With the Decree they cannot coerce the SBC to interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, dishonestly. Instead it is Bishop Libasci and the Vatican cardinals, bishops and Pope Francis, who must affirm Feeneyite EENS i.e. EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) which did not mention any exceptions.

 

The Decree of Precepts and Prohibitions still weighs upon the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Center, Richmond, New Hampshire, USA. It has been placed upon them by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican and the Diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire, USA.

The St.Benedict Center could contact about four or five heads of secular organizations in New Hampshire, and get simple statements from them saying that they believe; they hold, that:  LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II always refer to only hypothetical cases for us human beings. We humans cannot physically see anyone saved as such on earth or in Heaven. If someone is saved as such it would only be known to God. So they do not exist in our visible reality.

• Does LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc refer to physically invisible cases in your reality ?
• Everyone who is asked will agree. Their answer will be Yes.

Then they need to contact a few Superiors of religious organizations in New Hampshire including that of the CMRI. Again they will respond with YES.

Some may think , “Yes, of course,  this is common sense”.

Then the SBC should inform Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester in New Hampshire, about the response. Ask him, his Chancellor and Judicial Vicar, the same question.

Then clarify this issue with the Apostolic Signatura, the Supreme Tribunal at the Vatican. Personally ask the judges the same question.They too will have to answer in the affirmative.

Then ask the secular judges, who are Catholic, in New Hampshire, the same question and ask them to contact Bishop Peter Libasci. The Decree of Precepts and Prohibitions is a legal document which places restrictions on the St. Benedict Center, since the SBC affirms Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). EENS is in harmony with Vatican Council II interpreted rationally (LG 8, 14, 16 etc are invisible only) and the Catechism of the Catholic Church also interpreted rationally (CCC 847-848 refer to invisible cases always and so they do not contradict Feeneyite EENS).

So the theological and philosophical position of the Bishop of Manchester and Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican, is untenable. With the Decree they cannot coerce the SBC to interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, dishonestly. Instead it is Bishop Libasci and the Vatican cardinals, bishops and Pope Francis, who must affirm Feeneyite EENS i.e. EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) which did not mention any exceptions.

The Judiciary in New Hampshire must ask Bishop Libasci , to clarify that he  is normal like everyone else and cannot physically see non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church in the present times (1965-2023).

If the bishop does not affirm Feeneyite EENS, it means he is projecting invisible cases of LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, in Vatican Council II, as being exceptions. There is ‘a development of doctrine’ with the irrational premise (invisible people are visible) and irrational inference (Vatican Council II has exceptions for traditional EENS) and false conclusion (Vatican Council II has the hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition).

Instead they bishop must choose the rational premise (invisible cases are invisible, LG 16 refers to an invisible case), rational inference (there are no practical exceptions in Vatican Council II for traditional EENS) and rational and traditional conclusion (Vatican Council II has the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition).

- Lionel Andrades

Bishop Athanasius Schneider's Credo is written with the objective and factual error in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston. Also the past Catechisms are re- interpreted with the same error

 

Eclipse of the Synod: New Catechism to Launch in Rome

...Note well that none of the above is really anything new. In fact, Credo reads like any of the veteran Catholic catechisms of the past millennium, although including contemporary applications of the same timeless moral principles.

Lionel: False . Credo is written with the objective and factual error in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston. Also the past Catechisms are interpreted with the same error i.e when they mention invincible ignorance or the baptism of desire, they both are projected as visible exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215). This is a major error in philosophy and theology and is politically correct with the Left - but it is not Catholic.

______________________

 

Therefore, if Credo is not true, then it demands official censorship from the Vatican—an act that will require its opponents to marshal a propositional demonstration of how Credo is manifestly in error concerning the Faith.

Lionel: Bishop Athanasius Schneider interprets Vatican Council II with the same false premise as the popes from Paul VI.There are now many Catholics who interprets LG 8, LG 14, LG 15, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being only hypothetical cases always. So Vatican Council II nowhere contradicts the dogma EENS, the ecumenism of return of the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Athanasius Creed.For Bishop Schneider there are exceptions for the Athanasius Creed for me there are no exceptions. If there were no exceptions for the Athanasius Creed for him then he would be a Feeneyite on Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms and Councils and EENS.

