Tuesday, November 12, 2013

Vatican II's Intercommunion Heresy




____________________________________________
 
 
Note: Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church refer to particular cases and not giving of the Eucharist  in general.In general non Catholics are not given the Eucharist by the Catholic Church.
 
The understanding of Vatican Council II by the Most Holy Family Monastery is the same as that of the liberals and the Left.
 
They still consider the baptism of desire as a visible  and known exception to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus so they reject the baptism of desire! . They contradict the Council of Trent. They do not consider this a heresy. Similarly they assume that Nostra Aetate 3  refers to known exceptions to the traditional teaching on other religions.
 
They end up rejecting Vatican Council II and going into sedevacantism, when the fault is with their irrational interpretation of the Council.
 
Like the Vatican Curia and the traditionalists they are using Cushingism with the visible- dead theory in the interpretation of the Council. Without this false premise, NA 3, LG 16 etc, would not contradict Ad Gentes 7. Vatican Council II affrms the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus in Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14. They never mention Ad Gentes 7 in their books and videos on extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
-Lionel Andrades
 

Pontifical universities in Rome teach that Pope Pius XII made an objective error

At the pontifical universities in Rome they are being taught that Pope Pius XII made an objective error.He assumed, students are taught, that there were visible and known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.So Fr.Leonard Feeney was excommunicated for not claiming he could see the dead on earth, saved in invincible ignorance or the baptism of desire.
This error was the requirement for a Doctorate Degree at the Opus Dei university in Rome and a Masters Degree in Theology at the University of St.Thomas Aquinas,the Angelicum.
Imagine Pope Pius XII being able to see  former non Catholics, now dead and saved in Heaven,and then reasoning that every one does not have to convert into the Church in the present times.
So the Syllabus of Errors and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus were wrong , since there are visible exceptions to its teaching, according to the Catholic universities.
Pontifical universities officially teach that Pope Pius XII made a big change in Catholic theology with this 'objective observation' of his.
Opus Dei - Bishop Javier Echevarría
I was present at an Ecclesiology class of Fr.Robert Christian O.P at the  University of St. Thomas Aquinas when this error was being taught by him.
This is the reasoning at the Opus Dei university  and that of the Opus Dei prelature.Bishop Javier Echevarría, is the Prelate of Opus Dei and Grand Chancellor of the Pontifical University of the Holy Cross. He has  no comment.
This is a falsehood. He does not know of any exception in 2013 in Rome or elsewhere.
-Lionel Andrades

Don Mauro Tranquilo e Arcivescovo Gerhard Muller

Don Mauro Tranquilo è rispettato altre i preti di Fraternità San Pio X.Loro considerano lui il teologo ad Albano.Si dovrebbe chiedere arcivescovo Gerhard Muller, Prefetto della Congregazione per la Dottrina della Fede, il Vaticano qualche domanda sulla Concilio Vaticano II.
Perché, quando l'arcivescovo Muller ha detto il Concilio Vaticano
II è tradizionale e i tradizionalisti e progressisti bisogna correggere la loro interpretazione, sta dicendo:
 
1. Il Concilio Vaticano II (Ad Gentes7) è in accordo con il dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

2.LG 16, LG 8, AG 11, UR 3, NA 3 non sono note eccezioni Ad Gentes 7?

Sarebbe accettato da arcivescovo Muller se la Fraternità San Pio X, ha detto il Concilio Vaticano II non ha cambiato l'insegnamento della Chiesa riguardo la Sinistra ebraica, e di altri non cattolici.?
-Lionel Andrades