Wednesday, March 2, 2022
Popes go for Confession. They can be automatically excommunicated
Popes go for Confession. They can be automatically
excommunicated
Pope Benedict and Pope Francis reject the Athanasius
Creed, the Syllabus of Errors, the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the
Catechism of Pope Pius X, 24Q,27Q, and they change the interpretation of the Nicene
and Apostles Creed- all with the use of a Fake Premise which creates exceptions
for the past ecclesiocentrism of the Church.
The result is first class heresy and public schism
with the Magisterium of the 16th century, the Patristic period etc.
According to the teachings of the Catholic Church and
according to Canon Law they are automatically excommunicated. They are in
public sin. It is a scandal. This applies to an ecclesiastic.
They need to announce that they will interpret all
Magisterial Documents with the Rational Premise. So then there are no ‘exceptions’
for the past exclusivist ecclesiology. There is no discontinuity with the dogma
extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the Magisterium and missionaries of
the 12 to 16th century. There is no 'hermeneutic of reforms' which
results in a break with the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors.
It means that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22
etc refer to invisible cases and so are not practical exceptions for the
Catechism of Pope Pius X( 24Q,27Q-outside the Church no salvation).This is the
use of the Rational Premise ( invisible cases
are invisible).
They will then no more be able to say that Vatican
Council II is a rupture with Tradition since objective cases of non Catholics
saved outside the Church, according to LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc are ‘practical
exceptions’ for EENS etc. This would be the Irrational Premise (invisible cases
of LG 16 etc are visible in 2022 and so are known examples of salvation outside
the Church). This is the False Premise which produces the False Conclusion ( LG
8, LG 16 etc are practical exceptions for the Athanasius Creed etc, the Council
has the hermeneutic of discontinuity and is a break with Tradition.)
The present two popes can no more fall back on Vatican
Council II (Irrational) to support their liberalism since the Council can be interpreted
with the False or Rational Premise and the conclusion will be non-traditional or
traditional, heretical or orthodox, a break, or in harmony, with the past
Magisterium, which was inspired by the Holy Spirit.
So now the issue is Vatican Council II and not the
interpretation of EENS according to the St.Benedict Center or Fr. Leonard
Feeney.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