Whoever desires to be saved should above all hold to the Catholic Faith.Anyone who does not keep it whole and unbroken will doubtless perish eternally.-Athanasius Creed.

______________________

  Of course, this is something its opponents cannot do, as the book is simply “a guide to the changeless teaching of the Church.” To condemn Credo would thus be to affirm, in a public manner, that Church teaching has changed—at which point the faithful should respond with St. Paul: “Though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema” (Gal 1:8)!

 

Lionel: Interpreting invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance as being visible exceptions for traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus, has not been part of the Catholic Church's traditional teaching. The old exclusivist theology has been rejected by Schneider and Kwasniewski and there is a new theology which says outside the Church there is known salvation in the present times, there is salvation. So the dogma EENS has been made obsolete. They are politically correct. They cannot be accused of being Feeneyites.

_______________________

 

And yet, if the revolutionaries leave Credo uncontested, they must tacitly affirm it as an authentic expression of Catholic doctrine, voiced by the ordinary teaching office of the living bishopric (how collegial, synodal, and decentralized!).

Lionel: We have a politically correct Cushingite bishop who does not want to be accused of being a Feeneyite and so face excommunication or laicization. So he has allowed the teachngs of the Church to be changed.He has maintained his ecclesiastical status and is approved by his superiors.If Credo was Feeneyite neither Sophia or Angelus Press would be allowed to publish it.

________________________

 

We may therefore return to our comparison. Does your priest, bishop, or pope believe the following teaching, expressed in the pages of Credo?

 Are all religions, with their respective forms of worship, equally pleasing to God?

No. Only the religion established by God and fulfilled in Christ, with its divinely revealed worship, is supernatural, holy, and pleasing to God. All other religions are inherently false, and their forms of worship pernicious, or at least unavailing for eternal life.

Lionel: The above statement is true but it is contradicted when Bishop Schnedier and Peter Kwasniewski interpret Vatican Council II irrationally i.e they project LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc as being objective exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus . So for them not everyone needs to enter the Catholic Church for salvation. There are exceptions. So with this new theology they negate the above statement.

This was also the mistake of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops.

This is dishonesty. Since even after being informed they continue with this error and do not discuss it.

Peter Kwasniewski does not want to be stopped from writing books and speaking at conferences and so he is not discussing the mistake in Credo.He needs Vatican Council II to be a rupture with Tradition. He needs the hermeneutic of discontinuity with Tradition. Credo is conspicuous for what it does not say.

https://catholicism.org/

The theology of the Credo ignores the traditionalists of the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Center, in New Hampshire, USA.

- Lionel Andrades

____________________________ 

 https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2023/10/eclipse-of-synod-new-catechism-to.html#more

How can Pope Francis, Bishop Athanasius Schneider and the Apostolic Signatura interpret the Creeds, Catechisms and Vatican Council II irrationally and be considered apostolic, magisterial and Catholic?

 

How can Pope Francis, Bishop Athanasius Schneider and the Apostolic Signatura interpret the Creeds, Catechisms and Vatican Council II irrationally and be considered apostolic, magisterial and Catholic?

How can Bishop Schneider belong to the ‘one, holy, apostolic and Catholic’ Church (Nicene Creed) when he interprets Vatican Council II, the Creeds, Catechisms and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), with irrational Cushingism instead of traditional and rational Feeneyism?

Pope Francis must not refer to his Letters as being apostolic since with the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston, approved by Bishop Schneider and the SSPX bishops and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, there is a rupture with the old theology of the Apostles, the Church Fathers and the popes and saints of the Middle Ages. He could refer to his ‘papal letters’, or ‘personal letters’ but not apostolic letters. He issued Amoris Laetitia and Traditionis Custode, while interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally. For him LG 8, 14, 15, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc are physically visible cases in 1965-2023 and examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church- for me, they are not.

Pope Francis, Bishop Schneider and all the cardinals and bishops must affirm the Athanasius Creed- which says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation. This Council is not contradicted by invisible cases, referred to in LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA ,2 GS 22 etc in Vatican Council.

Bishop Schneider has published a new Catechism without affirming the Athanasius Creed, Feeneyite EENS and Vatican Council II rationally (LG 16 is an invisible case). The irrational version is dishonst.This is heretical and schismatic. This is official and ecclesiastical dishonesty.

