Sono lieto delle sofferenze che sopporto per voi e completo nella mia carne quello che manca ai patimenti di Cristo, a favore del suo corpo che è la Chiesa - Anna Katharina Emmerick

Dopo tanta attesa, diversi atti e testimonianza hanno provato i particolari doni spirituali e le eroiche virtu della pia veggente: assenza di alimentazione, conoscenza dei cuori umani, riconoscimento delle reliquie dei santi, conoscenza delle erbe medicinali, dei misteri biblici della fede, partecipazione con lo spirit nell' aldila e, sopratutto, le pene di sostituzione, ossia soffrire i dolori del passion.

Spesso diceva:

"Ho sempre percepito che Gesù Cristo è il Corpo di tutti e tutti portiamo anche i dolori con gli altri".

La nuova beata, che, recentemente, la Chiesa ha proposto all'imitazione e al culto dei fedeli, è dunque esempio eccezionale di una semplice e fragile creature che scopre il valore salvifico della sofferenza condivisa con Cristo.

Con le sofferenze della carne e dello spirito la beata Emmerick è icona del Cristo sanguinante, quasi sembra dire con l'apostolo Paolo:" Sono lieto delle sofferenze che sopporto per voi e completo nella mia carne quello che manca ai patimenti di Cristo, a favore del suo corpo che è la Chiesa"(Col 1,214).-La dolorosa Passione di nostro Signore Gesù Cristo, Secondo le visioni della Beata Anna Katharina Emmerick ( p.14. Edizione Shalom, 2005)  http://www.editriceshalom.it/media/attachment/file/8/3/8319.pdf

These days I am reading Anna Katharina Emmerick in Italian ( Shalom edition).-L.A

The Church is the only one, the Roman Catholic! And if there were left on the earth but one Catholic,he would be the one, universal Church, the Catholic Church, the Church of Jesus Christ against which the gates of Hell shall never prevail.- Catherine Anne Emmerich

Britain first : traditional mission doctrine based on Vatican Council II

Vatican Council II has called for mission based on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church but no one seems to be talking about it.
_______________________

Therefore, all must be converted to Him...and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door...

By means of this activity, the Mystical Body of Christ unceasingly gathers and directs its forces toward its own growth (cf. Eph. 4:11-16). The members of the Church are impelled to carry on such missionary activity by reason of the love with which they love God and by which they desire to share with all men the spiritual goods of both its life and the life to come.

Finally, by means of this missionary activity, God is fully glorified, provided that men fully and consciously accept His work of salvation, which He has accomplished in Christ.-Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II

_____________________________

7. This missionary activity derives its reason from the will of God, "who wishes all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, Himself a man, Jesus Christ, who gave Himself as a ransom for all" (1 Tim. 2:45), "neither is there salvation in any other" (Acts 4:12). -Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II
_____________________________

The majority of people are going to Hell without faith and baptism and there are no mission projects with the truth.

We cannot proclaim Jesus and teach falsehoods as the Catholic Faith.

This is what I was saying in 2002-2003 when Cardinal Vince Nicols, as the bishop of Birmingham,U.K, visited in Rome, the Beda Pontifical College, the Catholic seminary under the bishops of England and Wales.

It is now over 16 years and Catholics still do not teach correct mission doctrine in Britain, based on Vatican Council II.

Catholics in Britain need to affirm exclusive salvation  which is a Conciliar teaching.They should not depend only upon the traditionalists who only cite the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus,defined by three Church Councils.

The traditionalists do not cite Vatican Council II (AG 7) in mission and wrongly believe hypothetical cases mentioned in Vatican Council II contradict the past exclusivist ecclesiology and EENS.

Traditional mission, based on Vatican Council II could start in Britain and then spread to Poland and other countries , like the recent workshop on the Traditional Latin Mass, supported by Ecclesia Dei.


The Traditional Latin Mass must not be separated from the exclusive salvation theology of Vatican Council II. The Council affirms that the Catholic Church has the superiority and exclusiveness in salvation and all need to enter as members with faith and baptism.

The Church is saying in Vatican Council II(AG ) that there are billions of people in Hell and they are there without faith and baptism.

