The New Ecumenism is based upon Vatican Council II (irrational) so it is
not Feeneyite on extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). There are alleged visible cases of
Lumen Gentium 16 etc, which are exceptions for the dogma EENS. The Old Evangelization was
Feeneyite.It had its foundation on EENS according to the Church Councils. These Councils did
not mention any exceptions. The baptism of desire (BOD) and being saved in invincible
ignorance (I.I) refer to invisible and hypothetical cases only, always. So today
we have Mission based upon 1) the New Evangelization which is Christocentric
only or we can have 2) Traditional Mission whose foundation was the Old Evangelisation. It was Christocentric and also Ecclesiocentric.
NEW EVANGELISATION FLAWED
Pope Francis’ New Evangelization, like that of Pope Benedict, has a
flaw. It interprets Vatican Council II dishonestly. It then accepts a non-traditional
conclusion. It is heretical and schismatic doctrine. This is the
official policy of the Prefect for Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith,
Cardinal Victor Fernandes. But this is not a permanent error. He can correct the
mistake.
Inter-religious dialogue should be part of Traditional Mission. It is
always ecclesiocentric. We do not separate Jesus from the Church (Dominus
Iesus, Pope John Paul II). We also do not separate the Church from the Kingdom,
present and future (eschatological).
The Catholic Church with the Sacraments is necessary for salvation.
Other religions do not lead to Heaven (Catechism of Pope Pius X, 24Q, 27Q).
They have 'errors, deficiencies and superstition' (Dominus Iesus, Pope John Paul
II). Catholics are the new people of God, the Chosen People ( Nostra Aetate 4,
Vatican Council II).Outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation ( CCC
845,845,1257 etc).
IV. On the orientation of all human beings to the Church
6. It must be firmly believed that the Church is sign and instrument of salvation for all people.It is contrary to the Catholic faith to consider the different religions of the world as ways of salvation complementary to the Church.
7. According to Catholic doctrine, the followers of other religions are oriented to the Church and are all called to become part of her.
https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20010124_dupuis_en.html
Mohammad does not save. Buddha does not save. Islamism does not save
and neither Hinduism. Jesus is the only Savior of the world and he saves
through and in, His Mystical Body the Roman Catholic Church. The Catholic Church is a continuation
of the Jewish religion.Christ made a new covenant with his death and resurrection replacing the old covenants.
Other religions do not have true worship (CDF, Notification, Jacques Dupuis sj, 2001).
I. On the sole and universal salvific mediation of Jesus Christ
1. It must be firmly believed that Jesus Christ, the Son of God made man, crucified and risen, is the sole and universal mediator of salvation for all humanity
2. It must also be firmly believed that Jesus of Nazareth, Son of Mary and only Saviour of the world, is the Son and Word of the Father. For the unity of the divine plan of salvation centred in Jesus Christ, it must also be held that the salvific action of the Word is accomplished in and through Jesus Christ, the Incarnate Son of the Father, as mediator of salvation for all humanity.It is therefore contrary to the Catholic faith not only to posit a separation between the Word and Jesus, or between the Word's salvific activity and that of Jesus, but also to maintain that there is a salvific activity of the Word as such in his divinity, independent of the humanity of the Incarnate Word.
https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20010124_dupuis_en.html
Salvation is open for all in potential, but to receive this salvation
all need to enter Jesus Mystical Body, the Roman Catholic Church. Jesus died for
all, to save all, but to receive this salvation there is a condition. All must
accept and follow Jesus’ teachings, only in the Catholic Church. This means interpreting Vatican Council II rationally and accepting the dogma
extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the Feeneyite version, which like the Church Councils, does not mention any known exception.
IV. On the orientation of all human beings to the Church
6. It must be firmly believed that the Church is sign and instrument of salvation for all people It is contrary to the Catholic faith to consider the different religions of the world as ways of salvation complementary to the Church.
7. According to Catholic doctrine, the followers of other religions are oriented to the Church and are all called to become part of her.
https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20010124_dupuis_en.html
FEENEYITE EENS IS SUPPORTED BY VATICAN COUNCIL II (RATIONAL)
This is Feeneyite EENS according to the Church Councils which did not
mention any exception (Fourth Lateran Council, Council of Florence etc).
This is Feeneyite EENS according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church
(845, 845, and 1257) which did not mention any known exception.
This is Feeneyite EENS according to Vatican Council II (AG 7, LG 14)
with hypothetical and invisible cases of LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22
etc not being visible exceptions for EENS. So there are no exceptions for exclusivist Ad Gentes 7 mentioned in Vatican Council II( rational)
V. On the value and salvific function of the religious traditions
8. In accordance with Catholic doctrine, it must be held that «whatever the Spirit brings about in human hearts and in the history of peoples, in cultures and religions, serves as a preparation for the Gospel (cf. Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium, 16)».It is therefore legitimate to maintain that the Holy Spirit accomplishes salvation in non-Christians also through those elements of truth and goodness present in the various religions; however, to hold that these religions, considered as such, are ways of salvation, has no foundation in Catholic theology, also because they contain omissions, insufficiencies and errorsregarding fundamental truths about God, man and the world.
https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20010124_dupuis_en.html
This is Feeneyite EENS according to the Catechism of Pope Pius X (24Q, 27Q) with being saved in invincible ignorance (29Q) not a visible exception.
