Sunday, January 1, 2017

The New York Times interprets Vatican Council II with the common philosophical mistake

Image result for Photo mistake

Contrary to the Second Vatican Council’s endorsement of interreligious dialogue, Mr. Voris views Islam as “entirely different” from Christianity and portrays Judaism in outdated terminology that experts in Catholic-Jewish relations consider anti-Semitic. (The Trump campaign was accused at times of indulging in and even disseminating anti-Jewish rhetoric and imagery.)- Samuel G.Freedman 
‘Church Militant’ Theology Is Put to New, and Politicized, Use
Continue reading the main story

Happy and Holy 2017

Image result for photo of Fr.Stefano Gobbi

I  wish you all a happy and holy New Year, may it be filled with prayer and penance.Our Lady tells us that this is a sure way to get to Heaven.

Here is what I am re-reading these days.
Wherein is declared how necessary it is for the soul truly to pass through this dark night of sense, which is mortification of desire, in order that it may journey to union with God.
THE reason for which it is necessary for the soul, in order to attain to Divine union with God, to pass through this dark night of mortification of the desires and denial of pleasures in all things, is because all the affections which it has for creatures are pure darkness in the eyes of God, and, when the soul is clothed in these affections, it has no capacity for being enlightened and possessed by the pure and simple light of God, if it first cast them not from it; for light cannot agree with darkness; since, as Saint John says: Tenebroe eam non comprehenderunt.[86] That is: The darkness could not receive the light.
2. The reason is that two contraries (even as philosophy teaches us) cannot coexist in one person; and that darkness, which is affection set upon the creatures, and light, which is God, are contrary to each other, and have no likeness or accord between one another, even as Saint Paul taught the Corinthians, saying: Quoe conventio luci ad tenebras? That is to say: What communion can there be between light and darkness? Hence it is that the light of Divine union cannot dwell in the soul if these affections first flee not away from it.
 3. In order that we may the better prove what has been said, it must be known that the affection and attachment which the soul has for creatures renders the soul like to these creatures; and, the greater is its affection, the closer is the equality and likeness between them; for love creates a likeness between that which loves and that which is loved. For which reason David, speaking of those who set their affections upon idols, said thus: Similes illis fiant qui faciunt ea: et omnes qui confidunt in eis.[88] Which signifies: Let them that set their heart upon them be like to them. And thus, he that loves a creature becomes as low as that creature, and, in some ways, lower; for love not only makes the lover equal to the object of his love, but even subjects him to it. Hence in the same way it comes to pass that the soul that loves anything else becomes incapable of pure union with God and transformation in Him. For the low estate of the creature is much less capable of union with the high estate of the Creator than is darkness with light. For all things of earth and heaven, compared with God, are nothing, as Jeremias says in these words: Aspexi terram, et ecce vacua erat, et nihil; et coelos, et non erat lux in eis.[89] 'I beheld the earth,' he says, 'and it was void, and it was nothing; and the heavens, and saw that they had no light.' In saying that he beheld the earth void, he means that all its creatures were nothing, and that the earth was nothing likewise. And, in saying that he beheld the heavens and saw no light in them, he says that all the luminaries of heaven, compared with God, are pure darkness. So that in this way all the creatures are nothing; and their affections, we may say, are less than nothing, since they are an impediment to transformation in God and the privation thereof, even as darkness is not only nothing, but less than nothing, since it is privation of light. And even as he that is in darkness comprehends not the light, so the soul that sets its affection upon creatures will be unable to comprehend God; and, until it be purged, it will neither be able to possess Him here below, through pure transformation of love, nor yonder in clear vision. And, for greater clarity, we will now speak in greater detail.-St.John of the Cross, Ascent of Mount Carmel


The present magisterium is teaching relativism and has an air of indifferentism when informed.Even Cardinal Burke is keeping quiet about this

The present magisterium is teaching relativism and has an air of indifferentism when informed.Even Cardinal Burke is keeping quiet about this.1The two popes could suspend Cardinal Burke's faculties if he objects.As they can do so for any priest-pofessor at the now Masonic-pontifical universities in Rome. who speaks the truth.
Image result for photo magisterial heresy
Here is some of the relativism being taught by the Vatican Curia of liberals.
1.They assume that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance refer to known cases instead of just being hypothetical and invisible. So this gives them an opportunity to eliminate the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.This is a doctrinal change. 
It is pastorally enforced.If a Catholic Religious Superior affirms the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS, this means he or she  is not assuming the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance refer, to only hypothetical cases.The religious will be suspended or penalised. A priest can be denied incardination.
Image result for photo Fr.John Zuhlsdorf
This could be the reason why the blogger Fr.John Zuhlsdorf does not affirm the dogma EENS.He does not criticize inter-marriage with Jews.

