Sunday, June 23, 2019

Archbishop Thomas E.Gulllickson, the Apostolic Nuncio to Switzerland and Liechtenstein contradicts Archbishops Morandi and Di Noia, Secretaries at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) : schism ahead

Image result for Bishop Thomas Gullickson Photos
Archbishop Thomas E.Gulllickson, the Apostolic Nuncio to Switzerland and Liechtenstein contradicts Archbishops Morandi and Di Noia, Secretaries at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF).
Archbishop Gullickson answered my two questions on his blog.
Like me, he would answer:-
TWO POINTS/ TWO QUESTIONS
1. Unknown and invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are NOT personally known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).So I  would REJECT a new version of EENS with BOD,BOB and I.I being literal exceptions.
2.Unknown and physically invisible cases of being saved mentioned in Vatican Council II ( LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3 NA 2, GS 22 etc) are also NOT personally known examples of salvation outside the Church in 2019 and so they are NOT exceptions to 16th- century EENS.They do NOT contradict the Magisterium and missionaries of that time.

So the Apostolic Nuncio would support  16th century extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS), the past ecclesiology and an ecumenism of return.But the Archbishop-Secretaries at the CDF, like the present two popes, would reject 16th century EENS, the past exclusivist ecclesiology, an ecumenism of return, the Syllabus of Errors and the Athansius Creed.
Similarly there would be cardinals and bishops who would agree with the American Nuncio.

Fr. Stefano Visintin osb, Rector, University of St. Anselm, Rome answered the two questions, which I asked him,and was in agreement with the Apostolic Nuncio. It is the same for John Martignoni, apologist at the EWTN.

They are making an observation of life, an empirical observation when they say that there are no physically visible cases of the BOD, BOB and I.I. Upon this observation was based the old salvation theology which says outside the Church there is no salvation.
For the present two popes and the CDF, there are physically visible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I. Upon this observation there is the New Theology , which says outside the Church there is known salvation ; there is salvation.

So now for the CDF Secretaries - the Apostolic Nuncio and many priests in Rome would legally, not be Catholic.This is the change in status for the St. Benedict Center.

 Brother Andre Marie MICM, in his correspondence with the CDF in 2016 has indicated that there are no known cases of BOD, BOB and I.I in our reality,and that they would be known only to God.Since I.I, BOB and BOD are not exceptions to EENS for him  he is saying that in Heaven there are only Catholics.

Image result for Photos Roberto dei Mattei and Christopher Ferrara
Image result for Photos Roberto dei Mattei and Christopher FerraraImage result for Photos Roberto dei Mattei and Christopher Ferrara
Image result for Photos Roberto dei Mattei and Christopher Ferrara
This is unacceptable, legally and canonically, for the CDF and the Diocese of Manchester which has announced Precepts of Prohibitions.
So the same prohibitions would apply to cardinals, bishops, religious communities and priests and nuns who affirm Vatican Council II and EENS rationally and traditionally and so say that in Heaven there are only Catholics.
It would mean that the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary in the Diocese of Worcester, USA, under Bishop Robert McManus, are also outside the Church and are not Catholics for the CDF and the Left.-Lionel Andrades





SEPTEMBER 29, 2018


Repost : Archbishop Thomas E Gullickson and Father Stefano S.Visintin osb say there are no known cases of the baptism of desire in our reality(Graphics)

 JUNE 20, 2016

Prof.Phillip Blosser, a Professor of Philosophy at Musings of a Pertinacious Papist and Tancred at The Eponymous Flower agree with me : hypothetical cases (baptism of desire etc) cannot be explicit for us in 2016 
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2016/06/profphillip-blosser-professor-of.html
_______________________________________
 JANUARY 28, 2015 
Fr.Marco Hausmann , Fr.P. Stefano Visintin OSB say there are no exceptions to the dogma, Cardinal Valliani's Vicariate says there are  http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2015/01/frmarco-hausmann-fssp-frp-stefano.html

The Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) does not affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) in harmony with Vatican Council II. He is holding doctrinal talks with the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) when he should be asked to recant or resign

https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/the-prefect-of-congregation-for.html

 DECEMBER 19, 2018

Image result for Photo Vatican SSPX talks
The secret Vatican-SSPX doctrinal talks are not being made public, even though both sides claim to be Catholic.Cardinal Ladaria uses an irrationality to interpret Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS.So deception is in his interest https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/the-secret-vatican-sspx-doctrinal-talks.html

DECEMBER 13, 2018


At the Thomas More College of Liberal Arts they do not affirm orthodoxy and deny teaching heresy : they follow present day ecclesiastics in a rupture with the past Magisterium 
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/at-thomas-more-college-of-liberal-arts.html








