The Boston Heresy is an objective error which can be verified in public.

 

The Boston Heresy is an objective error which can be verified in public. The Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary in Richmond, New Hampshire, in the diocese of Bishop Peter Libasci, bishop of Manchester, USA, avoid this error. They interpret Vatican Council II etc, rationally.

The Boston Heresy is an objective error and is verifiable in public, I repeat.

If Vatican Council II is a break with Tradition it means the Boston Heresy is being applied.

If Vatican Council II is not a break with Tradition then it means that the Boston Heresy is avoided.

If Lumen Gentium 8, 14, 16 etc refer to visible cases then it means that the Boston Heresy is in operation.

If LG 8,14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, refer to invisible cases , it means we are back to the old theology and the Boston Heresy has been avoided.

So when Pope Francis says that the Council is a break with Tradition, this is true with the Boston Heresy.

When I say that the Council has the hermeneutic of continuity with Tradition, this is true, because I avoid the Boston Heresy.

When the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston (LOHO) projected invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance as being visible exceptions for Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS), this was irrational. The result was heresy. The 1949 LOHO says everyone does not need to be a member of the Catholic Church for salvation. This contradicts the dogma EENS which says they do need to be a member. 

But only visible cases can be exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. Invisible people do not contradict the dogma EENS.So the 1949 LOHO is telling us in public, that it’s reasoning was irrational. In this way it could produce a New Theology with new doctrines on salvation. This is heresy. It is schism with the pre-1949 Magisterium. This is a public error. The proof if there in the text of LOHO.

When Cardinal Ratzinger and Fr. Luiz Ladaria sj cites the 1949 LOHO approved by Pope  Pius XII in two papers of the International Theological Commission, they are telling us they choose the Boston Heresy. This is public.

When the liberals placed the LOHO in the Denzinger and referenced it in Vatican Council II( LG16), they were saying there were visible cases of non Catholics saved outside the Church in invincible ignorance(LG 16) etc. This is irrational. This is dishonest. There are no visible cases. But in this way they produce new doctrines on salvation and reject EENS according to the Council of Florence 1442 and the Catechisms of Trent and Pius X. This is heresy. This is the heresy in Boston in 1949.It is official.

When the entire Church today, changes ecclesiology, then the error is explicit. The cause of the break with Tradition is Vatican Council II (irrational) and the precise cause is the irrational premise (invisible people are visible) which produces a new theology, which is heretical. This is the Boston Heresy of the 1949 LOHO, an error overlooked by Pope Pius XII and also the popes who followed him.  - Lionel Andrades

Hidden clause

 

The Legion of Christ’s two leftist universities, situated on Via Aurelia, Rome,1 advertises its programs in Rome on buses and the metro stations. The Legion of Christ does not issue a caution note saying that only leftist students must apply. Those students who interpret Vatican Council II rationally cannot be enrolled. If a student is dismissed after a year or more, because he interprets Vatican Council II rationally. He or she must be asked to leave the university. The student cannot get an academic degree. Neither would he or she be asked to be present for the Final Matriculation Exam at the end of the semesters.

Students are not informed.

Students are not informed about this rule by the Legion of Christ and other pontifical, or secular, universities in Rome

It is the same with the Catholic seminaries in Rome. This is a hidden clause.

So if you are a practicing Catholic you are not welcome.- Lionel Andrades

1. 

The European University of Rome(UER)

https://www.upra.org/offerta-formativa/facolta/teologia/

Pope Francis supports the Boston Heresy of Pope Pius XII, Cardinal Richard Cushing, the Rector of Boston College and the American Jesuits. This is not Magisterial. Heresy and schism are not Magisterial.

 

Pope Francis supports the Boston Heresy of Pope Pius XII, Cardinal Richard Cushing, the Rector of Boston College and the American Jesuits. This is not Magisterial. Heresy and schism are not Magisterial. Even Michael Voris and Michael Lofton affirm the Boston Heresy of the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston. It is repeated at Vatican Council II.

I avoid this mistake.

For me, the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance are always hypothetical on earth for us human beings. They are not literal cases. They are not explicit. So they are not exceptions for Tradition. They do not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and an ecumenism of return to the Church.

In Rome, Father Federico Montani is the SSPX priest who offers the Latin Mass at the SSPX chapel. He told me he supports the dogma EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442) and the Catechisms of Pope Pius IX and Trent.

