Thursday, July 25, 2013

Msgr.Guido Pozzo specialised in Dogmatic Theology : he accepted the dead man walking and visible theory

Msgr.Guido Pozzo who oversaw   the Vatican-Society of St.Pius X talks,over doctrinal differences, studied at the Gregorian University  where he received a license and  doctorate in dogmatic theology.
 
He had his complete formation at the Gregorian University in Dogmatic Theology where he was exposed to the dead man walking and visible theory. He was taught, as at present, that the dead now  saved in invincible ignorance or the baptism of desire are visible to all of us on earth. These cases are known exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

This was part of his studies and he accepted it obediently and may be unthinkingly.
 
This was also the formation of the theologians who particapted in the Vatican-SSPX talks. They accepted like Guido Pozzo that  the dead man walking and visible on earth is a known reality. This objective error was not restricted to the Gregorian University.
 
The SSPX theologians even today condemn Fr.Leonard Feeney since  this  dead man walking theory  was not part of his formation. The American priest from Boston insisted he could not see any known or unknown exceptions to his literal interpretation of the dogma on salvation. So the Jesuits expelled him and  the Archbishop placed restrictions.The excommunication was enforced for some 19 years.
 
Since then Mnsgr,.Guido and so many others are appreciating the Emperors New Clothes.They can see the deceased who are real exceptions in 2013 to the literal interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney. Monsgr.Guido Pozzo was granted a licentiate and a doctorate with this observation.
 
Possibly if he said the Emperor has no clothes they would have asked him to leave.He would not have qualified to study at the Gregorian Pontifical University.-Lionel Andrades
 

Washington Post false catechesis on immodesty in clothes

A Washington Post report on Modesty does not mention that immodesty is a mortal sin for Catholics, it is the cause of lust and scandal among the onlookers which are grave sins, according to the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
The report says :
As Ann Cabiness stood in the Communion line at Our Lady of Lourdes Catholic Church on Sunday morning, two things were on her mind: connecting with God and getting out of the humid sanctuary before someone mentioned her skimpy tank top and tight, knee-length running pants.
“I know I’m inappropriate, but I’m trying to save time. I know I’m in the wrong. My mother would not approve,” the 30-year-old said sheepishly as she made a beeline from Mass at the Bethesda church to the gym. “But would it be better that I not come?”
Summer in our sweltering region forces a theological question: How does God feel about exposed shoulders in a house of worship? Or toes? Or some glimpse of thigh?
With temperatures in the 80s by 7:30 a.m. services, this is the season for church bulletin items like the one in Our Lady’s: “Dignity & Decorum: Please try not to wear beach shorts, tank tops, and flip-flops to the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. Thank you.”
 
“I know I’m inappropriate".
 It is not only inappropriate it is a sin.In this state she should not go up to receive the Eucharist since it would be a sacrilege.
 
“But would it be better that I not come?”
 
It would have been better to cover yourself and then go for Confession. Then receive the Eucharist at Mass.Going to the gym or the beach in those same clothing is also a sin.
 
According to Pope John Paul II's Veritatis Splendor the outward action, the way she was dressed indicated the inner intention; the knowledge that it was a sin.
It says a mortal sin is always a mortal sin.
 
The Catholic Church is the only moral authority and not the Washington Post and the Catholic Church still teaches the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. This would not be reported in the Washington Times. Instead it would be said that the Church has changed its teaching on modesty as it has on outside the church there is no salvation.The fullness of truth is not there in Christian communities and churches as it is in the Catholic Church.
 Events
Many priests today (Jesuits etc) would say that we know today people saved without the baptism of water and who are saved in invincible ignorance etc, visible for them. So there are exceptions.This is false.
 
Similarly immodesty is not a mortal sin for them since there can be cases who do not have 'full knowledge' or 'deliberate consent' and of course these cases are visible and known to them. This again is irrational. So immodesty does not fulfull the three conditions  since the two conditions which can be visible for us are not visible.It is because they are not visible only one condition is needed: grave matter. Immodesty is grave matter. If anyone dressed immodestily is innocent it would be judged by God. In general the bikini at the beach is a mortal sin.
The girl in the Washington Post picture is visible for us and it is a mortal sin.-Lionel Andrades
 
 
 

So many professors of theology and no one can respond

There are no many professors of theology, priests, at the Pontifical Gregorian University, Rome, and none  of them want to respond to the  blog post: Jesuits in first class heresy and other related reports on this blog,sent to them. They get a salary to teach theology and related subjects but now they will not respond on a professional subject.May be the professors are waiting for the Rector to come forward and he expects the Dean of Theology,R.P.Darius Kowalczyk (decanoteologica@unigre.it )  to respond, while none of the priest-professors want to give an account of their faith.They have so many specializations.

Biblical Theology Prof.essa Bruna Costacurta ( teobib@unigre.it ),Fundamental Theology Michelina Tenaci (fondteo@unigre.it), Dogmatic Theology, Sergio P.Bonanini (teodog@unigre.it ).
 
 
Fr.Keith Pecklers (kfpecklers@gmail.com ) would be quick to give a statement to the secular media against the traditionalists and sedevacantists but he has nothing to say here.Now he knows there are no known exceptions mentioned in Vatican Council II or many magisterial document, to  extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So this means he has the same literal understanding of the dogma according to Fr.Leonard Feeney and the traditionalists and sedevacantists ?.He will  probably be teaching the traditional doctrine on salavtion in the  next semester.Who knows?
Prof.Fr.Philip Renzces (freisem@unigre.it )has been promoting a theology of the Holocaust but has no comment here.Now he knows there are no known exceptions in 2013 to all needing to convert into the Catholic Church with 'faith and baptism' (AG 7) for salvation (to avoid Hell).He will teach this with reference to present day Jews and the other non  Catholics?
 
When the priest-professors at the Gregorian University make a public Profession of Faith it is heretical. They recite the Nicene Creed assuming there is known and visible baptism. So instead of one known baptism, the baptism of water, they believe there are three known and visible baptisms (water,blood and desire). If they continue with this heresy after being informed it is a mortal sin.The Athanisus Creed states 'outside the church there is no salvation' for them it is 'outside the church there is known salvation'.
 
They may deny that they believe there are three known and visible baptism of(water, blood and desire) instead of one (water).However when they say there are  known exceptions to the literal interpreattion  of the dogma extra eccleisam nulla salus, then for them being saved in invincible ignorance, implicit desire etc are visible and known cases. They would have to be known in 2013 for them to be exceptions to the Catholic teaching that all need to convert into the Chruch for salvation and there are no exceptions.
 
Over the centuries it was known that all needed to convert into the Church for salvation and there were no known exceptions.It was also known that those saved in invincible ignorance or implicit desire were known only to God,so the Church Councils did not mention them.They are possibilities and not  exceptions.
One of the Consultants at the University chapel is Sr.Brenda Dolphin ( brendadolphin46@gmail.com ) of the Psychology Department. She will continue to receive the  Eucharist at Mass from Jesuit   priests in public heresy.Also at the chapel in Spiritual Direction these heresies will be upheld.The Jesuits will deny the dogma outside the church there is no salvation and teach that there are known exceptions to  mortal sin.This is a contradiction to St.Ignatius of Loyola and the Jesuits saints and it is a new doctrine based on the irrational premise of being able to see the dead-saved.
-Lionel Andrades