Sister Maria Philomena micm is the Director of the St. Augustine Institute of Wisdom (SAI) at the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, USA.  She attends the Latin Mass and interprets all Magisterial Documents rationally unlike Bishop Schneider and the popes. She could challenge, legally, the dishonesty of the secular and Church organizations in New Hampshire. She could also correct, with a Canon Lawyer, the error at the Vatican institutions and the Apostolic Signatura, itself. They must all admit that LG 8, 14, 15, 16, NA 2, GS 22 etc, refer to hypothetical cases only in 2023. They must admit this officially and in public, especially, the bishop of in New Hampshire, USA. - Lionel Andrades

OCTOBER 27, 2023

Bishop Athanasius Schneider’s Catechism does not discuss the issue of Vatican Council II interpreted rationally or irrationally : It does not mention that there can be two versions of the Nicene Creed depending upon the interpretation of Vatican Council II, and the baptism of desire etc.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/10/bishop-athanasius-schneider-catechism.html

__________________________________________________

MAY 31, 2023

Send your donations to Sister Maria Philomena micm, Director of the St. Augustine Institute of Wisdom (SAI), New Hampshire, USA since she interprets Vatican Council II in harmony with the one, holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, unlike John Henry Weston, Mother Miriam, Michael Voris, Michael Matt, Raymond Arroyo… who interpret the Council heretically and schismatically, like the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican and Pope Francis and are approved by the ADL

 

Send your donations to Sister Maria Philomena micm, Director of the St. Augustine Institute of Wisdom (SAI), New Hampshire, USA since she interprets Vatican Council II in harmony with the one, holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, unlike John Henry Weston, Mother Miriam, Michael Voris, Michael Matt, Raymond Arroyo… who interpret the Council heretically and schismatically, like the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican and Pope Francis.They are approved by the Jewish Left ( ADL, SPLC etc.

Church Militant TV’s Premium programs are based upon Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. So donations would be useful if they were sent to Sister Maria Philomena micm. CMTV does not deny that their interpretation of Vatican Council II is irrational and unethical. They call this magisterial and being inspired by the Holy Spirit.

This is not Catholic. It does not have the Four Marks of the Church. Over the centuries they did not confuse what is invisible as being visible and then claim that the dogma EENS is obsolete.

When you are sending your donations to John Henry Weston know that he is hiding information from you about Vatican Council II. In this way he protects his tax exempt status. So he does not  affirm the traditional strict interpretation of EENS of the Church Councils in the Middle Ages. But Sister Maria Philomena micm and her community the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, NH, have always being affirming the strict interpretation of EENS. So it is easy for her to also be honest on Vatican Council II. The Council interpreted rationally does not contradict Feeneyite EENS.

How you interpret Vatican Council II determines how you interpret the dogma EENS.

So she can speak the truth to Catholics unlike Michael Matt at the Remnant or the SSPX bishops and the sedevacantist bishops.

So donations are being sent to Catholic media which hide information from Catholics.

Chris Ferrara and Roberto dei Mattei will not  affirm Vatican Council II ( rational)  and Feeneyite EENS in harmony with the Four Marks of the Catholic Church.They want a break with Tradition. It is the same with the liberals.

They know how you interpret Vatican Council II determines how you interpret the dogma EENS. -Lionel Andrades

https://www.saintaugustineinstitute.org/#:~:text=The%20Saint%20Augustine%20Institute%20of,of%20instruction%20in%20Catholic%20thought.

https://www.saintaugustineinstitute.org/

https://catholicism.org/the-brothers

Richmond, NH, United States, New Hampshire

+1 603-239-6485

smph@catholicism.org

saintaugustineinstitute.org

Donations

Saint Benedict Center, Richmond, New Hampshire (EIN: 02-0528845), is a non-profit New Hampshire charitable corporation. Contributions to Saint Benedict Center are tax-deductible under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.

How can I donate? You can:

1. Make a secure online donation.
   Donate any amount through authorize.net with the button below.

Or via GiveSendGo:

Or via Paypal:

1. Mail checks or money orders to:

Saint Benedict Center
Post Office Box 627
Richmond, New Hampshire 03470

1. Call 603-239-6485 to donate using a credit or debit card (MC, VISA, Discover, American Express).

2. Donate stocks, bonds, or other securities, possibly sparing yourself some or all of the capital gains tax (details here).