It is not adultery for him.Nor does he say that all Jews and Orthodox Christians are on the way to Hell according to the dogma EENS and Vatican Council II.
Since this is expected of him by the present magisterium.
If a priest says he accepts the baptism of desire as it was taught by the past popes and saints it is not enough.It has to be a visible- for- us- baptism of desire.This is the ruse of the liberal theologians.

2.Since there is known salvation outside the Church for the two popes Vatican Council II has to be interpreted as a rupture with Tradition.This is accepted in principle by the Vatican Curia.
Image result for photo magisterial heresy
It is also enforced in the Church.If a cardinal or parish priest would say truthfully that in Vatican Council II there are no exceptions mentioned to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma EENS, he will be penalised. If he would say that LG 16, LG 8, UR 3, NA 2 etc refer to hypothetical cases he would get a cautionary phone call from one of the auxiliary bishops in Rome, who is following the Jewish Left guidelines for the Catholic Church.
I interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with 'the rigorist interpretation' of the dogma EENS.For me there is no hermeneutic of rupture with Feeneyite EENS. 
The cardinals and priests however have to maintain the official deception on Vatican Council II.
Image result for photo magisterial heresy
3.Since there is no known salvation outside the Church there is no objective basis for the New Theology of Rahner, Kung,Ratzinger and Kasper. Yet priests at the pontifical universities have to teach Rahnerian new theology on salvation.It is made obligatory.Also catechists and religion teachers have to accept the new theology,based on an irrational premise, which is there in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (1995).It is there in CCC 1257 and 846 etc.It is also with this irrational new theology, the Catechism of the Catholic Church interprets Vatican Council II.So there is the hermeutic of rupture and it is official and 'magisterial'.
During the pontificate of Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict catechism teachers all over the world were ordered to teach the new theology.Any one not doing so would have to be reported to the local bishop.
Also seminarians were forbiddent to mention Hell in their homilies. This is all official. These were directives from the magisterium.
This is human error and it cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.How can a new theology be created on a false philosophy ? The false reasoning can even be detected by a non Catholic.
Image result for photo magisterial heresy
4.There is no scientific proof for Teilhardin theology.Yet it is being allowed by the pro-Masonic popes, to encourage New Age concepts including re-incarnation.It is a general rejection of Catholic dogma and doctrines.
5.There is a Department of the Theology Religions set up at the Gregorian Pontifical University, Rome. This is in contradiction of the teachings of Pope John Paul II. Pope John Paul II had asked Cardinal Ratzinger to issue a CDF Notification to Fr.Jacques Dupuis S.J on his book Towards a Christian Theology of Religious Pluralism.This is allowed by the 'magisterium'  in 2016.It is a rupture with the past magisterium.
Again this cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.How can the Holy Spirit contradict the past magisterium, re-interpret Vatican Council II with an irrationality and discard a dogma on salvation? How can the Holy Spirit suggest that we can physically see people in Heaven saved without the baptism of water but with the baptism of desire etc?
6.Now Mission is being conducted along with Orthodox Christians and Protestants.It is Jesus without the necessity of being a member of the Catholic Church for salvation.The other Christians are not told that they are outside the Church and need to be members for salvation.This is the new magisterium.It is deceit and we know from whom it comes.
Image result for photo magisterial heresy
7.In Amoris Laetitia they are changing traditional moral theology with the subjectivism used in salvation theology.

This is the work of the Masons who support all things evil like homosexuality, abortion etc.This is the work of Satan with the cooperation of ecclesiastical masonry.
These are only some examples of the present magisterium teaching heresy and relativism. For political reasons there is also an air of indifferentism.It is being condoned by cardinals.
Catholics use the term magisterium loosely to signify that there is a continuity with the past.This is not true.
A few weeks back there was a talk by Fr.Garcia L.C at the Regina Apostolorum University,Rome. He mentioned the magisterium of Pope Francis and the magisterium of Pope Benedict.I think he too realizes that there is no more a continous magisterium with the 16th century missionaries.
Image result for photo magisterial heresy
Pope Benedict confirmed it a few months back. He said the dogma EENS was no more like it was in the 16th century. So it is official.There is a rupture with the past magisterium.The present magisterium officially supports this rupture with the teachings of the Holy Spirit.-Lionel Andrades


MARCH 7, 2015

Cardinal Raymond Burke interprets Church documents with an irrational premise and conclusion and offers the Traditional Latin Mass