But because of the Boston Heresy, which the SSPX also support, like Voris and Lofton, he does not accept Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church. 

This is understandable. Since with the Boston Heresy- confusing what is invisible as being visible, - Vatican Council II contradicts EENS, the Syllabus of Errors, the past Catechisms and the rest of Tradition.Everyone should reject Vatican Council II ( irrational).

Even I would not interpret Vatican Council II, the Creeds and Catechisms, with the Boston Heresy.

But Fr. Federico Montani affirms the dogma EENS according to the Fourth Lateran Council and the Council of Florence etc. Voris and Lofton do not do so. They re-interpret the Creeds with the Boston Heresy. So there are ‘known exceptions’ for the dogma EENS. It is the same for Pope Francis. This is approved by the Left since it changes the interpretation of not only the dogma EENS but also the Creeds and Catechisms.So the Left forces them to abjure the Catholic Faith in reality

So how can Voris and Lofton say that SSPX are in schism when they both, like Pope Francis, are in the same theological boat, a sinking ship, which is not the Catholic Church. They follow the political theology of the Left. Instead Voris and Lofton should be interpreting Vatican Council II rationally and calling upon the SSPX, to do the same.

When Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally the Council only supports the ecclesiology of the 1962 Missal which says outside the Church there is no salvation.

They should be asking Pope Francis to become a traditionalist by interpreting the Councils and Catechisms rationally. Do not use the common false premise, the false inference and nontraditional, heretical and schismatic conclusion.

Voris and Lofton for political reasons must not support the Boston Heresy of the popes from Pius XII to Francis. This is not Catholic.

Outside the Church there is no salvation is the teaching of Vatican Council II ( Ad Gentes 7-Lumen Gentium 16, Catechism of the Catholic Church 845,846 etc) but the present popes are in schism, which is produced by the Boston Heresy. They can correct the error and then the whole Church returns to Tradition.There no more is general schism in the Church. -Lionel Andrades

FEBRUARY 27, 2023

SSPX priest is unethical on Vatican Council II

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/sspx-priest-is-unethical-on-vatican.html

FEBRUARY 26, 2023

Il sacerdote della FSSPX afferma il dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus secondo i vecchi Concili e Catechismi della Chiesa ma non il Concilio Vaticano II e il Catechismo della Chiesa Cattolica

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/il-sacerdote-della-fsspx-afferma-il.html

FEBRUARY 26, 2023

SSPX priest affirms the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to the old Church Councils and Catechisms but not Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/sspx-priest-affirms-dogma-extra.html

MARCH 6, 2023

SSPX's Father Federico Montani must only be allowed to interpret Vatican Council II honestly and so rationally at the Latin Mass in Rome. This is a legal point. He is correct when he rejects Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted irrationally and so dishonestlyhttps://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/sspxs-father-federico-montani-must-only.html

FEBRUARY 27, 2023

If the SSPX interprets Vatican Council II rationally their image changes

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/02/if-sspx-interprets-vatican-council-ii.html

 

A pope cannot be Magisterial who supports the Boston Heresy. He must correct the error.There are no physically visible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance.

 

A pope cannot be Magisterial who supports the Boston Heresy. He must correct the error.There are no physically visible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance.

LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II are always hypothetical.They are invisible cases in 1965-2023. So where are the exceptions for the Syllabus of Errors and the Athanasius Creed ?

Why do Catholic Answers and EWTN for example,  officially reject the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church ?

Why must Catholics change the interpretation of the Creeds? This is a mortal sin of faith.

Why must Catholics affirm the Boston Heresy of the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston?

Pope Francis and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith must correct the error in public .

In inter-religious dialogue and ecumenism non Catholics must be told to interpret Vatican Council II without the Boston Heresy. Mortal sins of faith send people to Hell.

