Bishop Peter Libasci, Bishop of Manchester, USA and his Curia have refused. to answer questions.They would not give an interview to Michael Voris, when he was in New Hampshire.Since the bishop interprets the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS) with an irrationality; a false premise.He then uses the same ruse to interpret Vatican Council II as a break with EENS and the rest of Tradition.
This is something he needs to hide from journalists.For instance if he was interviewed by Catholic Herald or LifeSites News he could be asked : "Is it true Excellency that you interpret unknown cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance and Lumen Gentium 8 etc in Vatican Council II, as referring to personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church in 2019? So they are objective examples of salvation outside the Church and of course objective and living exceptions to all needing faith and baptism for salvation (AG 7) ? "
He may respond, "YES".
If he responds with a NO he would be in trouble with the Left and the Vatican.
So it is a hopeless path he has to tread.
'Your Excellency, are you saying that invisible people who do not exist in our reality are real people saved without faith and baptism in 2019 or during your life time and you know them personally?. They would have to be real otherwise they could not be exceptions ?"
"Yes.I know them personally," he would have to persist irrationally,with his fingers crossed.
"But this does not make sense. There is a rupture between faith and reason.". It would be pointed out to him.
He could respond, " Yes but this is how the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and many of the traditionalists interpret Vatican Council II and EENS.We do the same at Manchester."
"You violate the Principle of Non Contradiction. How can people saved in Heaven without faith and baptism be also physically visible on earth to be objective exceptions to EENS? How can they be in two places at the same time ?"
He knows the political agenda he has to follow. So he could say, "This is how we interpret magisterial documents and the St. Benedict Center has to do the same to be accepted legally as Catholics.This is necessary for all Catholics in the diocese."
Bishop Libasci would know that the doctrinal position of the CDF and the diocese is false. So on the diocese website he does not link the Doctrinal Beliefs which Brother Andre Marie MICM posted on Catholicism.org the website of the St.Benedict Center.
They know.
So no questions will be answered and no interviews are being given.-Lionel Andrades
Posts