 DECEMBER 19, 2018


Cardinal Ladaria needs to resign instead he is holding doctrinal talks with the SSPX (Graphics)  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/12/cardinal-ladaria-needs-to-resign.html






_____________________________________________
AUGUST 18, 2018
 Placuit Deo promotes an ecumenical Jesus and not Jesus according to the traditional teachings of the Catholic Church,which did not separate Jesus from faith and baptism in the Church for salvation : Sandro Magister and Edward Pentin did not know http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2018/08/placuit-deo-promotes-ecumenical-jesus.html
______________________________________________

St.Benedict Center files canonical petition : two points of L.A need to be mentioned

The St.Benedict Center has filed a canonical petition with the bishop in the Diocese of Manchester and the ecclesiastics at the Vatican.
The ecclesiastics  whom they have petitioned believe :-

TWO POINTS/ TWO QUESTIONS
1. Unknown and invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are personally known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).So they would accept a new version of EENS with BOD,BOB and I.I being literal exceptions.
2.Unknown and physically invisible cases of being saved mentioned in Vatican Council II ( LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3 NA 2, GS 22 etc) are also personally known examples of salvation outside the Church in 2019 and they are exceptions to 16th century EENS, they contradict the Magisterium and missionaries of that time.

For Fr. Leonard Feeney there were no literal cases of the baptism of desire etc.They could also only be hypothetical for the popes over the centuries before Pius XII.So for him there would be no literal exceptions to the dogma EENS, mentioned in Vatican Council II.

 Fr. George de Laire, canonical vicar of the diocese of Manchester wants the SBC to accept the above two irrational points and so say that there are non Catholics in Heaven and that every one in Heaven is not Catholic.

For me unlike the ecclesiastics at the Vatican there are no exceptions to EENS. BOD,BOB and I.I do not contradict Feeneyite EENS and so the Holy Office (CDF) 1949 made an objective mistake. Similarly Vatican Council II does not contradict EENS and Ad Gentes 7 states all need faith and baptism for salvation,supporting EENS.
In their canonical petition they could mention my interpretation :-

TWO POINTS/ TWO QUESTIONS
1. Unknown and invisible cases of the baptism of desire, baptism of blood and being saved in invincible ignorance are NOT personally known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS).So I  would REJECT a new version of EENS with BOD,BOB and I.I being literal exceptions.
2.Unknown and physically invisible cases of being saved mentioned in Vatican Council II ( LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3 NA 2, GS 22 etc) are also NOT personally known examples of salvation outside the Church in 2019 and so they are NOT exceptions to 16th century EENS, they do NOT contradict the Magisterium and missionaries of that time.
-Lionel Andrades

JUNE 22, 2019



Popes and saints over the centuries before Pius XII used Feeneyism and not Cushingism as a theology.Feeneyism is Catholic orthodoxy on salvation.It is rational and not split with Tradition



NOVEMBER 3, 2014


The SSPX must respond to Bishop Semeraro by citing Catholic doctrine on Vatican Council II which supports their position
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2014/11/the-sspx-must-respond-to-bishop.html

NOVEMBER 5, 2009

FEBRUARY 27, 2014

There must have been a leftist storm over Archbold's report  https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2014/02/there-must-have-been-leftist-storm-over.html


OCTOBER 20, 2017

SSPX has a right to canonical status when they correct their doctrinal error in the 'chart' https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2017/10/sspx-has-right-to-canonical-status-when.html

Image result for Graphics Vatican Council II Feeneyite and Cushingite PhotosImage result for Graphics Vatican Council II Feeneyite and Cushingite PhotosImage result for Graphics Vatican Council II Feeneyite and Cushingite Photos
 OCTOBER 28, 2014

Pope Benedict XVI and the Bishop of Albano made a doctrinal errror with reference to the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 , Catechism of the Catholic Church 1257-1260 and an irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II 


 JULY 3, 2016


Peter Vere refers to the interpretation of the Church Councils, popes and saints including St.Thomas Aquinas and St. Augustine as being 'restrictive'https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2016/07/peter-vere-refers-to-interpretation-of.html


OCTOBER 7, 2017


SSPX canonical recognition is assured : Vatican Council II (premise-free) is no more an issue


NOVEMBER 10, 2017


No clarification or response from Bishop Robert J.McManus or Brother Thomas Augustine MICM on Catholic doctrine : how did they interpret Vatican Council II and EENS?


