Wednesday, July 12, 2023
L'Eucaristia deve essere ricevuta durante la Santa Messa solo sulla lingua e la Madonna inginocchiata ha detto alla veggente Gisella Cardia a Trevignon, Italia.
8 LUGLIO 2023
L'Eucaristia deve essere ricevuta durante la Santa Messa solo sulla lingua e la Madonna inginocchiata ha detto alla veggente Gisella Cardia a Trevignon, Italia.
L'Eucaristia
deve essere ricevuta durante la Santa Messa solo sulla lingua e la Madonna
inginocchiata ha detto alla veggente Gisella Cardia a Trevignon, Italia.
Gisella invita le persone a venire lì e pregare il tre di ogni mese quando alle
15 la Madonna le appare . Ha le stigmate per tutta la Quaresima. Una statua che
piange sangue nella sua casa è stata ripresa da un caso televisivo italiano.
Hanno anche filmato il sole che pulsa durante le apparizioni.
Con
la preghiera possiamo proteggerci durante le prossime pandemie e terremoti,
dice. Siamo entrati nel tempo della tribolazione. Con il rosario ci proteggiamo
dal male.
Che
la Madonna dica di ricevere l'Eucaristia sulla lingua e in ginocchio è
interessante, poiché con la falsa interpretazione del Concilio Vaticano II (con
l'uso di una finta premessa, inferenza e conclusione), le balaustre furono
rimosse nelle chiese. i palmi delle mani che mostrano mancanza di rispetto per
Gesù. Anche l'ostia viene facilmente portata a casa dai satanisti dove fanno
soffrire Gesù. Sappiamo che Gesù si sente nell'Eucaristia, si sente un essere
umano.
Il
Concilio Vaticano II interpretato razionalmente sostiene solo la liturgia del
passato e l'ecclesiologia esclusivista. Con il passato ecclesiocentrismo non
contraddetto dal Concilio Vaticano II, la Chiesa ritorna alla vecchia teologia
del Messale Romano alla Messa in latino e in greco. Sulla passata
interpretazione rigorosa di extra ecclesiam nulla salus si basa l'antica
liturgia. Quindi la lex orandi della Chiesa non può che essere Feeneyite.
Poiché il Concilio Vaticano II può essere interpretato solo razionalmente.
Abbiamo l'obbligo di interpretare il Concilio solo razionalmente e così
riportare la Chiesa ai tempi delle balaustre.
Ironia della sorte, Gisella è indagata da una Commissione della Conferenza Episcopale Italiana (CEI-Conferenza Episcopale Italiana) che interpreta il Concilio Vaticano II in modo irrazionale e quindi non etico. Questo non può essere magistrale. Eppure la Commissione che non interpreta onestamente il Concilio Vaticano II deve giudicare se le sue apparizioni sono autentiche.
Come può la CEI interpretare il Concilio Vaticano II in modo irrazionale e non razionale e considerarlo opera dello Spirito Santo? Come possono giudicare se le apparizioni di Gisella provengono da Dio, quando Papa Francesco interpreta i Documenti Magistrali (Credi, Concili ecc.) in modo non etico? La sua interpretazione dei Credo, Concili, Catechismi, EENS ecc. non è apostolica o magisteriale. In passato nel corso dei secoli si è scelto un presupposto razionale (gli invisibili sono invisibili) per interpretare i Documenti della Chiesa.
Come
può la Commissione CEI giudicare le apparizioni di Gisella, che non sono
approvate dalla sinistra politica? Per ragioni politiche la CEI non ha detto
che la poligamia e le unioni omosessuali dei Sinodi, non sono ispirate dallo
Spirito Santo. alle fiamme dell'inferno.
La CEI non ha affermato che la teologia morale tradizionale non sia contraddetta dal Concilio Vaticano II interpretato razionalmente.
La CEI non ha affermato che il Concilio Vaticano II non può più essere utilizzato per sostenere l'innovazione dei Sinodi.
Congar, Ratzinger, Rahner, Kung e Lefebvre hanno interpretato il Concilio in modo irrazionale ma la CEI non ne parla, per motivi politici.
Quando il Concilio viene interpretato razionalmente allora la Chiesa torna alla lex orandi dei secoli. Su questo la Cei non informa papa Francesco.
