there are no visible cases of LG 14 ( baptism of desire) etc for me so there is nothing in Vatican Council II to contradict the strict interpretation of EENS for me. We do not know any one saved outside the Church in invincible ignorance. So there is nothing in LG to contradict AG 7 and the 16th century interpretation of EENs.

For me Vatican Council II is not a rupture with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church, an ecumenism of return, the Athanasius Creed on EENS, the old ecumenism of the Syllabus of Errors and the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King based upon Ad Gentes 7.Entering the Catholic Church is a priority for salvation for all people -and not just those who know. This is why the Church is important. All those who are not in it are on the way to Hell. The norm is faith and baptism. The norm is not BOD, BOB and I.I.
This is why the priest is so important in the Catholic Church. Through the Sacraments he can help many people not go to Hell.

Any way those who know or do not know will only be known to God with reference to salvation. The ordinary way of salvation  for all is faith and the baptism of water and we do not know any extraordinary means of salvation.

Too bad these is so much confusion on the necessity of the Church for salvation, these days, and the Abbot does not have it in him to speak the truth.-Lionel Andrades

Adorazione Eucaristica - Medjugorje 4 gennaio 2020

Durante il viaggio per Medjugorje un terribile incidente stradale ma "Qu...

Ecco qual'è il motivo che spinge noi pellegrini a tornare a Medjugorje

Invocazione allo Spirito Santo di Padre Jozo