OCTOBER 7, 2017

SSPX must re-open negotiations for canonical status : cite new doctrinal references and explanations on this blog
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/10/sspx-must-re-open-negotiations-for.html


Vatican needs to apologise for the excommunication of Fr. Leonard Feeney and Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/vatican-cdfecclesia-dei-needs-to.html


 NOVEMBER 4, 2017


Formal recognition of traditionalist community in Worcester,Massachusetts opens new doctrinal path for SSPX canonical status


NOVEMBER 4, 2017

Breakthrough - Slaves recognised by Bishop Robert J.McManus : all Catholic religious communities can now affirm EENS with BOD, BOB and I.I not being exceptions

http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2017/11/breakthrough-slaves-recognised-by.html



SEPTEMBER 2, 2016


Cardinal Burke, Cardinal Sarah and the FSSP priests offer Holy Mass ad orientem and assume LG 16 refers to visible cases in 2016. This is irrational. It's inference and conclusion is non traditional.It creates the hermeneutic of rupture with the past

MARCH 19, 2010


CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IN ACCORD WITH THE DOGMA



____________________________________________________


WEDNESDAY, APRIL 15, 2015



Questions and Answers
what premise ? The irrational premise is "The dead are visible to us on earth".

What inference/ conclusion ?The inference is since the dead are visible to us on earth, those who are saved with the baptism of desire or in invincible ignorance being explicit ( visible in the flesh) become exceptions to the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.So it is concluded that Vatican Council II (LG 16 etc) contradict the strict interpretation of extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So it is concluded that Vatican Council II is a break with Tradition, it has the hermeneutic of rupture.

What theology ? The post -1949 theology says every one needs to enter the Catholic Church except for those in invincible ignorance or with the baptism of desire.Since it assumes that defacto( in fact in the present times,explicitly) there are known exceptions to the interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney of Boston.So it is a theology which assumes there is salvation outside the Church even though we cannot know of any one saved without 'faith and baptism'.

What Tradition? Pre- 1949 Catholic Tradition, on salvation ( soteriology) says there is exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. The three dogmas on extra ecclesiam nulla salus ,defined by three Church Councils, do not mention any exception. The text also does not mention the baptism of desire or being saved in invincible ignorance.I am referring to Cantate Dominio, Council of Florence 1441 etc.Also Mystici Corporis and the Council of Trent mention implicit desire etc but do not state that these cases are known to us, to be exceptions to the dogma.Neither do they state that there are exceptions to the dogma.Yet with the false premise and inference is how the Council of Trent, the Catechism of Pope Pius X etc are interpreted.

Do you accept the baptism of desire?Yes. I believe a Catechuman who has an implicit desire for the baptism of water and dies before he receives it can be saved. Since God will provide the means for him to receive the baptism of water. It has been the experience of saints, including St. Francis Xavier that some people returned from the dead only to be baptised by them with the baptism of water.

Irrational premise, Irrational inference, Non traditional conclusion The secular media uses an irrational premise which is "We can see the dead who are now in Heaven, we can physically see them in Heaven and on earth". They then make an irrational inference which is " Since we can see people in Heaven saved without the baptism of water and formal entry into the Church, there is known salvation outside the Church and these cases are an explicit exception to the traditional interpretation of EENS." Their conclusion is : Vatican Council II is a break with EENS.
I accept the Magisterium 
'For me the magisterial teaching of the Church documents (and not the contemporary magisterium i.e the persons in power) support the rigorist interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( AG 7,LG 14, CCC 1257,845,846, Redemptoris Missio 55, Dominus Iesus 20 etc).
I accept the Magisterium ( Vatican Council II (AG 7,LG 14), CCC 1257, 845,846, Redemptoris Missio 55, Dominus Iesus 20, Council of Trent,Syllabus of Errors, Catechism of Pope Pius X, Cantate Dominio Council of Florence 1441 etc).Magisterium, Scripture and Tradition, before and after Vatican Council II support Fr.Leonard Feeney and the four Catholic professors of theology, who were expelled by Boston College. http://www.creativeminorityreport.com/2015/03/dont-blame-vatican-ii.html#comment-1943178630

Exclusivist ecclesiology? The new theology is based on being able to see the dead. Remove the premise, which is, "I can see the dead on earth".We then have the old ecclesiology, the exclusivist ecclesiology. The ecclesiology of Vatican Council II is exclusivist. Since it affirms the rigorist interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in Ad Gentes 7, which says all need faith and baptism for salvation.LG 16,LG 8,UR 3,NA 2 etc are not known exceptions to Ad Gentes 7 or the dogma on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church. We are left with the old ecclesiology.

Who agrees with you? 
Archbishop Thomas E.Gullickson says Vatican Council II does not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/11/archbishop-thomas-egullickson-says.html

DEAN OF THEOLOGY AT ST. ANSELM SAYS THERE ARE NO KNOWN EXCEPTIONS TO THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
Implicit intention, invincible ignorance and a good conscience (LG 16) in Vatican Council II do not contradict extra ecclesiam nulla salus –John Martigion http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/11/implicit-intention-invincible-ignorance.html#links


____________________________