La Cei e il vescovo locale hanno già detto ai cattolici di non andare a Trevignon. Per i vescovi le apparizioni, non sono religiosamente, ma politicamente scorrette.
La
CEI e Papa Francesco devono correggere la loro posizione filosofica e teologica
sul Concilio Vaticano II. Un'interpretazione non etica del Concilio in
pubblico, non è opera dello Spirito Santo. Non è apostolico o magisteriale. Il
Concilio può essere interpretato razionalmente e allora sarà apostolico e
magisteriale ed etico. Ma poi significherebbe riportare la Chiesa cattolica
alla vecchia lex orandi, del vecchio Messale Romano, quando avevano le
balaustre. - Lionel Andrades
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/07/the-eucharist-must-be-received-at-holy.html
THE EUCHARIST MUST BE RECEIVED AT HOLY MASS ONLY ON THE TONGUE AND KNEELING OUR LADY TOLD THE SEER GISELLA CARDIA AT TREVIGNON, ITALY.
JULY 8, 2023
The Eucharist must be received at Holy Mass only on
the tongue and kneeling Our Lady told the seer Gisella Cardia at Trevignon,
Italy.
The Eucharist must be received at Holy Mass only on the tongue and kneeling Our Lady told the seer Gisella Cardia at Trevignon, Italy.Gisella invites people to come there and pray on the third of every month when at 3p.m Our Lady appears to her. She has the stigmata throughout Lent.A statue weeping blood in her home has been filmed by an Italian television case. They have also filmed the sun pulsating during the apparitions.
With prayer we can protect ourselves during coming pandemics and earthquakes she says.We have entered the time of the tribulation. With the rosary we protect ourself oneself from evil.
That Our Lady says to receive the Eucharist on the tongue and kneeling is interesting, since with the false interpretation of Vatican Council II (with the use of a fake premise, inference and conclusion), altar rails were removed in churches.Communion was permitted on the palms of the hand showing disrespect for Jesus. Also the host is easily taken home by Satanists where they make Jesus suffer. We know Jesus feels in the Eucharist, he feels like a human being.
Vatican Council II interpreted rationally supports the past liturgy and exclusivist ecclesiology only. With the past ecclesiocentrism not contradicted by Vatican Council II, the Church returns to the old theology of the Roman Missal at Mass in Latin and in Greek. Upon the past strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus is based the old liturgy. So the lex orandi of the Church can only be Feeneyite. Since Vatican Council II can only be interpreted rationally. We have an obligation to interpret the Council only rationally and so take the Church back to the times of the altar rails.
Ironically, Gisella is under investigation by a Commission of the Italian Bishops Conference ( CEI-Conferenza Episcopale Italiana) which interprets Vatican Council II irrationally and so unethically. This cannot be Magisterial. Yet the Commission which does not interpret Vatican Council II honestly is to judge if her apparitions are authentic.
How can the CEI interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally and consider this the work of the Holy Spirit? How can they judge if Gisella’s apparitions are from God, when Pope Francis interprets Magisteral Documents (Creeds, Councils etc) unethically ? His interpretation of the Creeds, Councils, Catechisms, EENS etc is not apostolic or magisterial. In the past over the centuries they chose a rational premise ( invisible people are invisible) to interpret Church Documents.
How can the CEI Commission judge the apparitions of Gisella, which are not approved by the political Left? For political reasons the CEI has not said that polygamy and same sex unions of the Synods, are not inspired by the Holy Spirit.The CEI for political- left reasons has not stated that the Synods are promoting mortal sins of morals, which take a person to the fires of Hell.
The CEI has not stated that the traditional moral theology is not contradicted by Vatican Council II interpreted rationally.
The CEI has not stated that Vatican Council II can no more be used to support the Synods innovation.
Congar, Ratzinger, Rahner, Kung and Lefebvre interpreted the Council irrationally but the CEI does not mention this, for political reasons.
When the Council is interpreted rationally then the Church returns to the lex orandi of the centuries.The CEI does not inform Pope Francis about this.
The CEI and the local bishop have already told Catholics not to go to Trevignon.For the bishops the apparitions, are not religiously, but politically, incorrect.