The Church guided by the Holy Spirit is saying that when we meet non Catholics we know that they are oriented to Hell since the ordinary way of salvation is faith and baptism and there is no extraordinary way, visible or known to us human beings.-Lionel Andrades 

Converts to the Catholic Church do not want to affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) nor the simple interpretation of Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II,which say all need faith and baptism for salvation : Fr.Brian Harrison and Edward Pentin

Converts to the Catholic Church do not want to affirm the strict interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) nor the simple interpretation of Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II,which say all need faith and baptism for salvation.Fr.Brian Harrison and Edward Pentin would like to believe that invisible cases of the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism  of blood(BOB) and being saved in invincible ignorance(I.I) are visible exceptions to EENS and AG 7.
_______________________

Therefore, all must be converted to Him...and all must be incorporated into Him by baptism and into the Church which is His body. For Christ Himself "by stressing in express language the necessity of faith and baptism (cf. Mark 16:16; John 3:5), at the same time confirmed the necessity of the Church, into which men enter by baptism, as by a door...

By means of this activity, the Mystical Body of Christ unceasingly gathers and directs its forces toward its own growth (cf. Eph. 4:11-16). The members of the Church are impelled to carry on such missionary activity by reason of the love with which they love God and by which they desire to share with all men the spiritual goods of both its life and the life to come.

Finally, by means of this missionary activity, God is fully glorified, provided that men fully and consciously accept His work of salvation, which He has accomplished in Christ.-Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II

_____________________________

Even former apologists Patrick Madrid and Robert Sungenis were not willing to make the theological change and say outside the Church there is no salvation and there are no known exceptions for them.

They would say that it is important to be a Catholic and it is necessary to enter the Church for salvation but would not admit that there are no practical exceptions to EENS and Ad Gentes  7 in the present times.

In other words there were exceptions for them as if they could know and judge exceptions.

This is the error Archbishop Augustine Di Noia made when he was asked about EENS by Edward Pentin for the National Catholic Register.Di Noia at Ecclesia Dei said that he would judge Anglicans who would be going to  Heaven for him.This is even though they were outside the Catholic Church.Di Noia would know how Jesus would judge and what would be the state of their soul before death.Edward Pentin accepted this answer.

Edward Pentin also, like Di Noia, interprets BOD,BOB and I.I and LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc 1 as referring to known people who will be going to Heaven outside the Catholic Church.

So with this irrationality Pentin derails traditional and rational Catholic theology. He re-interprets the Creed, Catechisms and Vatican Council II as a rupture with Tradition(EENS, Syllabus of Errors).He would make a false Profession of Faith since he has changed the understanding of the Nicene Creed.

So for Pentin and Fr. Harrison, St. Thomas Aquinas would contradict himself. Aquinas supports the strict interpretation of EENS, according to the dogma. But when Aquinas refers to hypothetical cases of BOD, BOB and I.I, it is interpreted as physically visible non Catholics saved outside the Church.In this way they become exceptions to Feeneyite EENS.

Fr. Leonard Feeney said that there are no cases of the baptism of desire etc. He meant it literally.

Even St. Thomas Aquinas and St.Augustine do not state that BOD, BOB and I.I are exceptions to EENS since they refer to known people saved outside the Church.

Fr.Brian Harrison and Edward Pentin, converts to the Catholic Faith have been informed over the last few years. They still are not announcing that they affirm EENS like the missionaries and Magisterium of the 16th century.

This is being Catholic for them.

They are also projecting Vatican Council II as a rupture with EENS, when it is not.

For me St.Thomas Aquinas does not contradict EENS and neither does Vatican Council II.

Vatican Council II is not ' a development', a rupture with EENS according to the missionaries in the 16th century and yet when Pope Benedict said this ( March 2016, Avvenire) there was no correction from Fr. Brian Harrison or Edward Pentin.

The Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) has made an objective mistake. It used a false premise(invisible people are visible) and inference( outside the Church there is known salvation) and this has been accepted by the Catholic converts.LOHO has been references in Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church and placed in the Denzinger, with the mistake which cannot be magisterial. It cannot be the work of the Holy Spirit.

-Lionel Andrades

1

 BOD(baptism of desire), BOB(baptism of blood) and I.I(invincible ignorance) and Lumen Gentium 8 (Lumen Gentium 8- elements of sanctification and truth in other religions), Lumen Gentium 14 ( case of the unknown catechumen and unknown non Catholics  saved in invincible ignorance), Lumen Gentium 16( invincible ignorance / a good conscience), Unitatitis Redintigratio 3( imperfect communion with the Church), Nostra Aetate 2( a ray of that Truth which saves all/ good and holy non Catholics in other religions) , Gaudium et Specs  22( people of goodwill).