Fr.Paolo Boumis, Parish Priest, Sant Agapito, Rome, the Missionaries of Charity (Men) of Mother Teresa and the Vicar General Cardinal Angelo Donatis and his Auxiliary Bishops in Rome, agree with me: there are no visible cases of non Catholics saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of water in 2023.
So there is nothing really in
Vatican Council II to contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma extra
ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of
Errors. I have corresponded with them via e-mail.
Even Pope Francis and all the
cardinals and bishops would have to agree with them. Since this is a general
observation. People who are saved as such are in Heaven and visible only to
God. This is common sense. I cannot meet someone saved with the baptism of
desire. I cannot see someone saved in invincible ignorance.
I interpret Vatican Council II
rationally. For me LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA, 2 GS 22 etc refer to invisible cases in 2023. They are only hypothetical cases and so they are not practical
exceptions for the Catechism of Pope Pius X (24Q, 27Q-other religions not being
paths to salvation).
BISHOP SCHNEIDER AND DR. TAYLOR MARSHALL
There are no literal cases of
the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance said Bishop
Athanasius Schneider and Dr. Taylor Marshall.
None- said Archbishop Thomas
E. Gullickson and Fr. Stefano Visintin osb and John Martignoni.Many priests have
said the same thing. The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible
ignorance technically exist only on paper said Ann Barnhardt.
There are no exceptions for
the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, mentioned in Vatican Council II, for
Sister Maria Philomena , Director of the St.Augustine Institute of Wisdom
(SAI), St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, USA.
NOT RAHNER AND LEFEBVRE'S INTERPRETATION OF THE COUNCIL
All the above mentioned are not
interpreting Vatican Council II like Rahner, Ratzinger, Congar, Bea, Balthazar,
Lefebvre and Kung.
Instead they are affirming
Feeneyite EENS with Ad Gentes 7 in Vatican Council II, while LG 8, UR 3, NA 2,
GS 22 etc are not practical exceptions.
This must be the Vatican
Council II taught at communion, confirmation, RCIA, Adult Catechesis, religion
classes for schools etc.
It must be the official and
only interpretation of Vatican Council II since it is rational, traditional and
ethical. The other, common version is not.
ONLY INTERPRETATION FOR ALL THE CARDINALS AND BISHOPS
All the cardinals and bishops
must only choose this honest interpretation of Vatican Council II which will be
a problem for the liberals and the Left.
Since there is no known
salvation outside the Catholic Church in the present times, there is no
theological foundation for the New Theology, New Ecclesiology, New Ecumenism,
New Canon Laws etc. The ‘people of God’ refer to only Catholics. Catholics are
the new people of God the new Chosen People (Nostra Aetate 4)
The Church has returned to being Christocentric and Ecclesiocentric.We have returned to Traditional Mission based upon there being exclusive salvation in only the Catholic Church and so all need to enter the Catholic Church, with faith and the baptism of water (AG 7), to avoid the fires of Hell.
ONLY VATICAN COUNCIL II (RATIONAL) IS MAGISTERIAL
The traditionalist-liberal division has ended since Vatican Council II no more has a theology to support liberalism.The ecclesiology of the Church before and after Vatican Council II is the same. The pope, cardinals and bishops are only Magisterial on Vatican Council II, when they interpret the Council rationally.
We have now identified the mistake in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 and can avoid it. It was not known to the Council Fathers and Pope Paul VI in 1965, that invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance could not be visible exceptions for Feeneyite EENS or EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council 1215,which did not mention any exceptions.
VATICAN COUNCIL II CAN NO MORE BE CITED TO SUPPORT LIBERALISM
Vatican Council II can no more be cited as having exceptions for the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church and ' a development of doctrine'. The Council is traditional.It has the hermeneutic of continuity with the ecclesiology of the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century. Even a non Catholic can recognise this.
For example, if there is a box of oranges and there is an apple in the center of the box then that apple is an exception because it is different but also because it exists there in that box. If it was not in the box it would not be an exception. Similarly invisible cases of the baptism of desire etc cannot be an exception for Feeneyite EENS. The 1949 Letter of the Holy Office made a mistake and the popes did not correct it. It is responsible for a fake new theology based upon a fake premise and inference.
HOLLERICH AND GRECH CAN NO MORE CITE VATICAN COUNCIL II SUPPORT INNOVATION AT THE SYNOD
The Council can no more be cited by cardinals Marx, Grech, Hollerich and others to support the innovation in faith, morals and mission etc at the Synods. We are back to the dogma outside the Church there is no salvation, of the Scholastic Period.
We are back to the 'following the hierarchical Church of St. Ignatius of Loyola' as Pope France once put it.-Lionel Andrades
OCTOBER 12, 2023
Fr.Paolo Boumis, Parish Priest, Sant Agapito, Rome, the Missionaries of Charity (Men) of Mother Teresa and the Vicar General Cardinal Angelo Donatis and his Auxiliary Bishops in Rome, agree with me: there are no visible cases of non Catholics saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of water in 2023
OCTOBER 10, 2023
Posts