Furthermore, the fact that the elements of truth and goodness present in the various world religions may prepare peoples and cultures to receive the salvific event of Jesus Christ does not imply that the sacred texts of these religions can be considered as complementary to the Old Testament, which is the immediate preparation for the Christ event.
https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20010124_dupuis_en.html
This is Feeneyite EENS according to the Apostles, the Church Fathers,
the popes of the Middle Ages, Pope Pius X and Vatican Council II (rational).
The New Evangelization is political and in line with the New Ecumenism, which is not Feeneyite and not according to Vatican Council II (rational).
It is a rupture with the Magisterium of for example the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16the century or that of Pope Pius X.
ABJURATION NEEDED
1. Pope Francis is not Feeneyite on EENS, which Pope Pius XII called ‘an
infallible teaching’. This brings automatic excommunication. He rejects a
Church teaching which is obligatory for all to believe in . It is a dogma defined by three Church Councils in the extra-ordinary form.It is not contradicted by Vatican Council II ( rational ).
2. Pope Francis interprets Vatican Council II irrationally, so he changes
the understanding of the Nicene and Apostles Creed and rejects the Athanasius
Creed ( it says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation). This is first class heresy in the hierarchy of truths of Pope John Paul II. This brings automatic excommunication, even for a cardinal, bishop or
priest.Pope Francis needs to interpret Vatican Council II, rationally i.e LG 8,14,15,16 etc refer to physically invisible cases in 1965-2024.
3. Pope Francis' Amoris Laetitia, Traditionis Custode and Fiducia Supplicans have its theological foundation upon Vatican Council II, irrational.These documents are heretical and schismatic. He needs to correct the error.He needs to affirm Vatican Council II, rational and the traditioinal exclusivist ecclesiology of the Apostles, the Church Fathers and the popes and saints of the Middle Ages upto the 1930s and 1940's.
Amoris Laetitia, Traditionis Custode and Fiducia Supplicans are :-
1) A rejection of Vatican Council II ( rational).
2) A rejection of traditional faith and morals and so they are a mortal sin of faith.The Athanasius Creed is rejected.The understanding of the Nicene Creed is changed to ' I believe in three or more physically known and visible baptisms which exclude the baptism of water for them to be exceptions for EENS, they are blood, desire, imperfect communion with the Church etc'.
The understanding of the Aposltes Creed is changed to ' I believe in the Holy Spirit which teaches the Holy Catholic Church that outside the Church there is known salvation while over the centuries it taught that outside the Church there was no known salvation'.
PRACTICAL APOSTASY
On morals - the Eucharist is being given to the divorced and re-married and those in public mortal sin.
The Latin Mass is not permitted for those who reject Vatican Council II irrational and accept Vatican Council II, rational.
The Eucharist is given to active homosexuals and their union is legalised and not considered a mortal sin.
This means automatic excommunication for the rejection of the faith, de fide teachings like the Creeds and the dogma EENS.
A pope has an obligation to issue Papal Documents based upon Vatican Council II, rational only.
All Magisterial Documents and teachings must be interpreted only ethically i.e with a rational and not irrational premise, to produce a traditional and not non traditional conclusion.
Pope Francis can more welcome and approve Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi in the name of Vatican Council II, which must only be interpreted rationally, supporting traditional faith and morals.Now all three of them are worthy of excommunication.
Cardinals and bishops can correct the mistake of the pope. They simply have to accept Vatican Council II and interpret it rationally. Then they can announce this in public. This would expose and oppose the common error on this issue, which is presently supported by the Vatican.
Pope Francis and Cardinal Victor Fernandez, would have to morally accept Vatican Council II, rational i.e hypothetical cases of LG 8,14,15,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 are not objective, visible examples of salvation in 2024. So they are not practical exceptions for the dogma EENS, the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors and the Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24Q,27Q).
We return to the Old Ecumenism, Traditional Mission and traditional faith and morals.
MESSAGE INCOMPLETE
APRIL 1, 2024
Cindy Wooden, Fr. Georges de Laire and Brother Andre Marie micm, are all Feeneyites on extra ecclesiam nulla salus when Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally by them
The correspondents of the National Catholic Reporter can only be 'progressive' if they interpret Vatican Council II irrationally, dishonestly and so non traditionally. There is no more support for their liberalism when Vatican Council II is interpreted honestly. There automatically is a hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition.
Posts