The CEI and Pope Francis must correct their philosophical and theological position on Vatican Council II. An unethical interpretation of the Council in public, is not work of the Holy Spirit. It is not apostolic or magisterial. The Council can be interpreted rationally and then it will be apostolic and magisterial and ethical. But then it would mean taking the Catholic Church back to the old lex orandi, of the old Roman Missal, when they had altar rails. -Lionel Andrades
Church Militant's stand-in Rome correspondent, Dr. William Mahoney does not say that Archbishop Victor Manuel Fernandez is gunning for Humanae Vitae based upon his interpretation of Vatican Council II (irrational).
HUMANAE VITAE COULD BE REMOVED BASED UPON VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL
Church Militant's stand-in Rome correspondent, Dr. William Mahoney does not say that Archbishop Victor Manuel Fernandez is gunning for Humanae Vitae based upon his interpretation of Vatican Council II ( irrational).
NO LIBERAL-TRADITIONALIST DIVISION IN THE CHURCH SAYS FERNANDEZ
Fernandez, elsewhere, has also said that there is no more a traditional-liberal division. He probably means, that by 2025 he will eliminate all Catholics from being members of the Church, who do not accept Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally and not rationally.The indications are there on the website of the 2025 Jubilee in Rome.
During his pontificate he made numerous apostolic journeys. The first of these was in Lampedusa where he highlighted the theme of welcoming migrants, which he too spoke about on his trip to America, first to Cuba and then to the United States of America. During this visit he gave speeches to the UN and to the Congress (the first Pontiff to speak in this institutional place) where he spoke about the environmental theme, so dear to him, and the fight against religious fanaticism of any origin, human rights and individual and civil liberties.- from the website of Jubilee 2025, Pope Francis
VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL IS REVOLUTION IN THE CHURCH FOR THE DDF
Since the Council interpreted irrationally is accepted by CMTV correspondents in Rome, they cannot complain when Fernandez justifies his liberalism. The Council interpreted irrationally is ‘ a revolution ‘ in the Church according to Reuters and Associated Press.
VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONAL DOES NOT SUPPORT LIBERALISM AND INNOVATION
CMTV is not telling the Vatican and the Left that contraception with condoms is not acceptable for Catholics. This teaching cannot be changed in the name of Vatican Council II (rational). For the Council then supports the past exclusivist ecclesiology and so also the traditional faith and morals of the Church. There is no theological opening for novelty.
NO PRECEDENT TO SUPPORT CONTRACEPTION BASED UPON VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONAL
So there is no precedent in the Catholic Church to accept homosexual unions or contraception. These are still mortal sins according to the past moral theology which is supported by Vatican Council II (rational). - Lionel Andrades
Church Militant's stand-in Rome correspondent, Dr. William Mahoney, discusses the latest heterodox positions of the man who will oversee Catholic doctrine.
_____________________________________
JULY 3, 2023
We have a revolution in the interpretation of Vatican Council II. There is a re-interpretation. It takes the Church back to the past ecclesiology. This is a new discovery. It will come as a surprise to many. It is simple.The red is not an exception for the blue. The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance is not an exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), the Council of Florence(1442) and the Athanasius Creed. This was not known to even the traditionalists like the SSPX, CMRI,MHT, MHFM etc. They were interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally like the popes from Paul VI to Francis.
We have a revolution in the interpretation of Vatican Council II. There is a re-interpretation. It takes the Church back to the past ecclesiology. This is a new discovery. It will come as a surprise to many. It is simple.The red is not an exception for the blue. The baptism of desire (BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance (I.I) are not exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215), the Council of Florence(1442) and the Athanasius Creed. They (BOD and I.I) are only hypothetical and theoretical cases in 2023. We cannot see or meet someone saved as such.
This was not known to even the traditionalists like the SSPX, CMRI,MHT, MHFM etc. They were interpreting Vatican Council II irrationally like the popes from Paul VI to Francis.-Lionel Andrades
JULY 3, 2023
Cardinals Grech, Hollerich and Marx and Bishop Georg Batzing and Sister Nathalie Bequart are interpreting Vatican Council II with the red being an exception for the blue. This is irrational. It is nontraditional and dishonest. For me the red is not an exception for the blue : The popes from Paul VI to Francis made a mistake on Vatican Council II .
