Gesù Tu per noi sei l'unica Via, l'unica Verità e l'unica Vita.

15 Years Later - This Was UNEXPECTED!!!

There is no denial from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican or the Vatican Press Office. The whole Church is using an Irrational and not Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II and this is political. Also the excommunications of Fr.Leonard Feeney and Marcel Lefebvre were political.

 There is no denial from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF), Vatican or the Vatican Press Office. The whole Church is using an Irrational and not Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II.This is political. Also the excommunications of Fr.Leonard Feeney and  Marcel Lefebvre were political.

Hypothetical-only cases of Lumen Gentium 8,14,15 and 16 and Unitatis Redintigratio 3,Nostra Aetate 2,Gaudium et Specs 22 etc in Vatican Council II are projected as being physically visible and known people saved outside the Catholic Church, in the present times.They are allegedly personally known non Catholics saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water.They are projected as ‘objective exceptions’ for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS).So the past exclusivist ecclesiology is made obsolete. They have to be personally known for the CDF since invisible people cannot be exceptions for Feeneyite EENS.

The CDF in its 1949 Letter to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr.Leonard Feeney had also interpreted unknown cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance as being known exceptions for the traditional strict interpretation of the dogma EENS.

Since Fr.Leonard Feeny would not accept visible cases of the baptism of desire etc he was excommunicated. Similarly Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre was not told by Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger to interpret Vatican Council II with LG 8,14,16 etc being only hypothetical cases. So the Council would remain ecclesiocentric and orthodox. Instead he was excommunicated for not accepting the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II by confusing what is invisible as being visible and then making false inferences and conclusions. Meanwhile Pope John Paul II and Cardinal Ratzinger did not affirm Vatican Council II (rational) in public. They let the whole Church continue with the political version of the Council.It was a false break with Tradition.

The CDF also issued a Decree of Prohibitions against the St.Benedict Center, Richmond,New Hampshire.The SBC interpret Vatican Council II and EENS with the Rational Premise. So there is no rupture with Tradition. Archbishops Di Noia and Morandi wanted Brother Andre Marie micm to interpret the Catechism of the Catholic Church 847-848 ( invincible ignorance) by confusing invisible cases as being visible exceptions for Feeneyite EENS.

For 60 years Vatican Council II has been given to Catholics and non Catholics with the False Premise and the CDF has kept it a secret.

Recently in Khazhakistan Bishop Athanasius Schneider interpreted the Council and EENS with the Rational Premise. He said that there was salvation in only Jesus Christ and only in the Catholic Church. When interviewed by Dr.Taylor Marshall, some time back, Bishop Schneider said that there are no literal cases of the baptism of desire. Marshall agreed. He said that there are no explicit cases of St.Thomas Aquinas’ implicit baptism of desire.

They were saying that Lumen Gentium 14( baptism of desire) was not a practical exception for the dogma EENS. Vatican Council II and EENS were projected rationally unlike the CDF and the present two popes.

The Rome Vicariate too has been controlling the political theology of the Church. A Salesian priest, Rector, of the Basilica of the Sacred Heart in front of Termini interpreted EENS like St.John Bosco.I quoted him on this blog.He was cautioned. The Franciscans of the Immaculate in their magazine Christ to the World said that the Church has not rejected the strict interpretation of EENS.The magazine was suspended by the Vicariate.An Austrian priest said that there were no literal cases of the baptism of desire and invincible ignorance.He was stopped from offering the Latin Mass at the church San Giuseppe a Capo le Case, Rome.An auxiliary bishop met with him and members of the Milita Christi.Other cases could be cited too.

Now Pope Francis can correct the objective error.He simply has to announce that LG 8,14,15 and 16,UR3,NA2,GS 22 etc are only hypothetical and theoretical cases. They are not literal examples of known people saved outside the Catholic Church in 1965-2022.They are not exceptions for the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church. Vatican Council II( rational) is in harmony with the Athanasius Creed with no known exceptions.

This announcement will end the liberalism in the Church.No development of doctrine will be possible in the name of Vatican Council II.

The Council will emerge traditional and division will end. It will be clear that Fr.Leonard Feeney and Archbishop Lefebvre were correct in rejecting the False Premise.Also the SSPX did well to not approve the irrational interpretation of the Council for canonical recognition. It means the Franciscans of the Immaculate can now affirm Vatican Council II and EENS at the Novus Order and Latin Mass.The Council will no more be a break with Tradition.Also the CMRI,MHT and MHFM have no more to go into sedevacantism because of Vatican Council II, traditional.-Lionel Andrades