Sunday, May 15, 2016

Cardinal Burke will not affirm Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.If he did Vatican Council II would not be a break with the dogma EENS according to the 16th century missionaries




I appreciate the talk by Cardinal Raymond Burke at the 2016 Roman Life Forum  and would recommend it.

4:48 He speaks about Fr.John Anthony Hardon and martyrdom.
5:13 He mentions Marian Catechist Apostolate founded by Fr. John Hardon.
8.50 Christian faith is important for society.He speaks about the importance also of the lay faithful
9:33 Catechesis was  important for the Servant of God Fr.John Hardon.
11.33 He mentions the moral  corruption today when even Catholics are not aware of the seriousness of missing Sunday Mass. 
12.30 Catechesis  formation is necessary.
14.44 A witness to the teachings of the Gospel is necessary.
18:38 We must preach the Gospel.
20:42 He said we need to preach the Faith like the early missionaries.
34:35 Also a martyrdom of witnesss needed.
35:03 Catholic doctrine is important.
37:15 He referred  Cardinal  Ratzinger speech before he was elected as pope. There was a reference to the dictatorship of relativism and all those who were faithful to the Creed were called fundamentalists.

Cardinal Burke: 2016 Rome Life Forum full talk

4:48 He speaks about Fr.John Anthony Hardon and martyrdom this is appreciated.
However Fr.Hardon like Cardinal Burke interprets Vatican Couhcil II with the subjectivism which Fr.Matthias Gaudron of the SSPX Germany refers to.This is an objective mistake.
5:13 He mentions the Marian Catechist Apostolate founded by Fr. John Hardon, an apostolate which also makes this objective mistake..
8.50 Christian faith is important for society.He speaks about the importance also of the lay faithful.
He does not say that these lay persons are taught to interpret the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) also with subjectivism. For Cardinal Burke and Fr.John Hardon the baptism of desire is an exception to the Feeneyite interpretation of EENS.Subjectivism! Moral theology taught to lay Catholics at pontifical universities is also based on this subjectivism.He has  never objected to it. This is part of catechesis in faith and morals.
9:33 Catechesis was  important for the Servant of God Fr.John Hardon.He accepted the new theology based on a false premise and inference.He did his catechesis based on this error.
11.33 On the video Cardinal Burke mentions the moral corruption today when even Catholics are not aware of the seriousness of missing Sunday Mass. 
Cathoics are presented with confusion and heresy by the magisterium.Even Cardinal Burke has accepted like Catholics in general (and the Magisterium), that there are known exceptions to traditonal teachings on faith and morals.Subjectivism is the norm. It is also at the basis of the annullment and dispensation factories.
12.30 Catechesis  formation is necessary for Cardinal Burke. He means a catechesis which approves a new and irrational theology in faith and morals.
14.44 He says a witness to the teachings of the Gospel is necessary and means there are known exceptions to Jesus' teaching on exclusive salvation in His Church.For him there also are known exceptions to Jesus' teaching on mortal sins and Hell.
18:38 We must preach the Gospel says Cardinal Burke and refers to a new Gospel which is a break with the dogma EENS according to the 16th century missionaries..
20:42 He said we need to preach the Faith like the early missionaries.The early missionaries were ecclesiocentric in their ecclesiology. The present Magisterium and Cardinal Burke is Christocentric but with a theology which excludes the necessity of formal membership in the Church for salvation.
34:35 Also a martyrdom of witness is  needed he said.How can we have a unity in  witness when the magisterium, two popes and Cardinal Burke assumes there is known salvation outside the Church and so every one does not need to be a formal member of the Church to avoid Hell?.
35:03 Catholic doctrine is important he said. He does not comment on so many posts on this blog(Eucharistandmission) which says doctrine on faith and morals has been changed.
37:15 He referred  to Cardinal  Ratzinger's speech before he was elected as Pope Benedict XVI. There was a reference to the dictatorship of relativism and all those who were faithful to the Creed were called fundamentalists.
Cardinal Ratzinger approved the new theology which contradicts the Nicene Creed, the dogma EENS and interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyism. So Vatican Council II has a hermeneutic of discontinuity.
Cardinal Burke is unable to affirm Vatican Council II with Feeneyism.if he did Vatican Council II would not be a break with the dogma EENS according to the 16th century missionaries.
These are all errors in doctrine and theology which Cardinal Burke does not comment upon.
-Lionel Andrades


Cardinal Burke interprets Vatican Council II like Fr.Hans Kung: contradicting the infallibility of the pope ex cathedra


http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/cardinal-burke-interprets-vatican.html


Related image
Fr.Gaudron, like Cardinal Burke and Joseph Shaw does not see how judgement of hypothetical cases result in a non traditional conclusion in Vatican Council II 
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/father-matthias-gaudron-like-cardinal.html