Without the Boston Heresy Vatican Council II would be saying that all non Catholics need faith and the  baptism of water for salvation ( AG 7/LG 14, CCC 845,846 etc).LG 8,14 and 16 etc are not practical exceptions for Ad Gentes 7, Lumen Gentium 14, CCC 846 etc. There is no break with Tradition. So the Council does not contradict the strict interpretation of the dogma EENS of the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442).Vatican Council II is not a break with the Magisterium of the 12^th to 16^th century.- Lionel Andrades

MARCH 23, 2023

Roberto dei Mattei, Christopher Ferrara, Fr.Nicholas Gruner, John Vennari, Louie Verrecchio, Ann Barnhardt, David Domet, Eric Sammons and Michael Matt, were all interpreting Vatican Council II with the Boston Heresy. It was the same with Mons. Brunero Gherardino, Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton, Fr. John Hardon and Fr. William Most. This was the mistake of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX and SSPX Resistance bishops.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/roberto-dei-mattei-christopher-ferrara.html

 MARCH 22, 2023

I have not written books on this subject and I have no intention of writing books in future. But one thing of which I am sure is that - there are no physically visible cases of LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in the present times.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/i-have-not-written-books-on-this.html

MARCH 22, 2023

Michael Voris and Michael Lofton are not Magisterial when they do not affirm the Fourth Lateran Council (1215) and the Council of Florence (1442) on the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as do the priests of the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX). So why do they say the SSPX is not Magisterial?

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/michael-voris-and-michael-lofton-are.html

MARCH 21, 2023

Faculty of Theology, University of Munich is legally dishonest

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/faculty-of-theology-university-of.html

 MARCH 20, 2023

An Augustinian Recollect priest at the church Sant Ildefonso e Tomasso Villanova, via Sistina, Rome, yesterday agreed with me. He said Vatican Council II has a continuity with the past.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/an-augustinian-recollect-priest-at.html

MARCH 19, 2023

This is interpreting Church Documents with the Boston Heresy of Pope Pius XII.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/this-is-interpreting-church-documents.html

MARCH 19, 2023

Without the Boston Heresy of Pope Pius XII, Cardinal Richard Cushing and the Jesuits - the Franciscans of the Immaculate and the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) could interpret Vatican Council II in harmony with Feeneyite extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2023/03/without-boston-heresy-of-pope-pius-xii.html

Roberto dei Mattei, Christopher Ferrara, Fr.Nicholas Gruner, John Vennari, Louie Verrecchio, Ann Barnhardt, David Domet, Eric Sammons and Michael Matt, were all interpreting Vatican Council II with the Boston Heresy. It was the same with Mons. Brunero Gherardino, Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton, Fr. John Hardon and Fr. William Most. This was the mistake of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX and SSPX Resistance bishops.

 Roberto dei Mattei, Christopher Ferrara, Fr.Nicholas Gruner, John Vennari, Louie Verrecchio, Ann Barnhardt, David Domet, Eric Sammons and Michael Matt, were all interpreting Vatican Council II with the Boston Heresy. It was the same with Mons. Brunero Gherardino, Mons. Joseph Clifford Fenton, Fr. John Hardon and Fr. William Most. This was the mistake of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX and SSPX Resistance bishops.

The Boston Heresy is the rejection of the past ecclesiocentrism of the Catholic Church, it puts aside the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). It re-interprets the Nicene Creed and the Catechisms of Trent and Pius X. It does this by confusing invisible cases of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance as being visible examples of salvation outside the Church and so practical exceptions for EENS and the past ecclesiocentric ecclesiology of the Church. It is a subtle philosophical mistake which produces a New Theology which says outside the Catholic Church there is known salvation; there is salvation.

The Boston Heresy of the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston (LOHO) is there among the traditionalists and liberals.

Bishop Robert Barron interprets LG 16 with the Boston Heresy and then says not everyone needs to enter the Catholic Church for salvation, as if he can judge an exception for the dogma EENS. So he says that we can have a reasonable doubt that most people are saved.

Michael Voris, like the SSPX, goes back to Tradition, to the popes and saints and says most people are oriented to Hell, since they die outside the Church and with mortal sins on faith and morals. I agree with him. But Michael trips himself on Vatican Council II which he interprets with the Boston Heresy of Pope Pius XII. He contradicts the pre-1949 popes and saints on EENS.

Cardinals Kasper, Muller and Brandmuller in Germany and bishops Dominique Rey and Roland Minnerath in France interpret Vatican Council II with the same common irrationality.

The Boston Heresy is an objective error which 

can be verified in public. I avoid it. - Lionel Andrades

Bike Tour Medjugorje to Apparition Hill | March 23, 2023

Morning Impressions Medjugorje | March 23, 2023

Medjugorje | WOW! What a Moment in front of Our Lady | March 22, 2023