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/07/cardinals-grech-hollerich-and-marx-and.html
JULY 3, 2023
We have a new discovery which is unknown to most people in the Catholic Church. The discovery is that ‘the red is not an exception for the blue’
We have a new discovery which is unknown to most people in the Catholic Church. The discovery is that ‘the red is not an exception for the blue’ i.e. the passages in Vatican Council II which refer to the baptism of desire (BOD) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I), which are marked in red, do not contradict the passages which are orthodox and support the past ecclesiocentrism and are marked in blue.
If the passages which refer to the BOD and I.I in red and the orthodox and traditional passages in blue, then it could be said that 'the red is not an exception for the blue'. Roughly it is said that the red does not contradict the blue.
The red passages are like ‘null’ or ‘zero‘ cases.
The red passages also do not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) of the Fourth Lateran Council (1215).
So Vatican Council II has no passage which is a rupture with the Athanasius Creed, the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX and the Catechisms of Trent and Pius X.
The passages in red do not contradict Feeneyite EENS. - Lionel Andrades
Lumen Gentium 14, Vatican Council II
They are fully incorporated in the society of the Church who, possessing the Spirit of Christ accept her entire system and all the means of salvation given to her, and are united with her as part of her visible bodily structure and through her with Christ, who rules her through the Supreme Pontiff and the bishops. The bonds which bind men to the Church in a visible way are profession of faith, the sacraments, and ecclesiastical government and communion. He is not saved, however, who, though part of the body of the Church, does not persevere in charity. He remains indeed in the bosom of the Church, but, as it were, only in a "bodily" manner and not "in his heart."(12*) All the Church's children should remember that their exalted status is to be attributed not to their own merits but to the special grace of Christ. If they fail moreover to respond to that grace in thought, word and deed, not only shall they not be saved but they will be the more severely judged.(13*)
Catechumens who, moved by the Holy Spirit, seek with explicit intention to be incorporated into the Church are by that very intention joined with her. With love and solicitude Mother Church already embraces them as her own.- Lumen Gentium 14, Vatican Council II
Unitatis Redintigratio (Decree on Ecumenism), Vatican Council II
It follows that the separated Churches(23) and Communities as such, though we believe them to be deficient in some respects, have been by no means deprived of significance and importance in the mystery of salvation. For the Spirit of Christ has not refrained from using them as means of salvation which derive their efficacy from the very fullness of grace and truth entrusted to the Church.
Nevertheless, our separated brethren, whether considered as individuals or as Communities and Churches, are not blessed with that unity which Jesus Christ wished to bestow on all those who through Him were born again into one body, and with Him quickened to newness of life - that unity which the Holy Scriptures and the ancient Tradition of the Church proclaim. For it is only through Christ's Catholic Church, which is "the all-embracing means of salvation," that they can benefit fully from the means of salvation. We believe that Our Lord entrusted all the blessings of the New Covenant to the apostolic college alone, of which Peter is the head, in order to establish the one Body of Christ on earth to which all should be fully incorporated who belong in any way to the people of God. This people of God, though still in its members liable to sin, is ever growing in Christ during its pilgrimage on earth, and is guided by God's gentle wisdom, according to His hidden designs, until it shall happily arrive at the fullness of eternal glory in the heavenly Jerusalem.- Unitatis Redintigratio (Decree on Ecumenism), Vatican Council II
Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II
Unitatis Redintigratio (Decree on Ecumenism), Vatican Council II
Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II
Therefore, all must be converted to Him, made known by the Church's preaching, and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door. Therefore those men cannot be saved, who though aware that God, through Jesus Christ founded the Church as something necessary, still do not wish to enter into it, or to persevere in it." Therefore though God in ways known to Himself can lead those inculpably ignorant of the Gospel to find that faith without which it is impossible to please Him...- Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II
Catechism of the Catholic Church 846-848
"Outside the Church there is no salvation" 846 How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church Fathers? Re-formulated positively, it means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body:
- Basing itself on Scripture and Tradition, the Council teaches that the Church, a pilgrim now on earth, is necessary for salvation: the one Christ is the mediator and the way of salvation; he is present to us in his body which is the Church. He himself explicitly asserted the necessity of faith and Baptism, and thereby affirmed at the same time the necessity of the Church which men enter through Baptism as through a door. Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it.
- Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience - those too may achieve eternal salvation.
Posts