For Burke and Shaw subjective cases are objective, this is the norm.So they interpret Vatican Council II as a break with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus 

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/for-burke-and-shaw-subjective-cases-are.html


ALShred

Maike Hickson has not addressed Cardinal Burke and Joseph Shaw's accepting the theology and doctrines of Amoris Laetitia

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/maike-hickson-has-not-addressed.html
author image


But if we shouldn’t—and indeed can’t—render a judgment of condemnation on another person’s state of soul, then we shouldn’t and can’t render a judgment of acquittal either.- .- E. Christian Brugger http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/but-if-we-shouldntand-indeed-cantrender.html

Cardinal Kasper will say doctrine has not been changed in principle, in theory but he knows very well that with the new theology, doctrine has been changed de jure and de facto, in principle and in fact

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/cardinal-kasper-will-say-doctrine-has.html


Cushingism is not part of the whole Tradition of the Church. Cardinal Burke interprets Vatican Council II and the dogma EENS with Cushingism: Amoris Laetitia is based on the new moral theology, the heretical theology.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/cushingism-is-not-part-of-whole.html


This is all accepted by Fr.John Zuhlsdorf, Cardinal Raymond Burke and Joseph Shaw. They offer/ attend the Traditional Latin Mass with this official heresy http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/this-is-all-accepted-by-frjohn.html

Don't evangelise like Fr.John Zuhlsdorf : he interprets Vatican Council II with Cushingism instead of Feeneyismhttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/01/dont-evangelise-like-frjohn-zuhlsdorf.html
Cardinal Raymond Burke and Prof. Joseph Shaw assume hypothetical factors or theories are explicit exceptions to the traditional de fide teaching on faith and morals http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/cardinal-raymond-burke-and-prof-joseph.html 

Cardinal Burke accepts the 'contemporary official magisterium' and does not consider Amoris Laetita heretical, since he uses the same heretical magisterial new moral theology

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/cardinal-burke-accepts-contemporary.html


So when Cardinal Burke and Fr. Z say there is no doctrinal change in Vatican Council II ( interpreted with exceptions) or in AL ( with known exceptions) are they really protecting themself ?


http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/so-when-cardinal-burke-and-fr-z-say.html



What if Cardinal Burke and Fr. Zuhlsdorf said that there are no known exceptions to Catholic moral and salvation theology ?.Would they lose their religious faculties in Rome?
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/what-if-cardinal-burke-and-fr-zuhlsdorf.html

Cardinal Burke accepts the liberal moral and faith teachings which have been changed with exceptions, so called known exceptions in the present times.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/cardinal-burke-acceptsthe-liberal-moral.html


Cardinal Raymond Burke ignores the new moral theology upon which Amoris Laetitia is based since he and Pope Benedict use the same irrational theology.

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/cardinal-raymond-burke-ignores-new.html


For humans, including the popes, there cannot be known exceptions to the moral law http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/for-humans-including-popes-there-cannot.html


The Catechism of the Council of Trent is free of the error of assuming hypothetical cases are general exceptions to the traditional moral teachings of the Church: other catechisms have made a mistake
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/cardinal-raymond-burke-ignores-new.html

National Catholic Register Cushingism is not part of the whole Tradition of the Church. Cardinal Burke interprets Vatican Council II and the dogma EENS with Cushingism: Amoris Laetitia is based on the new moral theology, the heretical theology
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/cushingism-is-not-part-of-whole.html

The two popes and most of the Jesuits assume there is known salvation outside the Church. Upon this irrationality(personally knowing people saved or about to be saved without Catholic faith and the baptism of water) they have based their new theology in faith and morals http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/the-two-popes-and-most-of-jesuits.html


Cardinal Raymond Burke accepts the liberal moral theology, which affirms known exceptions to the traditional teaching on mortal sin.So he will not have noticed this error in Amoris Laetitia http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/04/cardinal-raymond-burke-accepts-liberal.html


__________________________

Related image

MARCH 31, 2015

Cardinal Raymond Burke approved the article. Fr.Hardon like Cardinal Marchetti makes this wrong inference in the article

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/cardinal-raymond-burke-approved-article.html

Cardinal Raymond Burke approved Fr. John Hardon's error


Cardinal Raymond Burke interprets Church documents with an irrational premise and conclusion and offers the Traditional Latin Mass
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/cardinal-raymond-burke-interprets.html


Rome made a mistake in 1949 and Fr.John Hardon did not notice it
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/rome-made-mistake-in-1949-and-frjohn_3.html


The Catechumen you refer to is a hypothetical case for you and me. So it is not an explicit exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus : Fr.John Hardon too did not notice this.
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/the-catechuman-you-refer-to-is.html

For Cardinal Raymond Burke these hypothetical cases are explicit exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salushttp://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2015/03/for-cardinal-raymond-burke-these.html


_________________________________________