3. You can also remember Saint Benedict Center in your will. Please see our “Planned Giving” page.

4. Finally, if you are buying or selling a house, or any commercial or residential property, you can help us financially without any cost to yourself by using the professional services of Real Estate for Life.

Those who would like to contribute regularly are invited to join the Queen’s Tribute program. Queen’s Tribute supporters pledge regular monthly donations either automatically from their credit or debit cards, or through monthly reminders mailed from the Center. Queen’s Tribute donors have the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass (Traditional Roman Rite) offered for their intentions once a month. Contact us to see how to become a Queen’s Tribute donor.

https://catholicism.org/donations

 MAILING ADDRESS:

Saint Benedict Center
Post Office Box 627
Richmond, N.H. 03470

https://catholicism.org/contactus

________________________

________________________

APRIL 11, 2021

There is the Augustine Institute, Graduate School in Colorado, USA and there is the St. Augustine Institute of Wisdom, at the St. Benedict Center,New Hampshire,USA. I would recommend the latter

 

There  is the Augustine Institute, Graduate School in Colorado, USA  and  there is the St. Augustine Institute of Wisdom, at the St. Benedict Center,New Hampshire,USA. 

At the former Dr. Douglas Bushman( Steubenville/Ave Maria University) teaches and at the latter Sister Maria Philomena MICM.

The liberal Augustine Institute has a Bishops Advisory Board( see below) and the traditional St. Augustine Institute of Wisdon is under a bishop's prohibition.

At both, Colorado and New Hampshire they have been interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise, inference and conclusion.This is another  example of the wide spread theological division in the Catholic Church.It is caused by the fake premise approved by the USCCB and the Vatican.

For the former there are known and visible exceptions to extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS)and so not every one needs to enter the Catholic Church for salvation. While for the latter there are no exceptions to EENS and all need Catholic faith and the baptism of water to avoid Hell( for salvation).

At the former there is the New Evangelisation which is Christocentric and supports the New Ecumenism.Since for them EENS has exceptions.While at the latter there is the Old Evangelisation and the old Ecumenism of Return.They are  Christocentric and also Ecclesiocentric.

At the former they accept Vatican Council II with the fake premies,  inference and conclusion and so reject EENS ( Feeneyite). They accept a new version of EENS. It is EENS with exceptions. At the latter they reject Vatican Council II with the false premise( as all good Catholics should do) and go back to EENS with no exceptions; the EENS of Fr.Leonard Feeney, Brother Francis Malus MICM and Sister Catherine Clarke Goddard MICM.

The former interpret Vatican Council II and the Creeds and Catechisms with a false premise creating a hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition. The latter side steps Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally.They simply go back to Tradition.

I would recommend the latter. -Lionel Andrades

The Saint Augustine Institute of Wisdom* (SAI) is the educational division of Saint Benedict Center. The Institute provides well-rounded and conveniently simple courses of instruction in Catholic thought.

The classes available through SAI are a continuation of the studies which have been offered at Saint Benedict Center since 1942. Our teachers are the Popes, the Councils, the Saints, the Fathers and Doctors of the Church, and, most especially, Holy Scripture and Catholic Tradition.

The Saint Augustine Institute of Wisdom is a vehicle for continued adult education for Catholic men and women, in any occupation in life, increasing their knowledge of the Faith and things pertaining to it.

In order to give the studies form and purpose, the four-year program – with a Diploma in General Catholic Education – lies at the heart of SAI. However, with hundreds of hours of recorded lectures, SAI is a resource for a lifetime of learning.

https://www.saintaugustineinstitute.org/

Bishops Advisory Board of Augustine Institute, Colorado,USA

Most Reverend Samuel J. Aquila
Archbishop of Denver

Most Reverend John O. Barres
Bishop of Rockville Centre

Most Reverend Timothy P. Broglio
Archbishop of Archdiocese for the Military Services

Most Reverend Robert J. Carlson
Archbishop of St. Louis

Most Reverend Charles J. Chaput

Most Reverend James S. Wall
Diocese of Gallup

Most Reverend Paul S. Coakley
Archbishop of Oklahoma City

Most Reverend James D. Conley
Bishop of Lincoln

Most Reverend Frank J. Dewane
Bishop of Venice

Archbishop Jose H. Gomez
Archbishop of Los Angeles

Most Reverend Bernard A. Hebda
Archbishop of St. Paul & Minneapolis

Most Reverend Michael O. Jackels
Archbishop of Dubuque

Most Reverend James V. Johnston Jr.
Bishop of Kansas City – St. Joseph

Most Reverend R. Walker Nickless
Bishop of Sioux City

Most Reverend Michael J. Sheridan
Diocese of Colorado Springs

Most Reverend Thomas J. Olmsted
Bishop of Phoenix

Most Reverend Kevin Rhoades
Bishop of Fort Wayne-South Bend

Most Reverend David L. Ricken

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 8, 2022

Vatican does not support St.Augustine Institute of Wisdom, NH which uses a Rational Premise to interpret Vatican Council II but Augustine Institute, Colorado, which uses a False Premise and is accepted by the Left

 

 The name of the Augustine Institute in Colorado, USA is a misnomer. Since St. Augustine affirmed the old theology and the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). This is rejected by Tim Gray, the President of the AI. There is no denial from him or any of the faculty members. They interpret Vatican Council II with a False Premise to project non existing exceptions for the dogma EENS as held by St. Augustine. This is dishonest.

But this is what they understand by the word 'Magisterium'.

It means the Holy Spirit guides the Catholic Church today to use a False Premise to interpret Magisterial Documents ( Creeds and Catechisms).They also re-interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.In this way there is a False Break with the past Magisterium which was guided by the Holy Spirit. It taught that outside the Church there is no salvation. 

So with the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II they have received accreditation from the secular and Catholic organizations. 

On the other hand Sister Maria Philomena MICM, the Director of the St.A

Augustine Institute of Wisdom, in New Hampshire, USA interprets Vatican Council II with the Rational Premise. She is in harmony with the dogma EENS as held by St. Augustine, St. Thomas Aquinas... For her the baptism of desire does not refer to visible people in 2022. They are not practical exceptions for EENS according to the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.

Sister Maria Philomena has a four year on line course at the St.Benedict Center, Richmond, New Hampshire. 

 She avoids the False Premise in the interpretation of the Creeds, Catechisms and Vatican Council II, un-like the Augustine Institute, Colorado. It is the False Premise which makes the AI liberal and a break with the centuries old Magisterium of the Church. But the AI is supported by the apologists at EWTN who maintain the same political irrationality.

So she is not recognized by the USCCB. Instead a Decree of Prohibitions has been placed by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith,Vatican,  against her community, the  Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary.The Prohibitions have been placed upon the St. Benedict Center for not using the False Premise to interpret Magisterial Documents ( Catechism of the Catholic Church, Vatican Council II, dogma EENS etc), as does the Augustine Institute, a private organization.- Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2022/06/cdf-does-not-support-st-augustine.html

_________________

 MAY 27, 2023

St.Augustine Institute of Wisdom (SAI) needs to challenge the Education Department in the Diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire, USA, which interprets Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents, irrationally and dishonestly. Their adult catechisms, religious classes in school and First Communion and Confirmation classes are false. There is no denial from Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester. This issue is within the spheres of Church and secular laws.

 

St.Augustine Institute of Wisdom (SAI) needs to challenge the Education Department in the Diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire, USA, which interprets Vatican Council II and other Magisterial Documents, irrationally and dishonestly. Their adult catechisms, religious classes in school and First Communion and Confirmation classes are false. There is no denial from Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester. This issue is within the spheres of Church and secular laws.

Bishop Libasci must interpret Vatican Council II rationally and honestly and have it taught in the diocese. It is only then that there can be a dialogue with the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, at the St. Benedict Center in New Hampshire.

Bishop Libasci must not expect SAI to cheat and change doctrines by confusing what is implicit as being explicit, subjective as being objective. LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, are always invisible cases for all the religious communities in New Hampshire. So they cannot be practical exceptions for EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council and the Council of Florence.

All the religious communities in New Hampshire, including the sedevacantist CMRI, must only interpret Vatican Council II rationally, like SAI.

SAI makes the Catholic Church missionary once again. Both Jesus Christ and the Church needed for salvation. Jesus not separated from the Catholic Church as in the New Ecclesiology, New Ecumenism and New Theology. -Lionel Andrades

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/05/staugustine-institute-of-wisdom-sai.html